Dissenting Report by Coalition Senators

Dissenting Report by Coalition Senators

1.1        The Coalition cannot support the committee report as it relates to evidence provided by Surface Transport Policy on 23 May 2012, relating to the $20 million Tasmanian freight assistance package.

1.2        The matter is dealt with in paragraphs 3.32 – 3.34 of the committee report.

1.3        On the afternoon on 23 May 2012 the committee heard evidence from Mr Deegan of Infrastructure Australia:

Senator COLBECK: I want to ask some questions about the work that you are doing in Tasmania around the export freight issues that they have been dealing with. My understanding is that you were going to hand a report to the government by early May; is that correct?

Mr Deegan: That is correct. I am hoping that it will be released shortly. The federal minister asked that I undertake some further consultation after a discussion I had with him towards the end of April, which made a lot of sense.

Senator COLBECK: That is fine. So you have handed him the initial report?

Mr Deegan: I have had a discussion with him about the report. I have not yet handed in my report. That is imminent.[1]

1.4        Later that evening the committee took evidence from Surface Transport Policy regarding the allocation of the funding.

1.5        The committee was again told that the Infrastructure Australia report was not completed and that the finalisation of that report would be an input into finalising the assistance package.

Mr Mrdak: That will contribute some further thinking in relation to the terms of the arrangements, and we anticipate that over the coming weeks the minister and the Tasmanian government will announce the details of the arrangements.

Senator COLBECK: So we will not see a final answer on the allocation of that funding until the report from Infrastructure Australia is released?

Mr Mrdak: Certainly the finalisation of Mr Deegan’s report will be one of the inputs into finalising the program.[2]

1.6        The Committee was further advised that the detail of how the funding package was to be allocated was yet to be finalised.

Ms Gosling: That is right. As Mr Mrdak said, it will be a payment to the Tasmanian government. Once we have settled the exact detail of how that money would be allocated, then the allocation of the funds would be a question for the Tasmanian government.[3]

1.7        It is the Coalition’s view that the evidence provided to the committee regarding  the allocation of the funding indicated that decisions had not been made and it would be perhaps weeks before announcements would be made, and that the decision would be made by the Tasmanian government.

1.8        On the morning of 24 May 2012 articles appeared in The Advocate and the Examiner newspapers announcing the allocation of funding from the package (see pages 30 and 31).

1.9        It subsequently became evident that an embargoed media release had been issued on 23 May 2012 by Minister Albanese and two colleagues announcing the funding (see pages 32–33).

1.10      As indicated in a letter from Mr Deegan to the committee, the report from Infrastructure Australia was not handed to Minister Albanese until after the embargo time on the media release and the media articles had appeared in the two Tasmanian papers.

1.11      It is clear that the prerequisites for finalising the details of the funding, as outlined in evidence to the committee, had not been met when the announcement was made by Minister Albanese.

1.12      During debate on the matter at the commencement of business on the morning of 24 May 2012, the Chair, Senator Sterle said:

CHAIR: Thank you. Now, with all due respect, I know I sat here as you did ask those questions of the officers last night and I certainly share that you have some form of reason to be upset. The officers are big enough to look after themselves—and I am happy to facilitate a private meeting, should we need that—but I think the committee should write to the appropriate department and perhaps seek a briefing.[4]

1.13      It is the view of the Coalition that Minister Albanese was attempting to avoid the scrutiny of the committee in the allocation of the Tasmanian freight assistance package.

1.14      It is this action that the Coalition contests saw the committee misled by the evidence provided.

 

Senator the Hon Richard Colbeck Senator the Hon Bill Heffernan
Deputy Chair

 

 

Newspaper clippings

Newspaper clippings

Letter - A new deal for tasmanian exporters

Letter - A new deal for tasmanian exporters

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page