Introduction
1.1
On 23 June 2017, the Senate referred the provisions of the following
bills to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee for
inquiry and report:
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer)
Bill 2017 ("CC Bill"); and
-
Telecommunications (Regional Broadband Scheme) Charge Bill 2017
("RBS Bill").[1]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.2
In accordance with its usual practice, the committee advertised the
inquiry on its website and wrote to relevant individuals and organisations
inviting submissions. The date for receipt of submissions was 14 July 2017.
1.3
The committee received 15 submissions, which are listed at Appendix 1.
The committee also held a public hearing for this inquiry in Canberra on 10
August 2017. A list of witnesses who appeared at the hearings is at Appendix 2.
1.4
The public submissions and transcript of evidence are available on the
committee's website at www.aph.gov.au/senate_ec.
1.5
The committee thanks all of the individuals and organisations that
contributed to the inquiry.
1.6
The committee was initially required to report by 8 August 2017.
However, to facilitate the public hearing, the committee sought an extension of
time to report. The Senate agreed to extend the reporting deadline to 6
September 2017.[2]
Scope and structure of the report
1.7
This report comprises three chapters:
-
The remaining sections of this chapter provide background
information relating to the development of the bills as well as an overview of
the structure and provisions of the bills. Comments on the bills made by the Senate
Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills are summarised at the end of the
chapter.
-
Chapter 2 examines the principal issues raised by stakeholders
relating to the overall intent and specific provisions of the bills.
-
Chapter 3 discusses matters related to particular provisions that
would delegate legislative powers to the executive. The committee's overall
findings on the bills are provided at the end of that chapter.
Note on references
1.8
In this report, references to the committee Hansard transcript
are to the proof transcript. Page numbers may vary between proof and official Hansard
transcripts.
1.9
The written submissions provided by various stakeholders and the Hansard
transcript differ in the abbreviations used when referring to NBN Co Limited,
with 'nbn', 'nbn co', 'nbn Co' and 'NBN Co' all used. For consistency,
'NBN Co' is used whenever the company is referred to in this report.
Background
1.10
The bills follow the cost-benefit analysis and review of regulatory
arrangements for the National Broadband Network (NBN) undertaken by the panel chaired
by Dr Michael Vertigan AC (the Vertigan Panel). The Vertigan Panel produced the
following three reports:
-
A statutory review under section 152EOA of the
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (June 2014);
-
Volume I: National Broadband Network market and regulatory
report (August 2014); and
-
Volume II: The costs and benefits of high-speed broadband
(August 2014).
1.11
The government's response to the Vertigan Panel's recommendations was
outlined in a policy statement released in December 2014 entitled Telecommunications
Regulatory and Structural Reform.
1.12
The bills seek to implement key measures of the government's response to
the Vertigan Panel's recommendations. The bills would amend the broadband
regulatory framework by:
-
making amendments to network rules that apply to superfast
carriage services provided to residential and small business customers other
than the NBN;
-
establishing a Regional Broadband Scheme (RBS)
to provide for the funding of NBN Co satellite and fixed wireless services for
rural and regional areas; and
-
establishing statutory infrastructure
provider (SIP) obligations.
Overview of the bills
1.13
The CC Bill proposes amendments to the Telecommunications
Act 1997 (Tel Act), the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
(CCA) and the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards)
Act 1999 (TCPSS Act).
1.14
The CC Bill comprises five schedules, as follows:
-
Schedules 1 and 2 contain proposed amendments to the 'superfast
network rules' provided for in Parts 7 and 8 of the Tel Act.
-
Schedule 3 contains the amendments that would establish a regime
of SIP obligations.
-
Schedule 4, in conjunction with the RBS Bill, would establish the
RBS.
-
Schedule 5 contains an amendment that would alter arrangements
for determining the 'designated day' for the purposes of Telstra's structural
separation.[3]
1.15
It is proposed that the amendments in the bills would commence on the
day after Royal Assent.
