Australian Citizenship (Intercountry Adoption)
Bill 2014
Portfolio:
Immigration and Border Protection
Introduced: House of
Representatives, 29 May 2014
Purpose
1.1
The Australian Citizenship (Intercountry Adoption) Bill 2014 (the bill)
seeks to amend the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (the Act) to allow for
acquisition of Australian citizenship by a person adopted outside Australia by
an Australian citizen in accordance with a bilateral arrangement between
Australia and another country.
1.2
Specifically, the bill would amend the Act to create an entitlement to
citizenship for persons adopted in accordance with a bilateral arrangement.[1]
This entitlement is equivalent to that currently provided to persons adopted in
accordance with the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation
in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Convention).[2]
Committee view on compatibility
Rights of the child
1.3
Children have special rights under human rights law taking into account
their particular vulnerabilities. Children's rights are protected under a
number of treaties, particularly the Convention on the Rights of the Child
(CRC). All children under the age of 18 years are guaranteed these rights. The
rights of children include:
-
the right to develop to the fullest;
-
the right to protection from harmful influences, abuse and
exploitation;
-
family rights; and
-
the right to access health care, education and services that meet
their needs.
1.4
States parties to the CRC are required to ensure to children the
enjoyment of fundamental human rights and freedoms and are required to provide
for special protection for children in their laws and practices. In
interpreting all rights that apply to children, the following core principles
apply:
-
rights are to be applied without discrimination;
-
the best interests of the child are to be a primary
consideration;
-
there must be a focus on the child's right to life, survival and
development, including their physical, mental, spiritual, moral, psychological
and social development; and
-
there must be respect for the child's right to express his or her
views in all matters affecting them.
Extension of citizenship rights to children
adopted from countries that are not party to the Hague Convention
1.5
Of particular relevance to the bill, article 21 of the CRC provides
special protection in relation to inter-country adoption, seeking to ensure that
it is performed in the best interest of the child. Specific protections include
that inter-country adoption:
-
is authorised only by competent authorities;
-
is subject to the same safeguards and standards equivalent which
apply to national adoption; and
-
does not result in improper financial gain for those involved.
1.6
The Hague Convention establishes a common regime, including minimum
standards and appropriate safeguards, for ensuring that inter-country adoptions
are performed in the best interests of the child and with respect for the
fundamental rights guaranteed by the CRC. The Hague Convention also assists in
combatting the sale of children and human trafficking.
1.7
As noted above, the bill seeks to facilitate inter-country adoptions in
accordance with a bilateral agreement where the country of the child's birth
(or residence) is not a party to the Hague Convention. The 'fast track'
arrangements for citizenship are currently only available where the birth
country is a party to the Hague Convention. The statement of compatibility
states that the bill does not engage human rights:
...as Australia does not generally owe obligations to persons
outside its territory and or jurisdiction. As the children to whom these
amendments are relevant are located outside Australia's territory and/or
jurisdiction, Australia's obligations under the seven core human rights
treaties are not engaged. However, once these children come within Australia's
territory and/or jurisdiction it is acknowledged that some rights and freedoms
articulated under the seven core international human rights treaties will be
engaged.[3]
1.8
The statement of compatibility concludes that the bill is compatible
with human rights 'as it does not raise any human rights issues'.[4]
1.9
However, the committee notes that, by providing for the grant of Australian
citizenship (and the issue of passports) to children adopted by Australian
citizens, the bill would clearly provide for the exercise of Australian
jurisdiction over any such children both prior to and following their arrival
in Australia.
1.10
Moreover, as noted above, article 21 of the CRC imposes obligations on
both the country of the child's birth and the country of the adopting parents
to ensure that the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
1.11
It follows that the bill is therefore properly seen, in relation to a
child the subject of inter-country adoption proceedings under the bill, as
potentially engaging the requirement to act in the best interests of the child
and the rights guaranteed by the CRC. The committee considers that the
assessment in the statement of compatibility, to the extent it suggests that
Australia has no jurisdiction over or responsibility in relation to, such
children until their arrival in Australia, is based on an unduly restricted view
of both the scope of Australia's human rights obligations, and the
circumstances in which they may apply.
1.12
In the committee's view, the bill may limit the rights of the child, and
particularly the obligation to consider the best interests of the child in
relation to inter-country adoptions. This is because the bill specifies no
standards or safeguards that will apply to inter-country adoptions under a
bilateral agreement, and it is therefore not clear whether lower standards, or
fewer safeguards, may apply to inter-country adoptions under a bilateral
agreement that apply under the Hague Convention. Nor are such standards or
safeguards contained in the Family Law (Bilateral Arrangements—Intercountry
Adoption) Regulations 1998, which provide for the recognition of an
overseas adoption under the law of a country with which Australia has a
bilateral arrangement.
1.13
The committee's usual expectation where a right may be limited is that
the statement of compatibility set out the legitimate objective being pursued,
the rational connection between the measure and that objective, and the
proportionality of the measure.
1.14
The committee therefore seeks the advice of the Minister for
Immigration and Border Protection as to whether the bill is compatible with the
best interests of the child and the specific protections for inter-country
adoptions provided for in article 21 of the CRC and the Hague Convention.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page