Source of medicinal cannabis within the country
|
Official medicinal cannabis dispersion to patients
|
Where applied
|
PROs
|
CONs
|
Adherence to international treaties
|
1) No official source of
|
State-level tolerance to
|
U.S. - selected
|
- patients and caregivers
|
- not medicinal grade
|
It is rightful not to proceed with
|
medicinal cannabis
|
patient´s own cannabis
|
states (Alaska,
|
not criminalised for medicinal
|
cannabis
|
use and personal possession of
|
(patients exempted from
|
cultivation under
|
Hawaii,
|
cannabis use, own cultivation
|
- treatment follow-up
|
cannabis under
the criminal
|
criminal procedures upon
|
medical certification that
|
Maryland),
|
and cultivation / administration
|
with the doctor
not required
|
law.
|
doctor’s
recommendation /
|
expands to caregivers
|
Canada
|
by a 3rd person
|
- no control on
cannabis
|
|
certification (i.e. patient
|
|
|
|
diversion to the recreational
|
|
registry / cards)
|
|
|
|
market
|
|
2) Supply
of medicinal
|
Specific state or county
|
U.S. - selected
|
- quality
competition
|
- medicinal quality control
|
Non-adherence to 1961
U.N.
|
cannabis tolerated upon
|
level laws for medicinal
|
states (Arizona,
|
between producers
|
dependent on state-level
|
treaty on medicinal cannabis -
|
doctor´s recommendation
|
cannabis dispensaries
|
California,
|
- patients (caregivers)
|
regulations
|
the U.S. federal
scheduling
|
|
|
Colorado, Delaware,
|
and suppliers not criminalised
|
- treatment follow-up
|
doesn´t recognise cannabis as a
|
|
|
District of Colombia,
|
for medicinal cannabis use, own
|
with the doctor
not required
|
medicinal drug, and therefore
|
|
|
Maine, Michigan,
|
cultivation
|
- low control
over
|
dispensing is not controlled by a
|
|
|
Montana, Nevada,
|
|
dispensaries and conflation with
|
prescription regime. It is,
|
|
|
New Jersey, New
|
|
recreational users´ market
|
however, rightful not to
|
|
|
Mexico, Oregon,
|
|
(prescription regime lacking due
|
proceed with use and personal
|
|
|
Rhode Island, Vermont,
|
|
to federal laws)
|
possession of cannabis under
|
|
|
Washington,
Canada
|
|
|
the criminal law,
and such
|
|
|
|
|
|
provision has been applied
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
cultivation for own use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Medicinal cannabis trial
|
Certified small-scale provisions of federally- cultivated marijuana
|
U.S. National Institute of Drug Addiction (NIDA)– selected states (Therapeutic Research Program)
|
-
control over the number and
conditions of patients
- medicinal grade product
-
low chances for diversion into
recreational market on the wholesale level due to single
production point
-
low chances for diversion into
recreational market due to restricted no. of patients
|
- limited patients´ access
- monopoly-originated product, patients complaints about
quality
|
In adherence with 1961 Single convention on medicinal provisions of controlled substances.
|
4) Outsourcing herbal
cannabis / pharmaceutical preparations from abroad
(Option 1)
|
Herbal cannabis: Individual imports based
on prescription and further administrative approvals (herbal cannabis from the
Netherlands, Sativex from the UK)
|
Finland, Denmark
|
-
no specific regulatory system needed,
administratively managed
by the substance control
act authority
- medicinal grade herbal
product
- treatment follow-up with the doctor required as with
any other medication
-
low chances for diversion into
recreational market given the restricted no. of patients and lack of domestic production
|
-
individual imports are costly and a heavy administrative burden is imposed on
the patient
|
In adherence with 1961 Single convention on medicinal provisions of controlled substances.
|
4) Outsourcing herbal cannabis / pharmaceutical
preparations from abroad
(Option 2)
|
Pharmaceutical preparations: Prescription and
pharmacy dispersion of synthetic cannabinoids
|
Dronabinol or marinol available in Austria,
Canada, Germany, France,
Spain, Switzerland, UK, U.S.,
Sativex available in Austria,
Canada, New Zealand, UK, Australia
|
- existing medicine regulatory system used
- treatment follow-up with the doctor required as with
any other medication
-
medicinal-grade product
-
low chances for diversion into
recreational market (herbal cannabis not available)
|
- narrow range of available cannabis medication (lack
of herbal products)
|
In adherence with 1961 Single convention on medicinal provisions of controlled substances.
|
5) Licensing of growers
by an agency
(Option
1)
|
Agency that doesn´t
take possession of all domestically grown cannabis; herbal cannabis dispensed via an auxiliary system on doctor´s
recommendation
|
Israel, Canada
|
- quality competition between producers (e.g. Canada
has recently transferred from state-owned production to licensing system due
to concerns of product quality under monopoly production)
- low chances for diversion into recreational market
on wholesale level given the control via agency
|
- costs of setting up an agency or of assigning its
tasks to one of the existing agencies within the country
- medicinal quality not guaranteed by the system
- treatment follow-up with the doctor not required
- chances for diversion into recreational market on
consumer level given lack of control via prescription
|
Partially
in adherence with 1961 Single convention on medicinal provisions of
controlled substances; control under prescription system is required by the
treaty. The possession of cannabis by the agency is rather symbolic.
|
5) Licensing of
growers by an agency
(Option 2)
|
Agency that
takes possession of all domestically grown cannabis ; herbal cannabis dispensed in pharmacies upon doctor´s prescription
|
The Czech Republic, The Netherlands, Uruguay, The United Kingdom (herbal production for Sativex)
|
- quality competition between producers (e.g. Canada
has recently transferred from state-owned production to licensing system due
to concerns of product quality under monopoly production)
- full adherence to medical and prescription system
(herbal cannabis classified as a source substance to compounding pharmacists)
- treatment follow-up with the doctor required as
with any other medication
- low chances of diversion into recreational market
on wholesale level given the control via agency and on consumer level given
the control via prescription.
|
- costs of setting up an agency or of assigning its
tasks to one of the existing agencies within the country
|
In
adherence with 1961 Single convention on medicinal provisions of controlled
substances.
|
Source: Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and
Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, Submission 19, pp 15-18.