CHAPTER 4

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page

CHAPTER 4

Australian Crime Commission activities 2011–2012

4.1        This chapter provides an overview of the ACC's programs and respective activities over the 2011–12 period of review.

Program 1.1.1 Strategic Intelligence Services

4.2        Deliverables in relation to the ACC's strategic criminal intelligence services include the provision of:

Efforts to improve criminal intelligence

4.3        During the year, the ACC revised its criminal intelligence product suite range by distinguishing analytical intelligence products from tactical intelligence products. Analytical material includes the 'Picture of Criminality in Australia' report, briefings, strategic assessments, operational analysis, Fusion reports, current and emerging issues reports and intelligence briefs whereas tactical products include information reports and 'other information'.[2] Tactical intelligence products include information reports which contain immediate and relatively raw information. The information contained in these reports is often collated and used in analytical reports.[3] The ACC commented that distinguishing and reporting on the various product types will allow for more effective internal prioritisation and resource allocation.[4]

4.4        From a range of over 20 lines of analytical intelligence reports in early 2011, the ACC has focused on rationalising its product suite to seven. These include:

4.5        The ACC also noted that it had collaborated more widely to develop the agency's understanding of the nature of threats in relation to particular programs which led to the production of more strategic intelligence reports circulated to a broader range of agencies. Examples include potential threats to the Australian carbon pricing mechanism and the potential impact of organised crime in the investment sector.[6]

4.6        During the year, the ACC applied a new Intelligence Standards Framework (ISF) for intelligence analysts following a global best practice benchmarking exercise. The ISF provides a 'whole-of-life' approach for intelligence analysts from recruitment. It serves as an intelligence model to enable the ACC to bring intelligence standards, practices, processes and policies into one place.[7] According to the ACC, the ISF has already delivered benefits such as providing a central point for the development of intelligence standards, practices and processes. It contains eight standards of analytic tradecraft for application alongside the ACC's new intelligence philosophy and principles—'pioneering, predictive, professional, precise and partnered'.[8]  The eight standards include 'properly describes quality and reliability of sources' and 'incorporates alternative analysis where appropriate' as well as 'logical argumentation'.[9]

4.7        Other efforts to improve tools and the methodology that underpins the ACC's intelligence collection and analysis include the development of a new online system for collecting vital information and intelligence from partner agencies about serious and organised crime targets operating in Australia. The creation of the online system followed from an assessment of the needs of partner agencies regarding the collection of data about criminal targets.[10]

4.8        An external review of the methodology used to assess the harms associated with specific types of serious and organised crime was also undertaken which identified the need to revise the ACC's process to align its harm assessment with international best practice.[11] Further, the new risk assessment methodology involves a threat assessment and harms assessment process whereby risk is a function of the assessed threat and harm level: Risk = Threat x Impact.[12] When asked to explain the equation, the ACC stated that it is conceptual and:

...refers to the idea that the risk posed to Australia by specific types of serious and organised criminal activity can be established through an assessment of the threat that the activity poses (based on the capability and intent of those undertaking the activity) and an assessment of the impact that the activity has on Australia (measured by the Harms assessment process in the ACC). These two factors––threat and impact––are then considered together to derive a qualitative measure of risk.[13]

4.9        A review was also undertaken of the Target Risk Assessment Methodology (TRAM) used to 'establish the significance of serious and organised crime networks in Australia'. The TRAM is part of the National Targeting System (NTS) and is used by the ACC and law enforcement agencies to manage the National Criminal Targeting List (NCTL). While the review found that the current methodology is consistent with international best practice, its recommendations, which are not detailed in the annual report, will be implemented in 2012–13 to 'significantly improve our ability to analyse and use information captured for operational and strategic outcomes'.[14]

4.10      When asked about the findings and recommendations of the review, the ACC responded that the key findings of the review included a need for a more nuanced approach to the analysis and comparison of threat types posed by serious and organised crime, and wider accessibility to intelligence submitted in support of a threat rating.[15] The resulting methodological and technological changes which encompass 18 threat variables are collectively known as TRAM v2.[16] The transition from the original TRAM to TRAM v2 will involve some overlap between assessment methodologies over 2013 as existing targets are reassessed and new ones are added to the NCTL.[17]

Key criminal intelligence publications

4.11      The flagship publications of the ACC concerning criminal intelligence which are highlighted in the annual report include the:

Strategic assessments and policy support

4.12      During the year, the ACC produced 35 strategic assessments covering topics including serious and organised investment fraud and cybercrime.[23] The assessments featured in the annual report include the potential organised crime threat to the Australian carbon pricing mechanism, national illicit firearm assessment, and the potential impact of organised crime on sport.[24]

Program 1.1.2—Investigations and intelligence operations into federally relevant criminal activity

4.13      The three components of ACC investigations and operations include (a) special investigations, (b) special operations, and (c) national database and analytical tools. During the year, the ACC worked on four special investigations and five special intelligence operations.[25]

4.14      Through its special investigations and special operations, the ACC helped to disrupt a total of 26 criminal targets, stop $67.71 million worth of drugs from hitting the streets, restrain $103.59 million proceeds of crime, seize $5.47 million in cash, charge 97 people and convict 45 people. The ACC also conducted 328 coercive examinations and shared a total of 1884 intelligence products with partner agencies.[26] 

4.15      The deliverables in relation to program 1.1.2 include:

Special investigations

4.16      Special investigations are designed to disrupt and deter criminal groups by collecting evidence and intelligence about criminal activity. During the year in review, the ACC worked in four special investigations designed to disrupt and deter criminal groups with focus on high risk criminal targets, criminal wealth, established criminal networks—in Victoria, and high risk crime groups—in South Australia. The following tables provide an overview of the aims, highlights and achievements in relation to each special investigation.

