Chapter 2 Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China concerning Transfer of Sentenced Persons

Joint Standing Committee on Treaties

Committee activities (inquiries and reports)

Report 71 Treaty tabled on 29 November 2005

Print Chapter 2 (PDF 127KB) < - Report Home < - Chapter 1 : Appendix A - >

Chapter 2 Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China concerning Transfer of Sentenced Persons

Introduction
The Agreement
International Transfer of Prisoners (ITP) Scheme
Cooperation with the States and Territories
Implementation
Costs
Conclusion and recommendation

Introduction

2.1

The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China concerning Transfer of Sentenced Persons (the Agreement), done at Hong Kong on 25 November 2005, allows Australian nationals and people who have community ties with Australia serving prison sentences in Hong Kong, and Hong Kong nationals and people who have community ties with Hong Kong serving prison sentences in Australia, to be repatriated to their home country to serve out the remainder of their sentences.1

2.2

The Committee was informed that:

Cooperation between countries to repatriate prisoners to their home countries is designed to assist prisoners to reintegrate successfully into society. The aim of the scheme is to allow prisoners to serve out their sentences without language and cultural barriers, which may reduce their prospects for rehabilitation.2

2.3

Allowing for the international transfer of prisoners is seen as having humanitarian, rehabilitative and social benefits while ensuring as far as possible that the original custodial sentence of a transferred prisoner is carried out.3

2.4

It is difficult to estimate the precise number of prisoners who, over the lifetime of the Agreement, would be eligible for transfer. However, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade reports that there are currently five Australians sentenced to imprisonment in Hong Kong , another four who are in gaol awaiting trial or sentence and a further nine who have been arrested and are currently on bail.4

 

The Agreement

2.5

The Agreement obliges Australia to facilitate the transfer of Australian prisoners in Hong Kong and Hong Kong prisoners in Australia within the framework provided for by the Agreement and domestic implementing legislation.5

2.6

Article 5(1) of the Agreement obliges Australia to endeavour to inform prisoners of the substance of the Agreement.

2.7

Transfer between the two Parties is voluntary and requires the consent of the prisoner to the terms of the transfer.6 This is important as the terms of the transfer are negotiated by Australia and Hong Kong and will include agreement upon the sentence to be enforced.7 Where a request for transfer is made, the receiving Party is obliged to ensure that the transfer is voluntary and the prisoner has full knowledge of the legal consequences.8

2.8

Article 5 of the Agreement obliges Australia and Hong Kong to provide specific information to facilitate the consideration of a prisoner transfer request.9 Following the transfer of a prisoner, Article 9 obliges the receiving Party to provide the transferring Party with information concerning the enforcement of the sentence.10

2.9

The transferring Party retains jurisdiction for the revision, modification or cancellation of convictions and sentences imposed by its courts.11

2.10

Article 8 of the Agreement provides for the continued enforcement of a transferred prisoner’s sentence. As a general rule, the sentence imposed by the transferring country will not change.12 However, where the sentence is incompatible with the law of the receiving Party either by its nature or duration, the receiving Party may adapt the sentence in accordance with its domestic law.13 Where this occurs, the receiving country is not able to impose a sentence that is more severe than the sentence imposed by the transferring Party in terms of nature or duration.14

2.11

The receiving party generally bears the cost of the transfer; however: 15

That country may seek to recover some or all of the costs of transfer from the prisoner, provided that the prisoner is informed in advance and consents to the transfer on the basis that there will be specified cost recovery. In practice, the receiving state or territory in Australia meets the costs of transfer.16

2.12

Article 10 obliges both Parties to cooperate in facilitating the transit of prisoners to or from third States through its territory.

 

International Transfer of Prisoners (ITP) Scheme

2.13

The Agreement is one of three international agreements entered into by Australia to facilitate the international transfer of prisoners between Australia and, following the entry into force of the current Agreement, 58 other countries.

2.14

Australia is a party to the Council of EuropeConvention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (Council of Europe Convention) which facilitates the transfer of prisoners between Australia and 56 other countries.17 Under the Council of Europe Convention, 16 prisoners have been transferred from Australia to 5 other jurisdictions.18

2.15

Australia has only one other bilateral prisoner exchange agreement and that is with Thailand, the Agreement with Thailand on the Transfer of Offenders and Cooperation in the Enforcement of Penal Sentences.19 Under this Agreement, three prisoners have been transferred to Thailand.20

2.16

The Committee was informed that Australia is currently negotiating a transfer of prisoner agreement with China, although the details of those negotiations are not publicly available.21

 

Cooperation with the States and Territories

2.17

Implementation of the Agreement requires extensive cooperation with the States and Territories. Often, prisoners to be transferred out of Australia will have been sentenced for State and/or Territory offences. In addition, only the States and the Northern Territory currently have prisons and so State and Territory consent is required before prisoners can be received or transferred.

