Chapter 1
Introduction
Referral
1.1
On 15 October 2015, the Senate referred the provisions of the Food
Standards Australia New Zealand Amendment (Forum on Food Regulation and Other
Measures) Bill 2015 to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee
(committee) for inquiry and report by 30 November 2015.[1]
1.2
Appendix 4 to the Senate Selection of Bills Committee's report proposes
that the committee scrutinise the 'impact of the amendments to definitions in
the [Food Standards Australia New Zealand] Act'. The committee has also been
asked to scrutinise 'the impact of amendments of the composition of the [Food Standards
Australia New Zealand] board detailed in Schedule 2 of the Bill, including the
potential impact of reducing the representation of science and public health
expertise on the board'.[2]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.3
Details of the inquiry, including a link to the Bill and associated
documents, were placed on the committee's website.[3]
The committee also wrote to 12 organisations and individuals, inviting
submissions by 5 November 2015. Submissions continue to be submitted after that
date.
1.4
The committee received eight submissions to the inquiry.
Background
1.5
Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) is a bi-national Government
agency representing Australia and New Zealand that 'develops and administers
the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, which lists requirements for
foods such as additives, food safety, labelling and [Genetically Modified]
foods. Enforcement and interpretation of the code is the responsibility of
state and territory departments and food agencies within Australia and New
Zealand'.[4]
1.6
The work of FSANZ is guided by the Australia and New Zealand Food
Regulation Ministerial Council (the council) which is:
primarily responsible for the development of domestic food
regulatory policy and the development of policy guidelines for setting domestic
food standards. The Forum also has the capacity to adopt, amend or reject
standards and to request that these be reviewed.[5]
1.7
Membership of the council consists of ministerial representatives from
Australian states, territories and local government, and New Zealand. The Board
of FSANZ takes recommendations about food standards, guidelines and codes to the
council for consideration.[6]
1.8
Until recently, the council was one of the 22 councils that met under
the auspices of the Council of Australian Governments (COAG). On 13 December
2013, COAG decided to streamline the number of councils from 22 to eight. Despite
the council being one of those removed from COAG, this would not affect the
ongoing work of the council. The council determined that it would change its
name to the Australia and New Zealand Forum on Food Regulation (the forum).[7]
1.9
This change requires an amendment to the Food Standards Australia
New Zealand Act 1991 (the Act). This amendment 'presents an opportunity to make
other amendments in the same bill to improve the clarity and operation of the
legislation'.[8]
1.10
In a concurrent unrelated process, a review of the Food Standards
Australia New Zealand Board appointment process was conducted in 2013. This
review made a number of recommendations which were accepted by the forum and
form the basis of the legislative amendments in Schedule 2 of the Bill. These
include amending:
-
the compositional requirements of the FSANZ Board to address the
need for flexibility to accommodate FSANZ's future work requirements; and
-
in relation to certain categories of Board members, amend the
nomination process to be an open market process by advertising for upcoming
Board vacancies externally as well as seeking nominations from identified
organisations.[9]
Food Standards Australia New
Zealand Amendment (Forum on Food Regulation and Other Measures) Bill 2015
1.11
On 17 September 2015, the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Amendment
(Forum on Food Regulation and Other Measures) Bill 2015 was introduced into the
House of Representatives by the Minister for Health, Aged Care and Sport, the
Hon Sussan Ley MP.[10]
The Bill received a second and third reading before being transmitted into the
Senate on 15 October 2015 by the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister,
Senator the Hon James McGrath, with debate adjourned until the 30 November
2015.[11]
Key provisions and purpose of Bill
1.12
This Bill seeks to amend the Food Standards Australia and New Zealand
Act 1991 (the Act) to 'reflect the change of name of the former Australia
and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council to the forum'.