Aims, highlights and achievements 2011-12 of special investigations

Highest risk criminal targets

Aim: To maximise the impact against, and disruption to, targeted serious and organised crime entities representing the greatest risk and threat nationally.

Highlights & achievements:

Projects within this special investigation, including a number of multi-agency investigations, have disrupted drug manufacture and trafficking, seizure of drugs and arrests.[29]

In June 2011, the ACC board approved a special investigation into the highest risk criminal targets which is expected to run to 30 June 2014.

Targeting criminal wealth

Aim: Working in partnership with stakeholders to reduce the impact of serious and organised crime on the Australian community by detecting, disrupting and preventing activities through which criminal wealth is acquired, accumulated, concealed or transferred.[30]

Highlights & achievements:

This special investigation is due to run to 30 June 2014.[32]

Established criminal networks—Victoria

Aim: To work in partnership with Victoria Police to enhance knowledge and understanding of the nature, extent, and methodologies of high risk criminal groups and their impact on the Victorian and national community. Through this work, the ACC also aims to reduce the threat posed by the highest risk crime groups operating in or impact on Victoria.

Highlights & achievements:

High risk crime groups—South Australia

Aim: Working in partnership with South Australia Police to enhance understanding of the nature, extent, methodologies of high risk criminal groups and their impact on South Australia and the broader Australian community. Through this work, the ACC also aim to reduce the threat posed by the highest risk crime groups operating in or impact on South Australia.

Highlights & achievements:

In May 2011, the ACC board approved the extension of this special investigation to 30 June 2014.[34]

Special operations

4.17      Special operations are focused on gathering intelligence around particular criminal activity so decisions are informed by the extent, impact and threat of that activity. During the year, the ACC worked on five special operations, the aims and highlights of which are summarised below:

Aims, highlights and achievements 2011 –12 of special operations

High risk and emerging drugs

Aim: Working with partners to generate and share intelligence on illicit drug markets in Australia to develop a more detailed understanding of the size, profitability, trajectory and drivers of the markets; proactively monitor and report on new processes and methodologies; identify and report on the higher risk crime networks operating in the domestic illicit drug markets; and assist with the disruption of high risk criminal networks and the markets themselves.[35]

Highlights & achievements:

The ACC board approved this special operation to run through to 30 June 2014. The overarching drug-related priorities identified in the Organised Threat Assessment are expected to guide the ACC's priorities under this special operation for the next two years. [36]

National security impacts from serious and organised crime

Aim: To provide support on an 'as needs' basis through access to ACC coercive powers, to investigations by law enforcement and national security agencies into matters related to national security impacts from serious and organised crime.[37]

Highlights & achievements:

Making Australia hostile to serious and organised crime

Aim: To assist in making Australia's society, its institutions, industries and economy hostile to serious and organised crime.

Highlights & achievements:

National Indigenous Intelligence Task Force (Indigenous violence or child abuse No.2)

Aim: To collect and analyse information concerning violence and child abuse committed against Indigenous people and related criminal offending to produce reports and targeted intelligence that partner agencies can act on, support investigations, provide and instigate policy and law reform advice, and facilitate national intelligence collection and sharing.

Highlights & achievements:

Child sex offences

Aim: To support law enforcement agencies to develop intelligence and investigate child sex offences, through the use of coercive powers.

Highlights & achievements:

National criminal intelligence database and analytic tools

4.18      The national Australian Criminal Intelligence Database (ACID) serves as a repository for much of the intelligence that the ACC assembles itself as well as the intelligence uploaded by its partners.

4.19      ACID enables more than 24 Commonwealth, state and territory law enforcement agencies and other regulatory authorities to securely 'share, collate and analyse criminal information and intelligence nationally'.[46]

4.20      A scoping study initiated in 2011 to consider how ACID should evolve into the future is now 'well advanced'. The study is expected to identify the business requirements for a new criminal intelligence database to replace the existing database and tools.[47]

4.21      In addition, a data quality improvement program is currently underway to reduce the incidents of data duplication and increased consistency in searchable fields. Therefore:

Next year we expect to see changes in access control to improve information sharing, better integration of ACID data into the ACC-led National Criminal Intelligence Fusion Capability and improvements to ACID data quality.[48]

Committee view

4.22      The committee acknowledges the important work that the ACC has undertaken over the review period and recognises the commission's efforts in areas including joint taskforces such as Task Force Galilee.

 

Mr Chris Hayes MP
Chair

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page