Chapter 1
Annual report of departments
Department of Industry [incorporating the annual reports of Geoscience
Australia and IP Australia]
1.1
The Department of Industry's 2013–14
annual report was tabled in both houses of the Senate and House of
Representatives on 28 October 2014. The 2013–14
annual reports for Intellectual Property Australia (IP Australia), which
operates as a non-statutory agency with limited autonomy from the department, and
the annual report for the Geoscience Australia (GA), are also contained in this
annual report.
1.2
Following the Administrative Arrangements Order (AAO) issued on 18 September 2013,
the Industry portfolio brought together the skills, science, innovation,
industry, resources and energy functions of the former Industry, Innovation,
Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education; and Resources, Energy
and Tourism portfolios. The AAO also included the transfer of anti-dumping
functions from the Immigration and Border Protection portfolio to the Industry
Portfolio.[1]
1.3
As part of the machinery of government changes following the 2013
federal election, the new department is responsible for a range of functions
critical to improving the competitiveness of Australian industry, particularly
in the area of science, research and development, energy and resources,
vocational education and training, anti-dumping and industry policy.[2]
1.4
For the reporting period at 30 June 2014, the department's performance
reporting framework comprised four outcomes, which reflected the 2013–14 Portfolio Additional
Estimates Statements.
Review by Departmental Secretary
1.5
In its review, the department undertook a broad range of activities at a
time of significant ongoing structural adjustment due to the effect of declining
mining investments and traditional forms of manufacturing on the Australian
economy.[3]
1.6
Throughout this period, the department's efforts were directed towards
the following key initiatives:
-
establishing a one-stop shop for the environmental approval of
major offshore resources projects;
-
pursuing the government's commitment to reduce the regulatory
burden on business;
-
putting in place arrangements through the $50 million
Manufacturing Transition Grants Programme to assist the transition of
businesses to become more competitive and sustainable; and
-
developing the Exploration Development Incentive, which was to
attract private investment and drive the next wave of mining exploration and
development.
1.7
In addition to the government's 2014–15
Budget commitments, some of the department's other main initiatives included:
-
the $484.2 million Entrepreneurs' Infrastructure Programme, which
offers easy access and practical support to Australian businesses to develop
entrepreneurial skills, commercialise good ideas and provide support to
business in a simplified and streamlined way;
-
the $476 million[4]
Industry Skills Fund, prioritised through small and medium enterprises to
re-skill or up-skill their existing workforce to take advantage of new
technology, innovative work practices and emerging market opportunities; and
-
development of the government's $155 million Growth Fund to
support employees, businesses and regions affected by the GM Holden and Toyota
decisions to cease car manufacturing in 2017.[5]
1.8
In 2013–14
the department also set in train processes for building the foundation for a
strong and sustainable organisation to provide evidence-based advice for the
government's reform agenda. Following the department's restructure, it managed
the transition of 12 streams of incoming and outgoing functions, including the
transfer of about 760 staff into the department and 870 to other departments and
agencies.[6]
1.9
During the financial year, the department also introduced significant
efficiencies, which included: reducing the number of senior executive by 16 per
cent; rationalising a number of boards and committees; commencing development
of a consolidated corporate support model including shared services; and
rationalising the department's office accommodation.[7]
1.10
The department's direction for the following year will include some of the
following:
-
focus on the implementation and delivery of key budget
initiatives;
-
finalising the Energy White Paper;
-
consolidating functions into the Single Business Service Centre;
-
delivering and supporting key elements of the government's
industry innovation and competiveness agenda; and
-
improving the impact of the government's expenditure.
