Key issue
Following the removal of international travel restrictions implemented due to the COVID-19 pandemic, migration levels may be expected to return to pre-pandemic settings. Over the long term, permanent and temporary migration programs have been directed at promoting economic growth while contributing to social outcomes. Recent measures were introduced to support pandemic recovery. Further changes to the programs, including new visas, could lead in new policy directions.
Migration Program planning levels
The number of permanent visas allocated each year is announced in
the Budget, with the latest program year Migration Program planning levels available on the
Department of Home Affairs website. The Migration Program is set at 160,000
places for 2022–23, down from the historic high of 190,000 in the mid-2010s
(see Figure 1).
From the time of the 2018 Budget, the Coalition Government began describing the
planning level as a ‘ceiling’ not to be exceeded, whereas previously it had
been treated as a target, with the aim of granting as close to that number of
visas as possible.
The permanent Migration Program consists of 2 main streams, Skill
and Family, with many different categories and subclasses of visas within
these. In recent decades, the program has been balanced at about two-thirds
Skill stream places to one-third Family. These proportions changed during the
years of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. The trends are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Migration Program
outcomes 2003–04 to 2022–23
(a) Planned; does not account for 10,000
places re-assigned from Partner visas to the Skill stream for the 2021–22 year
announced in the 2022–23 Budget.
(b) Total includes a small number of Special Eligibility stream visas.
(c) Includes Child stream visas.
Source: Department of Home Affairs, Australian
Migration Statistics, 2020–21, data.gov.au; Migration Program planning levels, Department of Home Affairs website.
In 2019–20, the ceiling of 160,000 places was not reached, due to border and travel restrictions
in the final part of the program year (from March 2020) and the impacts of the pandemic on visa
processing capacity.
In 2020–21 and 2021–22, the balance of Skill and Family places was
adjusted to about half-half (approximately 80,000 each). The additional places in
the Family stream were assigned to Partner visas, which had a backlog of
applications. The focus on Partner visas also facilitated the granting of more
visas to people already in Australia, enabling the overall Migration Program
level for 2020–21 to be reached despite border closures. In the 2022–23 Budget, the Coalition Government stated
that the number of on-hand Partner visa applications had fallen and that 10,000
places from the 2021–22 allocation would be moved to the Skill stream (p. 11).
(For further details, see the Immigration article in the Library’s Budget
review 2022–23.)
The broad composition of the Skill and Family streams for 2022–23 sees
a return to allocations similar to pre-pandemic levels. Partner visa places
account for 40,500 out of the 50,000 total for the Family stream. The Skill
stream is allocated 109,900 places.
The 2022–23 Budget also states that Partner visas will
now be granted on ‘a demand driven basis’, similar to the Child stream (p. 12).
This means that places within the Migration Program are provided as estimates,
but they are not subject to an annual ceiling or cap (see the Budget review
Immigration article for discussion).
In 2020–21 and 2021–22, a large proportion of places in the Skill
stream- over one-third- were allocated to the Business Innovation and Investment
Program (BIIP) and Global Talent visa categories, the intention being to promote economic growth during the pandemic (pp.
93–94). The 2022–23 program returns to more balanced
allocations across the Skill categories, while retaining relatively high levels
for the BIIP and the Global Talent visa.
The Coalition Government introduced
the Global
Talent Visa Program in November 2019, offering a streamlined process to a
permanent visa to attract highly-skilled, high-earning individuals in key
industry sectors. The program is accompanied by a promotional campaign aimed at
prospective applicants. In 2021, the Government introduced changes
to the BIIP, streamlining eligibility and tightening investment
requirements intended to maximise economic contribution of the program.
The business sector generally supports these
programs (see for example Chapter 4 of the Joint Standing Committee on
Migration’s Interim
report of the inquiry into Australia’s skilled migration program).
However, other stakeholders
contend that they do not bring sufficient economic benefits especially
compared with other skilled categories, or that they
may not demonstrate adequate transparency and integrity.
The Albanese Government has committed
to create a new Pacific Engagement visa, similar to New
Zealand’s Pacific Access Category. This would be a substantial shift in
visa policy and relations with the Pacific, allowing people from eligible
countries to apply for a permanent visa if they have a job offer, without
necessarily meeting the full skills requirements of the Migration Program Skill
stream visas. A quota of 3,000
places is planned. Further visa measures for the Pacific are discussed
below.
Temporary visas
There are no caps on the numbers of temporary visas granted- most
categories are ‘demand-driven’. (There are exceptions, for example, the Working Holiday Maker Program has annual caps for
some countries under respective bilateral arrangements.)
