Introduction
1.1
On 20 September 2018, the Senate referred the provisions of the Treasury
Laws Amendment (Design and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention
Powers) Bill 2018 to the Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and report
by 9 November 2018.[1]
1.2
In brief, Schedule 1 of the bill creates a new obligation on the
providers of financial products to state the target market for a new product,
and to disclose who that market is. It places a new obligation on the
distributors of those products to ensure that they market the services only to
the target market. Schedule 2 of the bill creates new powers for the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to enforce these obligations and
to intervene where there is a prospect of detriment to consumers. Civil and
criminal penalties apply to contraventions of the new obligations.
1.3
According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the bill has no financial
implications.[2]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.4
The committee advertised the inquiry on its website. It also wrote to
relevant stakeholders and interested parties inviting submissions by 18 October
2018. The committee received 19 submissions, which are listed at Appendix 1.
1.5
The committee held public hearings in Melbourne on 31 October and
1 November 2018. The names of witnesses who appeared at the hearing are at
Appendix 2.
1.6
The committee thanks all individuals and organisations that contributed
to the inquiry.
1.7
Hansard references throughout this document relate to the proof Hansard.
Please note that the page numbering may differ between the proof and final
Hansard.
Background and consultation
Information verses regulation: what
the Financial System Inquiry said
1.8
Consumer protection in financial services, as in other areas, has
heavily relied on full disclosure about products. However, the nature of
financial products is that they are complex and not easily understood, even
where there is full disclosure.
1.9
The Financial System Inquiry (FSI) in 2014 addressed the question of how
to reduce the number of consumers buying financial products that were not
suitable to their needs, because of complexity or risk or time frames. The FSI
noted that more information does not necessarily help consumers:
The existing framework relies heavily on disclosure,
financial advice and financial literacy. However, disclosure can be ineffective
for a number of reasons, including consumer disengagement, complexity of
documents and products, behavioural biases, misaligned interests and low
financial literacy.[3]
1.10
The FSI also suggested that it was unsatisfactory that ASIC could only
wait for a breach of a regulation to occur before it could intervene.
1.11
The FSI recommended that the government take several actions, including:
Make issuers and distributors more accountable for design
and distribution of products and introduce a product intervention power. To
promote positive consumer outcomes, product issuers and distributors should
take greater responsibility for the design and targeted distribution of
products...ASIC should also be enabled to take a more proactive approach to
reduce the risk of significant detriment to consumers.[4]
1.12
This bill is the Government's response to recommendations 21 and 22 of
the FSI, which embodied these principles.[5]
Regulation of financial and credit
products
1.13
Financial products, through which a person makes an investment or
manages risk or makes non-cash payments, are generally regulated under the Corporations
Act 2001 (Corporations Act). Credit products, which are used when payment
of debt is deferred and a charge is made for providing the credit, are
generally regulated under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Credit
Act). Financial advice is regulated under the Corporations Act and has its own
criteria and objectives.
1.14
However, the definition of 'financial product' is broader in the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (ASIC Act), and includes
'credit products'. This was done deliberately in order to ensure that ASIC's
consumer protections apply to products that are not caught by the specific
provisions of the Corporations Act or the Credit Act.[6]
Consultation
1.15
Treasury published a Proposals Paper in December 2016. It described the
proposed measures as '...supplementing disclosure as the main form of consumer
protection'. The proposals were broadly similar to the content of this bill.
Thirty-three submissions were received.[7]
1.16
Treasury released an initial exposure draft of this legislation for
consultation in December 2017. Nearly 40 submissions were received in response.[8]
A new exposure draft was released in July 2018, and attracted a further 30
submissions.[9]
Content of the bill
Schedule 1
1.17
The bill amends the Corporations Act by inserting a new Part 7.8A,
Design and distribution requirements relating to financial products for retail
clients.
Design obligations—Scope
1.18
The bill requires the issuer of a financial product to make a target
market determination (TMD) before the product is marketed. The products covered
are, in general, those for which a product disclosure statement (PDS) or
disclosure to investors is already required under the Corporations Act. There
are some exceptions, and there is provision for regulations to specify other
products for which a TMD must be made.
1.19
This means that credit products are not covered because they are covered
by the Credit Act, not the Corporations Act.
1.20
The bill excludes MySuper products and margin lending facilities. These
are already subject to specific regulations.[10]
Fully paid ordinary shares, including securities issued under employee share
schemes, are also excluded. They are regarded as well understood.[11]
1.21
The TMD must be made before any person engages in retail distribution
conduct. Such conduct includes dealing in the product or giving a disclosure
document or providing advice about the product to a retail client.