1.16
The following paragraphs provide a brief summary of the proposed
amendments. Further details on how the proposed amendments are intended to
operate can be found in the respective explanatory memorandums (EMs) for the
bills.
Amendments to the superfast network rules
1.17
Parts 7 and 8 of the Tel Act, which were introduced in 2011, contain
network rules that apply to superfast carriage services provided to residential
and small business customers other than the NBN. The rules require operators of
such networks to supply a Layer 2 bitstream service to access seekers (Part 7)
and that the networks are structurally separated (Part 8). Among other
exemptions, the rules do not apply to superfast networks that existed prior to
1 January 2011 or to subsequent extensions of less than 1 kilometre of such
networks.
1.18
The overall intent and design of the rules seeks to ensure that the
structural changes brought about to the industry through the creation of NBN Co
and the structural separation of Telstra would not be undone by other new
networks operating in the same way that had previously given rise to concerns
about the state of competition in the market.[4]
1.19
Part 1 of schedule 1 to the CC Bill proposes that Part 7 of the Tel Act
would be repealed. Following the repeal of Part 7, access to specific wholesale
services on superfast broadband networks would only be mandated if the services
are declared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission(ACCC).
1.20
Various amendments to Part 8 of the Tel Act and the CCA are also
proposed. Specific proposals contained in the bill include:
-
amending the exemption under subsection 156(4) for network
extensions of less than 1 kilometre from a point on the infrastructure of a
network as it stood immediately before 1 January 2011;
-
changing the exemption under subsection 156(3) of the Tel Act for
networks that, prior to 1 January 2011, were being rolled out in stages as part
of a real estate development project, so that the exemption will only apply
until 30 June 2018;[5]
-
providing that the Part 8 rules no longer apply to local access
lines that that are part of a telecommunications network used to supply
superfast carriage services to small business customers—this change is intended
to create 'greater flexibility for network operators in the supply of superfast
carriage services to small business customers';[6]
-
providing a process for voluntary functional separation
undertakings to be submitted and considered by the ACCC—this process would also
for a telecommunications business other than NBN Co and Telstra to have both
network/wholesale and retail operations;[7]
-
providing the ACCC with the power to provide a class exemption
from the Part 8 rules for small start-up networks with fewer than 2,000 retail
residential customers on all fixed-line networks (this threshold could be
extended, by regulation, to 12,000 retail residential services);[8]
-
changing the offence provisions in Part 8 from criminal offences
to civil offences, while also introducing a formal warning and infringement
notice regime;[9]
and
-
providing that key decisions by the ACCC under the amended Part
8, such as the decision not to accept an undertaking, will be subject to merits
review by the Australian Competition Tribunal.[10]
1.21
It is intended that the existing rules would be grandfathered—that is,
the new rules would apply to 'local access lines that come into existence on or
after 1 July 2018, or that are altered or upgraded after that date and as a
result become capable of being used to supply a superfast carriage service'.
