Budget Review 2021–22 Index
Michael Klapdor
The Budget includes two significant changes to the Child
Care Subsidy (CCS) aimed at increasing workforce participation:
- increasing the rate of CCS for families with
more than one child aged under six years attending child care
and
- removing the annual cap on the amount of CCS that can be paid for families with incomes
above $189,390.
The measures were
announced prior to the Budget, on 2 May 2021, and will provide an
additional $1.7 billion in payments over the forward estimates. The CCS
changes are the major component of the Women’s
Economic Security Package (p. 81) (see separate article in this Budget
Review, ‘Women’s Safety and Economic Security’). The CCS measures will
commence on 1 July 2022 and will require legislation.
Current
Child Care Subsidy arrangements
The CCS is the Australian Government’s main
program to assist families with the costs of child care. It commenced on 2
July 2018 and replaced
two previous payments: Child Care Benefit and Child Care Rebate. An
estimated $9.0 billion will be spent on the CCS in 2020–21 (p. 6-10).
The CCS is means tested with rates of payment based on
family income, hours of care used, type of care used, and parents’ or carers’
level of work, training or study. The payment is paid
directly to providers and delivered to families in the form of a fee reduction.
An activity
test determines the number of hours per fortnight a family is eligible to
receive CCS. A maximum hourly amount payable via the subsidy is set by the
Government (the hourly rate cap),
with families receiving a percentage of this rate or the actual fees charged based on their
income. Table 1 sets out how the current income test works.
Table 1: current
Child Care Subsidy income test
Family’s
combined annual adjusted taxable income (ATI)
|
CCS
paid is equal to applicable percentage of the actual fee charged or the relevant
hourly rate cap (whichever is lower)
|
Equal to or below
$69,390
|
85%
|
Above $69,390 and
below $174,390
|
Decreasing
to 50%
Subsidy
decreases by 1% for each $3,000 of family income
|
Equal to or above
$174,390 and below $253,680
|
50%
|
Equal to or above
$253,680 and below $343,680
|
Decreasing
to 20%
Subsidy
decreases by 1% for each $3,000 of family income
|
Equal to or above
$343,680 and below $353,680
|
20%
|
Equal to or above
$353,680
|
0%
|
Source: Department of Social
Services (DSS), ‘3.5.1 CCS - combined annual ATI’, Family assistance guide, DSS website, 1 July
2020.
If a family earns more than $189,390 per year (and less than
$353,680) then the
total amount of CCS they can receive in 2020–21 is $10,560 per child—the
annual cap. Families earning less than $189,390 per year do not face a cap.
Families earning $353,680 or above cannot receive any CCS under the income
test.
Enhanced
Child Care Subsidy
The first component of the enhanced
Child Care Subsidy will provide an increased rate of subsidy for families
with more than one child aged under six years of age who are also attending child
care. The CCS rate for eligible second and subsequent children will be the percentage
amount worked out under the income test (Table 1) plus 30 percentage points up
to a maximum of 95%. For example, where the second child would have been
eligible for a CCS rate of 50% of the fee paid or hourly cap, they will receive
a CCS rate of 80% of the fee paid or hourly cap.
The rate for the first child aged under six in child care
will stay the same. Where two or more children are not aged under six years—for
example, one child aged three and one child aged six—the family will not be
eligible for the higher rate of CCS. Families with income over the higher
income limit (currently $353,680) will remain ineligible for any CCS for any
children.
Figure 1 compares the current and enhanced CCS rates with
the Australian
Labor Party’s proposed changes to the CCS’s design. The two policies offer
very different approaches to improving child care
affordability. In his 2020
Budget in reply speech, Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese proposed to
increase the maximum CCS rate to 90% of the fee charged or hourly rate cap. The rate would
gradually reduce by one percentage point for every $5,000 of family income
above $72,406. Labor’s CCS design does not have an
upper income limit and no annual cap, but the CCS rate reaches zero for
families with an annual income of around $530,000. The policy costs
an estimated $6.2 billion over four years.
Figure 1: current
and enhanced Child Care Subsidy compared with Labor’s
design
Source: Parliamentary Library
estimates based on DSS, ‘3.5.1 CCS - combined annual ATI’, Family assistance guide, DSS website, last
reviewed 1 July 2020; Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE), ‘Enhanced Child Care Subsidy’, DESE website, last modified 4 May 2021; Australian
Labor Party (ALP), ‘Labor’s Cheaper
Child Care Plan’, ALP website, n.d.
The Australian Greens have called for free child care,
similar to the arrangements in place from 6 April to 12 July 2020 under the
COVID-19 Early
Childhood Education and Care Relief Package (pp. 7–9).
Who will
benefit?
The Government
estimates that 250,000 families will have lower out-of-pocket costs as a
result of the proposed CCS changes. The 2020–21
Budget estimated 1.3 million families would be using child care services
approved for CCS in 2022–23 (there were 904,710 families using child care
services approved for CCS in the December
2020 quarter). This means that only around 20% of families using child care
are expected to benefit from the proposed changes in 2022.
