Chapter 2 - Role of the Commonwealth and state/territory governments
2.1
This chapter provides a brief overview of the role of
the Commonwealth Government and State and Territory Governments in the
Australian health system. It provides details of cancer initiatives and
strategies being undertaken by the Commonwealth, Cancer Institute New
South Wales, the Victorian Department of Human
Services and the Department of Health Western Australia.
The chapter outlines the national framework within which issues raised during
the Inquiry that affect government in relation to the delivery of cancer
services, and which are discussed in the following chapters, are addressed.
The Australian Health Care System
2.2
The Australian health care system is complex with
multiple levels of government and shared responsibility for health care.
Overview of health system funding
2.3
Australia’s
health system is financed by a mix of public and private funding arrangements.
In 2002-03 a total of $72.2b, or 9.5 per cent of Gross Domestic Product, was spent
on health. Of this:
- Public or government funding accounted for $49b,
or 67.9 per cent;
- Commonwealth Government - $33.4b (46.2 per cent);
- State and Territory Governments - $15.6b (21.6
per cent); and
- Private sector financing was $23.2b, or 32.1 per
cent.
Roles and responsibilities
2.4
The World Health Organisation has identified four key
functions of health systems: resource generation; financing; service provision;
and stewardship. These four functions underlie the organisation of the
Australian health system, where both public and private sectors fund and
provide health care and all levels of government are involved.
Commonwealth government
2.5
The Commonwealth government takes a leading role in the
provision of universal and affordable access to medical, pharmaceutical and
hospital services.
2.6
Through Medicare, the Commonwealth subsidises access to
primary care providers, including medical practitioners, and to a range of
specialist and diagnostic services. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme provides
subsidised access to pharmaceuticals. The Commonwealth also contributes funding
to public hospitals through the Australian Health Care Agreements. The Commonwealth
government’s main role in the provision of care for older people includes
financing and regulating residential aged care and community care. In addition
to these roles, the Commonwealth provides leadership in broader social policy
issues concerning an ageing population as well as the general population,
including promoting the health, independence and wellbeing of all Australians.
2.7
The Commonwealth also takes a leadership role in areas
of national policy significance, including protecting the overall health and
safety of the population, improving access to health services for the
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, guiding national research and
evaluation, trialling innovative service delivery approaches and coordinating
information management. In addition, the Commonwealth has various regulatory
responsibilities carried out by bodies such as the Therapeutic Goods Administration
and Food Standards Australia New Zealand.
State and Territory and local
governments
2.8
States and Territories have primary responsibility
under the constitution for the provision of health services, including most
acute and psychiatric hospital services.
2.9
The State and Territory governments are the main
providers of publicly provided health goods and services in Australia.
They provide public hospital infrastructure and services, including in
emergency department and outpatient settings, and are the major providers of community
based health programs. Allied health services have traditionally been a State
government responsibility and continue to be so, either through the public
hospital system, or through State funded community health services. State and Territory
governments also have primary responsibility for the provision of population
health programs.
2.10
The local government sector also delivers health
programs, often contributing a portion of funds through cash or ‘in-kind’ contributions.
Private Sector
2.11
Within the Australian health system, the private sector
delivers a significant proportion of primary, specialist and allied health care
through general practitioners, specialists, pharmacists, physiotherapists,
dentists and the like. Access by individuals to private providers is often
subsidised through Medicare or through private health insurance.
2.12
The private sector plays an important role in providing
the infrastructure and health providers required to meet the increasing demand
for health services. The private sector operates private hospitals and, through
health funds, offers private health insurance.
Non-government sector
2.13
Non-government bodies play an important role within the
Australian health care system in research, education, and programs for
prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment and associated policy. Of
particular importance are the consumer and support groups, community
organisations, professional bodies and educational institutions that provide a
range of services alleviating the burden on the government sector.
Joint government policy forums
2.14
The different roles and responsibilities of the various
levels of government have made it essential that there be ongoing cooperation between
jurisdictions in the interests of the health and wellbeing of all Australians.
2.15
The Australian Health Ministers Conference and the
Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council are the key coordinating bodies
comprising Ministers and officials from the Commonwealth and State and Territory
governments with responsibility for health matters. The Australian Health
Ministers Conference provides a forum for governments to discuss matters of
mutual interest concerning health policy, health services and programs and aims
to promote a consistent and coordinated national approach to health policy development
and implementation. The Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council advises
the Australian Health Ministers Conference on strategic issues relating to the
coordination of health services across the nation and operates as a national
forum for planning, information sharing and innovation.
