1.1
Labor Senators welcome this bill as it builds upon the leadership and
intervention of the Gillard Labor Government which in 2013 took the step of
demanding that Australia's broadcasters amend their broadcasting codes to
ensure a reduction in the promotion and advertising of gambling during live
sport. The bill also takes into account the response of the broadcast industry
and the ACMA.
1.2
Labor Senators note that the bill was introduced almost a year after
Labor moved a motion in Parliament calling for stronger restrictions on
gambling promotions during coverage of live sports.
1.3
Labor formally called for greater safeguards in February and March 2017
in the context of debate on the Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016. Labor
Senators also provided Additional Comments to the Senate Committee Report on
the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Sports Betting Reform) Bill 2015 stating
that:
Labor's approach on the issue of gambling advertising
demonstrates an understanding of, and confidence in, the co-regulatory system
of broadcast regulation, as enshrined in the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
Labor believes that industry should be afforded the time and flexibility needed
to alter business practices and contractual arrangements to address community
concerns.[1]
1.4
The Labor-lite announcement the Government eventually made is a step in
the right direction, however it remains to be seen whether it goes far enough
to address community concerns as it continues to permit gambling ads during live
sport coverage on broadcast and online platforms in ways which are yet to be
confirmed.
1.5
Labor Senators note that, while the Turnbull Government made its policy
announcement back in May 2017, the legislation was not available publicly until
the bill was introduced in the final sitting week in December 2017 and, at time
of writing in February 2018, a raft of question marks still hang over this
bill, a number of which were canvassed during the Inquiry process.
1.6
Labor Senators note that the bill has created all kinds of uncertainty
for industry and consumers, with exemptions to the online content service
provider rules to be considered by the ACMA once the legislation has passed the
Parliament.
1.7
Labor Senators appreciate that the bill seeks to introduce a platform-neutral
approach to the restriction of gambling promotions during live sports coverage
across broadcast, subscription and online platforms to achieve a level playing
field and consistency in consumer protection.
1.8
Labor Senators further note that the consistency in application of the
restrictions will be guided by the regulatory policy of the Broadcasting
Services Act 1992 which this bill extends to online content services. This
provides that the Parliament intends that different levels of regulatory control
apply across the range of services, including broadcasting and online content
services, according to the degree of influence that different types of those
services are able to exert in shaping community views in Australia. Further, it
provides that services be regulated in a manner than enables public interest
considerations to be addressed in a way that does not impose unnecessary
financial or administrative burden on providers of broadcast and online content
services, among other things.
1.9
Labor Senators note the concerns of the Digital Industry Group about
inconsistent regulation and will be interested to see how the ACMA balances
evidentiary and policy considerations as it considers specific and class
exemptions, as permitted under the bill.
1.10
Labor Senators have sympathy with SBS's concerns that the bill proposes
to regulate SBS programming contrary to SBS's independence. As SBS submitted to
the Inquiry into this bill:
SBS is committed to implementing appropriate restrictions in
accordance with [government] policy. However the implementation mechanism set
out in the Bill is inappropriate for application to a public broadcaster such
as SBS. This is because it would disturb SBS's editorial independence from
Government, and is inconsistent with provisions of the SBS Act which safeguard
this independence. SBS should not be captured by the regulatory regime set out
in the Bill. Instead, implementation of new restrictions should be achieved by
establishing one set of rules in the SBS Codes of Practice (SBS Codes) that
cover both broadcast and digital platforms.[2]
1.11
Labor Senators note that, over a year after Labor's call for
stronger protections, a host of issues are yet to be understood, worked through
and ironed out, in this bill.
1.12
We note that meanwhile, a range of people—parents and gambling experts included—continue
to worry about children's level of exposure to gambling ads, especially during
live sporting events. Gambling promotions continue to intrude upon our nation's
love of sport and cause significant public concern.
1.13
Addressing this issue has not been enough of a priority of the Turnbull
Government.
Senator Anne
Urquhart Senator Anthony Chisholm
Senator for
Tasmania Senator for Queensland
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page