Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1
On 14 February 2019, the Senate referred the provisions of the Treasury
Laws Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Bill 2019 (TLA Bill) and the Excise Tariff
Amendment (Supporting Craft Brewers) Bill 2019 (Excise Tariff Bill) to the
Economics Legislation Committee (the committee) for inquiry and report by
26 March 2019.[1]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.2
The committee advertised the inquiry on its website and wrote to
relevant stakeholders and interested parties inviting written submissions. The
committee received one submission, which is listed at Appendix 1.
1.3
The committee thanks all stakeholders who assisted with the inquiry.
Overview of the bills
1.4
The TLA Bill contains four schedules. The Excise Tariff Bill contains
one schedule which is intended to operate in conjunction with the amendments
made by Schedule 2 to the TLA Bill.
1.5
For the remainder of this Chapter, references to 'the bill' relate to
amendments proposed in the TLA Bill, whereas references to 'the bills' relate
to amendments proposed in the Excise Tariff Bill in conjunction with those in
Schedule 2 of the
TLA Bill.
Self managed superannuation fund
membership limit (TLA Bill—Schedule 1)
1.6
The primary definition of a 'self managed superannuation fund' (SMSF) is
set out under section 17A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act
1993
(SIS Act). Under this definition, SMSFs are required to have 'fewer than
five members'. As such, the maximum number of allowable members in SMSFs is
currently four members.[2]
1.7
The SIS Act also contains provisions dealing with small superannuation
funds, including some provisions that are limited to small funds that are not
SMSFs. Small funds that are not SMSFs are regulated by the Australian
Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and are generally referred to as 'small
APRA funds'. The threshold for small APRA funds is set at the same level as the
member limit for SMSFs; that is, fewer than five members.[3]
1.8
As outlined in the Explanatory Memorandum (EM), provisions in income tax
and superannuation laws that apply to SMSFs refer directly to the 'self managed
superannuation fund' definition set out in the SIS Act. Provisions that apply
to small APRA funds generally mirror the approach taken in the SIS Act by
referring to funds that have fewer than five members and that are not SMSFs.[4]
1.9
Schedule 1 (Parts 1 and 2) to the bill seeks to amend the SIS Act, Income
Tax Assessment Act 1997 and Superannuation (Unclaimed Money and Lost
Members) Act 1999 to increase the maximum number of allowable members in SMSFs
from four to six (that is, fewer than seven members). To ensure continued
alignment with the increased maximum number of members for SMSFs, Schedule 1
also amends provisions in the above Acts that relate to SMSFs and small APRA
funds.[5]
1.10
Presently, where an SMSF has more than one director member, its accounts
and statements for each income year must be signed by at least two members in
their capacity as an individual trustee or as a director of a corporate
trustee.[6] For SMSFs with three or four members, this requirement means that, under the
current definition of a 'self managed superannuation fund', at least half of
the SMSFs members must sign its accounts.[7]
1.11
To ensure that these requirements continue to apply correctly following
the increase to the maximum number of allowable members in SMSFs from four to
six, Schedule 1 also seeks to amend the sign off requirements under the SIS Act
relating to the accounts and statements that must be prepared by the trustees
of an SMSF each income year. Under the updated requirements, for SMSFs with
between three and six directors or trustees, at least half of the members must
sign its accounts and statements for an income year.[8]
1.12
By allowing groups of five or six people to establish an SMSF, Schedule
1 is aimed at supporting greater consumer choice and underpins the government's
plan for ensuring all Australians get a fair go, especially in retirement. As
the Assistant Treasurer, the Hon. Stuart Robert MP, explained in his second
reading speech:
Self-managed superannuation funds are often used by families
as a vehicle for managing their own superannuation savings and investment
strategies. For families with more than four members, currently the only real
options are to create two self-managed superannuation funds (which would incur
extra costs) or place their superannuation in a large fund. This limits their
choice and flexibility.[9]
Contingent amendments
1.13
The EM notes that several bills currently before the Parliament also
contain amendments that introduce or amend provisions that refer to small
superannuation funds.[10] Schedule 1 (Part 3) to the bill includes amendments that are contingent upon
the passage of those other Bills.
1.14
These bills currently before the Parliament include the:
- Treasury Laws Amendment (Improving Accountability and Member
Outcomes in Superannuation Measures No. 1) Bill 2017;
- Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Superannuation Measures No. 1) Bill
2018; and
- Treasury Laws Amendment (Protecting Your Superannuation Package)
Bill 2018.
