Report to the Senate

Report to the Senate

Introduction

1.           On 9 May 2007, the Senate referred to the committee for examination and report the following documents:

2.           The committee has considered the proposed budget expenditure for the year ending 30 June 2008, and has received evidence from the Minister representing the Minister for Foreign Affairs and the Minister for Trade; the Minister representing the Minister for Defence, and the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs; and officers of the departments and agencies concerned.

3.           The committee met in public session on 28, 29, 30 and 31 May 2007. Further written explanations provided by departments and agencies will be presented separately in volumes of additional information. This information will also be placed on the committee’s internet site (www.aph.gov.au/senate_fadt).

Questions on notice

4.                      The committee resolved, under Standing Order 26, that written answers and additional information should be submitted to the committee by close of business on Thursday, 26 July 2007.

Foreign Affairs and Trade portfolio

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Changes to output structure

5.           The committee notes that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has recently undergone a structural reorganisation in Outcome 1. Mr Doug Chester, Deputy Secretary, advised that 'the department did a reorganisation of divisions late last year and, as a result of that reorganisation, responsibility for various geographic areas was separated and realigned'.[1] This has resulted in changes to the numbering of the following outputs:

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Outcome 1

Previous

Current

Output 1.1

Protection and advocacy of Australia's international interests through the provision of policy advice to ministers and overseas diplomatic activity

No change

Output 1.1.1

North Asia

No change

Output 1.1.2

South and South–East Asia

South–East Asia

Output 1.1.3

Americas and Europe

Americas

Output 1.1.4

South Pacific, Middle East and Africa

Europe

Output 1.1.5

Bilateral, regional and multi-lateral trade negotiations

South and West Asia, Middle East and Africa

Output 1.1.6

Trade development/policy coordination and Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation

Pacific

Output 1.1.7

International organisations, legal and environment

Bilateral, regional and multi-lateral trade negotiations

Output 1.1.8

Security, nuclear disarmament and non–proliferation

Trade development/policy coordination and Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation

Output 1.1.9

International organisations, legal and environment

Output 1.1.10

Security, nuclear disarmament and non–proliferation

6.           The committee acknowledged the attendance at the hearings of Mr Doug Chester, Deputy Secretary, and officers of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.[2]

Late answers to questions on notice

7.           The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade was asked about the late response to the 80 questions taken on notice during the last estimates hearings in February 2007. The department informed the committee that no question had been answered by the required date of 29 March 2007 set down by the committee.

8.           Mr Chester stated that 68 answers were submitted to the Minister's office on 26 March (and approved on 17 April). The remaining 12 were submitted on 29 March (and approved on 8 May, apart from one answer that was amended). Of these answers, 79 were provided to the committee secretariat in one batch on 8 May, with the final answer provided on 23 May.[3]

9.           The committee sought an explanation for the delay in submitting the answers to the committee following approval by the Minister on 17 April. Mr Chester took the question on notice.[4]

10.         Other matters raised during the hearing are listed below.

Portfolio overview[5]
Output 1.1
1.1.1—North Asia
1.1.2—South East Asia
1.1.3—Americas
1.1.4—Europe
1.1.5—South and West Asia, Middle East and Africa
1.1.6—Pacific[6]
1.1.7—Bilateral, regional and multi–lateral trade negotiations, and
1.1.8—Trade development /policy coordination and APEC
1.1.9—International organisations, legal and environment
1.1.10—Security, nuclear disarmament and non–proliferation

AusAID[7]

11.         The committee acknowledged the attendance at the hearings of Mr Bruce Davis, Director General, and officers representing AusAID.

12.         Matters raised by the committee included:

Austrade[8]

13.         The committee acknowledged the attendance at the hearings of Mr Peter Yuile, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, and officers representing Austrade.

14.         Matters raised by the committee included:

Defence portfolio

Department of Defence

Pre-estimates briefing on the Portfolio Budget Statement and Annual Report

15.       Committee members attended a private briefing from Defence officers responsible for the PBS and Annual Report to gain a better understanding of these documents, their structure and outputs, the location and explanation of the various tables contained in the PBS and to determine a schedule and order for asking questions. The committee takes this opportunity to thank Defence for their assistance and willingness to assist the committee.

Proposed changes to the Department of Defence's Output structure

16.       During this briefing, the committee was advised of proposed changes to Defence's outcome and output structure. The changes are outlined in the PBS.

17.       During the hearing, a defence witness explained that the proposed changes were noted in the PBS to flag that Defence would have a new outcome structure which has been agreed to by the Minister for Finance and Administration. He explained:

The changes were agreed too late for us to be able to translate all of the information into this document this time around for two reasons. One was that we did not have enough time, but the second thing was that we were transitioning to an upgraded portfolio budgeting system. Our budgeting system, which we call BORIS, had just gone through a major upgrade and we judged that it was too risky to try in the short time frame to translate the information in here. We would rather do it in a measured way. So we have alerted you to that. What we plan to do in the additional estimates, the PAES, when we bring this back in December or January, is show you how we have converted the old structure into the new one, and the cross walk to explain that.[9]

