Chapter 6
Models of regulation
6.1
The previous Chapter determined that a single national regulator
should be established for Not-For-Profit Organisations in Australia. This
chapter determines the functions of such a regulator, based on the functions of
established regulatory bodies for non-for-profit organisations in England and Wales
and New Zealand.
The Regulator for Charity in England and Wales
6.2
A large number of submitters to this Inquiry commended the Charity
Commission in England and Wales (also colloquially referred to as the UK
Charity Commission) to the committee as an example of a regulator which is
working well in a number of areas and could be modified for adoption in Australia:
The Charity Commission in the UK is the best practice model. It
has as its focus the sustainability of the whole sector. It is the face of the
nonprofit sector and focuses on more than disclosure regimes.[1]
CSA points to the UK Charity Commission as one possible model
for such a specialist regulator.[2]
Australian regulation does not differentiate between social
enterprises and charities, failing to address the differences in their
operations. FIA recommends the consideration of a model of regulation that
recognises the difference between charities and social enterprises similar to
the UK model.[3]
Mission Australia recommends the establishment of a national
body that would regulate the charity sector, with a structure similar to the
regulatory bodies established in the UK and New Zealand.[4]
6.3
The Charity Commission for England and Wales was established by
law as both a regulator and a registrar for Charities. The aim of the
Commission is 'to provide the best possible regulation of these charities in
order to increase charities’ efficiency and effectiveness and public confidence
and trust in them'.[5]
The Commission notes that it fulfils the role by:
-
securing compliance with charity law, and dealing with abuse and
poor practice;
-
enabling charities to work better within an effective legal,
accounting and governance framework, keeping pace with developments in society,
the economy and the law; and
-
promoting sound governance and accountability.[6]
6.4
To achieve these aims, the Commission works in four ways. These
include:
-
Using information and advice to influence behaviour – the
Commission is responsible for gathering information on charities individually
and collectively, and making this information public.
-
Equipping charities to work better – this is done through
providing guidance and advice, visiting charities, requiring the modernisation
of the constitutions of existing charities and by registration processes (which
may include recognising new charitable purposes).
-
Promoting legal compliance through publications and casework.
-
Intervention and enforcement – the Commission evaluates
complaints of mismanagement or misconduct or investigates other evidence of
possible causes for concern. The Commission has powers to intervene in
charities to protect charity assets, which can be used if formal investigation
establishes serious mismanagement or abuse.[7]
6.5
In undertaking its work, the Commission follow seven principles,
which include: accountability; independence; proportionality; fairness;
consistency; diversity and equality; and transparency.
Register of Charities
6.6
In its role as Registrar of Charities, the Commission is
responsible for maintaining a Register of Charities. The Register records
details of organisations that:
-
have been recognised as charitable in law;
-
hold most of their assets in England and/or Wales;
-
have all or the majority of their trustees normally resident in England
and/or Wales, or
-
are companies incorporated in England or Wales.[8]
6.7
The Register is maintained online and is a searchable register
that provides a range of key facts and figures about the work and finances of
each charity. It records details about who is responsible for running the
charity and records whether they have complied with their reporting and
accounting responsibilities. Larger entities with an income in excess of £500,000
must also include a financial profile. Information for the Register is
collected from Annual Returns provided by Charities.
[9]
6.8
The above was retrieved from the Register. The search term 'AIDS'
was used which revealed that the Regulator monitors 13 AIDS-related charities
in England and Wales. The register of the first entry on the list, A.I.D.S.
Trust Cymru, is pictured. Each entry shows the registered number of the
charity, its activities, where it operates, a financial history, a compliance
history and a financial summary, with additional links to view the accounts of
the organisation.
6.9
The Register also serves a purpose for those wishing to find out
more about a charity in England or Wales, potentially to donate or offer
volunteer services. For example, a person living in Bridgend who wished to
donate to a local HIV charity could use the Register to locate A.I.D.S. Trust
Cymru. It is likely that this function could be expanded to include all
Not-For-Profit Organisations should a similar register operate in Australia.
New Zealand Charities Commission
6.10
The New Zealand Charities Commission was established by the Charities
Act 2005 and commenced operation on 1 July 2005. The Commission is an
Autonomous Crown Entity, which is a body that has been established by, or
under, an Act and is independent of Government, but which must have regard to
government policy when directed by the responsible Minister.[10]
6.11
In announcing its intention to establish a charities commission,
the New Zealand Government indicated that:
One of the key drivers for the Commission's establishment is the
desire to uphold public trust and confidence in the charitable sector by
increasing its accountability to donors, the public and the Government.[11]
6.12
The Charities Act 2005, which was passed by the New
Zealand Parliament in April 2005, specifies the functions of the Commission,
which include:
-
promoting public trust and confidence in the charitable sector;
-
encouraging and promoting the effective use of charitable
resources;
-
educating and assisting charities in relation to matters of good
governance and management though, for example, providing information to
charities about their rights, duties and obligations under the Act, issuing
guidelines or recommendations, and issuing model rules;
-
establishing and maintaining a registration and monitoring system
for charitable organisations;
-
monitoring and promoting compliance with the Act;
-
stimulating and promoting research about the charitable sector;
and
-
reporting and making recommendations to Government about
charitable sector matters.[12]
Registration and Monitoring
6.13
One of the Commission's primary functions is the registration and
monitoring of charities. The Charities Register commenced registrations on 1 February 2007 and charities had until 1 July 2008 to register.
