Introduction
1.1
This is the first report on annual reports for 2017 of the Senate
Environment and Communications Legislation Committee (the committee). It
provides an overview of annual reports of agencies within the allocated
portfolios tabled in the Senate between 1 May 2016 and
31 October 2016.
1.2
Annual reports inform the Parliament, stakeholders and other interested
parties of the operations and performance of public sector departments,
agencies and companies. They are a primary accountability mechanism.
Additionally, annual reports are important reference documents and form part of
the historical record.
Terms of reference
1.3
Under Standing Order 25(20), the annual reports of certain departments
and agencies are referred to the committee for examination and assessment. The
committee is required to:
-
Examine each annual report referred to it and report to the Senate
whether the report is apparently satisfactory.
-
Consider in more detail, and report to the Senate on, each annual report
which is not apparently satisfactory, and on the other annual report which it
selects for more detailed consideration.
-
Investigate and report to the Senate on any lateness in the presentation
of annual reports.
-
In considering an annual report, take into account any relevant remarks
about the report made in debate in the Senate.
-
If the committee so determines, consider annual reports of departments
and budget-related agencies in conjunction with examination of estimates.
-
Report on annual reports tabled by 31 October each year by the
tenth sitting day of the following year, and on annual reports tabled by
30 April each year by the tenth sitting day after 30 June of that
year.
-
Draw the attention of the Senate to any significant matters relating to
the operations and performance of the bodies furnishing the annual reports.
-
Report to the Senate each year whether there are any bodies which do not
present annual reports to the Senate and which should present such reports.
Allocated portfolios
1.4
In accordance with the resolution of the Senate on 31 August 2016, the
committee has oversight of the following portfolios:
-
Environment and Energy; and
-
Communications and the Arts.[1]
Reporting requirements
1.5
The Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013
(PGPA Act) established a performance reporting framework for all Commonwealth
entities and companies. The performance framework is based on section 38 of the
PGPA Act which requires all Commonwealth entities to measure and assess their
performance. The performance framework established under the PGPA Act includes
the requirement for Commonwealth entities and companies to prepare a corporate
plan and annual performance statements. The Public Governance, Performance and
Accountability Rule 2014 (PGPA Rule 2014) contain the minimum
requirements to be included.
1.6
For the first time, annual reports have been prepared with annual
performance statements. Section 39 of the PGPA Act requires all Commonwealth
entities to prepare an annual performance statement and include those
statements in their annual reports. Entities use the annual performance
statements to report on the results achieved against the targets, goals and
measures established at the beginning of a reporting year in its corporate
plan.
1.7
Following the transitional arrangements that were in place for reporting
in the 2014–15 financial year, the 2015–16 reporting period is the first full
year of reporting under the requirements of the PGPA Act. Below is a summary of
the legislative authority and requirements for the different types of bodies under
which annual reports are prepared for:
-
Non-corporate Commonwealth entities: PGPA Act, section 46 and the
PGPA Rule 2014, Division 3A(A); for portfolio departments and executive
agencies, the Public Service Act 1999, sections 63(2) and 70(2); and for
statutory bodies, relevant enabling legislation.
-
Corporate Commonwealth entities: PGPA Act, section 46 and the
PGPA Rule 2014, Division 3A(B); and for statutory bodies, relevant enabling
legislation.
-
Commonwealth companies: PGPA Act, section 97, which also refers
to requirements under the Corporations Act 2001 and the PGPA Rule, Part
3-3; and for statutory bodies, relevant enabling legislation.
-
Non-statutory bodies: the annual reporting requirements are
contained in the government response to the Senate Standing Committee on
Finance and Public Administration's Report on Non-Statutory bodies.[2]
Disclosure of senior executive
remuneration
1.8
In its Annual Reports (No.1 of 2016), the committee commented on
the decrease in the level of information provided for senior executive
remuneration as a consequence of the implementation of arrangements pursuant to
the PGPA Act and the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability (Financial
Reporting) Rule 2015 (FRR).[3]
1.9
In particular, the committee noted that while the FRR set out 'minimum'
requirements, no entities within the committee's portfolio areas provided any
additional information on director/senior executive remuneration. The lack of
additional information regarding senior executive remuneration has continued to
be a feature of relevant annual reports examined for this reporting period. The
committee notes that, as with the previous annual report, the NBN Co Annual
Report 2015–16 has provided full disclosure of senior executive remuneration.
