Chapter 1 - Introduction
[1]
Selection of
Bills Committee Report,
No. 8 of 2017, p. 3 and appendix 4.
[2] Selection of Bills
Committee Report, No. 8 of 2017, p. 3 and appendix 5.
[3] Note these cases are
being considered together by the High Court, and so will be referred to in this
report as Graham and Te Puia. See the Explanatory Memorandum, p.
6; see also the second reading speech on the bill made by the Hon Michael McCormack,
Minister for Small Business, House of Representatives Hansard, 21 June
2017, p. 7191.
[4] See the short particulars
of the cases at High Court of Australia, Graham v Minister for Immigration (M97/2016)
and Te Puia v Minister for Immigration (P58/2016).
[5] High Court of Australia, Graham
v Minister for Immigration (M97/2016) and Te Puia v Minister for
Immigration (P58/2016).
[6] Peter Benson, 'Bikies
challenge raises ASIO heat on Labor' in The Australian, 14 August 2017.
[7]
High Court of Australia, Graham v Minister for Immigration (M97/2016)
and Te Puia v Minister for Immigration (P58/2016). Note that Section
75(v) of the Constitution provides that: 'In all matters:...(v) in which a writ
of Mandamus or prohibition or an injunction is sought against an officer of the
Commonwealth; the High Court shall have original jurisdiction'.
[8] Submission 1, p.
4.
[9] The
Hon Michael McCormack, Minister for Small Business, House of Representatives
Hansard, 21 June 2017, p. 7191.
[10] Migration Act 1958,
section 503A(2)(c).
[11] Migration Legislation
Amendment (Strengthening of Provisions relating to Character and Conduct) Act
1998.
[12] High Court of Australia, Graham
v Minister for Immigration (M97/2016) and Te Puia v Minister for Immigration
(P58/2016).
[13] The
Hon Michael McCormack, Minister for Small Business, House of
Representatives Hansard, 21 June 2017, p. 7191.
[14] Explanatory Memorandum,
p. 1.
[15] Submission 1, p. 3.
[16] Standing
Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills, Scrutiny Digest 8 of 2017, 9 August
2017, p. 16.
[17]
Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills, Scrutiny Digest 8 of 2017,
9 August 2017, p. 17.
[18]
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human rights scrutiny
report, Report 8 of 2017, 15 August 2017, p. 34.
[19]
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human rights scrutiny
report, Report 8 of 2017, 15 August 2017, p. 38.
[20]
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human rights scrutiny
report, Report 8 of 2017, 15 August 2017, pp. 39–40.
[21]
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human rights scrutiny
report, Report 8 of 2017, 15 August 2017, pp. 41.
[22]
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human rights scrutiny
report, Report 8 of 2017, 15 August 2017, pp. 42.
[23]
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human rights scrutiny
report, Report 8 of 2017, 15 August 2017, pp. 43.
[24]
Explanatory
Memorandum, p.
1.
[25] Explanatory Memorandum,
p. 1 and Attachment A, p. 8.
[26]
The committee's
website can be found at www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs
Chapter 2 - Provisions of the bill and issues raised
[1] Explanatory Memorandum,
p. 1.
[2] Submission 1, p.
5.
[3] Submission 4, p.
7.
[4] Submission 3, p.
5.
[5] Submission 2, p.
1.
[6] Submission 4, p.
7.
[7] Submission 3, p.
4.
[8] Submission 3, pp.
4–5.
[9] Submission 3, p.
5.
[10] Submission 1, p. 4.
[11] Submission 3, p. 3.
[12] Submission 3, p. 4.
[13] Submission 4, p. 5.
[14] Submission 4, p. 7.
[15] Submission 4, p. 5.
[16] Explanatory Memorandum,
Attachment A, p. 5.
[17] Submission 1, p. 5.
Australian Greens–dissenting report
[1]
Refugee Law, Submission 3, p. 3.
[2]
Refugee Law, Submission 3, p. 4.
[3]
Law Council of Australia, Submission 4, p. 7.
[4]
Refugee Law, Submission 3, p. 6.
[5]
Law Council of Australia’s, Submission 4, p. 7.
[6]
Law Council of Australia, Submission 4, p. 7.
[7]
Refugee Law, Submission 3, p. 4.
[8]
Refugee Law, Submission 3, p. 4.