Chapter 8 - Schedule 7 - Partial capital gains tax roll-over for statutory licences
Overview
8.1
Schedule 7 of the bill proposes to amend the Income Tax Assessment
Act 1997 to extend the existing statutory licence capital gains tax (CGT)
roll-over (under Subdivision 124-C) to provide for roll-over where one or more
new licences are issued in consequence of the ending of one or more licences
and to provide for a partial roll over. A partial roll-over would apply where
one or more statutory licences end and are replaced by one or more new licences
and the licensee also received non licence capital proceeds such as money.
Background and summary
8.2
The Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer announced this measure
on 8 June 2007. At that time, he explained that the amendments would have
particular application to the Achieving Sustainable Groundwater Entitlements
(ASGE) program. The ASGE program is a joint NSW and Australian Government
initiative to ensure the six major groundwater systems in NSW are sustainable
in the long term.[1]
The program aims to address groundwater over-allocation and over-extraction
through a number of measures, including replacing existing groundwater
licences. The program also includes a financial assistance package for affected
licence holders of up to $100 million. However, payments under the ASGE have
apparently been delayed for some time pending a range of matters, including clarification
of their taxation status.[2]
Indeed, the committee was told that to date, no cash payments have been made
under the ASGE, even though many old groundwater licences have been replaced
with new licences, often with lower entitlements.[3]
Intended benefits of changes
8.3
The amendments proposed by Schedule 7 would ensure that licence holders
who are also offered a cash payment under the ASGE program will obtain a
partial CGT roll-over where the access licence (and any other new licences)
replaces the original bore licence or licences.[4]
8.4
Although the amendments have particular application to the ASGE, they
also have broader application. For example, media reports have suggested that
they may also be relevant to the buy back of water licences under the $10
billion National Plan for Water Security.[5]
Issues
8.5
The committee received one submission on schedule 7 of the Bill. The NSW
Irrigators' Council (NSWIC) and the Gwydir Valley Irrigators Association (GVIA)
generally welcomed the amendments in Schedule 7, telling the committee that
they would 'rectify an anomaly' in the CGT treatment of payments under the
ASGE.[6]
8.6
The GVIA and NSWIC were satisfied that the amendments 'will result in an
equitable taxation treatment of licences and ex-gratia payments made under the
ASGE program'. They explained that, without these amendments, in some cases
individual CGT liability would exceed any ex-gratia payment received under the
ASGE.[7]
8.7
However, the GVIA and NSWIC raised a concern about the timing of the CGT
event C2.[8]
They told the committee that their advice — including informal discussions with
Treasury and the ATO — suggested that the CGT event C2 occurred on the day the
old licences were extinguished and the new licences were issued. They pointed out
that, in the case of the ASGE, the extinguishment of licences has occurred on different
dates in different groundwater systems:
...five of the six valleys had their licences extinguished in the
last financial year but the licences for the Lachlan Valley have not yet been
extinguished and, again, they are probably either weeks or months away from
being extinguished and the new ones issued.[9]
8.8
The GVIA and NSWIC explained that this meant that licence holders in the
Lachlan Valley would qualify for enhanced CGT Small Business Concessions,
which commenced on 1 July 2007.[10]
8.9
The GVIA and NSWIC therefore suggested that Schedule 7 be amended to
deem that the CGT event C2 occurs at the time the licence holder receives and
accepts the letter of offer from the NSW Government (rather than the day the
old licences were extinguished and the new licences issued).[11]
They argued that:
Without this you will see an inequity in the ASGE programme with
entitlement holders in the Lower Lachlan being able to avail themselves of the
enhanced CGT Small Business Concessions, while entitlement holders in the other
groundwater sources will be denied this opportunity, yet both groups will
become entitled to the payments in the same financial year.[12]
8.10
In response, Treasury explained that the taxing point for CGT is when
there is a change of ownership of the particular CGT asset. In the case of the
groundwater licences at issue, this meant the time that old groundwater
licences were extinguished and new licences issued. Treasury acknowledged that
this would mean that:
Irrigators in the lower Lachlan may be able to access the
enhanced CGT small business concessions, which apply from the 2007-08 income
year... that difference in treatment arises from the timing of the ending of
their bore licences...The fact that they were offered their cash payment in the
same year as those whose licences ended in late 2006 does not change the timing
of the CGT event that led to the cash payment.[13]
8.11
Treasury told the committee that:
If the legislation were amended in accordance with the wishes of
the irrigators council, it would create a precedent for taxpayers in similar
circumstances to seek a change in the timing of the CGT event so that they too
could benefit where more generous tax arrangements were not available at the
time that the event occurred. More generally, amending the legislation would
not only represent a change in the timing of the CGT event C2 but also bring
into question the timing of CGT events more generally. A more general change in
the timing of the CGT events would be complex to legislate and difficult to
comply with and administer...[14]
Committee view
8.12
The committee welcomes the amendments proposed by Schedule 7 and hopes
that their passage will mean payments under the ASGE program can be made
without further delay. The committee notes the issue and suggested amendment raised
by the GVIA and NSWIC in relation to the timing of the CGT event. However, the
committee acknowledges Treasury's response that to amend Schedule 7 as
suggested would create a problematic precedent.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page