6.14
Registering with the Charities Commission is voluntary and has no
bearing on the legal status of a charitable organisation. For example,
registration with the Charities Commission does not replace incorporation under
the Incorporated Societies Act 1908. Incorporated societies must,
however, still register with the Charities Commission if they want to gain or
maintain tax exempt status.
6.15
A charity that chooses not to register with the Commission may
still call itself a charity and solicit funds from the public, however unregistered
charities do not qualify for tax exempt status. Such organisations are also not
entitled to refer to themselves as a 'registered charitable entity'.[13]
Monitoring
6.16
All charities registered with the Charities Commission are
required to file an annual return, along with a copy of their financial
accounts (audited or unaudited). The Annual Return Form collects information
about the:
-
sector and region in which the charity operates;
-
activities undertaken by the charity and who benefits from those
activities; and
-
people involved in the charity, including number of employees and
volunteers.
6.17
The return also requires financial information relating to income
and expenditure, assets and liabilities, and equity, broken down into a number
of categories, including: membership fees; donations; grants; salaries and
wages; and investments. In addition to the annual return, registered
organisations are required to notify the Commission of changes to a charity's
name, address for service, balance date, rules, purposes or officers, within
specified timeframes.
6.18
Financial penalties may be applied to charities that do not file
Annual Returns in a timely fashion, and to organisations that fail to notify
the Commission of changes to the organisation.
Costs
6.19
Registration is provided free of charge, however organisations
are required to pay a fee for filing their annual return. In July 2008 the fee
was $50 if the return was filed electronically online and $75 if the annual
return was filed in paper form. Organisations would also face compliance costs
in ensuring that annual returns were correctly completed and filed on time.
An Australian Model
6.20
In addition to the endorsements for existing registers, the
Committee heard numerous suggestions for the functions of an Australian
register:
Its primary role shall be that of an enforcement authority with
supportive advisory role.[14]
Such a body would:
− set the format for the way that information is
reported;
− monitor organisational compliance, and
− act when organisations fail to comply with the regime
(ie by failing to supply information, or by supplying inadequate information).[15]
[W]e believe such a body should take on more of an advisory role
providing assistance and a level of accreditation of such organisations. These
could involve:
-
setting parameters and guidelines for best practice;
-
approving exemptions from reporting requirements as referred
to above;
-
assisting in the establishment of training programs; and
-
promoting the principals of good corporate governance.[16]
An Australian body should have a role to support charities to
understand and comply with their obligations in the first instance, as well as
enforcing standards and investigating breaches and complaints where they occur.[17]
6.21
In considering the possible functions of a national regulator in Australia,
the committee examined the functions of the existing regulator for indigenous
corporations operating in Australia.
Office of the Registrar of
Indigenous Corporations – An Australian Case Study
6.22
The Registrar of Indigenous Corporations is an independent
statutory office holder who is responsible for the administration of the Corporations
(Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (CATSI Act).
The Registrar has 'powers to intervene that are similar to those exercised by
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)'.[18]
The role of ORIC is to support the Registrar.
6.23
ORIC is an agency of the Department of Families and Housing,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. It is responsible for regulating
approximately 2,600 Indigenous corporations, including charities and
Not-For-Profit Organisations.
6.24
The key functions of the Registrar and ORIC are to:
-
administer the CATSI Act and maintain the register of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander Corporations
-
regulate corporations which are registered under the CATSI Act
-
monitor the legislative compliance of corporations and assisting
corporations to maintain compliance
-
appoint special administrators when required
-
provide training for directors, members and key staff in good
corporate governance
-
advise individuals and groups on the registration process
-
register new corporations
-
assist corporations to transition from the ACA Act to the CATSI
Act
-
provide advice and information to corporations
-
assist with the resolution of disputes within and between
corporations.[19]
6.25
Like the Charity Commission in England and Wales, ORIC has a
enforcement function:
Under the CATSI Act the Registrar has the power to investigate
alleged corporate offences, to identify cases that are appropriate for referral
as a prosecution, and to refer these matters to the appropriate prosecution
agency. These investigation and referral powers enable the Registrar to respond
when alleged corporate offences come to light, further increasing the transparency
and security of Indigenous corporations for funding bodies and the broader
business sector.[20]
6.26
ORIC's system of regulation has not been comprehensively
evaluated to date. However, in its recent publication Overcoming Indigenous
Disadvantage: Key Indicators 2007, the Productivity Commission designated
ORIC's training program, and ORICs training partnership with the Victorian
state government and Swinburne University, as 'Things that work' in the field
of increasing governance capacity and skills.[21]
Committee View
6.27
The committee notes the aims, objectives and functions of the
national regulators in the UK and New Zealand. The committee is also aware that
neither system of regulation can be copied and implemented without change into Australia.
