There has been much recent media and political focus on
gender-based violence, with pressure mounting on the government to adequately
address what some have labelled a ‘national
emergency’ and Prime
Minister Anthony Albanese has stated is a ‘national scourge and a national
crisis’.
Gender-based violence is used here as a broad term covering
different forms of violence against women including family and domestic
violence (FDV), intimate partner violence and violence directed at women or
that affects women disproportionately. It is difficult to measure the true
extent of gender-based violence in Australia – not least because of the lack
of a consistent definition (p. 2) and known underreporting. Results from the 2021–22
Personal Safety Survey show that 20% of the adult population – 27%
of women and 12% of men – reported experiencing physical and/or sexual
family and domestic violence since the age of 15.
The National
Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022–2032 (National Plan) is the
Australian, state and territory governments’ central policy initiative designed
to address family and domestic violence. The Australian Government has
contributed close to $2.3
billion in funding for women’s safety measures across the October 2022–23
and 2023–24 budgets. The 2024–25 Budget, along with the 2023–24 MYEFO, contributes
a further $1.1 billion to the National Plan and women’s safety (p. 6).
The National Plan’s activities
addendum outlines the specific actions committed to by governments.
The National
Plan is framed around a continuum of prevention, early intervention,
response, and recovery and healing (p. 78). However, this Budget largely
prioritises response rather than prevention and early intervention. Given the
scale of the problem, it is unclear whether the combined effect of the
Commonwealth’s efforts with that of the states and territories, will succeed in
mitigating the harm that victim-survivors continue to face, nor the high
costs of this violence.
Leaving violence payments
The centrepiece of the Budget’s response to gender-based
violence is the investment of $925.2 million over 5 years (and $263.3
million per year ongoing) to make permanent the Escaping Violence Payment Program
(EVP) and the Temporary Visa Holders Experiencing Violence Pilot (TVP),
renamed as the Leaving Violence Program (LVP) (Budget
measures: budget paper no. 2: 2024–25, p. 176).
The measure was announced
following the meeting of National Cabinet regarding gender-based violence on 1
May 2024.
The programs are not new; the TVP having begun in April
2021, and the EVP in October of the same year. The TVP, delivered by the Australian
Red Cross, provides support to people on temporary visas, or with uncertain
visa status, who are experiencing family or domestic violence and experiencing
financial hardship. Initially, the program provided
payments of up to $3,000, referral to specialist services, and casework
support. The maximum payment was increased to $5,000 in the October 2022–23
Budget (Budget
measures: budget paper no. 2: October 2022–23, p. 186). The EVP,
delivered by Uniting,
provides similar support and up to $5,000 in financial assistance to Australian
adults experiencing intimate partner violence and financial stress.
The 2024–25 budget measure extends the 2 current trials to
June 2025, before rolling them together into the Leaving Violence Program, to
begin 1 July 2025. Once established, the scheme will cost $258.2 million per
year ongoing. This appears to be a substantial increase in annual
funding, with previous appropriations totalling $519.9 million for both trials
from 2021–January 2025 (roughly $148.5 million per year across 3.5 years). The
Budget provides that the financial support of up to $5,000 will be indexed
annually to the Wage Price Index. Indexing the support is a notable change, as
the value of the $5,000 provided under the EVP has been decreasing in real
terms since the scheme began in 2021. The measure also includes funding for
legal assistance and other supports for temporary visa holders experiencing
FDV.
While stakeholders
have welcomed the continuation of the program, there has been criticism of the
government’s focus on crisis payments rather than perpetrator intervention
programs and frontline services. In response, the Government has stressed
the immediate need to continue the soon-to-expire EVP and TVP trials, and the joint
responsibility of the states, territories and Commonwealth in funding
gendered-violence response services (discussed below).
