Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
MRCA Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (No.
MRCC 44/2013)
FRLI: F2013L02012
Portfolio: Veterans Affairs
Tabled: House of Representatives
and Senate, 4 December 2013
Summary of committee concerns
2.1
The committee seeks clarification of the objective of the pharmaceutical
reimbursement measure and further information on the impact the amendment will
have on those affected by the amendment.
Overview
2.2
This instrument sets out the circumstances in which the Military
Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission may arrange for pharmaceutical
benefits to be provided to members of the Defence Force, including former
members, or their dependants, at the concessional rate. It replaces the MRCA
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (2004 No. M22).
Compatibility with human rights
Statement of compatibility
2.3
The statement of compatibility states that the initiatives introduced by
the instrument could promote the right to health by ensuring that relevant
veterans or their dependants pay less for pharmaceuticals, receive certain
medications more quickly and are more likely to receive the correct medications
through better medication management. The statement goes on to state that
'[s]ome measures in the attached instrument could be considered as not totally
favouring the people in question' and that the:
[r]efinements to the pharmaceutical reimbursement provisions
could mean a person receives no pharmaceutical reimbursement compared to the
situation under the revoked Scheme. But this change was necessary to protect
the public revenue by preventing unintended payments.[1]
Committee view on compatibility
2.4
The committee notes the discussion of the pharmaceutical reimbursement
measure in the explanatory statement to the instrument. In particular the committee
notes the statement that:
[t]he "public revenue amendment" covers the
scenario of a couple where both members of the couple are eligible for the
pharmaceutical reimbursement, whether under the [Military Rehabilitation and
Compensation Act 2004] or the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. The
amendment ensures, in line with the policy intention for the pharmaceutical
reimbursement, that only one member of the couple receive the pharmaceutical
reimbursement.[2]
2.5
It is not clear to the committee what specific circumstances the
amendment is intended to address (in particular, it is not clear what is meant
by the statement 'in line with the policy intention for the pharmaceutical
reimbursement') or what impact this amendment will have on couples where both
members of the couple are eligible for pharmaceutical reimbursement.
2.6
The committee intends to write to the Minister for Veterans'
Affairs to seek further clarification as to the objective of the amendment to
the pharmaceutical reimbursement measure and the impact the amendment will have
on those affected.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Top
|