1.1
Coalition Senators support the comments in the majority report regarding
the invaluable contribution and commitment of all agencies and firefighters who
were engaged in the firefighting efforts during the January and February 2016
Tasmanian bushfires. Without their outstanding effort in a challenging
environment the destruction caused by the fires would have been more
widespread. Coalition Senators note that despite the significance of the event
not one life or property was lost. We also note that Tasmania has withstood
more significant fire events in the past.
1.2
Coalition Senators provide the following comments in relation to the
majority report recommendations.
Recommendation 1
2.45 The
committee recommends that the Australian Government:
-
recognise that climate change has increased fire conditions in
south-eastern Australia and the risk to natural and cultural values in the
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area; and
-
report annually to the World Heritage Committee on the state
of conservation in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
1.3
Coalition Senators acknowledge and accept the potential
future impacts of climate change in managing fire in Australia, including in
Tasmania. The Australian Government invests through programmes such as the
National Landcare Programme to improve natural resource management and
landscape resilience, including in the face of climate change pressures.
1.4
Coalition Senators do not accept the recommendation to
report annually to the World Heritage Committee on the state of conservation in
the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. State of Conservation reporting
is a formal process which is only required where the World Heritage Committee
has serious concerns about the state of a particular World Heritage property.
In July 2016, following the successful 2015 World Heritage Reactive Monitoring
Mission visit, the World Heritage Committee announced its positive decision on
the state of conservation of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. The
decision acknowledged the progress that Australia has made on addressing past
requests of the World Heritage Committee, and commended the commitment of the
Australian and Tasmanian Governments in accepting all 20 recommendations of the
monitoring mission to the property.
Recommendation 2
3.38 The committee recommends that the Australian
Government, in cooperation with the Tasmanian Government:
-
recognise the need to identify the ecological and biodiversity
impacts of fire on fire sensitive vegetation communities, organic soils and
endemic fauna species in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area; and
-
allocate long-term funding to the Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organisation and/or the Tasmanian Government to assist with
the development of fire assessment and modelling specifically suited to the
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
1.5
Coalition Senators make the following comments in relation to Recommendation
2 of the majority report.
1.6
The need to identify the ecological and biodiversity impacts of fire on
fire‑sensitive vegetation communities, organic soils and endemic fauna
species in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area is an important
foundation for effectively managing the Property. Responsibility for this work
lies with the State Government as the Property manager.
1.7
The Tasmanian Government is spending $250,000 to examine the impact of
climate change in the World Heritage Area and strengthen fire-fighting
techniques to protect the property. This research project was initiated by the
Tasmanian Government. Coalition Senators understand this work will be finalised
in the near future.
1.8
The Australian and Tasmanian Governments are delivering improved
outcomes for the Tasmanian Wilderness using an additional $10.2 million
provided by the Commonwealth for the identification, protection, conservation,
presentation and rehabilitation of the World Heritage values of the property.
This funding is in addition to the $3.4 million per year baseline funding
provided between 2013 and 2018 to assist with the management of the property.
1.9
In terms of investment through CSIRO, the Australian Government is
overseeing an increase in expenditure by CSIRO by $100 million between now and
2019. CSIRO is on track to receive $5.4 billion over the next four years,
including $3.257 billion from the Australian Government.
1.10
In 2015–16, CSIRO invested around $100 million in climate research,
comprising over $54 million on mitigation research, over $10 million on
adaptation research and $29 million on research to better understand the
Climate.
1.11
CSIRO is recognised as a world leader in fire behaviour research and
continues to define, lead and directly invest in critical research focussed on
improving the management and suppression of bushfires, allowing CSIRO to
provide expertise and advice to various governments, agencies and the public
across Australia. CSIRO bushfire research covers bushfire management
strategies; post-bushfire survey investigations; climate modelling projections;
and, development of disaster management software tools.
Recommendation 3
4.98 The committee recommends that the Australian
Government, in conjunction with state and territory governments, investigate a
national remote area firefighting capability, to support Australian fire
agencies.
1.12
Coalition Senators do not support Recommendation 3 of the majority
report.
1.13
Under Australia’s constitutional arrangements, state and territory
governments have primary responsibility for protecting life and property,
including responding to bushfires and providing assistance for disaster
affected communities. Each state and territory has emergency management
legislation, plans and arrangements to respond to emergencies. The Australian
Government supports state and territory governments by coordinating national
efforts in building resilience through disaster research, information
management and mitigation policy and practice.
1.14
Where the scale of an emergency or disaster exceeds or exhausts
jurisdictional response capacity and capability, or where resources
(government, community and/or commercial) cannot be mobilised in time, a state
or territory may seek Australian Government assistance. The Australian
Government Disaster Response Plan (COMDISPLAN) (activated by the Director
General EMA [DG EMA]), facilitates the provision of non-financial Australian
Government assistance to Australian states and territories, following a formal request
for assistance by a state or territory. This assistance can include for
example, but is not limited to, Australian Defence Force (ADF) support,
satellite imagery capabilities, Australian Medical Assistance Teams and
disaster victim identification.
1.15
Where civilian resources are inadequate, unavailable or cannot be
mobilised in time, emergency Defence Assistance to the Civil Community (DACC)
arrangements enable the ADF to contribute to save human life, alleviate
suffering and prevent loss of animal life or property. Defence assistance
follows a request from the relevant state or territory government to EMA in
accordance with COMDISPLAN. In some circumstances, ADF support to states and
territories can be approved by local ADF commanders. As a general principle,
Defence support is limited to the current qualifications, skills and resources
of the ADF. Firefighting, from either the ground or air, is a specialised skill
that requires equipment and training that the ADF does not possess and which
remains the responsibility of state and territory governments.