2.16
The Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council has
established two groups to look at planning and reform issues in the areas of
workforce and health reform.
Medical workforce
2.17
The Commonwealth undertakes to ensure that there is an
adequate number of health professionals to meet population need now and into
the future; that the health workforce is appropriately distributed to meet that
need; and that suitable education and training arrangements are put in place
for the health workforce. The health care workforce is a shared issue between
the Commonwealth and the States and Territories.
2.18
The Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee (AMWAC)
is an independent body set up at a national level in 1996 to promote strategic
workforce planning and to provide advice on national medical workforce matters.
In 2000, the Australian Health Workforce Advisory Committee (AHWAC) was founded
to oversee wider workforce planning needs such as the nursing, midwifery and
allied health workforces. Commonwealth and State and Territory health workforce
policies are coordinated through these mechanisms.
Health Reform Agenda Working Group
2.19
The health system needs to be responsive to the changing
needs of the population and the way that health services can be delivered. For
a number of years, Health Ministers have recognised the need for substantial
reform in the health system and have sought to progress reform through more
effective use of available resources. In the 12 months before the end of the
1998-2003 Australian Health Care Agreements, Health Ministers agreed to pursue
a substantive and cooperative reform agenda and appointed the Health Reform
Agenda Working Group to manage this work.
2.20
One of the identified areas of reform was cancer care. A
cancer funding reform project has subsequently been established under the
auspices of the Health Reform Agenda Working Group to make recommendations,
based on available evidence, about specific alternative funding arrangements
and implementation options to improve access to coordinated, best practice
cancer care. This project is being managed by a multi-jurisdictional group (led
by the ACT Health).[39]
Coordination of cancer activities
2.21
Specific national bodies have been established by the Australian
Health Ministers Advisory Council to coordinate information, advice and program
implementation including the National Health Priority Action Council, which
aims to drive improvements in National Health Priority Areas.
2.22
The National Health Priority Area conditions include cancer,
diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular disease and stroke, and arthritis and
musculoskeletal conditions. The National Health Priority Action Council
comprises representatives from each jurisdiction, as well as a consumer
representative and an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representative.
2.23
Cancer became a National Health Priority Area condition
in 1996. The Commonwealth and State and Territory governments work together on
cancer through this National Health Priority Area initiative. Eight priority
cancers have been identified by all jurisdictions where significant health
gains may be made through prevention, early detection and evidence-based
management. These are breast cancer, cervical cancer, bowel cancer, lung
cancer, melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, non-melanocytic skin cancer and
prostate cancer.[40]
Expenditure on cancer
2.24
The recent AIHW Report, Health system expenditures on cancer and other neoplasms in Australia,
2000–01, emphasises the massive expenditure on cancer by providing a
systematic analysis of Australian health expenditure in 2001 to treat or
prevent cancer and other neoplasms (an abnormal and uncontrolled growth of
tissue; a tumour), and to care for those with neoplastic disease. The report
shows that expenditure on cancer and other neoplasms in Australia
in 2000-01 was $2.9billion. This is 5.8 per cent of the total health
expenditure allocated by disease.
2.25
The expenditures for cancer and other neoplasms
attributed to the seven health sectors were as follows:
- Hospitals - $1,988m;
- Out-of-hospital medical services - $343m;
- Research - $215m;
- Total pharmaceuticals - $183m;
-
Aged care homes - $37m;
- Dental and other professional services - $24m;
and
- Public health programs (non-Medicare Benefits
Schedule) - $130m.
2.26
Total expenditure for cancer (malignant neoplasms) was
$2.15b, for public health programs $130m, and for other neoplasms $634m, giving
a total of $2.9b. Expenditure on treatment for cancer and other neoplasms was
$2.6b representing around 90 per cent of total expenditure on cancer and other
neoplasms.
2.27
The most expensive cancers overall were non-melanoma
skin cancers, a less threatening form of skin cancer ($264m), followed by
breast cancer ($241m), colorectal cancer ($235m), and prostate cancer ($201m).