The two fundamental differences between an Australian regulator and the
overseas model are that:
-
Australia's Commission should regulate both charities and other
Not-For-Profit Organisations; and
-
All Not-For-Profit Organisations should be subject to the
regulator, regardless of size (appropriate disclosure regimes for organisations
based on size are discussed in Chapter 10).
6.28
However, the committee believes there is sufficient comparability
between the Australian and UK environment to propose certain functions of the Australian
national regulator. The committee has also had regard to the role of ORIC,
which is already operating successfully in Australia, in recommending the
following functions:
-
Develop and maintain a Register of all Not-For-Profit
Organisations in Australia. Once registered, the Commission should issue each
organisation with a unique identifying number or allow organisations with an ABN
to use that number as their Not-For-Profit identifier. This could be enabled
using existing ASIC website resources.
-
Undertake either an annual descriptive analysis of the
organisations that it regulates or provide the required information annually to
the ABS for collation and analysis. (Chapter 2 provides additional
justification for this function.)
-
Secure compliance with the relevant legislation.
-
Develop best practice standards for the operation of
Not-For-Profit Organisations.
-
Educate / Advise Not-For-Profit Organisations on best practice
standards.
-
Investigate complaints relating to the operations of the
organisations.
-
Educate the public about the role of Not-For-Profit
Organisations.
6.29
Under a single, national regulator, ORIC would cease to operate
as an entity. The new regulator would assume the responsibility of regulating
indigenous Not-For-Profit Organisations, allowing these organisations the same
access to the benefits that other Not-For-Profit Organisations are expected to
gain from the introduction of the national regulator (as identified in Chapters
7, 9 and 10).
6.30
The committee notes that requiring all Not-For-Profit
Organisations to register will have the added advantage of allowing for the
first time a comprehensive descriptive analysis of the Sector.
6.31
The committee also believes that the introduction of a single
national regulator will have extensive benefits for those operating
Not-For-Profit Organisations. It is anticipated that an Australian National
regulator would have an educative function, providing training courses, advice,
basic IT spreadsheet systems and help for those establishing Not-For-Profit Organisations
with a 'starter kit'. The regulator would also offer free help and advice for
organisations wishing to amalgamate with similar organisations.
6.32
The regulator would also assist organisations with sharing part
time staff, and providing details of pro bono lawyers and accountants if
required. This function would be especially helpful for Not-For-Profit
Organisations operating in rural and regional areas.
6.33
A national regulator would also give the general public a role in
monitoring the Sector. Any person could check that an organisation that fundraises
or doorknocks is a genuine, well regulated Not-For-Profit Organisation simply
by looking up that organisation on the Register. If an organisation does not
appear on the Register's website, indicating that it is not registered as
required, it could be reported to the regulator for further investigation and
possible prosecution.
6.34
To offset the cost of operations, larger Not-For-Profit
Organisations should pay a fee, as with the New Zealand Regulator. The committee
believes that micro Not-For-Profit Organisations should be exempt from this
fee. The payment of an annual fee may also serve as a reminder to organisations
with minimal reporting requirements under the regulator to ensure that their
details are current.
Recommendation 4
6.35
The committee recommends that the Australian National Regulator
for Not-For-Profit Organisations should have similar functions to regulators
overseas, and particularly in the UK, including a Register for Not-For-Profit
Organisations with a compulsory sign-up requirement. The committee recommends
consultation with the Sector to formulate the duties of the National Regulator.
6.36
As a minimum, the Regulator should:
-
Develop and maintain a Register of all Not-For-Profit
Organisations in Australia. Once registered, the Commission
should issue each organisation with a unique identifying number or allow
organisations with an ABN to use that number as their
Not-For-Profit identifier. This could be enabled using existing ASIC website
resources.
-
Develop and maintain an accessible, searchable public
interface.
-
Undertake either an annual descriptive analysis of the
organisations that it regulates or provide the required information annually to
the ABS for collation and analysis. (Chapter 2 provides additional
justification for this function.)
-
Secure compliance with the relevant legislation.
-
Develop best practice standards for the operation of
Not-For-Profit Organisations.
-
Educate / Advise Not-For-Profit Organisations on best
practice standards.
-
Investigate complaints relating to the operations of the
organisations.
-
Educate the public about the role of Not-For-Profit
Organisations.
6.37
The voluntary codes of conduct developed by ACFID and FIA
respectively should be considered by the Regulator when implementing its own
code of conduct.
Recommendation 5
6.38
The committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government develops
the legislation that will be required in order to establish a national
regulator for Australia.
Recommendation 6
6.39
The committee recommends that, once a Register is established and
populated, this information should be provided to the ABS, who should prepare
and publish a comprehensive study to provide government with a clearer
picture of the size and composition of the Third Sector.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page