Chapter 1
Introduction and background
1.1
The Business Names Registration Bill 2011, the Business Names
Registration (Fees) Bill 2011 and the Business Names Registration (Transitional
and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011 are exposure bills which will implement
a national system for registering businesses in Australia. This national system
will replace the business registers currently operating in each state and
territory. Businesses will no longer be required to register in each state and
territory in which they trade. Rather, they will pay a flat fee to register
nationally.
1.2
This chapter provides an overview of the bills, examines the background
to the proposed legislation, provides an outline of the current business names
registration processes, summarises the likely benefits to the business community
if the bills are enacted and outlines the conduct of this inquiry.
Referral of the bills
1.3
On 6 July 2011, the Senate referred the exposure draft versions of the
following bills to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and
report by 15 August 2011:
- the Business Names Registration Bill 2011;
- the Business Names Registration (Transitional and Consequential
Provisions) Bill 2011; and
- the Business Names Registration (Fees) Bill 2011.
1.4
The terms of reference for this inquiry direct the committee to consider
the bills, currently in the form of a third exposure draft, before they are
enacted by any of the State legislatures. Each State legislature needs to pass
its own legislation conferring relevant powers to the Commonwealth (see
paragraph 1.26).
1.5
The committee acknowledges that these bills are in exposure draft form
and that the intent is to open discussion on their content before they are
introduced into the various parliaments. It is aware that this legislation
requires the agreement of all states and territories and that considerable work
has already been made to reach agreement on the exposure drafts among these
jurisdictions.
Overview of the bills
1.6
Currently in Australia, the registration of business names is a state
and territory regulated process. A business must register a business name in
the state or territory they are intending to trade in. If a business trades in
more than one state or territory, they must register their business name in
each jurisdiction independently. Each jurisdiction's registration fee differs
in cost, although all offer the option of three year registrations and renewals
(see Table 1.2).
1.7
The three bills give effect to the establishment of a National Business
Names Register and form one element of the Council of Australian Governments'
(COAG) Seamless National Economy Agreement, signed in 2008.
1.8
The objectives of the Business Names Registration Bill 2011 are:
- to ensure that the name of the person behind a business entity
name is known;
- to identify a business and how that business may be contacted;
- to simplify the registration process and to reduce the burden on
business by enabling them to register once nationally;
- to ensure identical or near identical business names are not
registered; and
- to ensure that undesirable and/or restricted names are not
registered.
1.9
As part of this package, the draft Business Names Registration
Regulations 2011, Business Names Registration (Fees) Regulations 2011 and the
Business Names Registration (Availability of Names) Determination 2011 are also
being introduced, but at a later date after the states and territories have
consented to their provisions. The Department of Innovation, Industry, Science
and Research (DIISR) has also compiled a Frequently Asked Questions sheet, available
on its website, to help explain the new arrangements to business owners.[1]
1.10
The regulations have not been settled with the states and territories
and have not been referred to this committee for inquiry. Nonetheless, the
draft regulations warrant attention insofar as they will reflect the content
and operation of the bills once passed.
Background of the bills
1.11
DIISR described to the committee the inception of COAG's business names initiative:
Five years ago, in July 2006, COAG identified this [business
names] as a regulatory hot spot. This was prompted by a range of drivers,
including the January 2006 report of the Taskforce on Reducing the Regulatory
Burden on Business, the Banks report. It was also informed by some of the
issues raised in the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property's review on
trademarks, company names, business names and domain names.[2]
1.12
The implementation timeline of the national business names registry is
summarised below. Following the Banks Report:
The Small Business Ministerial Council (SBMC) was tasked with
progressing this [the national business names register] and a submission was
provided to COAG in early 2007. Following consideration, COAG gave a further
directive to consider the proposal in terms of strengthening the cost-benefit
assessment, and considering related initiatives in business-to-government interaction
(including information discovery and business client account management), and
to do this in consultation with the Ministerial Council of Consumer Affairs (MCCA).[3]
1.13
The Small Business Ministerial Council then provided its recommendations
to COAG:
A business case was completed in April 2008 and
recommendations from the Steering Committee were provided to the SBMC in May
2008. In June 2008 the SBMC wrote to the Chair and Co-chair of the COAG Working
Group - Business Regulation and Competition Working Group (BRCWG) with its
recommendations.[4]
The COAG Agreement
1.14
In its submission, DIISR states that:
A model was agreed to by COAG at its July 2008 meeting:
COAG notes the Small Business Ministerial Council
considered this matter on 23 May 2008 and agreed in principle support for a
business model to develop a seamless, single online registration system for
both Australian Business Numbers and business names, including trademark
searching. COAG has approved the establishment of a national registration
system which will also deliver online business information services and improve
ongoing interactions between government and business, through such innovations
