Annual reports of statutory authorities
2.1
The annual reports of the following statutory authorities in the
Attorney-General's portfolio were referred to the committee for examination and
report during the period 1 November 2015 to 30 April 2016:
-
Australian Government Solicitor;
-
Family Law Council; and
-
High Court of Australia.
2.2
No annual report was referred to the committee over this time period
from the Immigration and Border Protection portfolio.
2.3
The committee has decided to closely examine the annual report of the
Australian Government Solicitor, as this is the last report for the authority
as a government business enterprise.
Australian Government Solicitor
2.4
The Australian Government Solicitor (AGS) was a statutory authority and
government business enterprise (GBE) during the 2014–15 reporting period. Its
role is to provide legal services to government, assisting the Attorney-General
in the role of First Law Officer, and advising Executive Government and all
Commonwealth Agencies.[1]
Under the Judiciary Amendment Act 2015, AGS was consolidated into the
Attorney-General's Department (AGD) on 1 July 2015 and its role as a statutory
authority was revoked. The AGS annual report for 2014–15 is therefore its last
as a GBE.
2.5
The AGS annual report was prepared in accordance with section 46 of the Public
Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act) and, under
the PGPA (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Rule 2014, the
Commonwealth Authorities (Annual Reporting) Orders 2011.[2]
It was tabled in the Senate on 23 November 2015.[3]
2.6
The AGS annual report for 2014–15 began with a brief section on the
consolidation of AGS into AGD, and the governance, financial and commercial,
staff and client implications of the transition as of 1 July 2015.
2.7
The Chief Executive Officer's review provided a financial reflection of
AGS's performance as a GBE since 1999, reporting total profits before tax of
$173 million and payments to the Commonwealth, including dividends, taxation,
competitive neutrality payments and loans, of $262 million. It also outlined
the major areas of legal advice for AGS during 2014–15, including royal
commissions, the application of the PGPA Act, immigration matters,
constitutional support of the proposed mandatory data retention obligations for
telecommunications service providers, and constitutional recognition of
Indigenous Australians.[4]
2.8
The CEO stated that AGS 'had one of [its] best years yet' in 2014–15,
continuing to be the largest provider of government legal services, with a
market share of 41%, and with a client satisfaction rating of 96%.[5]
2.9
In 2014–15, AGS achieved trading revenue of $120.2 million, $3.4 million
above the corporate plan target, and its total profit (including interest) was
$10 million,[6]
an increase of $4.3 million from 2013–14.[7]
AGS also made further savings of $1.7 million in corporate overhead expenses.[8]
2.10
In the 'Scorecard of AGS performance', AGS ranked itself 'good or better
performance or trends' in all five performance measures (financial performance,
business efficiency, leverage/solvency, customers and stakeholders, and staff).[9]
This ranking is reflected in the results in the Performance Summary for
2014–15, although in a number of instances the final performance against
financial targets was negatively affected by the transition from a GBE,
including total shareholder return (target 10.0%, actual 1.4%), return on
equity (target 10.1%, actual 0.7%) and net profit after tax (target $3.6
million, actual $0.2 million).[10]
This negative performance is attributed to a $6.6 million write-off of a
deferred tax asset, and in each instance it appears that the target was met
before the write-off at the end of the reporting period.[11]
2.11
In the section 'Outcomes against our corporate plan',[12]
AGS provided an excellent analysis of performance in four key areas of its
corporate plan (clients, practice, people, and business), including discussion
of change management and shifting strategic focuses due to the consolidation
with AGD, and the impact of these on the four year period (2014–18) covered by
the plan. For example, detail was provided on transitioning staff to the Australian
Public Service and reclassification of roles,[13]
and on the benefits to clients in moving to new pricing arrangements for
services provided by AGS after 1 July 2015, including a shift to cost-recovery
rather than commercial pricing for 'out posted' AGS lawyers.[14]
2.12
The committee commends AGS on the level of detail provided in this annual
report, particularly regarding the impact of the consolidation with AGD and the
transition arrangements. The committee considers the report of the AGS to be
'apparently satisfactory'.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page