Chapter 2 - Overview of the Bill
2.1
The purpose of the Customs Legislation
Amendment (Augmenting Offshore Powers and Other Measures) Bill 2006 (the Bill)
is to amend the Customs Act 1901 (the Customs Act) and the Customs
Legislation Amendment and Repeal (International
Trade Modernisation) Act 2001 to:
- enable Customs officers boarding a ship or aircraft to conduct
personal searches for, and take possession of, weapons or evidence of specified
offences;
- update customs broker licensing arrangements to accommodate current
practices in employment arrangements;
- update duty recovery processes and the payments of duty under
protest system and allow refunds to be applied against unpaid duty; and
- allow declarations to be made under the new SmartGate system and
to make it an offence to make false or misleading declarations under that
system.[1]
Schedule 1: Search powers on certain ships and aircraft
Part 1: Main amendments
2.2
The main amendments in Part 1 of the Bill will amend Division 1 of Part
XII of the Customs Act in relation to certain powers that enable Customs
officers to enforce the Customs Act, Division 307 of the Criminal Code[2]
or any prescribed Act (the specified Acts). In particular, the amendments will
empower Customs and other Commonwealth officers, immediately after boarding a
ship or aircraft for an enforcement purpose, to conduct personal searches for,
take possession of and retain:
- weapons;
- items that may assist a person to escape detection; and
- evidence of the commission of a relevant offence.[3]
2.3
The EM states that the new powers are required due to recent incidents
where Customs officers encountered 'violent resistance from persons on board...ships
and attempts to escape custody and dispose of evidentiary material.'[4]
2.4
The Second Reading Speech to the Bill justifies the grant of the new
powers as improving the safety of Customs officers and their capacity to obtain
and retain evidence and suspects relevant to offences under the specified Acts:
The new powers ensure the personal safety of the officers in
exercising their enforcement functions, help prevent the escape of any person
detained as a suspect, and help prevent the disposal of evidence.[5]
2.5
The new powers will be complemented by provisions introduced by the Bill
that govern the 'proper manner in which such powers may be exercised'.[6]
2.6
In addition, Part 1 of the Bill introduces a number of minor or
consequential amendments to other provisions of Division 1 of Part XII of the Customs
Act.
Items 1 and 2: definition of frisk search
2.7
The Customs Act currently contains two differently worded definitions of
'frisk search'.
2.8
Subsection 4(1) defines 'frisk search' for the purposes of the Customs Act
as:
- a quick search of the person by
the rapid and methodical running of hands over the person's outer garments; and
- an examination of anything worn
by the person that can be conveniently removed and is voluntarily removed by
the person.
2.9
However, subsection 183UA(1) defines frisk search for the purposes of
Division 1 of Part XII as:
- a search of a person conducted by
quickly running the hands over the person's outer garments; and
- an examination of anything worn
or carried by the person that is conveniently and voluntarily removed by the
person.
2.10
As well as the different form of words used, the two definitions are
distinguished by paragraphs 4(1)(c) and (d), which limit the purposes for which
a frisk search may be carried out and empower goods to be recovered as part of
a search.[7]
A frisk search may be conducted to:
- determine whether:
- if the search is conducted in circumstances
described in subsection 219L(1) or (1A)—the person is unlawfully carrying any
prohibited goods; and
- if the search is conducted in
circumstances described in subsection 219L(1B) or (1C)—the person is carrying
any weapon or thing capable of being used to inflict bodily injury on a person
conducting a search under Division 1 of Part XII; and
- recover any such goods.
2.11
Items 1 and 2 of Schedule 1 of the Bill establish a consistent
definition of 'frisk search' by replacing the subsection 4(1) definition with
that found at subsection 183UA(1), and repealing the definition of 'frisk
search' at subsection 183UA(1). The result will be that there is a single
definition of 'frisk search' in the Customs Act, thereby removing potential for
confusion.[8]
The current subsection 183UA(1) definition is preferred because it is more
consistent with that used in other Commonwealth legislation, such as the Crimes
Act 1914.[9]
2.12
The removal of the limitations at paragraphs 4(1)(c) and (d) allows
these matters to be dealt with more appropriately in a substantive provision of
the Customs Act, rather than in its definitions section.[10]
The limitations on the exercise of the frisk search powers are addressed in the
new subsection 219M(1A).
Item 3: Power to take possession of and retain found goods or documents
2.13
Under existing subsection 185(2) of the Customs Act, officers have the
power to search a ship or aircraft and any goods on such a ship or aircraft,
and to require persons on the ship or aircraft to produce documents. This
includes powers to secure goods found and to take copies, or extracts, of
documents found or produced.[11]
2.14
Under existing subsection 185(4A), evidence of the commission of an
offence against a law of the Commonwealth, a state or a territory obtained in
the exercise of powers under section 185 may be used, or given to another body
for use, in investigating or prosecuting an offence.