18.       The committee took this opportunity to refer to the briefing from Defence officers held prior to the hearings and suggested that a similar briefing would be helpful in light of the proposed restructure. The intention of another briefing would be to enable committee members to better 'track the outputs under the old system to the new system' in order to gain some familiarity with it and not waste time at the next round of estimates.[10] A committee member also added that the next annual report would need to spell out the changes using the same terms, so that committee members could 'easily move from the annual report this year to the accounts for next year'.[11]

19.       With regard to the transition to the new structure, Defence informed the committee that it would be obliged to report in the old structure for its Annual Report for financial year 2006–2007. In response to concerns about the contents of the Annual Report, a Defence officer suggested:

What we can do in the new structure from 2007–08 onwards is show it to you in the current structure and in the revised structure. We could brief you on that before we have the hearing into the additional estimates.[12]

20.       The committee indicated that such a proposal would be welcomed.

21.         The committee acknowledged the presence at the hearings, of Mr Nick Warner, Secretary of the Department of Defence, and Air Chief Marshal, Angus Houston, AM, Chief of Defence Force (CDF).[13]

Secretary's opening statement

22.         Secretary of the Department of Defence, Mr Nick Warner, informed the committee that the Defence Management Review report, along with Defence's response, was released publicly on 5April 2007. He stated that...

The report acknowledged the significant progress Defence has made over the past decade in a range of areas, most notably in military operations but also in policy development and a range of public sector reforms.

...

having acknowledged these achievements and successes, the review team made a series of recommendations about how Defence can improve its organisational efficiency and effectiveness. The report made 53 recommendations. The CDF and I, in consultation with the Defence service chiefs and group heads, agreed to implement 50 of the recommendations in full and two of the recommendations in part.

...

of the 50–plus recommendations we agreed, four key principles will underpin our approach to implementation: accountability and governance, support to our minister and government more broadly, people management and the need to reform our business systems. Clearer and more streamlined governance and accountability arrangements will assist us in maintaining a high operational tempo while also driving organisational reform and planning for the future.[14]

Chief of the Defence Force opening statement

23.         Chief of the Defence Force, Air Chief Marshal Houston, gave the committee a comprehensive update on ADF operational achievements, and recruitment and retention issues, since the additional estimates hearings in February 2007.

24. Air Chief Marshal Houston informed the committee that:

Firstly, in terms of our operations broadly, we continue to maintain a busy tempo, with the government to date approving the overall deployment of about 3,850 people to nine overseas operating locations in 2007. We also have 450 personnel deployed on security tasks in our maritime protection zone and other personnel deployed on international engagement, including participation in exercises and foreign visits. Additionally, in preparation for APEC 2007, a forward headquarters element has been established in Sydney for liaison and coordination of Defence support to the APEC security task force. Each of these deployments are within the capability of our forces, are sustainable for the duration of the deployment and leaves us postured to meet a range of contingency requirements.

... On our progress with recruiting and retention: As you are aware, the ADF has been directed to grow to a full–time strength of 57,000 by 2016. Its current strength is about 51,000, so this represents an increase of 6,000, or just over 11.75 percent, in ten years. To do this, we have to increase recruiting and improve retention. We have set ourselves a goal of increasing our recruiting intake for our full–time force from 4,677 to 6,500 per annum and reducing our separation rate from just over 11 percent to below 10per cent. We began looking at improving our recruiting in some depth in 2005. Already we have seen marked and improved recruiting performance.

...

Our first initiatives looked at stabilising key ranks within Army and Navy... [Within Navy] doctors, principal warfare officers, submarine warfare officers, underwater medicine qualified sailors, submarine and junior technical sailors are in particularly short supply, due in part to their attractiveness to the private professional organisations and industry. ... But it is not all bad and there are some encouraging signs that critical parts of our Navy workforce are on the road to recovery.[15]

25.         Other major topics examined during the hearing included:

Portfolio overview
Budget summary
Major capital facilities
People—Defence personnel

Defence Materiel Organisation

Outcome 1: Defence capabilities
Outcome 2: Navy
Outcome 7: Superannuation and housing support services

Defence Housing Australia[17]

26. The committee acknowledged the presence at the hearings of Mr Richard Bear, General Manager, Development and Construction, and officers of Defence Housing Australia.

27.         Issues that were discussed included:

Department of Veterans’ Affairs[18]

28.         The committee acknowledged the presence at the hearings of Mr Mark Sullivan, Secretary, and officers of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.

29.         Before commencing the examination of officers from the Department of Veterans' Affairs, the Secretary of the Department expressed concerns about the level of detail contained in questions about the personal circumstances of Geoff Gregg during the estimates examination of Defence. He indicated that he was not prepared to go into the 'some of the material that I heard today in terms of citing the evidence from psychological reports and chronologies'. He stated that he would be 'quite happy to go through the processes, the policy issues and the procedural issues...'[19]

30.         The committee member indicated he had been advised that that the parents, widow and family members had given their approval for questions to be asked. He indicated that his intention was to ask questions on procedures and not go to questions dealing with health details.

31.         Issues that the committee examined included:

Outcome 1—Compensation
Outcome 2—Health
Outcome 3—Commemorations
Output 6

Acknowledgements

32.         The committee expresses its appreciation of the assistance given during its hearings by Senator the Hon Chris Ellison and Senator the Hon Helen Coonan. The committee also acknowledges the attendance and cooperation of the many departmental and agency officers and the services of various parliamentary staff involved in the estimates process.

 

Senator Marise Payne

Chair

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page