Non-melanoma skin cancer was easily the most common of all the cancers with 374
000 cases. These figures are consistent with the burden of disease across
different tumour sites.[41]
National Service Improvement
Framework for Cancer
2.28
In 2002, the Australian Health Ministers Advisory
Council agreed to the development of National Service Improvement Frameworks
for the National Health Priority Areas (cancer, diabetes, asthma,
cardiovascular disease and stroke, and arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions)
under the auspices of the National Health Priority Action Council.
2.29
The National Service Improvement Frameworks are joint
initiatives of the Commonwealth and State and Territory governments and are an
integral component of a proposed National Chronic Disease Strategy, being
developed by the National Health Priority Action Council under the health
reform agenda.
2.30
The National Service Improvement Framework for Cancer
is the first developed and draws on existing international and national plans
including the United Kingdom's National Cancer Plan and Australia's cancer
plans and policies, notably those developed by State and Territory governments.
It also draws on a number of other recent documents developed including Optimising Cancer Care in Australia.
2.31
The Cancer Framework is specifically designed to be
‘patient centred’ and provides clarity about what the evidence suggests about
timely and effective care across the continuum (encompassing prevention,
screening, detection, management, rehabilitation and palliation). It supports
patients being treated with respect, dignity and autonomy, having access to
care when it is needed, being involved in informed decision-making, including
when and where health services require multidisciplinary input and coordination.
It provides national consensus about aspects of care through focusing on
critical service intervention points across the care continuum, which offer the
greatest potential to improve health outcomes for patients.[42]
Strengthening Cancer Care
2.32
The Commonwealth Government recently announced the Strengthening
Cancer Care Initiative. The Initiative has drawn from the National Service Improvement Framework for Cancer and is targeted
at ensuring better coordination of the national cancer effort, more research
funding for cancer care, enhanced cancer prevention and screening programs, and
better support and treatment for those living with cancer.
Cancer Australia
2.33
A key element of the Strengthening Cancer initiative is
the establishment of a national cancer agency, to be called Cancer Australia.
The new agency will be accountable to the Federal Minister for Health and
Ageing and will:
- Provide national leadership in cancer control;
- Guide improvements to cancer prevention and
care, to ensure treatment is scientifically based;
- Coordinate and liaise between the wide range of
groups and providers with an interest in cancer;
- Make recommendations to the Federal Government
about cancer policy and priorities; and
- Oversee a dedicated budget for research into
cancer.[43]
State and Territory Cancer Initiatives
2.34
State and Territory governments are developing and
implementing a range of initiatives to improve cancer services and treatment.
The initiatives include cancer plans, frameworks and monitoring mechanisms that
are based on, and integrate with, the National
Service Improvement Framework for Cancer.
2.35
The following examples of initiatives to address cancer
treatment and care at the State level have been drawn from submissions and
evidence provided by the Cancer Institute New South Wales,
the Victorian Department of Human Services and the Department of Health Western
Australia.[44] As these were the only jurisdictions
that provided submissions, it is unclear if the approaches outlined in this
evidence is representative of the other States or if the initiatives are
transferable to other jurisdictions, given the different ways in which services
are organised and resourced across Australia.
New South
Wales - The Cancer Institute
2.36
The Cancer Institute New South Wales
was established by the NSW Government in 2003. The Cancer Institute and the New
South Wales Department of Health work collaboratively as the key agencies for
cancer control in NSW. The objectives of the Cancer Institute are to:
- Improve cancer survival;
- Reduce cancer incidence;
- Improve the quality of life of cancer patients;
and
- Provide expert advice to government, the public
and key stakeholders.
2.37
The Cancer Institute has developed the New South Wales Cancer Plan 2004-06. The promotion and
coordination of cancer control activities for better cancer outcomes has been
identified as a key goal of the Cancer Plan which builds on other initiatives
in cancer control including the New South
Wales Chronic Care Program and the Clinical
Service Framework for Optimising Cancer Care in New South Wales. The
Framework describes the optimal structure of care for a cancer service at an
Area Health Service Level, to ensure equitable access to best practice care for
all patients.
2.38
The Cancer Institute's major programs include:
- Clinical enhancements - cancer nurse
coordinators; lead clinicians; psycho-oncology support and state wide cancer
streams;
- A research program- research fellowships,
Infrastructure and 'bench to the bedside' translational research grants;
- Information program – clinical data analysis,
standard treatment protocols; and
- Area Health Services – Cancer service streams.