Further, some have also commented on the narrow
eligibility of the EVP – focusing on people experiencing intimate partner
violence, not other forms of family and domestic violence. While the Women’s
Budget Statement states that 45,000 have accessed the EVP since it began in
2021 (p. 16), recent
reporting suggests that more than 48% of applicants were either declined or
did not proceed with their application. This is echoed in a 2023
review of the program (p. 26).
Frontline services
Funding for frontline services is important in supporting
victim-survivors to rebuild functional lives, and to prevent the recurrence of
violence (National Plan, p.
84). These services are not provided directly by the Australian Government,
with the federal government supporting the services through National
Partnership funding provided to the states and territories or by directly
funding services through grant programs.
There has been criticism
from the women’s safety sector – including women’s legal centres, emergency
accommodation providers and crisis centre workers – of the Budget’s lack of
investment in frontline workers and supports. However, in outlining the
responsibilities of the Federal, state and territory governments in responding
to gender-based violence, Minister for Women Katy Gallagher stated:
Well, the main funder of those frontline services are the states
and territories. So, where we've looked at the areas that we are primarily
responsible for – and I should say that we've got a lot of partnerships with states
and territories where we fund elements of the National Plan to End Violence
Against Women and Children. The big areas that we have responsibility for are
in prevention and early intervention and support and through our income support
system.
The Budget does provide some investment in frontline
services and supports, which may assist those experiencing gender-based
violence:
-
$6.0 million over 2 years from 2024–25 to support Primary Health
Networks on the Central Coast to provide local outreach trauma-informed
healthcare for women and their children experiencing domestic and family
violence or homelessness (Budget paper no. 2, p. 132).
- $423.1 million over 5 years from 2024–25 in additional funding to
support the provision of social housing and homelessness services by states and
territories under a new National Agreement on Social Housing and Homelessness
(subject to ratification of a new National Agreement) (Budget paper no. 2,
p. 74).
- $1.0 billion for social housing under the National Housing
Infrastructure Facility, including towards crisis and transitional
accommodation for women and children fleeing domestic violence (Budget paper
no. 2, p. 5).
-
$44.1 million in 2024–25 to support the National Legal Assistance
Partnership (NLAP) and Family Violence Prevention Legal Services, including
one-year indexation supplementation to the funding for Legal Aid Commissions,
Community Legal Centres and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal
Services, and additional funding to reduce community legal sector pay disparity
(Budget paper no. 2, p. 51).
Of these measures, the funding to the NLAP has received the
strongest criticism from the sector. For example, Women’s
Legal Services Australia described it as a ‘very modest investment in
community legal centres for indexation and wages’ while stating that the lack
of additional funding and the uncertainty of future funding past the end of the
NLAP on 30 June 2025 means that ‘many women’s legal services will have to start
planning to reduce services to women experiencing gender-based violence’. An independent
review of the NLAP released on 28 May 2024 recommends that the NLAP funding
model be abandoned, noting the current model lacks estimates of legal need (p.
125). Further, the report lists people experiencing or at risk of FDV as having
a high level on unmet legal need (pp. 66–68) and recommends including women as
a new priority cohort experiencing unmet legal need as well as creating a new
women’s funding stream (pp. 71–72).
While family and domestic violence (FDV) -specific frontline
services have received no extra funding in the current Budget, the Government
did provide funding for 500 frontline workers in the October 2022–23 Budget (Budget
measures: budget paper no. 2: October 2022–23, p. 187). Implementation
of this funding is the responsibility of the states and territories. As
of May 2024, 30 of 500 workers had been hired.
Prevention programs
While providing supports for women experiencing violence is
crucial, there is strong consensus that a focus on reducing perpetrator
behaviour is necessary.
The Budget provides:
- $4.3 million in 2024–25 to commission Australia’s National
Research Organisation for Women’s Safety to further build the evidence
base on pathways into and out of perpetration of family, domestic and
sexual violence.
- $1.3 million over 2 years from 2023–24 for a rapid review of
targeted prevention approaches to violence against women, with a panel of
experts to provide advice to Government on preventing gender-based violence,
including a focus on homicides (Budget paper no. 2, p. 157).
