Chapter 2
Description and history of home warranty insurance schemes
Description of home warranty insurance schemes
2.1
Home warranty insurance[1]
covers the homeowner for non-completion and defects in building work.
2.2
Last resort insurance provides cover only if the builder is dead,
disappeared or insolvent. These events act as a 'trigger' for a claim to be
processed under the last resort system.
2.3
Last resort insurance, if triggered, provides for an insurer to cover
the homeowner for loss arising from completing the house or remedying any
defects in the previous building work. The value of insurance is capped at $200,000
in Victoria and $300,000 in NSW.[2]
2.4
Claims for non-completion are capped at 20 per cent of the
contract value in NSW and Victoria. The cap for non-completion reflects the
expectation that home owners will have made progress payments to the builder
according to normal practice in the building industry. If the builder does not
complete the work, it is assumed that the cost of completion will not be the
full value of the house.
2.5
A 'first resort' scheme provides similar cover, but without the
limitation that the builder must be dead, disappeared or insolvent.[3]
In this case, if a claim is proved the insurer arranges or pays for
rectification then seeks recovery from the builder.
2.6
In either case the builder buys the insurance, with the homeowner
named as beneficiary. This differentiates home warranty insurance from most
insurance products wherein consumers take out a particular amount of insurance
to protect their own assets. Home warranty insurance is a third party insurance,
similar to compulsory wholesale insurance taken out by employers on behalf of
employees for injury at work, or to compulsory insurance taken out by motorists
on behalf of others who may be injured in an accident. Thus it is not typical
of 'insurance' as understood by many consumers.
2.7
All states and territories have home warranty insurance. In all
except Queensland it is last resort. In all except Tasmania it is mandatory
(the insurance was made voluntary in Tasmania from 1 July 2008). In all except Queensland it is privately underwritten. The first resort scheme in Queensland
is operated by a government monopoly, the Queensland Building Services
Authority, which also carries out builders licensing and enforcement functions.
2.8
NSW and Victoria had first resort schemes similar to Queensland's.
They switched to private insurance after abandoning their monopoly government
models in 1996-97. They narrowed the coverage to last resort from 1 July 2002, as a response to the crisis in availability of insurance following the
collapse of HIH in March 2001. In other states and territories the insurance
has always been privately underwritten last resort. More details of the NSW,
Victorian and Queensland schemes are at paragraph 2.19 and following.
2.9
Five general insurers offer home warranty insurance. All
insurance is mediated by brokers. Further details of the states' schemes are in
appendix 3. In the ACT insurance is also offered by the Master Builders Fidelity
Fund. Being a discretionary mutual fund the MBFF is not prudentially regulated
by APRA, but is regulated under the ACT Building Act 2004, which
reflects APRA standards.[4]
Recent history[5]
2.10
The collapse of HIH Insurance in March 2001 created severe capacity
constraint in the market as the company at the time had between 30% and 40%
market share and in many cases offered the lowest premium. Immediately
following the HIH collapse a number of other insurers pulled out of the market
in part due to the withdrawal of reinsurance. As a result many (particularly
small to medium) builders found it difficult to obtain HBWI, and were not able
to retain their building licences.
2.11
On 13 March 2002, after consultation with the insurance industry,
the New South Wales and Victorian Governments jointly announced a '10 point
plan’ intended to stabilise the market for home warranty insurance (comments in
square brackets are from the 2002 Allen report mentioned further below):
New Model for Builders' Warranty insurance in NSW/Victoria
1. The threshold for compulsory home warranty insurance will be
raised to $12,000. [the same as for Western Australia and South Australia]
2. The minimum period of cover for structural defects will be 6
years. [from 7 years in NSW and 6½ years in Victoria previously]
3. The minimum period of cover for non-structural defects will
be 2 years. [no distinction between structural and non-structural defects
existed previously]
4. The mandatory requirement for builders of high-rise
residential buildings to provide builders warranty insurance will be removed.
Owners of high-rise dwellings will have access to a last resort catastrophe
fund which is to be funded by builders and insurers. [2002 note: NSW did not
proceed with this exemption, but instead agreed to underwrite private insurance
for this purpose]
5. The maximum cover (i.e. excluding legal costs) for
non-completion claims will be 20 per cent of the original building contract
amount. [bringing NSW in line with Victoria]
6A. A homeowner will be able to claim under a home warranty insurance
policy when their builder is dead, has disappeared, or is insolvent. [making
insurance a 'last resort' as exists in WA, SA and the ACT]
6B. Insurers and NSW and Victorian agencies will agree
procedures which will provide insurers with an opportunity to meet consumer
needs for settlement of a claim prior to the 6A trigger point being reached.
7. The minimum amount of cover will be $200,000 (inclusive of
legal and other costs). [putting Victoria on a par with NSW]
8. New South Wales and Victoria will use their best endeavours
to harmonise their builders' warranty insurance products and the specified
processes to be followed by all parties (insurers, builders and homeowners).