1.15
The amendments in Schedule 1 (Part 3) seek to ensure continued alignment
between the increased member threshold in the definition of a 'self managed
superannuation fund' and the proposed provisions in the above bills.[11]
Commencement
1.16
Schedule 1 (Parts 1 and 2) commence on the later of:
- 1 July 2019; and
- The first 1 January, 1 April, 1 July or 1 October to occur after
the day amendments receive Royal Assent.[12]
1.17
The contingent amendments in Schedule 1 (Part 3) commence immediately
after the later of the time that Parts 1 and 2 in Schedule 1 to the bill
commence and the time that the relevant schedule in the other bill commences. However,
each of the contingent amendments do not commence at all if the relevant schedule
to the other bill does not commence.[13]
Extending support for craft brewers
(TLA Bill—Schedule 2 and Excise Tariff Bill—Schedule 1)
1.18
Excise duty applies to beer that is manufactured in Australia and is
payable at the time of entry for home consumption. Concessional excise duty
rates currently apply to draught beer entered for home consumption in
containers (typically kegs) with a capacity of greater than 48 litres. Given
the size of containers presently required to qualify for the concession, this
concessional duty rate normally only applies to draught beer dispensed for sale
from commercial premises.[14]
1.19
Further, any beer that is entered for home consumption in individual containers
exceeding 48 litres and that is subsequently repackaged into containers with a
smaller capacity, is considered to have been subject to further manufacturing
and is therefore currently subject to non-concessional rates of excise duty.[15]
1.20
Schedule 2 to the TLA Bill and Schedule 1 of the Excise Tariff Bill (hereafter
referred to as 'the bills') seek to amend the Excise Act 1901 (Excise
Act) and the Excise Tariff Act 1921 (Excise Tariff Act) to extend
concessional excise duty rates to brewers that supply draught beer in kegs or
other containers that have a capacity of
8 litres or greater.[16]
1.21
The Assistant Treasurer outlined how the measure will support craft
brewers:
Extending the concessional draught beer excise rates to kegs
of eight litres or more will support craft brewers, which prefer to distribute
beer from smaller kegs. This measure levels the playing field between small and
large breweries.[17]
1.22
Under the proposed amendments, the concessional excise duty rates apply to
draught beer packaged in containers if the containers:
- are designed to be connected to a pressurised gas delivery
system, pump delivery system or other system prescribed by regulations; and
- have a capacity of between 8 litres and 48 litres (inclusive).[18]
1.23
The EM notes that the requirement that the containers must be designed
to connect to a pressurised gas or pump delivery system is an integrity rule to
ensure that concessional duty rates do not apply to containers primarily
targeted for sale to consumers for personal consumption. This integrity rule
also seeks to ensure that the support provided by this measure is targeted for
the draught beer produced by craft brewers in containers purpose built for
dispensing at licenced commercial premises.[19]
1.24
To ensure that a similar integrity rule applies to repackaged beer, the
bills also propose consequential amendments to the Excise Act. Under the
proposed amendments, non-concessional excise duty rates apply to the
repackaging of beer into individual containers:
- of less than 8 litres; or
- of at least 8 litres but not exceeding 48 litres and not designed
to be connected to a pressurised gas delivery system, pump delivery system or
other system prescribed by regulations.[20]
Commencement
1.25
The amendments to the Excise Act and Excise Tariff Act proposed by the
bills apply to goods entered for home consumption on or after 1 July 2019.[21]
Global Infrastructure Hub Ltd (TLA
Bill—Schedule 3)
1.26
The Global Infrastructure Hub Ltd (the Hub) was established by G20 Leaders
at the 2014 Brisbane Summit. It was initially given a four-year mandate to
December 2018 to advance international efforts to lift infrastructure
investment.[22]
1.27
The Hub is funded by contributions from the Australian Government and
other G20 members. To avoid these funding contributions being subject to income
tax, the Hub was granted tax exempt status under Division 50 of the ITAA 1997.
This exemption will expire on 1 July 2019.[23]
1.28
In July 2018, the G20 Finance Ministers agreed to extend the mandate of the Hub for an additional four years to December 2022.[24]
1.29
Schedule 3 to the bill amends Division 50 of ITAA 1997 to extend the
Hub's listing as an income tax exempt entity until 30 June 2023.[25]
Commencement
1.30
The amendments in Schedule 3 apply from the first 1 January, 1 April, 1
July or 1 October after the bill receives Royal Assent.[26]
Miscellaneous amendments (TLA
Bill—Schedule 4)
1.31
Schedule 4 to the bill seeks to make a number of miscellaneous
amendments to legislation in the Treasury portfolio. As summarised in the EM, these
amendments make minor technical changes to correct spelling errors, bring
provisions in line with drafting conventions and repeal inoperative provisions.
The schedule also makes minor technical amendments to remove administrative
inefficiencies and clarifies the law to ensure that it operates in accordance
with policy intent.[27]
1.32
Progression of such amendments is intended to give priority to the care
and maintenance of legislation in the Treasury Portfolio. The Assistant
Treasurer elaborated on this point in his second reading speech, noting that:
By clarifying the laws and repealing unnecessary provisions,
these amendments also reduce the regulatory burden and make it easier for
Australians to access current laws.[28]
Commencement
1.33
Schedule 4 contains four Parts, with the amendments under each Part commencing
as follows:
- Part 1—Amendments commencing on the day after Royal Assent;
- Part 2—Amendments commencing on the first 1 January, 1 April, 1
July or
1 October to occur after Royal Assent;
- Part 3—Amendments commencing 28 days after Royal Assent; and
- Part 4—Amendments commencing on 1 January 2019.[29]
Financial impact
1.34
The EM states that the amendments in Schedules 1 and 3 of the TLA Bill
are estimated to have no revenue impact; and the amendments in Schedule 4 a
negligible financial impact, over the forward estimates period.[30]
1.35
As at the 2018–19 Budget, the Alcohol Taxation—extending support for
craft brewers and distillers measure is estimated to have a cost to revenue
of $85 million over the forward estimates period.[31]
Table 1: Financial impact of the 2018–19 Budget measure Alcohol
Taxation—extending support for craft brewers and distillers[32]
2017–18
|
2018–19
|
2019–20
|
2020–21
|
2021–22
|
-
|
-
|
-$25m
|
-$30m
|
-$30m
|
Compatibility with Human Rights
1.36
As required under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011,
the government has assessed the bills' compatibility with the human rights and
freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in Section
3 of that Act. The government considers that the bills are compatible.[33]
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page