Introduction
Establishment of the inquiry
1.
The price of public liability insurance premiums
has been a matter of ongoing debate over recent years. Every so often, a media
report would comment on the growing tendency in Australia to litigate, or a substantial award for an injury would spark
public discussion. Occasionally, the perceived trend in litigation would be
held to ‘witness a rising tide of civil suits’ with Australia compared to the US.[1] Warning signs of trouble in
public liability insurance were also registering elsewhere.
2.
In November 2000, the NSW Report of the Public
Bodies Review Committee found that:
There appears to be clear evidence that the number and cost of
claims against councils are increasing. Further, all predictions are that the
insurance market is ‘hardening’ and councils will be forced to pay much more
for their insurance in the foreseeable future.[2]
3.
This observation was borne out during the
following year not only in relation to local councils but across a range of
activities. During 2001, a greater sense of urgency crept into the reporting on
public liability with suggestions that some councils may decide not to have
playgrounds, or that local shows would close because of high public liability
insurance costs.
4.
As the year progressed, the implications of the
collapse of HIH, a major Australian insurance company, became clearer and
concerns about insurance premiums heightened.[3]
In April 2001, the media reported premium rises of up to 40 per cent for
replacement cover for professional indemnity and public liability insurance.[4] By May 2001, reports suggested
that professionals such as lawyers, engineers and architects faced increased
premiums for professional indemnity.[5]
During the following months stories appeared in the press of huge increases in
premiums that threatened small business, community and sporting groups and
adventure tourism.[6]
There were accounts of the cancellation of public events such as festivals.
With the terrorist attack in New York on 11 September came speculation that the Australian domestic
market would suffer from an expected increase in reinsurance rates.[7] By year’s end the situation
appeared to worsen with media accounts of ‘staggering’ increases in public
liability insurance premiums.[8]
5.
As problems began to emerge in the public
liability and professional indemnity area, the situation with medical
indemnity, in particular, deepened during 2001 with fears that some doctors,
notably those practicing obstetrics, were contemplating resigning their
positions because of the escalating costs of insurance.[9] By December 2001, the situation
had so deteriorated that the Prime Minister, Mr John Howard, announced plans for a medical
indemnity summit in early 2002.
6.
The upheaval in the area of medical indemnity
was felt even stronger when serious concerns were raised in February 2002 about
the viability of Australia’s
major medical defence organisation, United Medical Protection.
7.
On 3 February 2002, the Minister for Revenue and the Assistant Treasurer, Senator the Hon Helen Coonan, offered to
host a meeting ‘to coordinate the exchange of information about the
affordability and accessibility of public liability insurance among relevant
Ministers’. The meeting was to be held on 27 March 2002.[10]
8.
The issue of insurance premiums, however,
remained at the forefront of public attention particularly in March with the
prospect that some ANZAC Day marches would be cancelled because of high
premiums.[11]
9.
It is against this background of mounting
community and business concern about the availability of appropriate insurance
cover at an affordable price that the Senate resolved to have the matter
examined.
10.
On 20 March 2002, the Senate referred the
following matter to the Senate Economics References Committee for inquiry and
report:
- the impact of public liability insurance
for small business and community and sporting organisations; and
- the impact of
professional indemnity insurance, including Directors and Officers Insurance,
for small business;
with particular reference to:
- the cost of such
insurance;
- reasons for the
increase in premiums for such insurance; and
- schemes,
arrangements or reforms that can reduce the cost of such insurance and/or better calculate and pool risk.
Conduct of the inquiry
11.
The Committee advertised the inquiry in the Financial
Review on 5 April and in the Weekend Australian on 6 April 2002, calling for written submissions to
be lodged with the Committee by 13 May. The Committee also wrote to relevant
Commonwealth Government Ministers, state Premiers and territory Chief Ministers
drawing attention to the inquiry and inviting submissions. In addition, the
Committee notified various academics, organisations and people interested in
matters dealing with public liability and professional indemnity insurance
about the inquiry.