as automatic form filling. COAG has approved the establishment of a national
registration system and agrees to the necessary referral of power to the
Commonwealth to enable it to implement the system. COAG has asked that BRCWG
bring forward an implementation strategy to its meeting in October 2008.[5]
1.15
In October 2008, COAG agreed to an Implementation Plan for the Australian
Business Number (ABN) and Business Names Project. Importantly, this plan
stated:
[A]s previously agreed, the financial impacts of the reforms
related to the seamless national economy, including on States' revenue and
costs will be calculated and incorporated in the overall finalisation of
financial arrangements between the Commonwealth and the States.[6]
Table
1.1: COAG reform agenda: list of completed and upcoming reforms
Reforms completed
|
Reforms to be completed
in 2011 and 2012
|
Develop model national occupational health and safety
|
Regulation of chemicals and plastics
|
Streamlined environmental assessment and approvals ©
|
Personal property securities
|
Harmonisation payroll tax arrangements©
|
National Electronic Conveyancing System
|
Establish Health Practitioner Regulation Agency©
|
National system for consumer credit
|
A single national system of trade measurement©
|
Review of Australia's anti-dumping and countervailing
system
|
Nationally consistent rail safety regulation©
|
Energy reforms
|
A national consumer protection framework©
|
Infrastructure access regulation
|
A national consistent product safety framework©
|
Infrastructure access and regulation regimes
|
Agreement to a national oil and gas regulator©
|
Transport regulators, including maritime regulation
|
National regulation of trustee corporations©
|
Road reform plan
|
National regulation of mortgage broking©
|
Occupational licences
|
National regulation of margin lending©
|
Registering business names
|
National regulation of non-deposit lending
institutions©
|
Director's liability
|
Code-based assessment for single residential
dwellings
|
Not for profit sector
|
Agreement to develop a national construction code
|
Retail tenancy
|
Developed model national mine safety regulations
|
|
Nationally consistent approach to food regulation
|
|
Standard Business Reporting©
|
|
Wine labelling©
|
|
Established the National Occupational Licensing
Authority
|
|
Review of parallel import restrictions on books©
|
|
Agreement to national voc education and training
regulator
|
|
Agreement to legal professional reform
|
|
Source:
Council of Australian Governments, Communiqué, 13 February 2011: Attachment B.
The completion date of the
Seamless National Economy reforms has been brought forward by 6 months from
June 2013 to December 2012.
© Identified by COAG reform
Council as completed by 30 September 2010 or completed subsequently.
1.16
DIISR further notes:
As part of the COAG agreement, the States agreed to refer
their business names registration powers to the Australian Government to allow
the national system. An Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for Business Names
was signed by First Ministers in July 2009. The national system will not be
able to commence if any State does not refer or adopt the legislation. ... It
is proposed that the new national system for business names registration will
start in the first half of 2012.[7]
1.17
DIISR informed the committee that the planned commencement date for the National
Business Names Register is May 2012.[8]
1.18
As part of the Seamless National Economy Agreement, COAG has agreed to a
number of reforms to ease compliance for business and increase protection for
consumers, of which the National Business Names Register forms one part (see
Table 1.1)
1.19
According to the Intergovernmental Agreement for Business Names
Agreement, the purpose of the legislation is to:
(a) allow consumers and traders to identify and locate those trading under a
business name through a Register of Business Names, thereby facilitating
consumer protection; and
(b) attempt to prevent the registration of business names which are
inappropriate, and business names that are likely to offend, mislead or deceive
consumers and traders.[9]
1.20
The Agreement further states that:
The purpose of this Agreement is to endorse a national
business names registration scheme that will allow businesses to register once,
regardless of how many State/Territory jurisdictions those businesses operate
in. The national business names registration scheme will form part of a range
of measures that will, in addition to business names registration, provide a
variety of on‐line
services to businesses. The parties agree that the levels of service provided
by the Commonwealth's national business names registration scheme will not be
less than the levels of service currently provided in the State/Territory
systems.[10]
1.21
Therefore, 'this Agreement is entered into on the basis that the
national business names registration scheme established by the Commonwealth
will be the primary vehicle for business names registration'.[11]
DIISR and the consultation process
1.22
DIISR informed the committee that the key agencies involved in the
implementation of COAG's plan 'are the Department of Innovation, Industry,
Science and Research, the Australian Taxation Office through the Australian Business
Register, IP Australia, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
and the Department of the Treasury, plus each of the state and territory
agencies for small businesses, fair trading and consumer affairs'.[12]
1.23
Prior to this inquiry, DIISR held a series of public consultations on
the three draft bills and the draft regulations. In its submission, DIISR
provided a detailed overview of this process:
There has been extensive consultation for this initiative
since it commenced in 2006. Early consultation activities on the initiative
included:
- Stakeholder consultation with key
industry associations (September-October 2006)
- Market testing of concept (October
2006)
- Release of discussion paper and
consultation with industry associations (September-October 2007)
- Market testing to review key
project assumptions and inform project design (May 2009)
- Public consultation forums on the
proposed business name registration system were held in capital cities (April
2010).