Operational matters
1.11
For the 2013–14
financial year, the department recorded an operating loss of $41 million,
including depreciation and amortisation of $48.17million. Excluding
depreciation and amortisation, the department recorded an operating surplus of
$6.75 million in 2013–14.[8]
1.12
The department reported administered income as largely relating to
Royalty revenue, dividends issued by Snowy Hydro Limited, and registration fees
generated by the National Offshore Petroleum Titles Administrator.[9]
1.13
Some of the department's administered expenses for programmes on behalf
of the government included: $1,114 billion to provide vocational education and
training and support to students; $1,711 billion in grants to universities to
increase skills, qualifications and productivity; and $434.25 million in grants
to increase the production, use and awareness of science and research
knowledge.[10]
The department reported a net equity of $331 million as at 30 June 2014.[11]
1.14
The department had budgeted for an approved loss up to $1.20 million, in
part, to allow for the one-off costs associated with incorporating these
functions into and out of the department as a result of the recent machinery of
government changes. The operating result also incorporated the full-year impact
of the 2014 machinery of government changes.[12]
Geoscience Australia
1.15
In its report, Geoscience Australia recorded the following highlights
for the reporting period included:
-
Publication of various reports and data that underpin
evidence-based technical advice to government. These included Australian
Energy Resource Assessment, the OZMIN database, Critical commodities for
a high-tech world, the Australian Mines Atlas and Australia's
Identified Mineral Resource.[13]
They provided exploration and production information on Australia's
resources to assist in policy development and identified new opportunities for
industry.[14]
The Australian Energy Resource Assessment report provided an update to
the 2010 edition, and offered critical statistics and analysis for discussion
about Australia's energy future and the development of the government's Energy
White Paper.[15]
-
Development of the Australian Geoscience Data Cube, a major step
towards more open and useful government science data. This data will allow
scientists to analyse hundreds of thousands of images simultaneously and can be
used for a wide range of applications, including carbon accounting, Antarctic
science, and mapping of vegetation change, flood inundation, surface minerals,
shallow water bathymetry, and land cover.[16]
-
Publication of the results of the ground-breaking Broken Hill
Managed Aquifer Recharge (BHMAR) project managed by the Department of the
Environment. Geoscience Australia identified a range of new groundwater and
managed aquifer recharge options for the Broken Hill region.[17]
IP Australia
1.16
Similarly, some of the highlights for IP Australia for the 2013–14 period included:
-
An increase in demand for Australian IP rights in 2013–14, which reflected
international trends. The filing of patent applications domestically returned
to levels previously reached prior to the global financial crisis (GFC) in
2007, and the filing of applications for trademarks similarly grew and returned
to pre-GFC levels sooner.[18]
-
IP Australia continued its work with engaging with IP
professionals, academics and representatives of other government agencies on
its strategic research program and making relevant data available for broader
scrutiny and use.[19]
-
IP Australia became the first Commonwealth agency to volunteer to
undergo an agency Capability Review by the Australian Public Service
Commissioner (APSC). These external assessments provided insight into the
agency's strengths and weaknesses, which enabled it to address any capability
gaps. The review's preliminary findings have shaped IP Australia's operational
planning for 2014–15.[20]
1.17
IP Australia operates independently of the Department of Industry on
financial matters, and with some degree of autonomy on other matters, and
recovers more than 98 per cent of its costs by charging fees for its IP rights
service.[21]
Reporting requirements
1.18
The Department of Industry's 2013–14
annual report, which incorporates Geoscience Australia and IP Australia, is
well presented, with easy to locate information and provides a 'clear read'
between information contained in the annual report and the Portfolio Budget
Statements (PBS). Information in Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) contains
quantitative as well as qualitative information for benchmarking and assessing
whether estimates have been achieved over the reporting period. For 2013–14, the KPIs for the
programs of outcomes 1, 2 and 5 are set out in the Department of Industry 2013–14 Portfolio Additional
Estimates Statements (PAES), DIICSRTE 2013–14
PBS and DRET 2013–14
PBS. For the programs of outcome 3, the deliverables set out in the Department
of Industry 2013–14
PAES and DIICCSRTE 2013–14
PBS are used as the KPIs.[22]
1.19
The annual report for the Department of Industry, incorporating Geoscience
Australia and IP Australia, closely adheres to the
compliance index with the inclusion of some suggested reporting requirements such
as significant changes in nature of principal functions or services;[23]
factors, events or trends influencing departmental performance;[24]
and contribution of risk management in achieving objectives.[25]
Furthermore, by incorporating a range of real life case studies into the department's
annual report, complex information is made more user-friendly. In the area of
external scrutiny, the committee is pleased to note the annual report's
comprehensive summary of the different types of external scrutiny the
department has undergone, including its appearance before several parliamentary
senate estimates hearings.[26]
The committee considers that Department of Industry, Geoscience Australia and
IP Australia, have met their reporting obligations under the Acts and the
annual report is 'apparently satisfactory'.