Content of the target market
determination
1.22
The determination is to specify who the retail clients for the product
are, taking into account the likely objectives, financial situation and needs
of clients.
1.23
The determination will set out limitations on the distribution of the
product such that it will be marketed only to the target market. It must
specify the period the determination will operate before being reviewed. It
also must specify review triggers; that is, events or circumstances which would
suggest that the determination is no longer appropriate and should be reviewed.
1.24
It should specify the kinds of information needed to show if a review
trigger has occurred, who should report the information, and when it should be
reported. The product is not to be distributed during the review period, and
issuers must take steps to ensure that distributors are aware of the review.
1.25
More generally, issuers must specify information that distributors must
collect, keep and provide back to the offeror.
Distribution obligations
1.26
Distributors are prohibited from distributing a product unless a current
target market determination is in place.
1.27
Issuers and distributors must take reasonable steps to ensure that
distribution is consistent with the target market. What is reasonable depends
on the risk of harm inherent in the product: the probability that it will be
wrongly distributed, and the scale of the possible detriment.[12]
1.28
Distributors must collect, and issuers must retain, information relating
to their obligations, including the number of complaints about the product. A
distributor must notify the issuer, and the issuer must notify ASIC, about
significant dealing in a product that is not consistent with the target market
determination.
1.1
The bill uses a concept of 'excluded conduct'. For example, financial
advice and products which are provided to implement personal financial advice
are excluded by the definitions in the bill from the distribution obligations.
The reason is that such products already take into account the individual
consumer's circumstances. These products are still subject to the record
keeping obligations.[13]
Powers of ASIC
1.29
ASIC can request distribution information or other records.
1.30
If ASIC believes that there is a contravention of the design or
distribution obligations, it can investigate by way of a hearing and
submissions, and then can order that particular conduct (for example, marketing
the product) not occur. ASIC can make an interim order before investigating if
it considers that a delay is not in the public interest. A stop order is not a
legislative instrument.
1.31
ASIC can exempt specified persons or products, or modify how the
obligations apply to specified persons or products. This is done by a
notifiable instrument.
1.32
ASIC can exempt specified classes of persons or products, or modify how
the obligations apply to specified classes of persons or products. This is done
by a legislative instrument.
Penalties
1.33
Criminal and civil penalties apply, up to imprisonment for 5 years or
200 penalty units (currently $42,000) or both. In addition, a client who
suffers loss or damage through a contravention of the obligations can take
civil action to recover losses.
Transition period
1.34
The design and distribution obligations take effect two years after the
Act receives Royal Assent.
Schedule 2
Product intervention power
1.35
The bill amends the Corporations Act by inserting a new Part 7.9A,
Product intervention orders. It gives ASIC the power to intervene to pre-empt
detriment to retail clients. The bill amends the Credit Act in similar
terms with regard to credit products.
1.36
If ASIC is satisfied that a financial product which is available has
resulted in detriment or that a product which is about to be available is
likely to result in detriment to retail clients, it can make an order
specifying limitations on conduct relating to the product. The example that is
given (in a note to section 1023D of the bill) is that ASIC may order that the
product not be issued to a retail client unless they have received personal
advice. Such an order is not a legislative instrument.
1.37
ASIC can similarly make orders about classes of products. Such an order
is a legislative instrument.
1.38
Intervention orders cannot specify that a person must meet a standard of
training, or become a member of an external dispute resolution scheme. It
cannot specify a condition related to remuneration except as it is directly
related to the product at issue.
1.39
These limitations are because the intervention order has to relate to
conduct related to a consumer, and should not reach inside the firm.[14]
1.40
ASIC is required to consult with those likely to be affected before
making a product intervention order. This requirement can be met by ASIC's
publishing the proposed order on its website and inviting comment; and the
order is not invalidated by a failure to consult.
1.41
A product intervention order is in force for 18 months, but this can be
extended. The order can also be amended or revoked. However, if an order ceases
or is revoked, ASIC cannot remake the same order unless circumstances have
changed or the Minister approves in writing.
1.42
The person dealing in the product may be required to notify retail
clients whom they have dealt with in relation to the product of the order.
Penalties
1.43
Again, there are civil and criminal penalties and the possibility of
civil action to recover damages.
Date of effect
1.44
The amendments in Schedule 2 have effect from the day after the Act
receives Royal Assent.
Draft Regulations
1.45
On 23 October 2018, the Government released draft regulations to support
the bill. Among other things, they make clear that the design and distribution
obligations apply to basic banking products. They exclude defined benefit
superannuation schemes and eligible rollover funds. Comment on the draft regulations
is invited by 13 November 2018.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page