The bulk of temporary visas granted are for short term visitors (nearly two-thirds in 2018–19). Visitor visa
holders are not allowed to work. Most other temporary visas allow work rights,
but generally come with conditions linked to the purpose of the visa, and do not allow access to most social security payments.
Temporary visas limit the time a holder may stay in Australia. If the specified
time or purpose has concluded, the holder must apply for and be granted another
visa, or leave Australia.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there were over 2 million temporary visa holders in Australia.
This figure varies seasonally. For example there are many more people on
Visitor visas in Australia over summer than at other times.
The number of temporary visa holders in Australia fell substantially
during pandemic related travel and entry restrictions. Very few temporary visa
holders were permitted to travel to Australia, and those who were in Australia
but could not continue to meet the conditions of their visa or support
themselves, were encouraged to return to their home countries.
At 31 December 2019, there were over 2.4 million temporary visa
holders in Australia. One year later, this figure was 1.8 million, and at 31
December 2021 this had fallen to 1.6 million, mostly due to the small numbers
of Visitor visas. With the borders reopening in early 2022, the numbers have
started rising, attaining 1.8 million at 31 March.
Figure 2 shows the trends in stocks of temporary visa holders in
Australia for different visa categories, comparing the numbers at 31 March 2022
with the same point in time in previous years.
Figure 2 Temporary visa holders
in Australia (selected categories), snapshots at 31 March, 2013–2022
Source: Department of Home Affairs, Temporary
visa holders in Australia, data.gov.au
At March 2022, the number of Visitor visa holders was showing an
uptick, but recovery looks to be slower for other categories such as Students, Working
Holiday Makers and Temporary Skilled workers. (The dataset shows that numbers in the latter
categories are still down compared with March 2021, but have increased from low
points in September and December 2021.)
COVID-19 measures and pandemic recovery
During the period of closed borders (March 2020 to
February 2022), the Morrison Government set visa processing and entry
priorities to focus on visas for people with skills in key areas of shortage
created by the pandemic, that supported pandemic recovery, or could drive
investment and employment.
Factors such as internal travel restrictions and
loss of employment made it difficult for many temporary visa holders in
Australia to maintain their visa eligibility or to apply for another visa. The
Government introduced measures during the pandemic to grant limited flexibility
to temporary visa holders and applicants, particularly if a person was able to
work in a critical area of pandemic response and recovery.
Measures included: a Priority
Migration Skilled Occupation List to prioritise eligible temporary and
permanent visa applications to fill critical skills gaps; creating a ‘pandemic
event’ visa through the Temporary Activity (subclass 408) visa to allow
temporary visa holders to stay in Australia if they could continue to work; and
relaxing
certain work restrictions for working holiday makers and international
students. More details are available in the Department of Home Affairs report’ The
administration of the immigration and citizenship programs (9th
edition, pp. 4–6).
A COVID-19
concession period commenced from 1 February 2020 and does not yet have an
end date. This allows for temporary concessional visa arrangements such as waiving
certain visa fees and extending timeframes permitting temporary or provisional
visa holders to meet criteria for certain permanent visas. With the borders
reopening to fully vaccinated travellers from 21 February 2022, it is
likely these arrangements will be phased out as the pandemic recovery continues
and normal visa processing and travel resumes. However, even as pandemic
restrictions eased, the Morrison Government continued
to adjust visa settings, including for the ‘pandemic event’ visa, to
encourage economic recovery.
Business
stakeholders
have argued that the permanent Migration Program planning levels should be
increased at least in the next few years to stimulate economic recovery,
although as noted above, the current Budget maintains the planning level at
160,000 places. Many
economists also recommend a higher migration level, while other
analysts
argue that the settings and composition of the program, such as better focusing
the Skill stream to attract younger, higher-earning migrants, or improving
skills matching, are more important than the specific numbers.
The permanent Migration Program does not aim to
fill lower-skilled jobs, and shortages in these areas have been exacerbated by
the fall in temporary visa holders during the pandemic. Student visa holders
and Working Holiday Makers often work in sectors such as hospitality, retail
and agriculture, and employers may not be able to rely on filling vacancies
with temporary visa holders if numbers are slow to recover. Drawing on these
categories of temporary visa holders- where the primary purpose of the visa is
not employment- also raises concerns around the policy
intent of these visas and of migrant worker exploitation.
To assist with labour shortages in the agricultural
sector during the pandemic, the Government prioritised
entry of workers under the Seasonal Worker Programme (SWP), which allows
approved employers to recruit workers from participating Pacific Island
countries. In April 2022, the SWP and the Pacific Labour Scheme were merged to
form the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (PALM) scheme.