Department of the Treasury
1.20
The Department of the Treasury's ('the department' or 'Treasury') 2013–14 annual report was
tabled in the Senate on 17 November 2014[27]
and in the House of Representatives on 24 November 2014.
Review by Departmental Secretary
1.21
In the Secretary's last departmental review, Dr Parkinson outlined the
transitional environments in which the Australian economy operated and the role
of the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) during this period of transition.
1.22
While economic activity picked up in the United States, United Kingdom
and Japan and remained weak in Europe, it eased in the emerging economies
following their prominent role in driving economic activity post the global
financial crisis (GFC).[28]
1.23
According to Dr Parkinson, on the domestic front, the Australian economy
continued its shift from investment in the resource sector towards non-resource
sectors. This shift has been slower than anticipated with economic activity
recording below trend growth for several years, which resulted in a building
output gap and an increase in the unemployment rate.[29]
Presented with the above conditions, and with a backdrop of falling terms of
trade, the secretary explained that for Australia to deliver economic growth
sufficient to reduce unemployment and continue to enjoy living standards
improvements, priority needs to be directed towards boosting the country's
productivity growth and ensuring fiscal sustainability.[30]
1.24
In 2013–14,
following the federal election, Treasury focused on the delivery of the
government's election commitments for the remainder of the year. In this
context, the department provided advice on pathways to fiscal consolidation
over the medium-term and assisted the National Commission of Audit through the
provision of staff, and information on structure and components of government
revenue and expenditure.[31]
1.25
The 2013–14
period was also a transitional period for the department. Following completion
of the Australian Public Service Commission Capability Review of Treasury, the
department responded by developing a Capability Action Plan (incorporating some
reforms which were already in train), which focused on improving performance in
four main areas: leadership and change management; and planning, budgeting and
measuring.[32]
1.26
Against the department's backdrop of shrinking resources and a reduction
of up to a third of staff from their previous peak in 2011, the department
continued its strong focus on improving Treasury's knowledge base and
organisational strategies. The secretary commended staff for their
professionalism and resilience for their continued provision of high-calibre policy
analysis advice in such challenging circumstances.[33]
1.27
The following highlights were among some of the Secretary's listed
highlights:
-
support provided for the G20 tax agenda, including the
department's contribution to the development of the OECD action plan on base
erosion and profit-shifting, and consultation with businesses on exchange of
information proposals.[34]
-
assistance provided to maintain a robust and dynamic financial
system, and ensured that regulatory frameworks promote macroeconomic stability
and market confidence via the implementation of financial regulatory reforms,
including rules that address the availability and quality of financial advice;
likewise, progress on the implementation of internationally agreed regulatory
reforms designed to support financial stability.[35]
-
secretariat support provided to the Financial System Inquiry and
the Competition Policy Review, which provided recommendations to the government
on how to ensure the financial regulation and competition policy frameworks are
best positioned to support productivity growth and economic stability.[36]
-
continued development of Treasury's two-way secondment program
where Treasury staff have been seconded to the Business Council of Australia,
BHP Biliton, the Financial Services Council and the Australian Bankers
Association. Secondments to other parts of the public service have included:
the Reserve Bank of Australia, the Australian Taxation Office, the Australian
Competition and Consumer Commission, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade,
the Australian National University's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute and the
Commission of Audit.[37]
Operational matters
1.28
The annual report noted that the Treasury received an unqualified audit
report on the 2013–2014 financial statements from the Australian National Audit
Office (ANAO).[38]
1.29
The department reported a surplus of $0.3 million, compared to a surplus
of $3.0 million previously. Employee expenses increased by $10.4 million from
the previous year mainly due to the voluntary redundancy process. Likewise,
supplier expenses increased by $8.3 million from the previous reporting period
mainly due to expenditure relating to the hosting the G20 Finance Ministers'
and Central Bank Governors' meetings as part of Australia's 2014 host year.[39]
1.30
The department incurred $93.8 billion in administered expenses in 2013–14, compared to the $81.4
billion in 2012–13,
Treasury provided a one-off $8.8 billion grant to the Reserve Bank of Australia
(RBA) to strengthen its financial position to the level considered appropriate
by the RBA Board. There was also an increase in grant expenses to the states
and territories that the Treasury provides under the Intergovernmental Agreement
on Federal Financial Relations.
