1.1
Corruption in any form has no place in Australian society. Time and time
again we have seen politicians representing corporate interests over the
interests of the public. We have seen revelations of misuse of political
entitlements and we have seen evidence of systemic exploitation of workers
amongst some of Australia’s major employers. The Fair Work Amendment
(Corrupting Benefits) Bill 2017 will do nothing to prevent this from
continuing.
1.2
As pointed out in the Electrical Trades Union’s (ETU) submission, ‘while
the Turnbull government tries to establish an agency whose purpose is to attack
and weaken its political opponents, the government itself is providing the
strongest case for the establishment of a national anti-corruption agency
through the recent scandals of the former Minister for Human Services and the
former Victorian Liberal Party Director.’[1]
1.3
The lack of consultation with key stakeholders is worrying. In their
submission, the ETU stated: ‘Any serious attempts to improve governance should
include all stakeholders, unions, business representatives groups, the
government, the opposition and the crossbench, in that way ensuring a genuine
set of improvements and to avoid any ideological bias.’[2]
1.4
The process for such changes to industrial relations laws can reasonably
be expected to be submitted to the National Workplace Relations Consultative
Council. However, as pointed out by the Australian Council of Trade Unions
(ACTU): ‘As a minimum the Bill should have been submitted to the Committee on
Industrial Legislation (a subcommittee of the National Workplace Relations
Consultative Council). This bill was, inexplicably, never submitted to the committee.’[3]
1.5
The unprecedented placing of criminal offences in the Fair Work Act
2009 is concerning. Existing bribery offences relating to Commonwealth
officials are already contained in the Criminal Code Act 1958 and as the
ACTU pointed out in their submission; ‘bribery offences relating to
Commonwealth and Foreign Officials are found in the Criminal Code Act 1995.
That Act is the appropriate legislative vehicle for bribery offences.’[4]
1.6
It is clear that anti-corruption measures at a federal level are
inadequate. The Federal government is now the only jurisdiction without the infrastructure
to confront corruption. A serious approach to tackling corruption in Australian
must include the establishment of a federal, broad-based anti-corruption
watchdog. A National Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) would
oversee anticorruption at a federal level, preventing corruption occurring and
investigating claims as they arise.
1.7
As pointed out in the ETU’s submission: ‘At the May 2015 ACTU Congress
the entire union movement unanimously supported the establishment of an
independent national corruption watch dog to ensure that all Australian
institutions, government, corporate, financial, sporting and large membership
based were able to be corruption free.’[5]
Recommendation 1
1.8
The government establish a permanent National ICAC that has federal
jurisdiction to prevent corruption occurring and investigate claims as they
arise.
Recommendation 2
1.9
The bill should not be passed.
Senator Lee Rhiannon
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page