Recommendations
Recommendation 1
2.10 The
committee recommends that the objects of the Act be amended to remove the words
'to provide for' from section 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(ca).
Recommendation 2
2.57 The
committee recommends that the appropriateness of a greenhouse trigger under the
Act and the nature of any such trigger, should it be required, be carefully
considered in light of the findings of the independent review and in the
context of the government's overall response to climate change, in particular
the CPRS.
Recommendation 3
2.58 The
committee recommends that, having regard to the conclusions of the review of
the National Framework for the Management and Monitoring of Australia's
Native Vegetation currently underway, and in light of advice from the Threatened
Species Scientific Committee, the government should consider including a land
clearing trigger in the Act.
Recommendation 4
3.34 The
committee recommends that the government give urgent consideration to
increasing the resources available to the department in the areas of
assessment, monitoring, complaint investigation, compliance, auditing projects
approved under Part 3, and enforcement action.
Recommendation 5
3.37 The
committee recommends that the department undertake regular evaluation of the
long-term environmental outcomes of decisions made under the Act, and that the
government ensure agency resources are adequate to undertake this new activity.
Recommendation 6
4.19 The
committee recommends that the Independent Review of the EPBC Act and / or the
ANAO examine the effect of existing bilateral agreements on the quality of
environmental assessments of matters of national environmental significance.
The committee suggests that particular regard be given to the transparency of,
public engagement in, and appeal rights in relation to assessments performed
under a bilateral agreement, compared to the conditions that would have existed
had the assessment been performed under the EPBC Act.
Recommendation 7
4.33 The
committee recommends that the government review the interaction between the
EPBC Act and the Fisheries Management Act in relation to the conservation of
fish species and relevant assessment processes.
Recommendation 8
5.34 The
committee recommends that the process for nomination and listing of threatened
species or ecological communities be amended to improve transparency, rigour
and timeliness. Changes that should be considered include:
-
Either
requiring publication of the Scientific Committee's proposed priority
assessment list or reducing ministerial discretion to revise the priority
list under section 194K; and
-
Reducing the maximum
period allowed for an assessment under section 194P(3).
Recommendation 9
5.66 The
committee recommends that government policy regarding the use of 'offsets' for habitat
conservation state that the use of offsets:
-
is a last resort;
-
must deliver a net
environmental gain; and
-
should not be
accepted as a mitigating mechanism in instances where other policies or
legislation (such as state vegetation protection laws) are already protecting
the habitat proposed for use as an offset.
Recommendation 10
6.76 The
committee recommends that consideration be given to expanding the scope for
merits review in relation to ministerial decisions under the Act, particularly
in relation to:
-
whether an action is
a controlled action,
-
assessment decisions;
and
-
decisions on whether
a species or ecological community is to be listed under the Act.
The committee recommends that the independent review examine
this possibility in the first instance, and that the process of consideration
should include consultation with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page