2.39
A central philosophy of the New South Wales Cancer Plan is the patient-centred approach, which
recognises the important role and views of consumers and patients in developing
policy. It provides enhancement funding throughout New
South Wales in clinical services, research,
information and registries, prevention and screening and in cancer education.[45]
Victoria
- Department of Human Services
2.40
The Victorian Government has made a major commitment to
policy and service development in cancer control. The key cancer reform
activities in Victoria
include:
The development and implementation
of the Cancer Services Framework
2.41
The Cancer
Services Framework aims to ensure that the right treatment and support is
provided to cancer patients as early as possible in their cancer journey. The
integration of cancer service delivery is a major theme. The reforms are being
delivered through:
- The establishment of Integrated Cancer Services that
have been designed to support improvement in the integration and coordination
of care within both metropolitan and regional areas; and
- The delivery of clinical treatment and care
through ten major tumour streams that are designed to reduce variations in care
and promote best practice.
2.42
The integrated service model involves three
metropolitan and five regional Integrated Cancer Services based on geographic
populations (Metropolitan Integrated Cancer Services and Regional Integrated
Cancer Services). The philosophy of an Integrated Cancer Service is that
hospitals, primary care and community health services will develop integrated
care and defined referral pathways for the populations they serve.
2.43
Delivery of clinical treatment and care through major
tumour streams has been established to reduce variations in care and to promote
best practice.
The Fighting Cancer policy
2.44
The Fighting
Cancer policy identifies a number of areas to improve cancer services
including the upgrading and expansion of radiotherapy equipment, enhancement of
screening and prevention programs, and training and recruitment incentives for
radiation therapists.
The Ministerial Taskforce for Cancer
2.45
The Taskforce was established in November 2003 to
provide strategic advice and clinical leadership on the implementation of
cancer reforms. It provides advice to the Victorian Minister for Health on the
implementation and evaluation of Government directions for cancer services
reform.
Establishment of Cancer
Coordination Unit
2.46
The Cancer Coordination Unit has been established to
oversee the implementation of the Victorian Government's Fighting Cancer policy
and to coordinate the cancer service reform agenda including the implementation
of the Cancer Services Framework. The
unit has particular responsibility for policy commitments around improving the
coordination of cancer services. It also supports the Ministerial Taskforce and
associated working groups.[46]
Western
Australia - Department of Health
2.47
The Department of Health Western Australia
established a Health Reform Committee to examine cancer service delivery in Western
Australia. The
Review of Cancer Services report was finalised in October 2003. In response
to the report, a Health Reform Implementation Taskforce was established.
2.48
To implement the cancer service recommendations, the
Western Australian Cancer Services Taskforce was established in January 2005 to
formulate a comprehensive state-wide framework for cancer services to ensure an
integrated approach to cancer care and delivery. The Taskforce consists of
clinical experts in cancer care and community representatives.
2.49
The cancer services framework will cover the continuum
of cancer care as well as cancer research, education, training and workforce
development, patient information and genetic counselling and the private
hospital/service interface. The work of the Taskforce is due for completion in
mid 2005.[47]
2.50
Dr Neale Fong, Acting Director-General, Department of
Health WA advised the Committee that 'The Western Australian health system is
undergoing some radical reforms and will be the centre of a lot of activity in
reforming both health service delivery and health planning over the coming few
years'.[48] Professor
Christobel Saunders,
Chair of the WA Cancer Services Taskforce told the Committee that by June
the Taskforce will have developed a framework for cancer services in WA and an
implementation plan. This will include the appointment of a Director of cancer
services, who will further develop the plan and implement it. Professor
Saunders said they intend to develop referral
guidelines, tumour networks which will cover the whole State and collect data
to conduct audits. The implementation plan will also involve accreditation of
services and credentialing of practitioners.[49]
Conclusion
2.51
Australia
has one of the best systems of cancer care in the world. The Committee noted
that the Australian health care system is however complex with multiple levels
of government and shared responsibility for health care.
2.52
Efforts to coordinate Commonwealth and State and Territory
cancer activities occur through the National Health Priority Area initiative.
Cancer was identified as a National Health Priority in 1996 and a National
Service Improvement Framework for Cancer has been developed jointly between the
Commonwealth and the States and Territories.
2.53
The Committee also notes that the establishment of
Cancer Australia
will provide a valuable national leadership role in cancer control.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page