Other superfast fixed-line networks will continue to be subject to the
current wholesale-only obligation in section 143 of the Tel Act.[11]
1.22
Taken together, the repeal of Part 7 and the changes to Part 8 are
intended to ensure that, with limited exemptions, 'in future superfast
residential networks would either be subject to a class exemption granted by
the ACCC, operating on a functionally separated basis approved by the ACCC, or
operating on a wholesale-only basis'. This is intended to 'make the default
structural separation requirement clearer and more effective as a baseline for
the industry, while at the same time creating new commercial and competitive
opportunities'.[12]
Statutory infrastructure provider
regime
1.23
Schedule 3 to the bill would introduce a SIP regime that is intended to
'provide industry and consumers with certainty that all premises in Australia
will have access to infrastructure that supports the delivery of superfast broadband
services'.[13]
1.24
Currently, a ministerial statement of expectations provides a
requirement for NBN Co to rollout the NBN. The CC Bill proposes that connection
and supply obligations will instead be imposed by legislation, with this
statutory regime to be administered by the Australian Communications and Media
Authority (ACMA). After the NBN rollout is complete, NBN Co will be the
default SIP for all of Australia, although in particular circumstances other
carriers could become a SIP.[14]
1.25
The SIP obligations would impose connection and supply obligations on
SIPs (that is, NBN Co and alternative providers). Specifically, the SIP for a
service area must, on reasonable request by a carriage service provider on
behalf of an end-user at premises in the service area, connect the premises to
a qualifying telecommunications network in order that the carriage service provider
can provide qualifying carriage services to the end-user at the premises. The
SIP obligations require services with a peak download speed of at least 25 megabits
per second (Mbps) and a peak upload speed of at least 5 Mbps, and carriage services
that can be used by end‑users to make and receive voice calls. If it is
not reasonable to provide fixed-line services, the SIP 'must provide a fixed wireless
or satellite technology solution'.[15]
1.26
In its submission, NBN Co highlighted the importance, from its
perspective, of the requirement for requests from service providers to be
'reasonable'. NBN Co explained:
The Bill reflects the Government's clear intention that
premises in Australia have ready access to superfast broadband, however, it
also acknowledges the practical reality, important to [NBN Co] as a SIP, that
there may be limitations to the provision of access in some instances. The Bill
therefore requires a SIP to connect premises to a qualifying network on
reasonable request from a carriage service provider. This concept of
reasonableness will ensure that [NBN Co] responds appropriately to [retail
service provider] requests (on behalf of an end user) for a superfast broadband
connection where the network is available, while acknowledging there may be
instances where [NBN Co] is constrained in its ability to meet a particular
request or where multiple requests are made unreasonably for connections to a
premises.[16]
1.27
In addition, the CC Bill proposes that the Minister will have a reserve
power to set standards and rules that SIPs must comply with and/or benchmarks
that SIPs must meet or exceed.[17]
1.28
On how providers covered by the SIP obligations would be identified, the
EM for the CC Bill states the following:
The [CC] Bill provides that,
as the NBN rolls out, NBN Co will become the default SIP for each area which it
declares to be 'ready for service'. These areas are termed 'interim NBN
service areas' in the Bill. NBN Co will also be required to declare interim NBN
service areas for all areas that, prior to the Bill coming into force, it has
already declared to be ready for service. To ensure enhanced transparency about
the service status of an NBN rollout area, the Bill would require NBN Co to
notify the ACMA when it declares an interim NBN service area.
...Following completion of the rollout, NBN Co will be the
default SIP for the 'general service area' which, as a default, will be all of
Australia. However, 'nominated service areas' that are covered by other SIPs
will be excluded from the general service area.[18]
1.29
The CC Bill also provides a complaints process that includes a
requirement for a SIP to notify a service provider within five days if it
refuses a request to connect premises to its network. In turn, the service
provider is required to provide the notice to the end user. The relevant EM
advises that this process seeks to address the concern that 'end-users
frequently have little visibility, when a request for a service is rejected, of
why the request has been rejected and whether the rejection was caused by the
actions of a retail provider or a wholesale provider'.[19]
Targets for NBN Co
1.30
As part of the SIP regime, proposed section 360S of the Tel Act would
provide targets for NBN Co that are expressed as intentions of the Parliament.
These statements set out that the Parliament expects NBN Co to take all
reasonable steps to ensure that the telecommunications networks operated by NBN
Co are used to supply qualifying fixed-line carriage services to customers in
Australia:
-
are capable of being used to supply fixed-line carriage services
with peak download speeds of at least 50 Mbps and peak upload speeds of at
least 10 Mbps to at least 90 per cent of premises in areas that, according
to NBN Co's website, are serviced by those networks; and
-
that NBN Co's fixed-line networks are capable of being connected
to at least 92 per cent of premises in Australia.[20]
Regional Broadband Scheme
1.31
The RBS Bill and schedule 4 to the CC Bill propose the introduction of an
industry charge to fund non‑commercial fixed wireless broadband and
satellite broadband for regional areas as part of an RBS. At present, losses
associated with these services are funded by an internal cross-subsidy within
NBN Co.[21]
Under the proposed RBS, carriers would be required to pay a charge for each
premises on their network with an active fixed-line broadband service that
enables a download speed of 25 Mbps or more, with the charge calculated on a
monthly basis. The funds raised by this charge would be quarantined in a
special account, which will be used to pay eligible funding recipients and to
cover the administration costs associated with the scheme.
