Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Portfolio specific issues

2.1        This chapter provides an overview of some of the matters raised during the committee's hearings on the Additional Estimates 2016–17. The discussion follows the outcome and agency structure.

Environment Portfolio

Department of the Environment

2.2        The committee opened the hearing with the Department of the Environment and Energy by asking general questions about:

Outcome 1: Conserve, protect and sustainably manage Australia's biodiversity, ecosystems, environment and heritage through research, information management, supporting natural resource management, establishing and managing Commonwealth Protected areas, and reducing and regulating the use of pollutants and hazardous substances

2.3        The committee called officers in relation to Program 1.1: Sustainable Management of Natural Resources and the Environment. Matters discussed by the committee included:

2.4        The committee called officers in relation to Program 1.2: Environmental Information and Research and Program 1.3: Land Sector Initiatives. The committee discussed the impending release of the next State of the Environment report and the spread of mange in Tasmania's wombat populations (p. 103).  

2.5        Officers were called in relation to Program 1.4: Conservation of Australia's Heritage and the Environment. Matters raised included:

2.6        Officers from the department were called in relation to Program 1.5: Environmental Regulation. Matters canvassed included:

2.7        The committee called officers from the department in relation to Program 1.6: Management of Hazardous Wastes, Substances and Pollutants. Matters discussed included:

Outcome 2: Reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions, adapt to the impacts of climate change and contribute to the negotiation of an effective global solution to climate change, through developing and implementing a national response to climate change

2.8         The committee agreed to put on notice any questions in relation to Program 2.1: Reducing Australia's greenhouse gas emissions and Program 2.2: Adapting to Climate Change (pp. 115, 116).

Outcome 3: Advancement of Australia's strategic, scientific, environmental and economic interests in the Antarctic by protecting, administering and researching the region

2.9        Officers from the department were called in relation to Program 3.1: Antarctica: Science, Policy and Presence. Dr Gwen Fenton, the Chief Scientist of the Australian Antarctic Division, represented Dr Nick Gales as Acting Director in his absence. Matters examined included:

Outcome 4: Improve the health of rivers and freshwater ecosystems and water use efficiency through implementing water reforms, and ensuring enhanced sustainability, efficiency and productivity in the management and use of water resources

2.10      The committee called officers of the department in relation to Program 4.1: Water Reform and Program 4.2: Commonwealth Environmental Water and examined both programs concurrently. Matters discussed included water allocations in the Murray-Darling Basin system (pp. 117–121).

Outcome 5: Support the reliable, sustainable and secure operations of energy markets through improving Australia’s energy efficiency, performance and productivity for the community

2.11      The committee continued its examination of the department by calling officers in relation to Program 5.1: Energy. Matters discussed included:

Australian Renewable Energy Agency

2.12      The committee called officers from the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) and canvassed the following matters:

Bureau of Meteorology

2.13      Officers were called from the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) and matters examined included:

Clean Energy Finance Corporation

2.14      The committee called officers from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC). The committee noted that this was the last appearance of Mr Oliver Yates, Chief Executive Officer, before the committee at Estimates. In his opening statement Mr Yates highlighted the role played by the estimates process:

...the role the committee operates is very important for all government organisations so that they know they will be publicly scrutinised and held to the highest standards—not only are our own organisation but any others that have to appear before you. I would like to thank many of the senators, some of whom are here and some who are not, who have provided our organisation with great support over the four and half years that I have been CEO.[7]

2.15      Other matters discussed included:

Clean Energy Regulator

2.16      Officers of the Clean Energy Regulator were called and matters examined included:

Climate Change Authority

2.17      The committee called officers from the Climate Change Authority and canvassed the following matters:

Director of National Parks

2.18      The committee called the Director of National Parks, Ms Sally Barnes, and discussed the flowing matters:

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority

2.19      The committee called officers from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Matters examined included:

Office of the Supervising Scientist

2.20      The committee called the Office of the Supervising Scientist and discussed the rehabilitation of the Ranger uranium mine site including advice in relation to the proposed closure criteria (pp. 83–86). 

Communications and the Arts Portfolio

2.21      As noted in chapter one, the committee conducted its examination of the Communications and the Arts Portfolio over two days: 28 February 2017 and 24 March 2017. On 24 March 2017, the committee completed its examination of the Department of Communications and the Arts and NBN Co as well as a number of agencies within the portfolio.

