Introductory Info
Date introduced: 4 December 2019
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Agriculture
Commencement: Export Control Bill—sections 1 and 2 commence on Royal Assent; sections 3 to 432 commence on Proclamation or at 3 am (ACT time) on 28 March 2021, whichever occurs later.
Consequential Amendments Bill—sections 1–3 commence on Royal Assent; Schedules 1–3 are contingent on, and commence at the same time as, the Export Control Bill.
The Export Charges Amendment Bills all commence at the same time as section 3 of the Export Control Bill.
The Bills Digest at a glance
Background
Australia’s existing legislative framework for
agricultural production and certification of exports (including fish, forestry,
fibre and food products) has developed over 35 years and currently comprises 17
Acts (including the Export Control Act 1982 and the Australian Meat
and Live-stock Industry Act 1997) and more than 40 legislative instruments.
These include legislative instruments which regulate the export of fish, eggs,
dairy, beef, lamb, goat, rabbit and pig meat, poultry meat, wild game meat,
ratite (for example, emu) meat, live animals (including livestock), and plants
and plant products.
Legislative package
This Bills Digest relates to a package of Bills
comprising:
- the
Export Control Bill 2019
- the
Export Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2019
- the
Export Charges (Imposition—Excise) Amendment Bill 2019
- the
Export Charges (Imposition—Customs) Amendment Bill 2019 and
- the
Export Charges (Imposition—General) Amendment Bill 2019.
The purpose of the legislative package is to create an
overarching legislative framework which will regulate the export of goods from
Australian territory. This will replace the existing regulatory scheme, with seventeen
export-related Acts repealed as part of this package.
The Bills will operate so that relevant details are set
out in rules.
Stakeholder support
The Bills have been subject to extensive consultation and
most, though not all, stakeholders are supportive of the Bills which will
consolidate the array of Acts, Regulations and Orders that currently govern the
export of Australia’s agricultural exports into a more cohesive framework.
The Bills were referred to the Senate Standing Committee
on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport for inquiry and report. The
Committee recommended that the Bills be passed.
History of
the Bills
The Export Control Bill 2017 (the first Bill) was
introduced into the Senate on 7 December 2017.[1]
Although some second reading debate on the first Bill took place on 5 February
2018, no further action was taken. The first Bill lapsed when the 45th
Parliament was prorogued.
The first Bill was not referred to Committee for inquiry
and report and no Bills Digest was published in relation to that Bill.
Although the Export Control Bill 2019 (the Bill) has a
similar structure to the first Bill, its provisions have been substantially
amended and so are not in equivalent terms to those in the first Bill.
Purpose of
the Bills
This Bills Digest relates to a package of Bills comprising:
- the
Export Control Bill 2019 (the Export Control Bill)
- the
Export Control (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2019
(Consequential Amendments Bill)
- the
Export Charges (Imposition—Excise) Amendment Bill 2019
- the
Export Charges (Imposition—Customs) Amendment Bill 2019 and
- the
Export Charges (Imposition—General) Amendment Bill 2019
The purpose of the suite of Bills is to create an
overarching legislative framework which will regulate the export of goods from
Australian territory. The Bills will operate so that relevant details are set
out in rules.
The Consequential Amendments Bill repeals 17 separate
statutes including the existing Export Control Act
1982 so that all exports can be regulated under the one Act.
The three remaining Bills, the Export Charges
(Imposition—Excise) Amendment Bill 2019, the Export Charges
(Imposition—Customs) Amendment Bill 2019 and the Export Charges
(Imposition—General) Amendment Bill 2019 amend the Export Charges
(Imposition—Excise) Act 2015, the Export Charges
(Imposition—Customs) Act 2015 and the Export Charges
(Imposition—General) Act 2015 respectively to create a legal structure
for the recovery of costs through the imposition of charges as a cost recovery
levy.
Structure of
the Bills
The Export Control Bill comprises 11 Chapters:
- Chapter
1 sets out preliminary matters including relevant definitions
- Chapter
2 is about exporting goods including goods which are prohibited or temporarily
prohibited from export; the issue of government certificates in relation to
certain goods that are to be exported; and offences and penalties arising under
that Chapter
- Chapter
3 sets out the framework for accreditation of properties for a kind of export
operations including the manner in which an application is to be made; the
conditions which may apply to an accreditation; and the powers to vary or
revoke accreditation
- Chapter
4 is about the registration of establishments for a kind of export including
the conditions which may apply to registration and the powers to vary or revoke
registration
- Chapter
5 relates to the approval of a proposed arrangement for certain kinds of export
operations including the conditions to which the arrangement may be subject to
conditions and the manner in which the approval of the arrangement may be
varied or revoked
- Chapter
6 is about export licences
- Chapter
7 is about export permits
- Chapter
8 sets out other matters relating to export including when, and in what form a
notice of intention to export a consignment of goods is required
- Chapter
9 sets out the Secretary’s power to require an audit of export operations or
the performance of functions and the exercise of powers by certain persons
under the Export Control Act
- Chapter
10 sets out the compliance and enforcement regime for the Act and
- Chapter
11 contains miscellaneous provisions including in relation to the making of
applications, review of decisions and confidentiality of information.
The Consequential Amendments Bill comprises three
Schedules:
- Schedule
1 provides for the repeal of certain statutes which will be redundant with the
enactment of the Export Control Act
- Schedule
2 sets out consequential amendments and
- Schedule
3 contains application, saving and transitional provisions.
