Key issues
2.1
The committee notes that the measures outlined in the Bill have been
previously examined and reported on in the 44th Parliament. The
committee does not intend to provide a detailed examination of the measures in
this report, and refers to its predecessor committee's report on the Social
Services Legislation Amendment (Budget Repair) Bill 2015, which recommended
that the Bill be passed.[1]
2.2
Consistent with the previous inquiry, the majority of submitters do not
support the measures outlined in Bill. These submitters suggest that the
proposed measures would disproportionately impact low-income earners and
disadvantaged groups. The committee recognises that submitters reiterate
concerns that were raised during its predecessor committee's previous inquiry.
These concerns are summarised below.
Proportional payment of pensions outside Australia
2.3
Most submitters do not support the proposal to reduce the portability of
the age pension and other payments. These submitters argue that the measure would
have a disproportionate impact on Australia's migrant population, particularly
those who have worked in Australia for less than 35 years and would receive a
reduced payment after 6 weeks overseas.[2]
For example, the Federation of Ethnic Communities' Councils of Australia noted
that this measure would affect a significant number of pensioners 'who were
born overseas and maintain important ties to their place of birth'.[3]
Other submitters stated that this measure will 'disproportionately impact on
some of the poorest in the community.[4]
2.4
The Chinese Australian Services Society (CASS) noted its support for
this measure, believing 'that it enables the Government to allocate limited
resources to deal with more pressing social issues'.[5]
2.5
The committee reiterates that its predecessor committee has previously
examined and expressed its support for the measure proposed in changes to the
payment of pensions outside Australia, as the 'measure reinforces the residence
based nature of Australia's pension system'.[6]
The committee notes that where people receive a proportionally reduced pension
under this measure, this is likely to be supplemented through a proportion of
pension income support from another country.[7]
The committee agrees with the Minister for Social Services (Minister) that the
measure would:
...more fairly distribute the retirement costs between
countries based on the period of time that people have lived and worked in
Australia, and it reflects the principle of shared responsibility—that is, the
idea that each country should pay a benefit which reflects a person's
association with that country'.[8]
Cessation of the Pensioner Education Supplement and the Education Entry
Payment
2.6
Some submitters do not support the cessation of the Pensioner Education
Supplement and Education Entry Payment. These submitters argue that removing
the payments would create 'an additional barrier to pensioners taking up
training and education opportunities', and could have a 'negative impact on
enhanced workforce participation'.[9]
In its submission, the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) noted:
The combined loss of removal of these payments is up to $35
per week. This will particularly disadvantage sole parents who are already
facing payment cuts (and have lost the Low Income Support Bonus and new
recipients will lose the Family Tax Benefit Energy Supplement payment, which
combined amount to at least $350 per annum). This will make pursuing education
and training, which is essential to improve work prospects, more difficult.[10]
2.7
The committee notes that during the previous inquiry, some submitters expressed
concern that there are no provisions for transitional arrangements for those
currently part-way through a course of study and in receipt of the Pensioner
Education Supplement. Whilst the committee notes that submissions to this
inquiry did not raise this particular issue, nonetheless, the committee acknowledges
this concern.
2.8
The committee notes that the supplement and payment were established
before the introduction of other specific tuition assistance schemes such as HECS-HELP,
FEE-HELP and VET FEE-HELP; and specific income support payments such as Youth
Allowance (student), AUSTUDY and ABSTUDY. The committee further notes that
'despite its name, the Pensioner Education Supplement is not available to
people receiving the age pension'.[11]
As noted in previous inquiries, the committee is satisfied that 'other supports
remain available to assist low income pension recipients and those seeking to
undertake further education'.[12]
2.9
The committee also notes that cessation of the Pensioner Education
Supplement and the Education Entry Payment is consistent with the 2015 report
on the social welfare system titled A New System for Better Employment and
Social Outcomes. This report noted that:
Ceasing these supplements will also help to simplify the
income support system by reducing the number of payment supplements, consistent
with the recommendations of the McClure review of welfare.[13]
Pauses on indexation
2.10
Some submitters to this inquiry and previous inquiries do not support
changes to indexation. Submitters have argued that 'indexation is essential to
maintain the real value of income support' and that pausing indexation 'will
cause unnecessary hardship to vulnerable people', and 'undermine incentives to
work'.[14]
In its submission, ACOSS argued against the pauses on indexation:
Income free areas should not be adjusted through ad-hoc
freezing of indexation to achieve short term budget savings at the expense of
reducing the incomes of people on low wages. People on allowances are already
relying on inadequate levels of income support. The maximum rate of the
Newstart Allowance is now just $38 per day, and has not been increased in real
terms for over twenty years. Any measure which further reduces the adequacy of
incomes for people partly reliant on allowances should be strongly opposed.[15]
2.11
The committee notes that the proposed pauses to indexation would only
impact those recipients whose circumstances change.[16]
2.12
The Minister noted that 220 000 recipients would be affected by the
proposed changes, the majority of whom are receiving AUSTUDY, ABSTUDY, Youth
Allowance, Newstart Allowance and Parenting Payment (partnered). A small number
receiving Parenting Payment (single), Partner Allowance, Sickness Allowance and
Widow Allowance would be affected. The committee notes that the proposed pauses
to indexation would only impact those recipients whose circumstances change.
2.13
The committee agrees with the Minister that pausing indexation is 'a
common lever that has been used by successive governments to realise budget
savings' and would have:
...the effect of slowing the growth in social security
expenditure and is expected to generate, in these measures, savings of $107.4
million over the forward estimates.[17]
Committee view
2.14
This Bill reintroduces a Bill which lapsed at the dissolution of the 44th
Parliament. This Bill will improve the long term sustainability of the social
security system and the federal budget, and will also ensure that the
Australian social security system remains targeted to those most in need.
2.15
Submitters have raised concerns about the impact of the measures
contained in this Bill on vulnerable and disadvantaged groups in society. The
committee acknowledges these concerns; however, is satisfied that this Bill
strikes the right balance and provides appropriate safeguards for these groups.
2.16
The committee notes that the vast majority of pension recipients will
not be affected by the proposed change to the payment of pensions outside
Australia. The committee is confident that people outside of Australia subject
to a proportional reduction to their pensions will be able to seek
supplementary pension payments from the country in which they are currently
living.
2.17
The committee is satisfied that existing targeted tuition and income
support provides more appropriate support than the Pensioner Education
Supplement and the Education Entry Payment. The committee acknowledges the need
for transitional arrangements for people who are receiving the Pensioner
Education Supplement and are part-way through a course of study.
2.18
Finally, the committee highlights that the proposed pauses to indexation
would not impact the payments received under working age and student allowances
unless a person earns above the income free area consistent with current
arrangements.
Recommendation 1
2.19
The committee recommends that the Bill be amended to include
transitional arrangements for current recipients of the Pensioner Education
Supplement, to enable them to complete their education or training course.
Recommendation 2
2.20
The committee recommends that the Bill be passed.
Senator Jonathon Duniam
Chair
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page