12.
The terms of reference and other information
about the inquiry were also
advertised on the Committee’s internet homepage at
https://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/
13.
A total of 166 submissions was received. A list
of submissions is contained in Appendix 1. All but five of the written
submissions were made public documents.
14.
Apart from the material contained in written
submissions and in oral evidence presented to it, the Committee drew on a range
of information contained in reports and reviews from various committees of
inquiry, and from comments and articles by people directly involved with public
liability and professional indemnity matters.
15.
After initial consideration of the submissions,
the Committee began public hearings on 8 and 9 July in Canberra. These hearing
were followed by further hearings in Melbourne and Sydney. Details of the
hearings and the witnesses who appeared at them are contained in Appendix 2.
The Hansard transcript of evidence taken at the hearings was made available on
the internet.
16.
The Committee continues to receive submissions
and supplementary submissions. These later submissions have generally
reinforced the evidence already received by the Committee and indicate that for
many the problems caused by high premiums still remain.
Complementary reviews
17.
The Committee is aware of the number of separate
reviews and inquiries now taking place into public liability insurance. These
include a panel of experts chaired by the Hon. Justice David Ipp, which has
recently reported on the law of negligence; the ACCC’s brief to monitor and
report on premium costs; and the Productivity Commission’s study into claims
management. The Committee accepts that much of their work will traverse and in
some cases examine at greater depth specific matters that are dealt with in
this report. Nonetheless, the Committee feels strongly that it has a
responsibility to ensure that the voice of the broader Australian community is
heard on this matter. The inquiry has taken evidence from business people,
community and volunteer workers, and representatives from a wide range of
professions. They have been able to make known their views, experiences and
concerns and to put forward their solutions for the Committee’s consideration.
This inquiry has certainly facilitated open public debate. Also, rather than
focus on specific aspects, the inquiry provides an overview of key issues.
18.
The Committee also appreciates that the states
and territories and the Commonwealth Government are taking steps to address the
problems. Some of their measures are being introduced in stages. The Committee
is in a position to look at these developments but cannot assess their
effectiveness at this early stage other than to place them in the broader
context of reforms that are taking place across the nation. It can comment on
the complementarity of reform between the states and between the states and the
Commonwealth.
Structure of the report
19.
The report reflects on recent developments in
public liability and professional indemnity insurance that have given rise to
the present problems. It also assesses the direction being taken by the various
jurisdictions and the insurance industry in meeting the challenge caused by
rising premiums and the difficulties being experienced in obtaining adequate
cover.
20.
This report is divided into the following three
broad parts:
- A general introduction that describes the current situation in
the public liability and professional indemnity insurance industry in Australia
and its implications for Australian society and the business community. This
includes a summary of recent developments in the overarching global and
domestic insurance industry and the implications for the Australian insurance
market.
- An analysis of the underlying causes of the current problems and
an appreciation of the measures being taken to address them. This part is
further divided into sections that deal with the rise in the number of claims
and the increase in the amount of awards or settlements.
- An examination of the regulatory framework in which the insurance
industry operates which includes an assessment of the data currently available
on the industry. This part also considers the role of APRA, the ACCC and ASIC
as regulatory bodies concerned with various aspects of the insurance industry
and the adequacy of consumer protection.
Acknowledgments
21.
The Committee wishes to express its appreciation
to everyone who contributed to the inquiry by making submissions, providing
other information or appearing before the Committee at public hearings.
Part I
The current situation in the
public liability and professional indemnity insurance industry in Australia
This section of the report provides a general introduction
that describes the current situation in the public liability and professional
indemnity insurance industry in Australia and its implications for the business
and the wider Australian community. It provides a wide representation of views
from the medical profession, accountants, financial advisers, surveyors,
engineers, retailers, community, sporting and volunteer groups, and local
councils.
It also includes a summary of recent developments in the
overarching global and domestic insurance industry and the implications for the
Australian insurance market.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page