National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a
Participant) Rules 2013
FRLI: F2013L01066
Portfolio: Social Services
Tabled: House of Representatives and Senate, 20
June 2013
Summary of committee concerns
2.1
The committee re-iterates its concerns raised previously on related
legislation in relation to the narrow definition of 'disability' and the
compatibility of the requirement for applicants to participate in the NDIS to
be aged under 65 with the right to equality and non-discrimination.
Overview
2.2
The National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (NDIS Act)
makes provision for various matters, including ‘significant policy matters’, to
be covered by the NDIS rules, which are to be made as disallowable legislative
instruments.[94]
The NDIS Act provides that the NDIS rules may prescribe matters for the
purposes of the criteria relating to becoming a participant in the scheme.[95]
2.3
These rules supplement the requirements set out in the NDIS Act relating
to age, residence and disability or early intervention requirements that must
be met for a person to become a participant.
Compatibility with human rights
Statement of compatibility
2.4
The statement of compatibility accompanying the instrument states that
the instrument engages the rights of person with disabilities in the Convention
on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD),[96]
the rights of children in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC),[97]
the right to protection of the family in the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)[98]
and the right to equality and non-discrimination in the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).[99]
2.5
The statement concludes that the instrument is compatible with human
rights because it advances the protection of the rights of persons and children
with disabilities and creates additional opportunities for person with
disability to exercise those rights by providing support to enable
participation in social, economic and cultural life. The statement states that
any limitations imposed by the instrument are reasonable, necessary and
proportionate to ensure the long-term integrity and sustainability of the NDIS.[100]
Committee view on compatibility
Definition of disability
2.6
In its consideration of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Bill
2012, the predecessor to this committee (the former committee) expressed
concern that the concept of disability used for the purposes of the NDIS
appeared not to be as broad as that contained in the CRPD.
2.7
In her response to the committee the Minister stated that
The purpose of Clause 24 of the Bill is to set out disability
requirements for a person to become a participant in the NDIS. It is not
intended to be a definition of disability or to limit who may be considered a
person with a disability.
2.8
The Minister went on to state that the access requirements would meet
the needs of the NDIS for equitable, transparent and rigorous decisions on who
is able to receive support.
2.9
The former committee noted the Minister’s response and noted that the
definition in subclause 24(1)(e) of the bill (now section 24(1)(e) of the
National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2012) provides that a person with an
impairment will only meet the eligibility requirements if ‘if the person’s
support needs in relation to his or her impairment or impairments are likely to
continue for the person’s lifetime.’ The committee compared this requirement to
article 1 of the CRPD which provides in part that ‘[p]ersons with disabilities
include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory
impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full
and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.’
2.10
The Becoming a Participant Rules stipulate that a person meets the
disability requirements if the person satisfies all of the requirements set out
in paragraph 5.1 of the Rules. This reflects the concept of disability as
recognised in the NDIS Act.
2.11
The statement of compatibility acknowledges that the definition of
disability under the instrument does not reflect the corresponding CRPD
definition, however states that the 'narrower definition of 'disability'
employed by the scheme is aimed at achieving a legitimate purpose by targeting
those people with disability who have a significant impairment to their
functional capacity'.[101]
2.12
The committee remains concerned regarding the use of a narrower
concept of disability.
Equality and non-discrimination
2.13
The committee notes that the instrument relies upon the requirement
set out in the NDIS Act that access to the scheme will be limited to persons
aged under 65 at the time of application. The committee notes that its concerns
regarding the right to equality and non-discrimination and the general
exemption from the Age Discrimination Act 2004 are addressed further in
this report under 'Responses to the committee's comments on bills and
legislative instruments' in relation to the National Disability Insurance
Scheme Legislation Amendment Bill 2013.
Limitations on rights
2.14
As noted above, the statement of compatibility concludes that where the
instrument limits rights, those limitations are reasonable, necessary and
proportionate to ensure the long-term integrity and stability of the scheme.
However, there is no indication in the statement of the specific rights that
are referred to here
2.15
Accordingly, it is not possible for the committee to assess
whether any limitations on those rights are permissible.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page