Chapter 2

Chapter 2

Examination of portfolios

Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy portfolio

2.1        The committee welcomed Senator the Hon Stephen Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.

2.2        During its examination, the committee raised a variety of issues which are noted below. The page numbers beside each issue refer to the proof transcript for Monday, 25 May 2009.

Australia Post

2.3        Members of the committee raised newspaper reports of alleged irregularities in the issuing of passports at one Australia Post office.[1] Officials undertook to provide further information to the committee about the review being undertaken into the reported breach.

2.4        In correspondence dated 1 June 2009, Australia Post advised:

Immediately following the arrest of the Australia Post staff member at Fairfield a review into the incident by senior Australia Post staff from the Corporate Security and Commercial Divisions was launched.

The review examined the specifics of the incident, the policies and procedures in place, their effectiveness and any changes required to them.[2]

2.5        Mr McCloskey further advised that as part of the review there had been numerous discussions with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and concluded that:

At this stage the review has not found any evidence to suggest that the Fairfield case is anything more than an isolated incident and DFAT have expressed confidence in Australia Post's current policies and procedures. Any request to modify these by DFAT or the AFP would be acted on as a matter of priority.[3]

2.6        Other issues raised included:

Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Special Broadcasting Service Corporation
Australian Communications and Media Authority

2.7        On Tuesday, 26 May the committee continued its examination of the portfolio commencing with some general questions of the department. The page numbers beside each issue below refer to the proof transcript for Tuesday, 26 May 2009.

2.8        General issues included:

2.9        Questioning commenced in relation to Program 1.2: Telecommunications, Online and Postal Services:

2.10      At the commencement of the examination of officers in relation to Program 1.1: Broadband and Communications Infrastructure, the Minister made a statement about the National Broadband Network and progress on the implementation of this policy, noting that:

We have consulted widely with local and state and territory government, telecommunications companies, electricity companies, the building industry, other Commonwealth departments and consumer groups. This consultation occurred around the proposed regulatory changes, options for rolling out new fibre backbone networks and the greenfields policy.[4]

2.11      The Minister set out a number of activities being undertaken to implement the rollout of high–speed broadband infrastructure including:

2.12      The Minister concluded that while not as constrained to answer questions with the termination of the RFP process,

... the details of the proposal[s] submitted and the evaluation of these proposals remain confidential. Therefore, we will not be detailing the contents of either the panel's report to government, the proposals themselves or the ACCC's individual and comparative assessment of the proposals. I also ask that you respect the fact that we are in commercial negotiations with the Tasmanian government.[8]

2.13      In later questioning about the Panel's report and a report by the ACCC which included requests for copies of the reports, the Minister indicated that the reports contained 'extensive commercially sensitive information provided by NBN proponents in strict confidence'[9] and 'that the release of commercially sensitive information would be irresponsible'.[10] There were further interchanges about the release of the reports.

2.14      Upon further questioning about the establishment of a cabinet sub-committee to consider the NBN policy, the Minister undertook to seek advice as to what further information he may be able to provide to the committee.[11]

2.15      Further questions relating to Program 1.1 included:

2.16      At the conclusion of questioning about Program 1.1, officers were called and examined in relation to Program 1.3: Broadcasting and Digital Television. Issues raised included:

Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts portfolio

2.17      On Wednesday, 27 May the committee commenced its examination of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts portfolio and welcomed Senator the Hon Jan McLucas, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Health and Ageing, representing the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, the Hon Peter Garrett MP, and portfolio officers.

2.18      The committee welcomed Ms Robin Kruk, recently appointed Secretary of the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, to estimates.

2.19      The committee commenced with general questions of the portfolio including about Arts Indemnity Australia and the Australian government International Exhibitions Insurance Program;[12] the National Collecting Institutions Touring and Outreach program[13] and funding for art training organisations.[14] It then moved to items as listed on the circulated agenda. The page numbers refer to the proof transcript for 27 May 2009.

2.20      The chair called officers in relation to Outcome 5: Participation in, and access to Australia's culture and heritage through developing and supporting cultural expression, and protecting and conserving Australia's heritage:

National Film and Sound Archive

National Gallery of Australia

National Library of Australia

National Museum of Australia

Australia Council

Screen Australia

Australian Film, Television and Radio School (AFTRS)

Australian National Maritime Museum

Program 5.1: Arts and Cultural Development
Program 5.2: Conservation and Protection of Australia's Heritage

2.21      At the conclusion of the examination of Outcome 5, the Chair called officers in relation to Outcome 3: Advancement of Australia's strategic, scientific, environmental and economic interests in the Antarctic by protecting, administering and researching the region:

Program 3.1: Antarctic Science, Policy and Presence

2.22      At the conclusion of the examination of Outcome 3, the Chair called officers in relation to Outcome 1: The conservation and protection of Australia's terrestrial and marine biodiversity and ecosystems through supporting research, developing information, supporting natural resource management, regulating matters of national environmental significance and managing Commonwealth protected areas:

Bureau of Meteorology

Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority

Sydney Harbour Federation Trust

Office of the Supervising Scientist

Director of National Parks

Program 1.1: Sustainable Management of Natural Resources and the Environment

2.23      The committee continued its examination of Program 1.1 on Thursday and page references below refer to the transcript of hearing for Thursday, 28 May 2009.

2.24      Issues included:

Program 1.2: Environmental Regulation, Information and Research

2.25      At the conclusion of Program 1.2, officers were called in relation to Outcome 2: Improved capacity of Australian communities and industry to protect the environment by promoting energy efficiency, reducing carbon emissions, and regulating hazardous substances, wastes, pollutants, ozone depleting substances and synthetic greenhouse gases:

Program 2.1: Energy Efficiency and Climate Change

2.26      At the conclusion of Program 2.1, the committee called officers in relation to Outcome 4: Adaptation to climate change, wise water use, secure water supplies and improved health of rivers, waterways and freshwater ecosystems by supporting research, and reforming the management and use of water resources:

Murray–Darling Basin Authority

National Water Commission

Program 4.1: Water Reform

 

Senator Anne McEwen
Chair

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page