Department of Communications and the Arts

2.22      The committee commenced its examination of the Communications and the Arts Portfolio on 28 February 2017 by inviting an opening statement from the Minister for Communications and for the Arts, Senator the Hon Mitch Fifield. The Minister drew the committee's attention to the recent announcement of the resignation of Mr Ahmed Fahour as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Australia Post (pp. 2–4).

2.23      At the conclusion of the Minister's opening statement, the committee discussed issues related to senior executive remuneration (pp. 4–7, 9–16, and 18–22).

2.24      The committee called officers from the Department of Communications and the Arts and the following general matters were discussed:

2.25      The committee canvassed issues related to Programs 1.1 and 2.1 at its hearing on 24 March 2017 as follows:

Outcome 1: Promote an innovative and competitive communications sector, through policy development, advice and programme delivery, so all Australians can realise the potential of digital technologies and communications services

2.26      Officers were called in relation to Program 1.1: Digital Technologies and Communications Services. Matters canvassed included:

Outcome 2: Participation in, and access to, Australia's arts and culture through developing and supporting cultural expression

2.27      The committee called officers in relation to Program 2.1: Arts and Cultural Development and discussed the following matters:

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

2.28      The committee called officers of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and discussed the following matters:

Australia Post

2.29      In his opening statement, Mr John Stanhope, Chairman of Australia Post, addressed the issue of senior executive remuneration in the organisation (pp. 39–40). At the invitation of the committee, Mr Ahmed Fahour made an opening statement and summarised for the committee some of the achievements during his term of office and future challenges facing the organisation (pp. 40–41).

2.30      At the conclusion of both opening statements, the committee discussed the issue of senior executive remuneration in the organisation (pp. 42–53, 54–57 and 59).

2.31      Other matters discussed by the committee included:

2.32      At the conclusion of the committee's examination, the Chair acknowledged Mr Fahour's contribution to the estimates process over his seven year tenure at Australia Post.[8]

National Broadband Network Co Ltd

2.33      One 28 February 2017, Mr Bill Morrow, Chief Executive Officer, made an opening statement and provided the committee with an update on the progress of the rollout of the National Broadband Network (NBN) since the Supplementary Budget Estimates (pp. 102–103).

2.34      The committee canvassed the following matters with NBN Co:

2.35      Officers from NBN Co were called to appear before the committee at the hearing on 24 March 2017. The following matters were discussed:

Special Broadcasting Service

2.36      The committee called Mr Michael Ebeid, Managing Director and CEO of the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS), who provided an opening statement acknowledging the recent appointment of Dr Hass Dellal as SBS Chairman (p. 33). The following matters were discussed:

Agencies examined on 24 March 2017

2.37      The committee examined the following agencies on Friday, 24 March 2017:

Australia Council

2.38      The committee called officers from the Australia Council, who appeared via videoconference, and discussed changes to funding arrangements (pp. 3–9) and decision making processes for selecting arts projects (p. 10).

Australian Communications and Media Authority

2.39      The committee called officers  of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) and discussed:

National Film and Sound Archive

2.40      The committee called officers from the National Film and Sound Archive (NFSA) and discussed the impact of funding cuts on the programs and operation of the NFSA (pp. 15–17).

National Library of Australia

2.41      This was the Director-General's first appearance at Estimates and the committee welcomed Dr Marie-Louise Ayers appearing in her new position. Matters raised included:

Office of the Children's eSafety Commissioner

2.42      The chair welcomed Ms Julie Inman-Grant, Commissioner, to her first appearance before the committee at Estimates and invited her to make an opening statement. Ms Inman-Grant provided the committee with a brief overview of the role and anticipated expanded responsibilities of the Office of the Children's eSafety Commissioner:

I think 2017 is going to be a year of extension and further opportunity. You may know that there is legislation pending in the House, tabled on 9 February by Paul Fletcher, which will expand the remit of the office from the children's e-commissioner's office to the e-safety commissioner's office. That will allow us to expand our remit and to really meet the safety needs of all Australians, particularly those from vulnerable communities.[9]

2.43      Other matters discussed included:

Screen Australia

2.44      The committee called officers from Screen Australia and discussed the following matters:

Senator Linda Reynolds CSC
Chair

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page