The first exposure draft of the Business Name Registration
Bill 2010 and its related fees bill were exposed for public comments from 28
May to 28 August 2010 (a period of three months) following consideration by
States and Territories. The draft Bill was revised as a result of comments
received and it, and the draft Transitional Bill, were forwarded to
State/Territory officials for further comment in November 2010.
The second exposure draft of all the primary legislation was
released for public consultation on 14 March 2011. The closing date for
submissions was 24 April 2011. (This was in accordance with the Ministerial
Council on Corporations’ agreement to truncate the consultation period.)
Public consultation sessions on the second exposure draft of
the Business Names Registration Bills ran from March until April 2011. A
significant effort was made to ensure parties interested in the initiative were
aware of the second exposure. Firstly, advertisements on the public
consultation appeared in The Australian and the Australian Financial Review on
14 March 2011. 717 emails went to those who had expressed an interest in the
initiative after previous consultations. A news item was sent to 3680 email
subscribers to the business.gov.au website. A notification was sent to 1109
relevant Business Consultation Website email subscribers. The Business Consultation
Website had an additional 105 hits. Finally 131 industry associations were
invited to meet face to face with officials from [DIISR] in six capital cities
in early to mid April 2011.[13]
1.24
Following these public consultations and further discussions with state
and territory officials, third exposure drafts of the bills were released. The
third exposure drafts are the subject of this inquiry.
1.25
The committee commends Senator the Hon. Nick Sherry, Minister for Small
Business, and DIISR for the extensive community consultations. Of the
submissions received by the committee, none were critical of the consultation
process.
Enactment of the bills
1.26
In order that the Business Names Registration Bills to be enacted, each
state and territory needs to enact their own legislation, conferring power to
the Commonwealth. DIISR explained the process to the committee secretariat:
A state, and it only has to be one state, should enact the
legislation before the Commonwealth enacts. By enacts I mean the relevant
state parliament must pass the legislation, gain Royal Assent for it. Then the
Commonwealth can enact its legislation, which will rely in part on a referral
of state powers to the Commonwealth (paragraph 7(1)(b) of the Business Names
Registration Bill 2011). If there were no state referral enacted by a state
before the Commonwealth enacted, then paragraph 7(1)(b) would be void.
Thus the sequence of events is:
- a state, in this case probably
Tasmania, enacts the legislation and thereby refers powers to the Commonwealth
(other states may also enact the legislation and refer their powers);
- the Commonwealth enacts its
legislation; and
- remaining states adopt the
business names referral legislation
Tasmania has introduced the relevant legislation, and must
enact it before the Commonwealth does.[14]
1.27
DIISR noted in its submission that:
The Registration Bill establishes the National Business Names
Registration System. This involves the States either referring powers to
regulate business names to the Commonwealth or adopting the Commonwealth law.
The law will apply in all Territories except Norfolk Island (however Norfolk
Island could be brought into the scheme at a later date). The Registration Bill
and the Transitional Bill are not intended to exclude the concurrent operation
of most State or Territory laws. Subject to displacement provisions, the law
will not apply to provisions that are capable of concurrent operation.[15]
1.28
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) explained its
role in the transition process for the national register:
We will have one date where the whole new national register
goes online, and in the few months prior to that we will be working with each
department in the states and territories to migrate their current registers
across. Then we will have one go-live date and various transitional
arrangements to facilitate any impacts that occur around the go-live date.[16]
Current business names registration processes
1.29
Currently, businesses are required to register names in the state and/or
territory where they intend to trade.[17]
If a business wants to trade in more than one state/territory, they have to
register the business in each of the relevant jurisdictions. For example, if
Joe starts up a lawn mowing business and calls it Joe's Mowing, and he wants to
trade in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, he would have to register his business
separately in each state. This means that Joe would need to undergo three
different registration processes and pay three different registration fees.
