CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Background
1.1
On 4 December 2008, the Senate referred the Federal Justice System
Amendment (Efficiency Measures) Bill (No. 1) 2008 (Bill) to the Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (committee) for inquiry and report
by 17 February 2009.
1.1
The primary purpose of the Bill is to improve the conduct of business in
the federal courts through several measures. It also aims to clarify and expand
the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia under the International Arbitration
Act 1974 (International Arbitration Act). Finally, it seeks to respond to
the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Black v
Black [2008] FamCAFC 7 (Black v Black), where the Court
applied a strict compliance test in relation to certain technical requirements
for binding financial agreements made under the Family Law Act 1975 (Family
Law Act).
1.2
Key aspects of the Bill include proposed amendments to several Acts,
including:
- the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (FCA Act), to
allow the Federal Court to refer a proceeding, or one or more questions
arising in a proceeding, to a referee for report. The Bill would also amend the
FCA Act to allow a single Federal Court judge to make an interlocutory order in
the original or appellate jurisdiction of the Court in a matter otherwise
required to be heard and determined by a Full Court.
- the International Arbitration Act to give the Federal Court
concurrent jurisdiction with state and territory supreme courts for matters
arising under Parts III and IV of the Act, which deal with the UNCITRAL
Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the UNCITRAL Model Law),
and the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States
and Nationals of other States 1965 (ICSID Convention). The amendments also
seek to clarify the Federal Court’s existing jurisdiction for matters arising
under Part II of the Act (giving effect to the Convention on the Recognition
and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958).
- the FCA Act, Family Law Act, Native Title Act 1993 and
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, to remove the current
restrictions on Chief Justices and Presidents acquiring an interest in land for
the purposes of the Lands Acquisition Act 1989.
- the Public Order (Protection of Persons and Property) Act 1971
to allow an authorised, non-judicial officer of the Federal Court to make an
order specifying that certain premises are ‘court premises’ for the purposes of
the Act. The purpose is to ensure that the areas in which authorised officers
are able to exercise powers under the Act in the interests of security are
readily identifiable to authorised officers and the public.
- the Family Law Act, to relax certain technical requirements that
must be strictly satisfied for financial agreements and termination of
financial agreements to be binding. These amendments respond to the concerns
about the binding financial agreement provisions of the Act that have arisen
following the decision of the Full Family Court in Black v Black. The Family
Law Council has confirmed that amendments are required to restore confidence in
the binding nature of these agreements.[1]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.2
The committee advertised the inquiry in The Australian newspaper
on 17 December 2008, and invited submissions by Monday 12 January 2009. Details of the inquiry, the Bill and associated documents were placed on the
committee's website. The committee also wrote to 50 organisations and
individuals.
1.3
One submission, from the Family Law Section of the Law Council of
Australia, was received.
1.4
The committee then wrote to and received a response from the
Attorney-General, the Hon Robert McClelland MP, in relation to issues raised in
the Law Council's submission.
1.5
No public hearings were held.
Acknowledgements
1.6
The committee thanks the Law Council of Australia for their submission
and officers of the Attorney-General's Department for their assistance.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page