1.32
The EM for the CC Bill outlines the rationale for introducing the charge
and how the funding mechanism is intended to operate as follows:
The purpose of the charge is to sustainably fund the net
costs of NBN Co's fixed wireless and satellite networks, which provide access
to essential broadband services predominantly in regional Australia. The charge
was foreshadowed by Government in its December 2014 response to the...Vertigan
Review.
Rolling out superfast broadband infrastructure to regional
Australia is very expensive. NBN Co's fixed wireless and satellite networks are
expected to incur a net cost of $9.8 billion (in net present value terms) over
thirty years. NBN Co currently funds these net costs through an internal cross
subsidy from its fixed line networks. The monies collected from the Scheme will
be used to fund NBN Co's net costs for constructing and operating fixed
wireless and satellite network infrastructure, replacing the company's opaque
internal cross subsidy. The funding assistance will be in the form of contracts
and/or grants made by the Secretary of the Department to NBN Co.[22]
1.33
The Minister who introduced the CC Bill in the House of Representatives
indicated that the RBS is intended to make the existing cross-subsidy within
NBN Co transparent and to require 'all fixed-line broadband carriers to
contribute equitably to the cost of providing regional broadband services'. The
Minister added:
Once established the Regional Broadband Scheme will provide
certainty for regional Australians that their essential broadband services will
be maintained and upgraded into the future.[23]
1.34
Liability for the charge would commence on 1 July 2018, with the charge
collected one year in arrears (that is, from 2019–20). In 2019–20, the
financial impact (on an underlying cash basis) is estimated to include revenue
of approximately $30 million and expenditure of approximately $29 million.
In the years leading to 2019–20, approximately $700,000 is expected to be spent
on administrative costs related to establishing the RBS.[24]
Entities covered by the charge
1.35
The EM for the CC Bill explains that carriers will have to pay the
charge for premises to which a carriage service provider provides a broadband
service during the whole or part of a month using a local access line that is
technically capable of providing a download speed that is normally 25 Mbps or
greater.[25]
The RBS would not cover mobile broadband services, fixed wireless broadband
services or satellite broadband services.[26]
1.36
Three categories of exemptions from the charge are proposed. These are:
-
an exemption for small networks—carriers with less than 2,000
potentially chargeable premises during the whole or a part of a month are
exempt from paying the charge on those premises;
-
an exemption for lines transitioning to the NBN or being
decommissioned under certain agreements, such as the lines transitioning to NBN
Co from Telstra under the revised Definitive Agreements; and
-
a transition period to assist smaller carriers—the first 25,000 residential
and small business premises covered by the charge will be exempt for the
first five years of the RBS to 'lessen the burden on smaller carriers
and help them transition to paying the charge'.[27]
Charge amounts
1.37
The EM for the RBS Bill explains that the RBS is intended to require all
carriers, including NBN, to contribute funding at an initial rate of
approximately $7.10 per month, per chargeable premises.[28]
The charge is imposed on an annual basis (each financial year) and comprises a
base component (initially $7.09 per month) and an administrative cost amount (initially
$0.01266 per month).[29]
1.38
Although specific base component and administrative cost amounts are set
in the bill and indexed, the bill proposes that the Minister would have the
power, by legislative instrument, to change the base component and/or the
administrative cost amount following receipt of advice from the ACCC.[30]
However, this discretion is limited by clause 17A of the RBS Bill, which
applies an upper limit on the monthly charge that can be set by the Minister.