2.15
However, there is no explicit power in section 185 that allows an
officer to take possession of and retain goods found or documents produced
where such goods or documents may be evidence of the commission of an offence.[12]
2.16
Accordingly, Item 3 of Schedule 1 inserts new paragraphs (cb) and
(cc) into subsection 185(2). These paragraphs give officers additional powers
to take possession of and retain goods found or documents produced under
subsection 185(2), where such goods or evidence may afford evidence of the
commission of a relevant offence.[13]
The matters that determine whether such goods or documents may afford evidence
of the commission of a relevant offence are to be set out in proposed
subsection 185(7).
2.17
Item 3 makes explicit Customs' power to take possession of and retain,
for the purposes of investigating and prosecuting a relevant offence,
evidentiary material found or produced in the exercise of the subsection 185(2)
powers.[14]
This amendment will align the existing subsection 185(2) powers with the
amended personal search power at section 185AA.
Item 6: Circumstances in which goods and documents may be used as evidence
2.18
Proposed subsection 185(7) sets out, for the purposes of new paragraphs
185(2)(cb) and (cc), the circumstances that satisfy the criteria that 'goods
found or documents produced on a ship or aircraft may afford evidence of the
commission of a relevant offence.'[15]
2.19
Under subclause 185(7), where a ship is in Australia, goods or documents
may afford evidence of an offence, either inside or outside Australia, against
the Customs Act, Division 307 of the Criminal Code or an Act prescribed
consistently with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).[16]
2.20
Where a ship is outside Australia, goods or documents may afford
evidence only of an offence:
- in Australia against the Customs Act, Division 307 of the Criminal
Code or an Act prescribed consistently with UNCLOS; and
-
in Australia's exclusive economic zone against an Act prescribed
consistently with UNCLOS.[17]
2.21
Where an aircraft is in Australia, goods or documents may afford
evidence of an offence, either inside or outside Australia, against the Customs
Act or Division 307 of the Criminal Code.[18]
2.22
The limits on the scope of the power to take possession of and retain
evidentiary material prescribed by subclause 185(7) are in accordance with Australia's
jurisdiction in the various maritime zones under UNCLOS.[19]
Items 8 to 12: Amended search
powers under section 185AA
2.23
It is proposed to amend section 185AA to expand the scope of the
personal search powers and the circumstances under which they may be exercised.
2.24
Existing section 185AA of the Customs Act allows an officer to search
for, take possession of, and retain items on a person, or in that person's
immediate control, that could inflict bodily injury or help the person to
escape.
2.25
However, these personal search powers can only be exercised where the
person is on a detained ship or aircraft, or where the person is on a detained
ship or aircraft and is being placed on another ship or aircraft for the
purpose of being moved. Further, the existing powers do not allow officers to
search for and take possession of potential evidentiary material.
2.26
Proposed subsections 185(1) and (1A) will allow a person that is found
on a ship or aircraft boarded under subsection 185(2), or placed on a ship or
aircraft under subsection 185(3AA), and any clothing and other property within
the immediate control of that person, to be searched for the purposes of
finding out if they are carrying or hiding:
- a weapon or thing capable of being used to inflict injury or help
the person escape; or
- a document or other thing that may afford evidence of the commission
of a relevant offence.[20]
2.27
New subsection 185AA(1B) sets out the circumstances in which a document
or other thing may afford evidence of the commission of a relevant offence.
