Chapter 4

29th Report of the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation
Commonwealth Superannuation Bills
Table of Contents

Chapter 4

Labor and Australian Democrat Senators' Majority Report

4.1 Labor and Australian Democrat Senators believe that the Government's choice of superannuation model will severely disadvantage many existing Commonwealth Public Servants and all prospective Commonwealth Public Servants.

4.2 What the Government has labelled as an attempt to introduce choice of superannuation fund into the Australian Public Service is actually nothing more than another broken promise by the Prime Minister, Mr Howard.

4.3 Many provisions of this legislation breach the personal undertaking given in writing to all public servants by the Prime Minister before the 1996 election:

I give you my rock solid guarantee that the Coalition will not cut and destroy public sector superannuation schemes or the entitlements of existing and prospective Commonwealth Government employees. [1]

Attached to this letter was the statement:

A Coalition Government will:

4.4 If the Government was seriously interested in introducing choice of fund, it would not close the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme to new Commonwealth public servants and would not be trying to force workers to choose a fund offered by their employer.

4.5 The Government seems intent on driving choice into the public sector to suit ideological reasons rather than reflecting genuine demand from employees.

4.6 In addition, the Government has shown little commitment to a public education campaign which would allow workers to make an informed choice of fund, after weighing up all of the facts which could affect their decision.

4.7 Under the Government's bills, employees who either cannot join the PSS or opt out of either the CSS or PSS should be completely aware that they would or will be disadvantaged in the following ways:

There are other relevant concerns also raised in Chapter 3 of the report.

4.8 There is currently significant mobility within the Public Service, but given that different departments will offer different superannuation options, those employees who transfer will either have to:

Recommendation

  1. Labor and Australian Democrat Senators recommend that, consistent with recommendations made in the Senate Select Committee's Twenty Eighth Report on Choice of Fund:
  2. employees should not be adversely disadvantaged by the move to choice of fund;
  3. if any proposed model of choice of four funds is proceeded with, genuine agreement should be reached with employees;
  4. the PSS should not be closed but instead should continue to be offered as a fund choice to new members of the Australian Public Service;
  5. the start date for choice of superannuation fund should be delayed until 1 July 2000 for both new and existing employees;
  6. any default fund arrangements should be based on the fund to which the majority of employees at a worksite belong, provided they are eligible to join;
  7. the default fund must meet minimum standards in the areas of insurance and investment choice.

Labor Senators recommend that the bills not be passed unless substantially amended to address the concerns outlined above.

Senator the Hon. Nick Sherry Senator Stephen Conroy

Deputy Chairman

Senator Chris Evans Senator Lyn Allison

Footnotes

[1] Letter dated 28 February 1996, by the then Leader of the Opposition, the Hon. John Howard MP.

[2] Extract from Coalition superannuation and public administration policy released February 1996.