Chapter 3

Fourteenth Report: Examination of Annual Reports for 1997-98 in fulfilment of the Committee's duties pursuant to s.206(c) of the Native Title Act 1993
Table of Contents

Chapter 3

Land Fund Report 1997-98

Statutory Reporting Requirements

3.1 Statutory requirements in relation to the Land Fund's annual reports are set out in s.193I of the ATSIC Act. They include the requirement for the Minister to cause to be prepared as soon as practicable after the end of 30 June each year a report about the administration and operation of the Land Fund and its supporting legislation (s.193I(1)). These requirements were set out in Chapter 3 of this Committee's Fifth Report.

3.2 The following specific matters are required by s.193I(2) of the ATSIC Act to be included in each Land Fund report:

a) particulars of amounts credited to the Land Fund during the financial year;
b) particulars of amounts paid out of the Land Fund during the financial year;
c) particulars of investments of the Land Fund;
d) the realised real return on investments of the Land Fund in respect of the financial year;
e) such other information (if any) as is specified in the regulations.

3.3 Further, copies of annual reports are to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days after the completion of the report (s.193I(3)).

Compliance

Tabling

3.4 The 1997-98 annual report of ATSIC, with the Land Fund report appended (Appendix 11), was presented to the Minister on 28 October 1998 and was tabled in the Senate on 10 November 1998 and the House of Representatives on 11 November 1998. The Land Fund report satisfied the tabling requirements.

3.5 Importantly, part of the Land Fund report is reproduced as Appendix 1 to the ILC annual report for 1997-98.

Specific Matters

Amounts Credited to the Land Fund

3.6 The 1994-95 Budget committed $200 million to the Land Fund. And on 4 July 1995 $123,178,000 was appropriated to the Land Fund. This amount represented the first of nine (indexed) annual allocations of $121 million from 1995-96 through to 2003-2004. Each year the amount is to be indexed to maintain value in 1994-95 dollar terms. The third special appropriation of $129,792,000 occurred on 2 July 1997 (ATSIC annual report 1997-98, p.209; ILC annual report 1997-98, p.98).

3.7 The value of the Land Fund on 1 July 1997 was $396,515,489. An amount of $81,522,000 was appropriated to the Land Fund at the commencement of the reporting period, taking the value of the base investment of the fund to $478,037,489. The value of the fund at 30 June 1998 was $527,095,789. This amounts to a realised real return on investments for 1997-98 of 7.05% (ILC annual report 1997-98, p.99).

Investment Outcome

3.8 From 1 January 1998 the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund became a Reserved Fund within the Commonwealth Public Account and is now called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Fund Reserve. It is a requirement that, from 1 January 1998, monies in the Land Fund be invested in accordance with s.39(8) of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (the FMA Act). Previously, monies in the Land Fund had to be invested to comply with the Audit Act 1901. (ILC annual report 1997-98, pp.15,16,98)

3.9 At page 99 of the ILC report, the Land Fund report records that:

3.10 The Land Fund report notes that a revised investment strategy was instigated in February 1998; it aims to improve the Fund's investment returns within the constraints of the FMA Act. The Land Fund Report states (p.100 of the ILC annual report 1997-98) that:

3.11 The figure of $1106 million (indexed) for the 2004 Land Fund target is specified at s.193AA(2) of the ATSIC Act. (The Land Fund report, reproduced at p.99 of the ILC annual report, incorrectly refers to the indexed target of $1106; it should read $1106 million.) The ILC annual report again includes the table of notional allocations to and from the Land Fund (ILC annual report, p.16). This shows a notional allocation after ten years of $1289 million, consistent with the figure reported in the 1996-97 annual report (p.11).

3.12 The Committee's Thirteenth Report (p.15) notes that the ILC had not explained, or attempted to reconcile the `notional' and `target' Land Fund figures in its 1996-97 report. The 1997-98 ILC report corrects this and explains the difference between the `notional' and `target' figures at page 17.

3.13 In its Thirteenth Report, the Committee also comments that the ILC report does not repeat the reference to a land fund target of $1.46 billion, as contained in the 1995-96 report. The 1997-98 report refers to the figure of approximately $1.4 billion, explaining that it is a notional figure that is often stated as the likely value of the land fund when established (p.17). The ILC also refutes the suggestion that the fund has already reached this `projected 2004 target' (p.17).

3.14 The ILC annual report does not report fully on the possibility that the Land Fund may not meet its target balance by June 2004 and does not specifically refer to the recent investment experience of the Land Fund. The only reference is at page 17 where the report states:

3.15 The Committee is concerned that the Land Fund could be placed in the situation of not meeting the target balance as the result of investment experience. And, in this regard the ILC report should have noted that s.193AA(1) of the ATSIC Act provides for a one-off payment to be credited to the Land Fund if it fails to meet the target balance by June 2004. That is, the target balance is assured by the Commonwealth.

Amounts Paid Out of the Land Fund

3.16 In the reporting period an amount of $48,270,000 was drawn down to the ILC from the Land Fund.

3.17 This is the first year that no allocation was made to ATSIC for its Land Acquisition and Maintenance Program (LAMP); the ILC assumed sole program responsibility at the federal level for management of indigenous-held land from 1 July 1997 (ILC annual report 1997-98, p.28). The assumption of sole responsibility by the ILC for land management raises a question concerning the arrangements for land management that were shared by ATSIC and the ILC prior to 1 July 1997. That matter is taken up in Chapter 4 of this report.

Investments and Realised Real Returns

3.18 The ILC report states (p.98) that:

And it is stated on page 99 that:

3.19 The report (p.98) states, however, that the Land Fund became a Reserved Fund within the Commonwealth Public Account from 1 January 1998 and, from that date, any Land Fund monies had to be invested in accordance with the FMA Act. The Committee was concerned that these statements could have been confusing in their reference to the legislation under which Land Fund monies were invested during the 1997-98 financial year.

3.20 The Committee wrote to ATSIC on 8 June 1999, seeking clarification of this matter. A reply was received from ATSIC on 11 June 1999 which stated:

The Committee notes that this matter should have been clearly articulated in the Land Fund annual report.

Summary

3.21 The financial statements of the Land Fund annual report for 1997-98 received an unqualified audit. Further, reporting about the Land Fund for 1997-98 complies with the legislative requirements.