CHAPTER 1

Value-adding in Agricultural Production

CHAPTER 1

BACKGROUND: SETTING THE SCENE

Introduction to Part 1

1.1 The report consists of seven chapters divided into three parts. Part 1 consists of Chapters 1 and 2, Part 2 contains Chapters 3, 4 and 5 with Part 3 composed of Chapters 6 and 7. Chapter 1 of Part 1 is largely an introduction to the issue of value-adding in agricultural production with Chapter 2 providing an examination of several significant industries involved in value-adding activities in Australia.

1.2 This chapter defines the concept of value-adding in relation to agricultural production and sets out the importance of value-adding to the national economy. By providing information on the structure of Australia's agricultural industry and its performance in comparison with the manufacturing sector it is intended to provide the reader with an appreciation of the context in which value-adding takes place.

1.3 A number of issues are introduced in this chapter that are dealt with in greater detail in later chapters in relation to specific sectors of Australia's agricultural industry. These issues include: research and development, Australia's competitiveness in adding value to its agricultural production and Australia's exports of value-added products.

1.4 The content of the chapter has been set out under the following major headings:

Definitions of value-adding

1.5 There are a wide variety of definitions of value-adding. These definitions can be simple or quite complex. In very simplistic terms value-adding can be defined as an activity that gives a product or commodity a higher value in the market place than would be the situation if no value-adding activity had taken place. [1] The Victorian Government, in its submission to the inquiry, stated that value-adding means any process or stage of production that increases the value of a raw material. [2] The then Minister for Primary Industries and Energy, the Hon Simon Crean, in March 1992 provided a broad definition of value-adding when he stated that value-adding can be defined as all the processes involved in making a product more attractive to customers. [3]

1.6 According to Mr Peter McKerrow methods, other than production and processing, for example better transport, storage, presentation, marketing and promotion can add value to agricultural commodities. [4] Mr McKerrow stated that:

1.7 Mr McKerrow went on to advise that on occasion this definition is extended to include any activity that increases the value of the product, for example changing the form of an export, such as exporting live lobsters instead of canned or frozen lobsters. [6]Often for statistical purposes processed or manufactured products, involving some level of value-adding, have been divided, depending on the degree of processing or manufacturing involved, into:

1.9 There are considerably more complex definitions of value-adding than those outlined above. For example, value-adding's established meaning in economics, according to Dr Alistair Watson, an agricultural economist, quoting G. Stoneham and J. Hider, is "the measure of the surplus to capital, labour and land after other costs have been deducted." [8]

1.10 In this report the Committee adopted a broad definition of the term value-adding. The term has been applied to all processes involved in giving a product or commodity increased value to a consumer compared to a situation where no value-adding activity had taken place. The Committee accepts the view of the Department of Primary Industries and Energy (DPIE) that the concept of value-adding:

1.11 In formulating its definition the Committee has noted comments made by the Australian Meat and Livestock Corporation (AMLC) calling for a distinction to be made between “further processing” and value-adding. The Corporation told the Committee, “the two terms are quite distinct and should not, we believe, be used interchangeably.” [10]

1.12 In addition to farm based production the term rural production includes activities such as fishing, aquaculture, forestry and hunting. However, the Committee has chosen to interpret the term “value-adding in agricultural production” in its terms of reference as referring to farm based value-adding production. Therefore value adding activities in the fishing, forestry, aquaculture and hunting industries have not been examined in this report.

Footnotes

[1] Evidence, International Wool Secretariat, p. 141; see also South Australian Development Council, Value-Added Food Processing in South Australia, Draft 24 May 1995, p. 3.

[2] Evidence, Victorian Government, p. 26; see also Evidence, South Australian Government, p. 544, and Evidence, Tasmanian Government, p. 782.

[3] Simon Cream, Value-adding in Agriculture: A Government Perspective, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 25.

[4] James Walcott and David Adams, Bred-in Added -value, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 34: see also Submission, Queensland Fruit and Vegetable Growers, p. 1.

[5] Peter McKerrow, Value-Adding to Agriculture, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 27.

[6] Peter McKerrow, Value-Adding to Agriculture, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 27.

[7] Peter McKerrow, Value-Adding to Agriculture, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 27.

[8] Dr Alistair Watson, Further Processing of Agricultural Productions in Australia: Some Economic Issues, Research Paper Number 5, 14 December, 1993, Parliamentary Research Service , Department of the Parliamentary Library, p. 2. For more technical and complex definitions of value-adding see ibid, pp. 2-4; James Walcott and David Adams, Bred-in Added -value, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 34 and Peter McKerrow, Value-Adding to Agriculture, Agricultural Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1992, p. 27.

[9] Evidence, DPIE, p. 881. For a very broad definition of value-adding which includes the building of relationships see Evidence, AWB, p. 85.

[10] Evidence, AMLC, p. 324.