Chapter 1 - Introduction
Background
1.1
On 11 May 2006,
the following suite of bills was introduced into the House of Representatives:
- Customs
Amendment (Fuel Tax Reform and Other Measures) Bill 2006
- Customs
Tariff Amendment (Fuel Tax Reform and Other Measures) Bill 2006
- Excise
Laws Amendment (Fuel Tax Reform and Other Measures) Bill 2006
- Excise
Tariff Amendment (Fuel Tax Reform Other Measures) Bill 2006.
Reference of the bills
1.2
Upon their introduction into the House of
Representatives, the bills were referred to the Senate Economics Legislation
Committee for inquiry and report by 9
June 2006. The reference limited the Committee's inquiry to
reviewing the alcohol taxation measures contained in the bills with respect to
their likely consumer, social and economic effects and their effect on
industry. The Committee tabled an interim report on the bills out of session on
9 June 2006.
Purpose of the bills
1.3
As the Committee's inquiry was limited to the alcohol
measures contained in the bills, this report does not go into the other
measures or wider purpose of the bills.[1]
Suffice it to say, the bills largely simplify and streamline existing
regulations governing a range of excisable goods.
1.4
With regard to alcohol products, the bills propose the
following:
- A streamlined provision will enable rules to be
determined for measuring the volume, weight or alcoholic strength of an
excisable good.
- To protect the revenue, bottling of duty-paid
bulk beer is considered to be excise manufacture to prevent lower excise
liability applying.
- Streamlining the concessional spirits scheme to
reduce the administrative burden on users and protect the revenue where
concessional spirits are unable to be satisfactorily accounted for.
- Redefining mead, grape wine and wine to conform
with their definitions in the A New Tax
System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999.
- Maintaining brandy at a lower excise duty rate
than that applied to other excisable spirit beverages, and defining brandy as a
spirit that has been distilled from grape wine and smells like, and possesses
the other characteristics of, brandy (as distinct from so-called fruit
brandies, which do not attract the lower excise duty).
- Upon approval, spirits may be used to fortify
Australian wine or Australian grape must and will attract a free rate of duty,
subject to any conditions imposed in the grant of approval.
- Continuing maturation provisions that brandy,
whisky or rum must have 'been matured by storage in wood for a period of not
less than two years'.
- Incorporating the provisions from the repealed
Spirits Act that make it an offence to misuse the terms 'old' or 'very old' for
any spirit unless it has been aged in wood for periods of at least five and ten
years respectively.
The inquiry
1.5
Although the inquiry was directed to the alcohol
related measures contained in the bills, much of the evidence addressed the
wider issue of alcohol tax policy reform. The measures contained in the bills
were seen as largely technical and uncontroversial refinements and accepted as
improvements to the regulatory framework governing the alcohol industry and its
various sectors. Consequently, the Committee's inquiry and report is largely a
discussion of proposals for reforming elements of alcohol taxation policy.
Submissions
1.6
The committee advertised its inquiry in The
Australian on 16 and 24 May 2006.
In addition, the committee contacted a number of individuals and organisations
in writing alerting them to the inquiry and inviting them to make a submission.
A list of submissions received appears at Appendix 1. A list of other evidence
received appears at Appendix 2.
Hearing and evidence
1.7
The committee held a public hearing at Parliament
House, Canberra on 5 and 6 June 2006. Witnesses who appeared
before the committee at the hearing are listed at Appendix 3. Copies of the Hansard transcript from the
hearing are tabled for the information of the Senate. It can be accessed on the
internet at http://aph.gov.au/hansard.
Acknowledgements
1.8
The committee
wishes to thank all those who assisted with its inquiry.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page