As a Commonwealth company, it is not required to provide this level of
information on remuneration. The committee commends NBN Co's commitment to
transparency in relation to remuneration.
1.10
More recently, the disclosure of the remuneration of senior executives
of Commonwealth entities has been the subject of discussion and response by the
Government, particularly in relation to Australia Post. At the Supplementary
Budget hearings in October 2016, the committee sought details of senior
executive remuneration as these were not included in its 2015–16 annual report.
The questions were taken on notice and Australia Post then sought to have the
answers received on a confidential basis under another of the committee's powers.
On 7 February 2017, the committee made public the answers as part of the
estimates process.
1.11
The then chair of the committee, Senator Paterson, in a statement to the
Senate noted that this information had been available previously in annual
reports.[4]
The then chair also noted that the Auditor-General in the January 2017 Audits
of the Financial Statements of Australian Government Entities for the Period
Ended 30 June 2016, had commented on disclosure requirements for executive
remuneration and concluded:
There would be benefit in government considering making the
aggregate level of transparency for key management personnel remuneration in
the public sector consistent with that required for listed entities.[5]
1.12
In response to a question in the Senate, the Minister for Communications
stated that the Government 'agrees with the Senate committee's unanimous view
that there is a public interest to report the executive remuneration offered at
Government Business Enterprises (GBEs) and that GBEs should be held to a high
standard of disclosure'.[6]
The committee welcomes the Minister's comments. The committee has also written
to the Minister for Finance and the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and
Audit noting that its experience with Australia Post raises broader issues
about the adequacy of information included in annual reports that have
application across the Commonwealth.
1.13
In addition, the committee notes that at its Additional Estimates hearing
of 28 February 2017 Mr John Stanhope AM, Chairman of Australia Post,
indicated that Australia Post had the previous night published on its website a
Remuneration Report. This report outlined the senior executive remuneration
strategy and the various components of salary, including the long term
incentive payments. Mr John Stanhope stated that:
It is the board's intention, going forward, to disclose
senior executive remuneration in the upcoming and future annual reports...If you
look at that disclosure, it is virtually a precis of the whole contract, and
you will see how we set benchmarks and how we reward our executives—not just
the CEO; all the senior executives. The disclosure includes the explanation of
the business. By the way, I will just add: I believe it is in the interest of
us to disclose these things because it has become apparent that Australia Post
is not actually well understood, so disclosure, in my mind and in the mind of
the board, is very important.[7]
1.14
The committee welcomes the announcement by Australia Post that it will
provide detailed information on senior executive remuneration in its future
annual reports.
Reports examined
1.15
This report examines the following reports, tabled in the Senate or
presented out of session to the President of the Senate and referred to the
committee between 1 May 2016 and 31 October 2016:
Non-corporate Commonwealth entities
-
Department of Communications and the Arts—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Department of the Environment and Energy—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Australian Communications and Media Authority and the Office of
the Children's eSafety Commissioner—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Bureau of Meteorology—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Clean Energy Regulator—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Climate Change Authority—Annual Report 2015–16; and
-
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority—Annual Report 2015–16.
Corporate Commonwealth entities
-
Australia Council for the Arts—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Australian Broadcasting Corporation—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Australian Film, Television and Radio School—Annual Report
2015–16;
-
Australian National Maritime Museum—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Australian Postal Corporation—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Australian Renewable Energy Agency—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Clean Energy Finance Corporation—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Director of National Parks—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
National Film and Sound Archive of Australia—Annual Report
2015–16;
-
National Gallery of Australia—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
National Library of Australia—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
National Museum of Australia—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
National Portrait Gallery of Australia—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Old Parliament House (Museum of Australian Democracy—Annual
Report 2015–16;
-
Screen Australia—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Special Broadcasting Service Corporation—Annual Report 2015–16;
and
-
Sydney Harbour Federation Trust—Annual Report 2015–16.