2.18

Administrative arrangements, concluded by the Federal Government, exist with all States and Territories except South Australia where they are currently being negotiated.22 Administrative arrangements facilitate the international transfer of prisoners but the Committee was informed that:

The absence of an administrative arrangement with South Australia does not prevent the transfer of prisoners to South Australia.23

 

Implementation

2.19

The International Transfer of Prisoner Act 1997 (Cth) provides the legislative framework for the transfer of prisoners between Australia and other countries.24 Complementary legislation exists in all States and Territories.25

2.20

In 2004, amendments to the International Transfer of Prisoner Act 1997 (Cth) allowed semi-autonomous regions, such as Hong Kong, to be declared a transfer country with which Australia can enter into an agreement for the transfer of prisoners.26

Costs

2.21

The National Interest Analysis (NIA) provides that the approximate cost of maintaining a prisoner in Australia is A$50 000 per year.27

2.22

However subsequent evidence from the Attorney-General’s Department advised the Committee that approximately $59 203 was spent per year to keep an adult prisoner in custody.28

2.23

However, the Committee was informed that there is ‘considerable dispute between jurisdictions as to what it costs to house a prisoner’.29 Following the entry into force of the Agreement, Australia would save approximately this amount of money each year a transferred prisoner would have otherwise spent in an Australian prison.30

2.24

The Commonwealth, State and Territory governments have agreed that the costs for received prisoners will be shared, with the Commonwealth bearing the administrative costs of the transfer and the State or Territory government to which the prisoner is being returned bearing the transport and maintenance costs.31 As mentioned previously, the State or Territory government may seek to recover such costs from the prisoner.32

Conclusion and recommendation

2.25

The Committee recognises the humanitarian, rehabilitative and social benefits of international transfer of prisoner agreements. In particular, the Committee recognises the value of an agreement with Hong Kong where there is a relatively high number of Australian nationals in Hong Kong prisons.

 

Recommendation 1

The Committee supports the Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China concerning Transfer of Sentenced Persons and recommends that binding treaty action be taken.

 

 

 

Dr Andrew Southcott MP
Committee Chair



Footnotes

1
See subsection 4(5)of the International Transfer of Prisoners Act 1997 (Cth) for the definition of ‘community ties’ with Australia and see subsection 4(4) for the definition of ‘community ties’ with a foreign country. Back
2
Article 6 of the Agreement; Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p . 2. Back
3
National Interest Analysis (NIA), para. 16. Back
4
NIA, para. 10. Back
5
Article 2 of the Agreement. Back
6
Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 3. Back
7
Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 6. Back
8
Article 6(1) and (2) of the Agreement; NIA, para. 20. Back
9
NIA, para. 21. Back
10
NIA, para. 21. Back
11
Article 7 of the Agreement. Back
12
Attorney-General’s Department website, accessed at 17 January 2006 : <http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/criminaljusticeHome.nsf/Page/International_Transfer_of_Prisoners_Scheme> Back
13
Article 8(3) of the Agreement. Back
14
Article 8(3) of the Agreement. Back
15
Article 12 of the Agreement. Back
16
Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 4. Back
17
Ms Joanne Blackburn, Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 3; NIA, para. 8; Attorney-General’s Department, Submission 1, p. 2; see also JSCOT Report 43, p. 19. Back
18
Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 3. Back
19
Ms Joanne Blackburn, Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 3; See also JSCOT Report 43, p. 19. Back
20
Ms Joanne Blackburn, Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 3 ; NIA, para. 14. Back
21
Attorney-General’s Department, Submission 1, p. 2; Ms Joanne Blackburn, Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 7. Back
22
NIA, para. 27. Back
23
Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 9. Back
24
NIA, para. 24. Back
25
NIA, para. 26. Back
26
NIA, para. 23. Back
27
NIA, para. 28. Back
28
Attorney-General’s Department, Submission 1.1, p. 2. Back
29
Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 6. Back
30
NIA, para. 28. Back
31
NIA, para. 29. Back
32
NIA, para. 29; Article 12 of the Agreement; Ms Joanne Blackburn , Transcript of Evidence, 5 December 2005 , p. 4. Back

Print Chapter 2 (PDF 127KB) < - Report Home < - Chapter 1 :  Appendix A - >