1.16
EMA can also support the coordination of resources between states and
territories. This can be facilitated under the Arrangements for Interstate
Assistance (AIA) and through the Commissioners and Chief Officers Strategic
Committee (CCOSC) of the Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities
Council (AFAC), which is co-chaired by DGEMA, and in which all states and
territories participate. The AIA enables Australian states and territories to
exchange capabilities (fire services, emergency services and land management
agencies) during significant incidents. The CCOSC comprises Chief Officers and
Commissioners from Australia and New Zealand fire and emergency services
agencies. The CCOSC was established in December 2013 to provide expert
operational advice on national issues. The CCOSC can coordinate national
operational matters during significant events and provide an operational
reference group for multi-jurisdictional response arrangements.
Recommendation 4
4.100 The committee recommends that the Australian
Government commit to long-term funding for the National Aerial Firefighting
Centre of an amount that is at least equal to the government's current
contribution, rising in line with the Consumer Price Index.
1.17
Coalition Senators make the following comments in relation to Recommendation
4 of the majority report.
1.18
The Commonwealth provides $14.8 million each year to the National Aerial
Firefighting Centre (NAFC) to assist with the costs of leasing specialised
bushfire fighting aircraft and on 29 December 2015, the Prime Minister
committed to a further, one-off $0.5 million to the NAFC to support the
extension of some of these leases for the 2015-16 fire seasons. This additional
funding was provided to NAFC on 13 April 2016. Aircraft leased under these
arrangements were utilised in the response to these fires.
1.19
Given the very high cost of developing and maintaining specialist
firefighting aircraft and the finite duration of the Australian fire season,
the NAFC leases rather than purchases an aircraft fleet. Leasing aircraft
allows (i) adjustments to be made to resourcing levels based on assessed risk
and (iii) greater flexibility to introduce new technology.
1.20
The NAFC, in conjunction with all states and territories, monitors
emerging capabilities and has an established multi-jurisdictional working group
to closely assess the technical and economic aspects of its fleet. Aircraft
selection is based on advice from state and territory experts and is
underpinned by over 60 years of research in Australia. The NAFC also continues
to work closely with overseas organisations involved in the evaluation of
aerial firefighting capabilities.
1.21
In addition to the Tasmanian NAFC contracted aircraft, in excess of 20
NAFC contracted aircraft from mainland Australia were deployed to Tasmania.
This fleet consisted of aircraft which remained under contract with NAFC, as
well as those which were reengaged on an ad-hoc basis following the expiry of
their contracts (the department does not have specific figures relating to this
fleet as this detail is not currently available to NAFC). In addition to these
aircraft, a Very Large Air Tanker (VLAT) and Large Air Tanker (LAT) from New
South Wales, and two LATs from Victoria, conducted fire-bombing sorties in
Tasmania.
1.22
Coalition Senators note that ongoing support for the NAFC will continue
to be managed through normal Budget processes.
Recommendation 5
5.48 The committee recommends that the Australian
Government recognise the need to enhance protection and conservation efforts in
the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area by allocating increased funding:
-
to the Parks and Wildlife Service, Tasmania, for appropriate
management activities and resources; and
-
for research projects aimed at providing qualitative and
quantitative data specific to climate-related and ecological threats to the
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (such as dry lightning strike).
1.23
Coalition Senators make the following comments in relation to Recommendation
5 of the majority report.
1.24
As stated under Recommendation 2, it is important to note the Australian
Government is providing an additional $10.2 million for the identification,
protection, conservation, presentation and rehabilitation of the World Heritage
values of the property. This funding is in addition to the $3.4 million per
year baseline funding provided between 2013 and 2018 to assist with the
management of the property.
1.25
The Tasmanian Government is spending $250,000 to examine the impact of
climate change in the World Heritage Area and strengthen fire-fighting
techniques to protect the property. This research project was initiated by the
Tasmanian Government. Coalition Senators understand this work will be finalised
in the near future.
1.26
As referred to under Recommendation 2, the Australian Government is
overseeing an increase in expenditure by CSIRO by $100 million between now and
2019. CSIRO is on track to receive $5.4 billion over the next four years,
including $3.257 billion from the Australian Government. A substantial amount
of this investment is being directed to research to better understand climate
change impacts, landscape adaptation and bushfire management.
1.27
Coalition Senators acknowledge the importance of qualitative and
quantitative data in managing landscapes across Australia, including in
Tasmania.
Recommendation 6
5.49 The committee recommends that the Australian and
Tasmanian Governments:
-
develop options to increase cooperation to ensure that the
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area is protected and conserved in line
with Australia's obligations under the World Heritage Convention; and
-
work together to ensure strong provisions to protect the
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area from bushfire risks are included in
the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan.
1.28
Coalition Senators do not support Recommendation 6 of the majority
report.
1.29
Coalition Senators are confident the two Governments are meeting their
obligations under the World Heritage Convention. Indeed, the World Heritage
Committee has acknowledged in July 2016 the progress Australia has made on
addressing past requests of the World Heritage Committee, and commended the
commitment of the Australian and Tasmanian Governments in accepting all
20 recommendations of the 2015 monitoring mission to the property.
Senator
James Paterson Senator Jonathon
Duniam
Deputy
Chair Senator
for Tasmania
Senator
for Victoria
Senator
David Bushby
Senator
for Tasmania
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page