While not specifically a COVID-19 measure, the Coalition
Government also introduced a new Australian Agriculture visa program. The ‘Ag visa’
was negotiated between the Liberal and National parties, aiming to compensate
for the anticipated loss of UK backpacker workers from the sector as a result
of the Australia- UK Free Trade Agreement (2021) (which is not yet in force in
Australia). The agreement includes an exemption for UK working holiday makers
from having to undertake a period of specified agricultural work to
qualify for a second-year or third-year visa. Only Vietnam has so far signed a memorandum of
understanding for the Ag visa.
The Australian Labor Party (ALP)
indicated in its pre-election policy statements that it would wind back
the Ag visa and merge it into the PALM scheme, honouring the arrangement with
Vietnam but otherwise continuing to limit eligibility to Pacific Island
countries and Timor Leste.
Visa transitioning and pathways to permanent
residence
Migration Program planning levels are only one
factor in how many people migrate to Australia each year. The Australian Bureau
of Statistics measures net overseas migration (NOM). NOM is the difference
between people arriving in Australia and people departing from Australia.
Migrant arrivals to Australia are counted in NOM if they are in Australia for a
total of 12 months or more during a 16-month period. Therefore, this counts
people who arrive on a permanent visa, but also those who arrive on a temporary
visa and stay for a year or more, for example to study or work.
In 2018–19, prior to the pandemic, NOM
was 241,300. In 2020–21, it was -88,800, that is, more people left
Australia than arrived. The 2022–23
Budget (p. 114) projects that NOM will return to near pre-pandemic levels (around
235,000) in 2024–25. For further information, see the Budget review Immigration
article and the article ‘Australia’s population: recent changes’ in this Briefing book.
Usually, around half of permanent visas are granted to people
already in Australia on temporary visas. This proportion increased during the
pandemic to 67.5% in 2020–21 (p. 3). Given
the permanent Migration Program levels of 160,000 per year and that many of
these visas will be granted to people already in Australia, it is evident that
temporary migration is projected to make up a significant proportion of NOM.
While most temporary visa holders will leave Australia at some point,
others may transition through several temporary visas before obtaining a
permanent visa, or they may remain in Australia on temporary visas without ever
obtaining a permanent visa. In most cases, a temporary visa holder must meet
the criteria for a permanent visa in the same way as any other applicant. However,
some temporary visas place limits on applying for a subsequent visa.
For example, the short-term stream of the Temporary Skill Shortage visa allows
only one subsequent application for another TSS visa. The TSS (subclass 482) visa
replaced the subclass 457 visa in March 2018. The Joint Standing Committee on Migration’s report on Australia's
skilled migration program recommended changing the short-term TSS to
allow a pathway to permanent residence, stating that ‘All employer nominated
visas should provide the option of a pathway to permanency’ provided that
requirements, such as skills, age and English language levels, are met (p. 42).
Stakeholders, including the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, also recommended
implementing a pathway for all temporary skilled migrants. The
ALP has indicated it would support this (see for example pages 103–108 of the
committee’s report).
New Zealand citizens living in Australia are a unique case, as the Special Category (subclass 444) visa allows them
to stay and work indefinitely despite it being a temporary visa (see Figure 2).
If they wish to become permanent residents (and eventually Australian citizens),
most must apply for a permanent visa in the Migration Program. The New Zealand stream of the Skilled Independent (subclass 189) visa
was introduced in 2016 to facilitate the pathway to permanent residence for
certain subclass 444 holders, although applicants need to meet requirements
including an income threshold. There are calls to broaden the eligibility for
this pathway, enabling more New Zealanders to become permanent residents. Observers note this may reduce vulnerabilities for some of
those living in Australia and enable them to make a greater contribution to the
economy and society, but may come at higher social security costs.
Further reading
Department of Home Affairs, The Administration of the Immigration and Citizenship Programs, 9th edition, (Canberra: Department of Home Affairs, 2022).
Joint Standing Committee on Migration, Final Report of the Inquiry into Australia’s Skilled Migration Program, (Canberra: Australian Parliament, 2021).
Susan Love, Where to Find Immigration Data: a Quick Guide, Research paper series, 2021–22, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, 2022).
Senate Select Committee on Temporary Migration, Select Committee on Temporary Migration, final report, (Canberra: The Senate, 2021).
Harriet Spinks, Australia’s Permanent Migration Program: a Quick Guide, Research paper series, 2021–22, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, 2021).