This section effectively limits the scope of the power to search for evidence. The
circumstances are the same as those prescribed in subsection 185(7).[21]
2.28
New subsections 185AA(2) and (2A) will allow a person that is found on a
ship or aircraft boarded under subsection 185A(2A), and any clothing and other
property within the immediate control of that person, to be searched for the
purposes of finding out if they are carrying or hiding a weapon or thing
capable of being used to inflict injury.[22]
Power to examine things found
2.29
New subsection 185AA(3) provides a new power for an officer to examine
any thing found in the course of a search under section 185AA. If the thing
found is a document, the examination may include reading the document directly
or with the help of an electronic device.[23]
2.30
Proposed subsection 185AA(3A) allows an officer to do, or arrange for
another officer or another person to do, whatever is reasonably necessary to
permit the examination of the thing or things being examined.[24]
2.31
Proposed subsection 185AA(3B) limits the scope of subsection 185AA(3A)
by prohibiting an officer from damaging a thing being examined by forcing it,
or part of it, open unless:
- the person being searched has been given a reasonable opportunity
to open the thing or part of it, or
- it is not reasonably practicable to give the person such an
opportunity.[25]
Power to take possession of weapons and
evidence
2.32
Proposed subsection 185AA(3C) allows an officer to take possession of:
- a weapon or other thing capable of being used to inflict injury
or help a person escape; or
- a document or other thing that may afford evidence of the commission
of a relevant offence,
where the weapon,
thing or document is found in the course of a search under new subsection
185AA(1A).[26]
2.33
Further, new subsection 185AA(3C) allows the retention of the weapon,
document or thing for such time as the officer thinks necessary for the
purposes of the Customs Act, Division 307 of the Criminal Code or an Act
prescribed under subsection 185AA(1B) (the specified Acts).[27]
2.34
Proposed subsection 185AA(3C) also enables an officer:
- to take possession of a weapon or other thing capable of being
used to inflict injury that is found in the course of a search under new
subsection 185AA(2A); and
- to retain the weapon or other thing for such time as the officer
thinks necessary for the purposes of the Customs Act.[28]
Item 9: Immunity for search conducted in good faith
2.35
Existing subsection 185AA(6) gives immunity against civil or criminal
proceedings to a person who conducts a search under section 185AA at the
request of an officer. It is required that the person act in good faith and in
accordance with subsection 185AA(7).
2.36
Existing subsection 185AA(7) prohibits an officer or other person who
conducts a search under section 185AA from using more force, or subjecting a
person to greater indignity, than is reasonably necessary to conduct the
search.
2.37
Proposed subsection 185AA(6) would retain the current immunity and
extend it under the same conditions to an officer who conducts a search under
section 185AA.[29]
Item 10: Evidence able to be used to prosecute offences
2.38
Under proposed subsection 185AA(7A), if an officer, in a search
conducted under section 185AA, obtains evidence of the commission of an offence
against a law of the Commonwealth, a state or territory, that evidence may be
used, or given to another body for use, in investigating or prosecuting the
relevant offence. New subsection 185AA(7A) does not override or limit a state's
laws of evidence relating to proceedings for an offence against the laws of
that state.[30]
Item 12: Definition of 'a person found on a ship or aircraft'
2.39
Item 12 of Schedule 1 inserts new subsection 185AA(9), which extends the
scope of the phrase 'a person found on a ship or aircraft' in section 185AA to
include a person suspected on reasonable grounds by an officer of having landed
from, or left, the ship or aircraft.[31]
Item 16: Power to conduct a frisk search
2.40
Existing section 219M establishes the manner in which a frisk search of
a person detained under section 219L is to be conducted. The power to conduct a
frisk search is implied from a reading of sections 219L and 219M; there is no
explicit power in either section to conduct a frisk search.
2.41
Accordingly, Item 16 of Schedule 1 inserts new subsection
219M(1A), which provides the express power for a Customs officer to conduct a
frisk search of a person detained under section 219L for the purpose of
determining whether they are unlawfully carrying prohibited goods.[32]
2.42
New subsection 219M(1A) also establishes a power to recover any
prohibited goods found in the course of a frisk search. [33]
Schedule 2: Agents and customs brokers
2.43
Division 3 of Part XI of the Customs Act provides for the licensing of
customs brokers. Under existing section 183C, where a broker's licence is
granted by the CEO of Customs, the CEO shall endorse on the licence:
- the place(s) at which the licence holder may act as a customs
broker; and
- the person(s) who is a nominee of the licence holder and the
corresponding place(s) at which the nominee acts as a customs broker.[34]
2.44
Existing section 183CD sets out the conditions that must be fulfilled
for a person to be eligible to be a nominee of a customs broker. Under
paragraph 183CD(1)(f), a nominee of a customs broker cannot be the nominee of
another customs broker. Under paragraph 183CD(1)(j), a nominee of a customs
broker cannot be a customs broker at a place other than a place where the first-mentioned
customs broker is a customs broker.[35]
Restrictions on the employment of locum or freelance customs brokers
2.45
The nominees of corporate customs brokers have traditionally been
individual customs brokers employed full-time. However, corporate customs
brokers are increasingly employing locum or freelance customs brokers as nominees
on a part-time basis. Such locum or freelance customs brokers could be employed
by a number of different corporate customs brokers at any one time.[36]
2.46
Existing paragraph 183CD(1)(f) of the Customs Act means that such locum
or freelance brokers may not act as nominees for more than one corporate
customs broker.[37]
2.47
Existing paragraph 183CD(1)(j), which requires that a nominee not be a
customs broker at another place, further restricts the use of locum or
freelance brokers as nominees. Current Customs practice is to specify for the
purposes of section 183CE 'all places in the Commonwealth' as the place at
which the licence holder may act as a customs broker. This policy renders the
condition set out in paragraph 183CD(1)(j) redundant because, being licensed to
act as a customs broker at 'all places in the Commonwealth', a locum or
freelance broker can never be a customs broker at another place.[38]
2.48
In recognition of the increasing employment of locum and freelance
brokers as nominees by corporate customs brokers, the Bill proposes the repeal
of paragraphs 183CD(1)(f) and 183CD(1)(j) of the Customs Act.[39]
Schedule 3: Recovery of duty
Duty recovery
2.49
Currently, section 153 of the Customs Act makes provision for the
recovery of duty by Customs. Further, section 165 of the Customs Act provides a
time limit of four years for the recovery of duty by Customs where duty has
been short levied or erroneously refunded.