[2002 note: this resulted in both states adopting early intervention mechanisms
along the line of Qld and WA, although NSW stopped short of giving builder
licensing investigators powers to arbitrate disputes on site]
9. Insurers' liability in respect of claims above $10 million
arising from the death, disappearance or insolvency of any single builder will
be capped. The catastrophe fund referred to at 4 above will also be available
to meet claims liabilities in excess of $10 million.
10. New South Wales and Victoria will use their best endeavours
to harmonise the reporting requirements for insurers between the two states.[6]
2.12
NSW and Victoria changed their schemes accordingly from 1 July 2002.[7]
2.13
The Ministerial Council on Consumer Affairs in 2002 commissioned
a national review of home warranty insurance and consumer protection (the Allen
Inquiry). The review considered insurance as well as licensing, contracts,
dispute resolution and compliance. Its core recommendation was to 'put less
emphasis on insurance and give more attention to strengthening the regulatory
framework'. [8]
2.14
A 2005 inquiry into housing regulation in Victoria by the
Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission (VCEC) considered home warranty
insurance among other things. Its main conclusions on HWI were:
- the crisis in availability of insurance which occurred in 2001-02
had ended;
- the market for insurance was competitive and there was no sign of
insurers making excessive profits;
- insurers had responded to concerns that insurance eligibility
demands were preventing discouraging people from entering the industry;
- the number of registered builders showed little change in the
period 2000-2005;
- owner-builder trend data did not support claims of a major shift
to unregistered builders to avoid the insurance;
2.15
VCEC supported continuing privatised last resort insurance,
arguing that 'this [first resort/last resort] debate is almost academic,
because private insurers are unwilling to offer such "first resort"
cover'.[9]
It recommended some improvements: better information to consumers; a code of
conduct for insurers; and better dispute resolution services. [10]
2.16
An inquiry by a NSW Legislative Council Committee in 2006-07 was
concerned by evidence of poor consumer protection. It supported additional
measures to improve consumer information, promote early and fair dispute
resolution, and promote the accountability and transparency of the scheme.[11]
2.17
The Productivity Commission considered home warranty insurance in
its 2008 report Review of Australia's Consumer Policy
Framework. The Commission seemed to accept the argument of insurers that
'private capital would never be used to make a first resort HWI market'.
However it noted the large number of complaints made to the inquiry, and agreed
that consumer protection in home building could be better. It recommended enhancing
the effectiveness of early stage consumer protection measures such as better
linking of licensing to builder performance and better dispute resolution
procedures. The Productivity Commission recommended:
In examining how to improve 'last resort' home builders'
warranty insurance, the Senate Economics Committee should also consider how to
enhance the effectiveness of earlier stage consumer protection measures in the
home building sector, including through:
- providing for guaranteed access to effective
alternative dispute resolution across Australia; and
- better linking licensing schemes to actual builder
performance.[12]
2.18
In response to ongoing concerns Tasmania made its last resort scheme
voluntary from 1 July 2008. This is intended as part of a suite of changes
aimed at improving consumer protection in the home building sector. Other
elements of the new policy package include:
- a mandatory dispute resolution process, administered by Consumer
Affairs and Fair Trading (CAFT), open to both consumers and builders to
initiate;
- some mandated standard contract terms, in order to reduce the
likelihood of contractual disputes; and
- mandatory provision of information to consumers on the
protections available to them.[13]
Home warranty insurance in New South Wales[14]
2.19
Before 1997 NSW operated a government-sponsored first resort
scheme. The provision of insurance was privatised from 1 May 1997 following a recommendation of the 1993 Dodd inquiry into the then Building Services
Corporation. The Dodd report found that 'there was no reason for the Government
to continue in its monopoly of the insurance market and moreover its political
ownership leaves it vulnerable to pressures not faced by private insurance.'
2.20
On 1 April 2002 the threshold for insurance was increased to $12,000
(previously $5,000). From 1 July 2002, in response to problems of availability
of insurance following the collapse of HIH in March 2001, the scheme was
changed to provide for claims to be made only where the builder has died,
disappeared or become insolvent.
2.21
The 'Grellman' inquiry into the NSW scheme in 2003 did not
recommend any fundamental change to the privatised last resort model, but made
various suggestions for improvement.[15]
Some changes were made to the scheme from 1 September 2005 in response to Grellman's recommendations. For example the changes -
- established the home Warranty Insurance Scheme Board to monitor
the scheme and advise the minister;
- recognising that a builder may seek insurance from more than one provider,
authorised and required insurers to seek and provide relevant information among
themselves regarding builders;
- authorised the Commissioner for Fair Trading to exchange
information about builders with insurers;
- introduced claims handling guidelines which insurers must comply
with;
- introduced a rule of 'deemed acceptance' of a claim after 90 days
(previously the rule had been 'deemed refusal' after 45 days).[16]
2.22
On 30 December 2005 the Minister for Commerce signed an industry
deed with insurers setting out the manner in which the government has agreed to
exercise its powers under the Home Building Act 1989. The
insurers agreed to provide certain information, which is the basis of the
Office of Fair Trading's quarterly reports on the scheme since March 2007.
