10Freedom of Information Amendment Bill 2025
The order of the day having been read for the resumption of the debate on the question—That the bill be now read a second time—And on the amendment moved thereto by Ms Chaney, viz.—That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:
“the House declines to give the bill a second reading, and calls for an independent review of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, with terms of reference to provide recommendations on how best to:
(1)encourage greater proactive disclosure of information to the public, and thus reduce the need for formal freedom of information requests;
(2)maximise accessibility, transparency and efficiency for genuine and lawful freedom of information requests, including through setting an appropriate fee structure;
(3)improve the timeliness of dealing with freedom of information requests, including review processes;
(4)ensure that exemptions to disclosure requirements do not go further than is required for good government;
(5)create a robust system for the resourcing, training, auditing, and oversight of authorised officers responsible for freedom of information decisions;
(6)manage vexatious and frivolous requests;
(7)address the potential impact of artificial intelligence, both to improve freedom of information processing and to mitigate the impact of its use in generating vexatious and frivolous requests; and
(8)provide structural support for public servants to provide frank, honest, timely and evidence-based advice”—
And on the amendment moved thereto by Ms Spender, viz.—That all words after “House” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:
“declines to give the bill a second reading, and:
(1)notes that:
(a)freedom of information laws are there to serve the public, not make the lives of Ministers or public servants easier;
(b)in designing this bill, the Government failed to consult any members of the public, journalists or other stakeholders who use the freedom of information legislation, only government departments;
(c)the Centre of Public Integrity has ‘fact-checked’ four claims the Government have made relating to this bill they argue are false; and
(d)the Centre of Public Integrity has recently released its Integrity Report Card that gave the Government a ‘fail’ on five out of six integrity measures, including a fail on ‘Commitment to Transparency’; and
(2)urges the Government to urgently address the issues raised in the Integrity Report Card and prioritise restoring public trust in Government”—
Debate resumed.