1.31
The Treasury's departmental net asset position decreased by $3.6 million
in 2013–14, mainly due to the recognition of separation and redundancies
payable at 30 June 2014.[40]
Conversely, Treasury's net assets increased by $12.3 billion for the reporting
period; this was mainly attributed to an increase in the value of Treasury's
investments in Australian Government Entities. The department reported
sufficient cash reserves to fund liabilities.[41]
1.32
During the reporting period, Treasury advised Treasury ministers, other
ministers of the Government and relevant stakeholders on a range of
macroeconomic issues, including:
-
an analysis of the Australian and international economic outlook,
including the Australian fiscal outlook, and prepared macroeconomic forecasts;
-
monitoring domestic and international economic, financial and
policy developments to assess their implications for macroeconomic policy
settings; and
-
an analysis on drivers of the Australian economy and factors
likely to influence medium-term economic performance, including productivity.
This analysis was used to develop policy recommendations to improve Australia's
economic growth, living standards and wellbeing.[42]
1.33
For 2013–14,
Treasury contributed to public debate and awareness of budget decisions and the
fiscal outlook when it reported roughly 460,000 unique visitors to the Budget
website between 2014–15
Budget and 30 June 2014 and over 3.9 million pages having been viewed.[43]
Treasury has jointly prepared with the Department of Finance other information made
widely accessible including the Budget Overview, Building Australia's
Infrastructure, and information books on the topics of Higher Education,
Health, and Social Services.[44]
In consultation with the AOFM, Treasury also provided advice on debt issuance
and debt policy issues. This included advice on issues affecting the
government's debt management operations including the performance, governance
and functioning of the Commonwealth debt market.[45]
1.34
Through the Markets Group, Treasury provided advice on policies intended
to promote competitive, efficient markets and to enhance consumer wellbeing; a
secure financial system and sound corporate practices; and foreign investment consistent
with Australia's interest.[46]
1.35
The department also provided a range of advice to the government on:
-
the prudential framework applying to financial markets, including
the banking sector, insurers, superannuation funds and capital markets;[47]
-
foreign investment and trade policy, and continued to participate
in free trade agreement negotiations;[48]
-
the improved operation of Australia's financial reporting,
corporate governance and corporate insolvency regimes;[49]
-
competition in product and services markets, and to support the
interests of Australian consumers.[50]
1.36
The department also assumed the lead role in advising the government on
whole of government policy settings to support the efficient operation of the
Australian small business sector.[51]
Reporting requirements
1.37
The committee commends the Department of Treasury for its continued
high-quality and comprehensive coverage of the department's operations and
performance over the reporting period. The annual report's layout and format is
user-friendly, especially with its inclusion of graphics, trend information and
relevant visuals to break up the block of information presented in text form.
This arrangement enhances the presentation of complex information. Furthermore,
the list of requirements is closely adhered to, making information easy to
locate. The committee is pleased to note the inclusion of suggested information
such as: the approach adopted to identifying areas of significant financial or
operational risk; how the nature and amount of remuneration for SES officers is
determined; workforce planning, staff turnover and retention.[52]
1.38
In relation to external scrutiny, the committee is pleased to note that
Treasury has included a list of parliamentary committees it has participated in
for 2013–14, as well
as recent reports from the ANAO.[53]
1.39
The committee considers the Department of Treasury's 2013–14 annual report 'apparently
satisfactory'.
1.40
The committee would like to express its appreciation to the Treasury for
regularly appearing at estimates and contributing to the committee's inquiries
in
2013–14, as well as to other parliamentary inquiries. However, as previously
noted, the committee is disappointed in the significant number of late answers
to questions on notice.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page