Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Chair’s Preface
In 2010 the Productivity Commission released its most recent
report into problem gambling in Australia. The Commission concluded that 95,000
Australians are poker machine problem gamblers while another 95,000 are at risk
of becoming so.[1]
Between five and 10 people are affected by each problem gambler, bringing into
the millions the total number affected.[2]
Of the 600,000 Australians who play poker machines weekly 15
per cent are problem gamblers.[3]
They lose almost $5 billion each year,[4]
a staggering figure pointing to the scale of the tragedy associated with poker
machines. Problem gamblers routinely lose everything including their jobs,
family and friends, homes, minds and sometimes even their lives.
The Productivity Commission recommended a raft of harm
minimisation measures, the most important of which is mandatory pre-commitment
(MPC). This is a system requiring poker machine players to set limits on their
losses before they start gambling. MPC requires lock-out when limits are reached,
cooling-off periods for limit increases, safeguards to prevent gamblers from
machine hopping and have available an effective self-exclusion function.
A significant reason for the prevalence of poker machine
problem gambling in Australia is the preponderance of high intensity poker
machines with high bet limits, fast games, big jackpots and substantial cash
load-up capacity. They produce a high level of volatility and the likelihood of
big losses, often well over $1,000 an hour.[5]
For instance poker machines are not uncommon in Australia with $10 bets, game
times of a few seconds and jackpots so big they’re paid only once in the life
of the machine. Many thousands of dollars can be loaded up at one time through
cash note receptors. MPC will help protect gamblers playing such high intensity
machines.
But many of Australia’s 600,000 regular poker machine
players, and millions more genuinely occasional recreational players, would be
just as happy to gamble on the sort of low intensity machines referred to by the
Productivity Commission and available overseas. Such machines would not need to
be part of the MPC regime as they are relatively safe due to a $1 maximum bet
and other features limiting losses to an average of $120 an hour. Venues will
need to have MPC high intensity machines or non-MPC low intensity machines, or
a combination of both.
Industry concerns with these reforms are unwarranted. For a
start MPC is not too expensive, as evidenced by industry leaders who’ve said
they’re happy to see voluntary pre-commitment on all machines—which would incur
virtually the same cost as fitting MPC. Reliance initially on
jurisdiction-based technical solutions will help keep implementation costs
down.
MPC will not unduly affect revenue, except in venues with a
heavy reliance on problem gamblers. Nor will it be onerous for small
venues—pubs and clubs running 15 machines or less—especially in rural and
regional areas, because such venues will have until 2018 to introduce MPC. This
is four years more than larger venues and two years more than the Productivity
Commission recommended.
MPC doesn’t require ‘a licence to gamble’, because most
players will prefer and choose to utilise the low intensity machines not
covered by MPC. For the same reason MPC can’t possibly drive recreational
gamblers away and venues to the wall. Moreover MPC will be no more onerous on
people’s privacy than existing club memberships and venue loyalty schemes. It
will be card based with no reliance on fingerprinting or biometric data.
Like pubs and clubs, casinos will need to have MPC high
intensity machines or non MPC low intensity machines, or a combination of both.
There will be no exemptions for casinos, except that foreign tourists can be
provided with cards overriding MPC.
Millions of Australians are suffering from poker machines
and something must be done about it as quickly as possible. Introduction of an
effective mandatory pre-commitment system by the earliest possible date—2014—is
now an urgent and critical national priority. Our children will judge the
Members and Senators of the 43rd Parliament on this. As they should.
Mr Andrew Wilkie MP
Chair
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Top
|