2.50
The High Court has interpreted the time limit in section 165 as only
limiting Customs' power to recover duty in situations where the short payment
of duty and the overpayment of a refund are the result of a Customs' error.
However, as a matter of policy, Customs applies the time limit in section 165
of the Customs Act to the recovery of all duty, except in cases of
fraud.[40]
2.51
Items 1 to 4 of Schedule 3 of the Bill implement Customs' current policy
on time limits and the recovery of duty. The Bill amends the Customs Act to
consolidate sections 153 and 165 of the Customs Act, and to limit the time for
the recovery of customs duty to four years in all cases, except in the case of
fraud or evasion where no time limit will apply.[41]
Payments under protest
2.52
Under section 167 of the Customs Act, if there is a dispute as to the
amount or rate of duty payable on goods, the owner of the goods may pay under
protest the sum demanded by a Collector as the duty payable in respect of the
goods. If the duty is paid under protest, the sum paid is deemed to be the
proper duty payable unless the contrary is determined in an action brought in
accordance with section 167.[42]
2.53
Section 167 also sets out how an owner makes a payment under protest,
for both documentary and electronic entries. Both of these processes only allow
payments under protest to be made at the time goods are originally entered for
home consumption. However, if Customs conducts an audit on an owner's
transactions after goods have been entered into home consumption and determines
that duty, or additional duty, is payable on goods, there are currently no
statutory provisions specially allowing such post-entry payments under protest
to be made.[43]
2.54
Further, there are still provisions in the Customs Act requiring payments
under protest with respect to import entries under the COMPILE system to be
made by a registered COMPILE user, using COMPILE. As COMPILE is no longer used
and people cannot be registered COMPILE users, owners of goods cannot comply
with these provisions in making a payment under protest.[44]
2.55
The EM states that, for these reasons, Item 5 of Schedule 3 repeals the
existing requirements relating to payments under protest and replaces them with
'requirements that are general in nature and are easier to comply with'.[45]
2.56
New subsection 167(3) sets out the circumstances when a payment is taken
to be made under protest, namely:
- where the owner of the goods, or agent of the owner, gives
Customs notice, by document or electronically, that the payment is being made
under protest; and
- Customs receives the notice no later than seven days after the
day on which the payment is made.
2.57
The requirements for the notice that a payment is being made under
protest are set out in new subsection 167(3A), and do not differ substantially
from existing requirements.[46]
2.58
Item 7 of Schedule 3 inserts a new subsection 167(3B) into the Customs Act,
which provides for a payment under protest to be made under the Accredited
Client Program.
2.59
Item 8 of Schedule 3 inserts a new subsection 167(4A) into the Customs
Act, which sets out the circumstances in which a person can recover duty which
was paid under protest through the Accredited Client Program. Essentially,
there is no action for a sum paid through the Accredited Client Program under
protest, unless:
- the payment is made as a payment under protest under subsection
167(3B); and
- the action for recovery is brought within the timeframes set out
in paragraph 167(4A)(b) (generally six months from when the duty would be
payable if the accredited client monthly estimates were not paid).
Schedule 4: Treatment of certain information given to Customs
2.60
As part of the SmartGate process, eligible passengers and crew may be
required to answer questions and make declarations electronically to Customs
about their accompanied personal and household effects. These answers and
declarations will be used to assess a person's eligibility for automated
clearance and identify persons who may hold items of interest (such as
prohibited imports and dutiable/taxable items) to Customs.[47]
2.61
Existing paragraph 234(1)(d) of the Customs Act makes it an offence to
make a false and misleading statement (including an omission), directly or
indirectly, to an 'officer of Customs'. Currently, the provisions of the Customs
Act mean that passengers and crew who make false and misleading declarations
electronically using the SmartGate system would be making false and misleading
statements to 'Customs', and not necessarily to an 'officer of Customs'.[48]
2.62
The amendments in the Bill ensure that any false and misleading
information provided using the SmartGate system is covered by the existing
offence provisions relating to making false and misleading statements to an 'officer
of Customs' (Item 1 of Schedule 4).
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page