This upper limit, referred to as the 'combined component cap', is set at $10
for the first financial year and for future years would be indexed to the
consumer price index. The legislative instrument would be subject to disallowance.[31]
Pass through to wholesale customers
1.39
When the bills were introduced in the House of Representatives, the
Minister explained that customers on NBN Co's networks 'will not experience
price rises as the charge is already embedded in NBN Co's pricing'. The
Minister observed that, once the rollout of the NBN is complete, it is expected
that NBN Co will have 'around 95 per cent of the fixed-line market,
which means it will continue funding the bulk of the cost for providing
broadband to regional Australia'. The Minister added that, for non-NBN entities,
'it will be up to these networks to decide whether some or all of the charge is
passed on'.[32]
Payments to eligible funding
recipients
1.40
To fund the fixed wireless and satellite networks supported by the RBS, the
CC Bill would provide that the Secretary of the Department of Communications
and the Arts, on behalf of the Commonwealth, may enter into a contract with, or
provide a grant to, certain operators of fixed wireless and satellite networks
for the purposes of:
-
the connection of premises to fixed wireless or satellite
networks;
-
the supply of eligible services to carriage service providers to
enable them to provide fixed wireless and satellite broadband services; or
-
fixed wireless or satellite facilities.[33]
1.41
Networks would be eligible to receive funding if their fixed wireless
and satellite networks are capable of peak download speeds of at least 25 Mbps.
The relevant EM notes:
Whilst it is envisaged that NBN Co will be the only eligible
funding recipient at the Scheme's commencement, there is flexibility for the
Minister to declare other eligible funding recipients if required.[34]
1.42
The EM goes on to provide further details about the funding
arrangements, including a proposed mechanism to offset a funding recipients
charge liabilities against their funding entitlement.[35]
Reporting requirements and review
1.43
The CC Bill contains proposed reporting obligations for carriers to
assist with the operation of the RBS:
-
The first reporting obligation is a once-off report to the ACCC
to 'give the ACCC a snapshot of the high speed, fixed line broadband market at
it stands during November 2017'. This report is intended to assist the ACCC to
provide advice to the Minister about the base component of the RBS charge.
-
The second reporting obligation is an annual report to the ACMA
on information necessary to enable the carrier's charge liability to be
assessed and the charge collected.[36]
1.44
The CC Bill also establishes information gathering powers for the ACCC
and ACMA for certain information relevant to the RBS.[37]
1.45
The RBS would be subject to a statutory review. Specifically, the CC
Bill includes a provision that would require a review of the amendments enacted
by schedule 4 of the CC Bill to be conducted during the first four years of the
RBS or as soon as practicable afterwards. This review must involve public
consultation.[38]
Establishing the 'designated day'
for Telstra's structural separation
1.46
Schedule 5 to the CC Bill would alter arrangements for the 'designated
day' for the purposes of Telstra's structural separation.[39]
At present, the designated day is either 1 July 2018 or another date
specified by the Minister. The bill would change the date specified in the Tel
Act to 1 January 2020 while retaining the ministerial discretion to set a
different date. The relevant EM states that this change 'better reflects the
date by which the NBN rollout is now expected to be completed'.[40]
Reports of other committees
1.47
When examining a bill or draft bill, the committee takes into account
any relevant comments published by the Senate Standing Committee for the
Scrutiny of Bills (Scrutiny Committee). The Scrutiny Committee assesses
legislative proposals against a set of accountability standards that focus on
the effect of proposed legislation on individual rights, liberties and
obligations, and on parliamentary propriety.
1.48
The Scrutiny Committee commented on the bills in its Scrutiny Digest
No. 8 of 2017. In relation to the CC Bill, that committee is seeking advice
from the Minister in relation to the proposed modified disallowance procedures,
provisions which exempt certain instruments from disallowance and a strict
liability offence. In relation to the RBS Bill, that committee commented
on the proposed delegation to the executive of legislative power in relation to
taxation and the proposed modified disallowance procedures.[41]
These matters are discussed in Chapter 3.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page