Chapter 1
Introduction
The referral
1.1
On 4 September 2014, the following bills were introduced into the
House of Representatives by the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection,
the Hon Scott Morrison MP:[1]
-
the Customs Amendment (Korea-Australia Free Trade Agreement
Implementation) Bill 2014 (the Customs Bill); and
-
the Customs Tariff Amendment (Korea-Australia Free Trade
Agreement Implementation) Bill 2014 (the Tariff Bill).
1.2
Together, these will be referred to as 'the Bills'.
1.3
On the same day and on the recommendation of the Selection of Bills Committee,[2]
the Senate referred the provisions of the Bills to the Legal and Constitutional
Affairs Legislation Committee (the committee) for inquiry and report by
2 October 2014.[3]
The Korea-Australia Free Trade Agreement and related parliamentary
inquiries
1.4
Negotiations for a free trade agreement between Australia and the
Republic of Korea, which commenced in 2009,[4]
were concluded in early December 2013.[5]
The full text of the Korea-Australia Free Trade Agreement (KAFTA) was
publicly released on 17 February 2014[6]
and the agreement was signed on 8 April 2014.[7]
KAFTA was tabled in Parliament on 13 May 2014.[8]
1.5
This is the third parliamentary inquiry that has related to the final
text of KAFTA. The other two were as follows:
-
An inquiry by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCoT),
which received written submissions from 78 individuals and organisations,
and heard from 37 witnesses during the course of four days of public
hearings in Canberra, Sydney and Brisbane. The report of JSCoT,[9]
which ran to 93 pages, was tabled on 4 September 2014.[10]
-
An inquiry by the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
References Committee, which is due to table its report one month after the
tabling of the report of JSCoT (that is, on 4 October 2014).[11]
1.6
Both the report of JSCoT and the two days of public hearings conducted
by the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee[12]
examined—in some detail—(a) the negotiating process by which the agreement
was brought about and the consultation that occurred during that process,
(b) the specific provisions of the agreement, (c) issues arising from
those provisions, and (d) the anticipated impact of the agreement,
particularly on the Australian economy and individual industries within it.
1.7
This committee's inquiry is of a somewhat different nature. The committee
has been asked to report, not on KAFTA itself, but rather on the two Bills that
have been introduced to give domestic effect to certain customs-related
provisions of it.
1.8
Given that the merits of KAFTA have been considered extensively by two
other committees, this committee does not propose to traverse that ground
again. Instead, this report will examine the more focused question of whether
the Bills faithfully implement the relevant obligations that Australia has
assumed under KAFTA.
Overview of the Bills
The Customs Bill
1.9
The Customs Bill, if passed, would amend the Customs Act 1901 with
the aim of implementing Australia's obligations under Chapter 3 of KAFTA.[13]
That chapter, which is entitled 'Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures', sets
out the definitions and procedures that are to be used to determine whether a
particular good originated in Australia or Korea. This matters because the
parties to KAFTA have agreed that such goods shall receive preferential rates
of customs duty. The actual changes to the rates are contained in the Tariff
Bill.
1.10
The exact provisions of the Customs Bill and the relevant articles in
Chapter 3 of KAFTA will be considered in chapter 2 of this report.
The Tariff Bill
1.11
The Tariff Bill seeks to amend the Customs Tariff Act 1995
to amend the duties payable on goods that originate in Korea in accordance with
Annex 2-A of KAFTA. The exact provisions of the Tariff Bill and the
relevant provisions of KAFTA will also be considered in chapter 2 of this
report.
Conduct of this inquiry
1.12
As per the usual practice, the committee advertised the inquiry on its
website and wrote to a number of stakeholders inviting submissions by
15 September 2014. Details of the inquiry were also placed on the committee's
website (https://www.aph.gov.au/senate_legalcon).
1.13
The committee received seven written submissions, which have been listed
at Appendix 1. All of these were published on the committee's website.
1.14
In light of the inquiries by JSCoT and the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence
and Trade References Committee, the committee did not hold a public hearing.
Acknowledgement
1.15
The committee acknowledges the short period of time available to provide
a submission and the effort required to do so. The committee thanks those
organisations that participated in the inquiry.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page