Additional Comments by Senator Andrew Bartlett
1.1
My assessment of the evidence provided to the Committee is that the
legislation puts efficiency above fairness and justice. It appears to increase
the risk of an unfair process and an incorrect outcome in determining refugee
or migration cases. It is true that promptness is generally of benefit to
appellants, as well as to the Tribunal and the Department. However, this
should not occur at the risk of an unjust outcome.
1.2
The mantra of 'improving efficiency' has been used a number of times
over the past decade to justify a series of amendments to the Migration Act put
forward by the current government. In most cases, the impact has also been to
constrain the rights of applicants and appellants. In most cases, the
consequences have been more delays and appeals. I believe it is time more
attention was paid to improvements at the primary decision making level, rather
than cutting off avenues of procedural fairness. Statistics given to the
Committee and contained in the Annual Report of the Migration Review Tribunal
show that over 50% of primary decisions made at Departmental level are
overturned at the MRT. It is obvious that the Department's processes are
seriously lacking if they are getting it wrong so regularly. It is also time to
review the Migration Act with an aim to reducing the complexity and red tape
involved in the multitude of visa categories.
1.3
A good point that all witnesses make is that every new amendment to the
Migration Act opens up new avenues of legal challenge and is likely to clog up
the courts even more. This is because the proposed amendments will create
a new series of tests that will have to be assessed. This is a pattern in
common with many of the past amendments that have been put forward by the
government with the stated intent of improving 'efficiency', but which have led
instead to more appeals and greater delays.
1.4
Having an oral hearing without a written follow up can mean applicants
and their representatives do not know exactly what the issues are that need
addressing. These things can be easily missed at a hearing, particularly
given language barriers and, in the case of refugee claims, the traumatic
nature of some of the issues being examined. The advantage of the current process
is that, while it may be more time consuming, it is very clear what the pivotal
issues are.
1.5
I do not believe sufficient evidence was provided to the Committee to
make yet another change to the Migration Act, which has already been subjected
to a multitude of amendments over recent years.
Andrew Bartlett
Queensland Democrat Senator
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page