2.23
In a dispute situation where the builder is still in business
complainants can use the dispute resolution service of the Office of Fair
Trading, or take cases to the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT),
which was established in 2002. A building inspector may issue a rectification
order. Failure to comply with a rectification order is grounds for disciplinary
action against the builder. The consumer is advised to take the matter to the
CTTT using the rectification order as evidence. In 2005-06 the Home Building
Division of the CTTT received 4,003 applications, of which 76 per cent were
matters under $25,000.[17]
Home warranty insurance in Victoria
2.24
The privately underwritten Domestic Building Insurance Scheme was
introduced in May 1996, replacing the previous government scheme administered
by the Housing Guarantee Fund. On 1 July 2002 it moved to being a last resort
scheme, as agreed with NSW according to the 10 point plan (see paragraph 2.11).
2.25
Building Advice and Conciliation Victoria (BACV) was established
by the Victorian Government in 2002 as a one-stop shop for building disputes.
It provides free advice and conciliation services and is jointly delivered by
Consumer Affairs Victoria and the Building Commission. Eighty per cent of
disputes conciliated by BACV are successfully resolved. Disputes which cannot
be resolved by BACV can be taken to the Victorian Civil and Administrative
Tribunal (VCAT). The number of building matters initiated in VCAT has declined
from over 1000 in 200-01 to 824 in 2006-7.[18]
2.26
The Building Practitioners Board, a statutory authority, is
responsible for registering builders. It checks that applicants have the
appropriate qualifications and insurance. As in NSW, financial assessment of
builders is effectively delegated to insurers. The Board has disciplinary
powers to suspend or cancel a licence or impose penalties. [19]
2.27
The Victorian Government advised that it is currently reviewing
its builder registration and disciplinary framework with a view to better
protecting consumers against problem builders.[20]
2.28
Victoria has no reporting comparable to NSW's home warranty
insurance reports, but advised that it is currently working with the insurance
industry on ways to improve data collection about home warranty insurance. [21]
Home warranty insurance in Queensland[22]
2.29
Queensland has mandatory 'first resort' home warranty insurance -
a claim for non-completion or defects can be made even when the builder has not
died, disappeared, or become insolvent. The scheme was introduced in 1977. It
is administered by the Building Services Authority, which was established in
1991 to replace the Builders' Registration Board of Queensland, which dated
from 1972.
2.30
The BSA is not regulated by APRA, but voluntarily follows the
conditions APRA imposes on general insurers. Insurance cover (aside from the
'first resort' aspect) is similar to that in other states, but with some
differences:
- cover of $200,000 for non-completion, defects and subsidence
that occur before practical completion;
- $200,000 for defects and subsidence that occur after practical
completion;
- the maximum total cover is $400,000;
- these amounts include up to $5,000 for alternative accommodation,
removal and storage costs
2.31
The cover against subsidence is 'no-fault' providing the builder
has tested the ground according to the Australian Standard. As well, the scheme
covers consumers who are uninsured because of the builder's fraud.
2.32
The BSA is also responsible for builders' licensing and
disciplinary matters. Applicants must satisfy financial requirements, and are
monitored more or less closely according to their turnover level to assure
their financial stability. There is a system of demerits points leading to
possible loss of licence for infringements.[23]
2.33
The BSA has no specific legislative charter for dispute
resolution, but it argues that its power to require rectification of defective
work acts as an effective dispute resolution mechanism. Early intervention is
designed to prevent disputes from escalating. Consumers and builders may appeal
BSA decisions in the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal.[24]
Suggested changes
2.34
Opponents of present last resort schemes mostly suggested either
that the insurance should be made voluntary, or that the other states should adopt
a government-operated first resort scheme, as exists in Queensland and used to
exist in NSW and Victoria before the mid-1990s.
2.35
Insurers and regulators made various suggestions for improvement:
- better disclosure to the consumer about the nature of the
product;
- an additional trigger to allow an insurance claim, viz
cancellation of the builder's licence;
- a statutory contract condition that allows the consumer to
terminate the contract in the event of the builder's insolvency (in this case
the contract would not become an asset in the hands of the receiver);
- a 'guarantee of completion' - in a non-completion claim the
insurer would be obliged to arrange completion of the house, not merely to pay
out the beneficiary.
2.36
Other suggestions were made which relate more to minimising
disputes or improving the dispute resolution arrangements which may precede an
insurance claim or are the consumer's only recourse if the last resort
conditions are not met. They included:
- more diligent vetting of builders by the licensing authorities,
and more diligent action to de-license offending builders;
- better public information about builders' licensing record
(record of infringements etc);
- better certification of building works;
- clearer, perhaps mandatory, standards and tolerances, so that
there can be less dispute over whether work is a defect;
- cheaper and quicker dispute resolution in state fair trading
departments and tribunals.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page