1.30
As mentioned above, business owners are required to register business
names with the relevant state and/or territory authorities. Each state and
territory has a designated agency that registers business names with different associated
charges:
- Western Australia—the Department of Commerce. An application form
for the registration of a business name can be downloaded from the department's
website and lodged at an office of Consumer Protection or by mail. A registration
fee of $90 is payable upon lodgement (three year registration).[18]
- South Australia—the Office of Consumer and Business Affairs
(OCBA). Applications may be completed online via the Department of Justice
website. Alternatively, an application form can be downloaded from OCBA's
website and lodged with the office in person, by mail or by facsimile. A
registration fee of $159 is payable at the time of lodgement (three year
registration).[19]
- Victoria—Consumer Affairs Victoria. Victorian applicants may
lodge their business name registration online. The online system has the
capacity to automatically accept or reject an application. The forms may also
be downloaded from the Department's website and lodged via post, fax, email or
in person at the Victorian Consumer and Business Centre or a local Victorian
Business Centre. The registration fee is $85.50 for three years.[20]
- New South Wales—Fair Trading NSW. Applicants may download a
registration form from the Fair Trading website and lodge it in person or via
mail; the option to register a business name online is not available. A three
year registration fee for a new business name is $160 and the renewal fee is
$120.[21]
- Queensland—the Office of Fair Trading. At the time of
application, business owners are required to provide certified copies of
identification, such as a passport, driver's licence or birth certificate. Forms
can be downloaded from the Office of Fair Trading website and lodged by mail or
in person at the nearest Fair Trading Office, a Magistrates Court or Queensland
Government Agent Program office. Registration for one year is $133.60 or
$255.60 for three years.[22]
- Tasmania—the Department of Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading.
Registration forms can be downloaded from the department's website and lodged
via mail or in person at Service Tasmania. A three year registration fee of
$140 is payable at the time of application.[23]
-
the Australian Capital Territory—the Office of Regulatory
Services. Registration forms are available from the office's website and may be
lodged in person or by mail. Registration fees are $151 for three years or $221
for a five year registration.[24]
- Northern Territory—the Department of Business and Employment.
Registration forms may be downloaded from the department's website and lodged
electronically via the Department of Justice, by mail or in person at a
Territory Business Centre. Registration fees for a three year period are $66 for
a new business and $56 for renewals.[25]
Table 1.2: State and
Territory business registration fees
|
One Year Fee ($)
|
Three Year Fee ($)
|
Five Year Fee ($)
|
Three Year Renewal ($)
|
Western Australia
|
|
90.00
|
|
75.00
|
South Australia
|
|
159.00
|
|
128.00
|
Victoria
|
|
85.50
|
|
61.10
|
New South Wales
|
|
160.00
|
|
115.00
|
Queensland
|
133.60
|
255.60
|
|
206.85
|
Tasmania
|
|
140.00
|
|
140.00
|
ACT
|
|
151.00
|
221.00
|
127.00
|
Northern Territory
|
|
66.00
|
|
56.00
|
Source: Secretariat survey of state/territory
registration fees (website listed in footnotes 15–22)
1.31
While a national names availability search is free in most states and
territories, the Tasmanian Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading charges $15.40 for
this service.
1.32
This state and territory based system means that an identical business
name might be in use by multiple businesses in different regions.
Company and business registrations
1.33
Registering business names is very different to registering a company
name. Company registrations are managed by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission (ASIC), under the Corporations Act 2001 and are administered
using a central registration system. Companies are therefore not restricted in
trade and may conduct business throughout Australia, without being required to
register the company name in each state. Company names are also unique;
business owners may not register identical or almost identical company names.
1.34
Registering a company is much more expensive than registering a business,
costing from $500 to many thousands of dollars, depending on registered agent
fees and company structure. A business owner may register the company
themselves via the ASIC website, which costs between $351–$2137 depending on
company structure. However, there is a large checklist that needs to be
completed for incorporation and many business owners find it easier to use a
registered agent (ASIC provides a list of these on their website) to complete
this process.
1.35
Most companies are also protected by limited liability (unless they
choose not to be), which unincorporated businesses are not. This protects
company owners from being personally sued and/or fined, whereas small business
owners are not subject to this same protection.
The merit of the proposed legislation
1.36
The bills offer four key benefits to small business in Australia. First,
the process of registering business names will be simplified by providing a
central online facility that allows businesses to check the availability of business
names and to register business names on the one website.