1.13
The Bill also contains a number of consequential and minor amendments to
the workings of the forum. These include:
-
mak[ing]
amendments to improve the clarity and operation of the legislation—these
amendments are intended to improve regulatory efficiency and provide greater
clarification for businesses and Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ),
by removing ambiguity and improving consistency in the way in which the act
outlines procedures for consideration of food regulatory measures; and
-
changes
in relation to consumer rights, science, public health and food industry board
members positions, amends the FSANZ Board's compositional requirements and
appointment process, in accordance with recommendations endorsed by the forum,
to:
- address
the need for flexibility to accommodate FSANZ's future work requirements, and
- include a
competitive selection process (such as external advertising), which the bill
allows to occur simultaneously with the existing nomination process when
recruiting for each vacant FSANZ Board member position.[12]
1.14
This Bill is comprised of two schedules, with Schedule 1 having two
parts.
Schedule 1
1.15
Primarily, this schedule proposes to change the name of the Australia
and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council to the Australia and New
Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation. There are a range of
consequential amendments that relate to this change.
1.16
Under the current Act, an exhaustive list of government agencies need to
be informed of all changes to FSANZ standards, guidelines and codes. A more
precise definition of an 'appropriate government agency' is provided in this
Bill, meaning that only government agencies relevant to the change will be
informed of any changes. Consequently, item 11 repeals section 19 of the Act
that requires FSANZ to refer any matter dealing with GM food to the Office of
the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR). As a result, item 4 repeals the
definitions of "Gene Technology Regulator", "GMO (Genetically
Modified Organism)" and "GM (Genetically Modified) Product".[13]
1.17
This schedule also seeks to modernise the manner in which FSANZ
communicates draft standards or variations of a draft standard with the public
and non-government stakeholders. Currently, FSANZ must publish a notice in a
generally circulating newspaper; however under the proposed changes, these
notices would only need to be published on the FSANZ website.[14]
1.18
Items 14, 32 and 87 of the Bill clarifies that the inclusion of a
Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) in reports to the FSANZ will now only be
required if FSANZ has requested that a RIS be prepared as part of that report.[15]
These provisions refer to reports made under section 33 of the Act that refers
to 'Approving the draft standard or draft variation'; section
63 of the Act that refers to 'Review of decisions'; and section 101 of the Act that
refers to 'Re-affirm[ing] the standard or variation or propose changes'.[16]
1.19
FSANZ currently has a food standard that regulates nutrition content
claims and health claims on food labels and advertising. Items 23 and 41 of this
Bill seeks to remove a requirement whereby draft variations are assessed
'against the criteria set out in the Nutrition, Health and Related Claims
Standard in relation to high level health claims'. This is primarily because
such criteria do not exist. Instead high level health claims are based on '13
pre-approved food-health relationships'.[17]
1.20
There is no financial impact relating to this schedule. [18]
1.21
Part 1 of schedule 1 of this Bill is intended to commence the day after
Royal Assent. Part 2 of the schedule is intended to commence on 'a single day
to be fixed by proclamation, but if the provisions do not commence within a 12
month period beginning on the day the Act receives Royal Assent, the provisions
do not commence at all'.[19]
Schedule 2—appointing members to
the Board
1.22
This schedule proposes to amend the compositional requirements for the
FSANZ Board including quotas for the qualifications and experience of members
who are selected as Board members. The qualifications and experience of members
are defined in item 1 and include representatives and individuals with
expertise in consumer rights member, food industry, and science and public
health member. These changes to the appointment process for members of the
FSANZ Board reflect recommendations from the Board review process which were
endorsed by the forum.[20]
1.23
There is no financial impact relating to this schedule.[21]
1.24
These changes are intended to commence on 1 January 2016.[22]
Consideration of the Bill by other committees
Scrutiny of Bills
1.25
The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills made no comment
on this Bill.[23]
Human Rights
1.26
As the Bill does not engage human rights, the Parliamentary Joint
Committee on Human Rights does not consider that the Bill requires additional
comment.[24]
Acknowledgement
1.27
The committee thanks those organisations who made submissions to the
inquiry.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page