Outstanding
Questions on Notice 29 March 2017
| # |
Question
From/To |
Reference |
Response[1] |
PII
Claim |
| 1 |
Watt/
Faulkner |
When
you say 'we' got together, do you remember who was part of that meeting? And
if there were any meeting notes taken, could I please request a copy of
those? (Committee Hansard 17/2/17, pp. 5–6) |
In
part (A: pp. 2–3) (notes not provided) |
No |
| 2 |
Watt/
Loughton |
Mr
Loughton, in early 2016, did you become aware of any contact between the
Commonwealth Attorney-General and his Western Australian counterpart around
the issue of intervention in this case? (Committee Hansard 17/2/17, p. 16) |
No |
NA |
| 3 |
Watt/
Faulkner |
I
am just thinking really hard about that particular appearance. This is a
question to both Mr Loughton and Mr Faulkner. Did Mr Lambie or anyone else
from the Attorney-General's office instruct you or request that you appear
for the Commonwealth, on that occasion? (Committee Hansard 17/2/17, p. 22) |
No |
No |
| 4 |
Watt/
Faulkner |
You
are taking on notice whether there was any contact with Mr Lambie or the
Attorney's office and whether instructions were provided to appear or a
request was made to appear. Similarly, do you recall or does Mr Loughton
recall whether the Attorney-General requested that the Commonwealth be
represented on that occasion? (Committee Hansard 17/2/17, p. 22) |
No |
No |
| 5 |
Pratt/Brandis |
CHAIR:
There were some 30 questions taken on notice that the department did not
answer on 17 February, so the committee is asking if you can provide the
answers from the department or, alternatively—
Senator
Brandis: I am sure that can be done.
CHAIR:
specify the harm to the public interest that would arise from answering the
questions.
Senator
Brandis: I will ensure that the questions are answered, and those answers, of
course, may include any appropriate claims of immunity. (Committee Hansard
8/3/17, pp. 23–24) |
In
part (some questions remain unanswered) |
In
part (legal advice not an accepted ground) |
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents