Chapter 1
Introduction
Referral
1.1
On 10 September 2015, the Senate referred the provisions of the Social
Services Legislation Amendment (More Generous Means Testing for Youth Payments)
Bill 2015 (Bill) to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee (committee)
for inquiry and report by 9 November 2015.[1]
Objective of the Bill
1.2
The Bill seeks to implement a 2015–16 Budget measure that pledges 'more
support for families with dependent young people who qualify for certain income
support payments'[2]—that
is, Youth Allowance (YA) and ABSTUDY Living Allowance.[3]
In the Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill (EM), this support is described as
'more consistent and generous'.[4]
1.3
The Minister for Social Services (Minister) advised that the proposed measures
were adopted following 'an examination of issues by an interdepartmental
committee [IDC] on access to higher education for regional and remote
students'.[5]
Two of the IDC's key preliminary findings were that, for regional and remote
students: cost, socio-economic status and distance are barriers
to accessing higher education; and inequities in the Youth Allowance
Parental Means Test arrangements create difficulties for some families. The Bill
intends to respond to issues identified in the IDC's interim advice—namely,
concerns over parental means testing and the level of student assistance
available.[6]
1.4
The Minister stated:
Removing complex and unnecessary means tests and improving
the operation of the parental income test is a good first step...This bill is
boosting assistance for working families, particularly in rural and regional
areas, and better supporting young people into study to build their careers,
develop economic opportunities and contribute to our economy.[7]
Overview and purpose of the Bill
1.5
The Bill comprises Parts 1–3 of Schedule 1 that amend the Social
Security Act 1991 (Act) and the Social Security (Administration) Act
1999 (Administration Act) to:
-
remove the Family Assets Test (FAT) and the Family Actual Means
Test (FAMT) from the YA parental means test arrangements (Part 1 of Schedule 1);
-
align the Parental Income Test (PIT) exemptions for YA with the
Family Tax Benefit Part A (FTB–A) arrangements (Part 1 of Schedule 1);
-
remove maintenance income from the YA PIT (Part 1 of Schedule 1) and
introduce a separate maintenance income test for the treatment of child support
(Part 3 of Schedule 1); and
-
where a family has a dependent child who receives an individual
youth payment that is parentally income‑tested and younger siblings who
qualify for Family Tax Benefit (FTB), the 'family pool' for the YA PIT will
include all FTB children (Part 2 of Schedule 1).[8]
1.6
The proposed measures will commence on 1 January 2016 (items 1–18 and
20 in Part 1 of Schedule 1), 1 July 2016 (Part 2 of Schedule 1) and 1
January 2017 (Part 3 of Schedule 1).[9]
1.7
According to the Department of Social Services (Department):
The measures in this Bill are consistent with long term
directions to simplify the system and align rules for dependent children from
birth to independence as recommended in the Government commissioned Final
Report of the Reference Group on Welfare A New System for Better Employment and
Social Outcomes (February 2015).[10]
1.8
The Government estimates around 33,500 families with dependent young
people will benefit from the proposed measures:
An estimated 22,400 dependent young people would be eligible
for an increase in youth payments while a further 11,100 dependent young people
would become eligible for youth payments for the first time. Around 230,000
families currently subject to the [FAT] or the [FAMT] would benefit from
reduced regulatory burden.[11]
Consideration by committees
1.9
The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered but
had no comment on the Bill.[12]
At the time of writing, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights has
deferred its consideration of the Bill.[13]
Conduct of the inquiry and acknowledgement
1.10
Details of the inquiry, including links to the Bill and associated
documents, were placed on the committee's website.[14]
The committee also wrote to 49 individuals and organisations, inviting
submissions by 9 October 2015. Submissions continued to be accepted after that
date. The committee received nine submissions, which are listed at Appendix 1. All submissions
were published on the committee's website. The committee thanks those
organisations who assisted with the inquiry.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page