Families with multiple children in child care can have very
high out-of-pocket costs. In couple-families, the high costs are a significant
disincentive for the second earner to undertake work, or to work more than a
few days per week. The combined effect of higher child care fees, lower CCS
benefits, lower Family Tax Benefit payments and income tax can mean that there
is little or no increase in family income when a second earner undertakes more
work. Research
by the Grattan Institute suggests some second-earners
lose more than 80%—and sometimes 100%—of their additional earnings moving from
three days of work a week to four or five days. The Grattan Institute found the
budget measures will reduce these disincentives for many families
but some will still gain only a small benefit from additional work.
Figure 2 and Table 2 compare the current, enhanced and Labor
CCS models for a family with two children aged under six years in child care
for four days a week. The enhanced and Labor CCS model provide the same
increase in assistance for such a family where their income is under $70,000. A
two-child family with income between $70,000 and $210,000 would be slightly
better off under the Labor model, while those with income between $210,000 and
$327,000 would be better off under the enhanced CCS. The Labor model does not
have an income limit so the small number of families with very high incomes
(around 2% of families according to the
Department of Education, Skills and Employment, p. 33) are better off under
this design compared to the current and enhanced CCS models.
For families with three or more children aged under six
years in care, the enhanced CCS model offers a higher level of assistance to
eligible families than the Labor CCS.
Figure 2:
Child Care Subsidy rates per week under different models, family with two
children aged <6 years in care
Notes:
Based on a fee of $10.50 per hour, ten hours of care per day, for four days a
week.
Source: Parliamentary Library
estimates based on DSS, ‘3.5.1 CCS - combined annual ATI’, Family assistance guide, DSS website, last
reviewed 1 July 2020; DESE, ‘Enhanced Child Care Subsidy’, DESE website, last modified 4 May 2021; ALP, ‘Labor’s Cheaper Child Care Plan’, ALP website, n.d
Table 2: weekly
out-of-pocket costs of child care under different CCS models, family with two
children aged <6 years in care
Annual family income ($)
|
Current CCS ($)
|
Enhanced CCS ($)
|
Labor CCS ($)
|
50,000
|
126.00
|
84.00
|
84.00
|
100,000
|
211.71
|
126.85
|
117.60
|
150,000
|
351.71
|
225.71
|
201.60
|
200,000
|
433.85
|
294.00
|
285.60
|
250,000
|
433.85
|
294.00
|
369.60
|
Notes: Based on a fee of $10.50 per hour, ten hours of care per day, for four
days a week.
Source: Parliamentary Library
estimates based on DSS, ‘3.5.1 CCS - combined annual ATI’, Family assistance guide, DSS website, last
reviewed 1 July 2020; DESE, ‘Enhanced Child Care Subsidy’, DESE website, last modified 4 May 2021; ALP, ‘Labor’s Cheaper
Child Care Plan’, ALP website, n.d
Issues and
stakeholder response
A key issue for the enhanced CCS model is that it will add
complexity to the system with different payment rates depending on the age and
number of children in a family. One of the reasons for the introduction of the
CCS was that it was simpler than the previous fee assistance system—then Social
Services Minister Scott Morrison stated in 2015 that the child care sector
and families had ‘screamed’ at the Government: ‘for goodness sake make this
simpler, it is far too complicated’.
Early
Childhood Australia, a peak body, welcomes the additional funding for child
care. However, CEO Samantha Page noted that the changes ‘add complexity to an
already complex system’. Ms Page also stated ‘we are
disappointed that changes are planned to come in to effect in 2022, meaning
many families currently using child care won’t have any relief’.
The Australian
Childcare Alliance, which represents privately owned child care providers,
commended the Government’s proposed changes. President Paul Mondo stated: ‘The
removal of the annual CCS cap for many families and the increased support for
multiple-child families are the sensible next step in providing greater work
options for parents’.
Removing the annual cap on CCS for higher income families
will reduce work disincentives. Administrative data quoted in one
media report stated that around 200,000 families receiving CCS had income
above the $189,390 threshold at which the annual cap applies. However, only
around 18,000 of these families reached the cap each year. Some families may
have chosen to reduce their use of child care, and therefore their working
hours, to not hit the cap.
Another key issue will be how the policy interacts with
early childhood education. Currently, children in standalone preschools are not eligible
for CCS (preschool programs delivered through centre-based day care
services are eligible). In 2019, around 87.7% of children attended preschool in
the relevant state-specific year before primary school and 40.7% of children
attended a program within centre-based day care (Report
on Government Services 2021, Table 3A.17). Those children in preschool
who are ineligible for CCS may make their siblings ineligible for the higher
rate of CCS—as the enhanced CCS is only available where multiple children under
the age of six attend child care services. This could create an incentive for
families to move children from standalone preschools to preschool programs
within centre-based child care services.
A separate budget measure will provide ongoing funding for
preschools, initially funded through a new four-year funding agreement with the
states and territories. See the article in this Budget Review on
‘Universal access to preschool’.
This brief was amended on 13 May 2021 to correct figures in table 2 and figure 2.