1.37
Second, businesses will only have to register a business name once with
ASIC, which will be valid nationwide. This provides a substantially more efficient
system for small businesses, than the current system requiring registration in
each state and territory in which a business trades.[26]
1.38
Third, the ABN registration process will be simplified. Businesses will
no longer be required to register for an ABN separately via the Australian Taxation
Office (ATO) website. Instead, business owners will be able to register
business names and register for an ABN at the same time via the online
facilities provided by ASIC.
1.39
Fourth, the fee schedules enacted by the Business Names Registration
(Fees) Bill 2011 and the proposed Business Names Registration (Fees)
Regulations 2011 will provide substantial financial savings for businesses by
providing a one off fee ($30 for a one year registration and $70 for three
years) for nationwide business registration, as opposed to the current system
under which businesses may be required to pay up to eight different
registration fees depending on the number of states and territories they wish
to trade in.
1.40
In summarising these potential benefits, DIISR writes:
The 2009 cost/benefit analysis by Ernst & Young to
undertake a cost/benefit analysis of the ABN Business Names Registration
Project found that this part of the initiative will provide around $500 million
in savings to business over eight years through the reduction of time and cost
spent registering a national business name and ABN. Savings include (but are
not limited to):
- $203 million over eight years in
savings through reduced costs to business from standardised national fees; and
- $116 million over eight years
through the online 24/7 combined ABN/business names registration forms.
Consumers will also benefit from the new national system.
Consumers will be able to search online free of charge for business contact
details, business address and the entity to which the business name is
registered in Australia. Further information (current and historical) will be
provided for a small fee.[27]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.41
The committee received 18 submissions to this inquiry, which are listed in
Appendix 1. It invited witnesses to attend a public hearing at Parliament House
in Canberra on 2 August 2011. At the hearing, the committee took evidence
from DIISR, ASIC and the Law Council of Australia among others. Witnesses who gave
evidence at the hearing are listed in Appendix 2.
1.42
During the course of the inquiry, various financial organisations gave
evidence to the committee raising their concern that the bills' provisions
would restrict their ability to comply with the Anti-Money Laundering and
Counter-Terrorism Act 2006 (AML-CTF Act).[28]
However, the committee did not receive any evidence from police forces or intelligence
agencies. Accordingly, the committee asked the state and territory
Commissioners of Police and the Director-Generals of the various intelligence
agencies for comment on the capacity of third-party credit providers to comply
with the AML/CTF Act under the proposed legislation. Chapter five makes comment
on this matter.
1.43
Following the public hearing, the committee submitted a number of
questions on notice to DIISR, ASIC, the credit checking firm Veda Solutions,
the Law Council of Australia and the Australian Bankers' Association (ABA). The
committee thanks all these agencies for their timely responses.
1.44
The secretariat also had regular verbal correspondence with DIISR and ASIC
seeking clarification on issues that arose and received written correspondence
from Treasury and the Law Council of Australia.
1.45
The committee and the secretariat thank DIISR, ASIC and all participants
in this inquiry for their cooperation. It also acknowledges that DIISR and the
Minister for Small Business, Senator the Hon. Nick Sherry, approached the
secretariat to refer the draft exposure bills to the committee for inquiry and
comment.
Clarification of DIISR's evidence
1.46
Following the public hearing, the secretariat sent DIISR the Proof
Hansard. DIISR subsequently sent the secretariat several pages of 'corrections'
that it wanted to make to the evidence. In total, there were 18 'corrections';
many of these fundamentally changed the meaning of what was said. Further, some
of the subsequently corrected statements were used by the committee during the
hearing as the basis for further questioning of DIISR and other witnesses. The
following correction is a case in point:
I would like to correct the record on page 4:
I stated: "Only three states collect date of birth; the
other five do not."
My answer should have been: "Only three states give out
date of birth of adults; the other five do not."
1.47
The committee is concerned, therefore, that it may have been misled—albeit
unintentionally—and that these corrections now cast the evidence of other
witnesses in a different light.
1.48
Having received DIISR's corrections, the secretariat notified the Department
that the substantive corrections could not be made to the record but would need
to be clarified through a letter of clarification to the committee. DIISR
subsequently provided this letter of clarification, although several of the
original 'corrections' had been omitted.
Structure of the report
1.49
This report is divided into five chapters:
- chapter two outlines the main provisions of the three draft
bills;
- chapter three discusses submitters' concerns that the proposed
legislation limits their ability to comply with the Anti-Money Laundering and
Counter–Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act);
- chapter four canvasses various other issues raised by submitters
in relation to the bills; and
- chapter five presents the committee's view.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page