While there is funding for research and reviews, there is no
additional funding to implement new perpetrator intervention programs in
this Budget although a number of prevention programs are currently funded,
having received multi-year funding in the March
2022–23 and October
2022–23 budgets.
Community
attitudes and government-wide approach
As outlined in the National Plan:
Prevention means stopping violence against women from
occurring in the first place by addressing its underlying drivers. This
requires changing the social conditions that give rise to this violence;
reforming the institutions and systems that excuse, justify or even promote
such violence. Effective prevention requires integrated and cohesive work that
builds mutually reinforcing action at all levels, together with clearly defined
and well-supported implementation (p. 79).
The results of the 2021 National
Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey suggest that
‘understanding and attitudes regarding violence against women are improving
slowly, but further progress is needed’ (p. 22), with the authors noting that
‘poor understanding and problematic attitudes regarding violence against women
at the population level reflect a culture that allows this violence to
perpetuate’ (p. 21).
The Budget includes multiple measures which aim to alter the
institutions and contexts which perpetuate harmful attitudes towards violence
against women and gender inequality.
Office for Women
The Budget provides $3.9 million over 4 years from 2024–25
(and $1.0 million per year ongoing) in additional resourcing for the Office for
Women to support whole of government coordination and work with the Department
of Social Services to identify further opportunities to respond to gender-based
violence and continue to embed a focus on women’s safety across government (Budget
paper no. 2, p. 157). Despite the additional resourcing for the Office
for Women, the Portfolio
Budget Statements for the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet show
a decrease in funding for the Office over the forward estimates: $20.5 million
in 2023–24, reducing to $14.1 million in 2024–25 and down to $9.3 million in
2027–28 (p. 28). The reason for this reduction is not clear.
Higher education code
The Budget allocates $18.7 million over 4 years from 2024–25
(and an additional $28.8 million from 2028–29 to 2034–35) to introduce a
National Higher Education Code to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence
from 1 January 2025 (Budget Paper no. 2, p. 63). This Code responds to The
Action Plan Addressing Gender-based Violence in Higher Education, and the high rates of gender-based violence
reported in the context of tertiary education.
Online age verification pilot
The Budget also includes $6.5 million in 2024–25 to develop
a pilot of age assurance technologies to protect children from harmful online
content (Budget paper no. 2, p. 150). This measure was announced
as part of the package of measures to address gender-based violence following
the 1 May meeting of National Cabinet. In this context, an age verification
pilot was presented as focusing on limiting access to pornography. This follows
a history of parliamentary interest in the subject, including the eSafety
Commissioner’s submission of an age
verification roadmap to government following a recommendation of the House
of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs’ Inquiry
into age verification for online wagering and online pornography. A 2017
Australian Institute of Family Studies report, The
effects of pornography on children and young people, found that
young peoples’ consumption of pornography online reinforces gender stereotypes
and positively correlates to an increase in sexual aggression.
Response
Commentators
have noted
the continuing lack of initiatives to target the role of gambling,
alcohol and drug use in fuelling family and domestic violence. While there
are existing programs that seek to address these issues external to FDV,
reviews such as the National
Preventative Health Strategy (p. 67) and the recent You
win some, you lose more House of Representatives committee report
(recommendation 2) stress that holistic measures which consider the needs of
particularly vulnerable communities are required for intervention to be
effective.
Gender equality and women’s
empowerment
As Michael
Salter and Ashlee Gore suggest in their ‘Tree of Prevention’ model,
fostering gender equality, women’s empowerment, and ‘equitable stable, and just
societies’ more generally is likely to reduce the risk of violence and increase
the effectiveness of prevention activities (p. 70).
The Budget makes some efforts in addressing these wider
societal conditions, including through the investment in women’s health
initiatives and adding superannuation payments to Parental Leave Pay (Budget
paper no. 2, pp. 132, 166).
All online articles accessed May 2024