Commonwealth companies
-
Australian Business Arts Foundation Limited (Creative
Partnerships Australia)—Annual Report 2015–16;
-
Bundanon Trust—Annual Report 2015–16; and
-
NBN Co Limited—Annual Report 2015–16.
Reports not examined
1.16
The committee is not obliged to report on Acts, statements of corporate
intent, policy papers, budget documents, corporate plans or errata. The
following were referred to the committee between 1 May 2016 and
31 October 2016 but are not examined in this report:
-
Australian Communications and Media Authority—Communications
Report for 2015–16;
-
Australian National Maritime Museum—Corporate Plan 2016–2020;
-
Australian Postal Corporation—Diversity and Inclusion Annual
Report 2016;
-
Climate Change Authority Act 2011—Towards a climate policy
toolkit: Special Review on Australia's Climate Goals and Policies Report, dated
August 2016; and
-
Fuel Quality Standards Act 2000—Independent Review on the
Operation of the Act Final Report by Marsden Jacob Associates and Pacific
Environment Limited, dated April 2016.
Timeliness
1.17
Section 46 of the PGPA Act requires the provision of an annual report of
a Commonwealth entity to the responsible minister by the 15th day of
the fourth month after the end of the reporting period for the entity. This
section of the Act does not, however, provide for a timeframe for the minister
to present the report to the Parliament.
1.18
Section 97 of the PGPA Act sets out the requirements for the provision
of annual reports of Commonwealth companies to the responsible minister.
1.19
The PGPA Rule 2014 states that annual reports for corporate Commonwealth
entities, non-corporate Commonwealth entities and Commonwealth companies must
comply with the Guidelines for the Presentation of Documents to the
Parliament, which is prepared by the Department of the Prime Minister and
Cabinet.[8]
1.20
The guidelines advise that for all entities:
As per past practice, it is expected that the responsible
Minister will present the report to each House of Parliament on or before 31
October. If Senate Supplementary Budget Estimates hearings are scheduled to
occur prior to 31 October, it is best practice for annual reports to be
tabled prior to those hearings. This ensures that annual reports are available
for scrutiny by the relevant Senate standing committee.[9]
1.21
Where a body is unable to meet this deadline, an extension of time to
report can be sought under the provisions of subsections 34C(4)–(7) of the Acts
Interpretation Act 1901.
1.22
Appendix 1 lists the annual reports tabled (or presented) in the Senate
and the House of Representatives between 1 May 2016 and
31 October 2016 and referred to the committee, with relevant tabling
dates.
Reports received after
31 October 2016
1.23
The committee is disappointed to note that the Great Barrier Reef Marine
Park Authority within the Environment and Energy Portfolio and the
Classification Board and the Classification Review Board within the
Communications and the Arts Portfolio presented their annual reports after
31 October 2016. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Annual
Report 2015–16 was tabled in the Senate on 8 November 2016. The Classification
Board and the Classification Review Board Annual Report 2015–16 was tabled in
the Senate on 9 November 2016. Those annual reports received after
the 31 October deadline will be examined and considered in the committee's
Annual Reports (No. 2 of 2017).
Senate debate
1.24
Under Standing Order 25(20)(d), the committee is obliged to note any
remarks made in the Senate about annual reports. None of the annual reports
examined in this report were the subject of Senate debate.
Apparently satisfactory
1.25
Standing Order 25(20)(a) requires that the committee report to the
Senate on whether the annual reports of departments and agencies in its
portfolios are 'apparently satisfactory'. In making this assessment, the
committee considers such aspects as timeliness of presentation and compliance
with relevant reporting requirements.
1.26
The committee has examined all annual reports referred during the
reporting period and considers that they are apparently satisfactory.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page