Background
The genesis of the Export Control Act 1982 (the current
Export Control Act) lies in Australia’s meat substitution scandal which
came to light in August 1981. Addressing the
Senate in relation to the scandal, Senator Fred Chaney stated:
This statement is to advise the Senate in detail of the
measures undertaken by the Government, following the confirmed finding on 13
August 1981 of horse meat in a shipment of Australian boneless beef to
the United States of America. This discovery, coupled with the finding in
Melbourne on 21 August of kangaroo meat in cartons marked for export as
boneless beef, is an extremely grave matter. The Government is determined
to have all the facts of this case brought to light, to stamp out this
kind of activity, to prosecute those involved, and to ensure that all possible
measures are taken to prevent such activity from happening again. The tragedy
of this case is the immense damage it has caused to the reputation of our meat
industry, both here and overseas.[2]
[emphasis added]
The resulting Royal
Commission into the Australian Meat Industry conducted by Mr Justice Woodward
set out the problem as follows:
The main question which the
Royal Commission has been asked to answer is how widespread have malpractices
been in the meat industry in recent years.
...[I am] conscious of the fact
that a longer and more detailed investigation than has been possible in the
time available, would undoubtedly have revealed many more transgressions; and
the prevalence of commercial malpractice disclosed by the evidence—at all
levels of the industry—constitutes a very serious problem. In particular, large
quantities of meat, from animals killed more cheaply at non-export abattoirs,
have found their way onto export markets, and the quality, age or other
characteristics of export meat have often been falsely described.[3]
The response to the Royal Commission was swift.
Introducing the originating Bill for the current Export Control Act, the
Minister for Primary Industry stated:
The purpose of this Bill is to establish a new and
comprehensive legislative base for the export inspection and control
responsibilities within my portfolio. Under existing arrangements, export
inspection powers are drawn from the Customs Act 1901 and the Commerce
(Trade Descriptions) Act 1905. This has created a number of administrative
and legal weaknesses ...[4]
2015 Review
In July 2015, the Department of Agriculture circulated a
discussion paper about the future of agricultural export regulation.[5]
The discussion paper stated that the Department was undertaking a review to
assess whether the existing export regulation:
- meets
the needs of industry and government today and into the future
- is
flexible and enables industry and government to respond to a range of situations
and contemporary issues
- ensures
that importing country requirements are met without imposing an unnecessary
regulatory burden on users of the system and
- is
clear, transparent and easy to understand.[6]
Following on from the discussion paper and resultant
feedback, a report was published in May 2016.[7]
That report indicated that ‘the majority of stakeholders are comfortable with
the current level of agricultural export regulation’ but would like to see
improvements made to the regulation, such as aligning requirements with
importing country requirements and increased flexibility.[8]
Rationale
for the Bill
The Explanatory Memorandum to the Export Control Bill sets
out the rationale for the Bill at this time:
Australia’s existing legislative framework for agricultural
production and certification of exports (including fish, forestry, fibre and
food products) has developed over 35 years and currently comprises 17 Acts
(including the Export Control Act 1982 and the Australian Meat and
Live-stock Industry Act 1997) and more than 40 legislative instruments.
This includes legislative instruments which regulate the export of fish, eggs,
dairy, beef, lamb, goat, rabbit and pig meat, poultry meat, wild game meat,
ratite (e.g. emu) meat, live animals (including livestock), and plants and
plant products ...
Many of the legislative instruments that support the existing
export certification framework are due to sunset (cease to be law) on 1 April
2021 in accordance with the requirements of the Legislation Act 2003.
This deadline provided the opportunity to review those legislative instruments
as part of a broader review of the entire agricultural exports legislative
framework, which took place in 2015 (the Review).[9]
Consultation
The Department states that the Export Control Bill has
been the subject of extensive consultation:
The department has engaged with supply chain
participants and other stakeholders through a range of channels. The department
has used its website extensively to provide information and draft legislative
documents, and to seek feedback. Consultation has also occurred directly with
peak industry bodies, though established departmental-industry consultative
committees, via email and at face-to-face workshops and seminars.[10]
Committee
consideration
Senate Rural
and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee
The Bills were referred to the Senate Rural and Regional
Affairs and Transport Committee (RRAT Committee) for inquiry and report by 7
February 2020.[11]
The RRAT Committee received six submissions.
In its report, the RRAT Committee recommended that each of
the Bills in the legislative package be passed.[12]
Senate
Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills
The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills (Scrutiny
of Bills Committee) has reiterated its comments in relation to the first Bill.[13]
Those comments are canvassed below in the context of the provisions to which
they relate.[14]
Policy
position of non-government parties/independents
Australian Labor Party (ALP) members of the RRAT Committee
supported the package of Bills but made additional comments expressing support
for the concerns of some submitters ‘about the compliance costs of meeting
regulatory and operational requirements, such as preparing for audits and
addressing documentation requirements’. They urged the Government to work
closely with agriculture sectors during the development of commodity-specific
rules.[15]
Position of
major interest groups
Submitters to both the RRAT Committee’s inquiry into the
Bills in the legislative package and to the Department of Agriculture’s discussion
paper have made comments which reflect their involvement in the export of goods
from Australia. That being the case some submitters were very much in favour of
the changes in the Bills whilst others considered that the Bills would not
bring about better outcomes.
For instance, Grain Trade Australia (GTA) has stated that
it ‘has no significant issues in relation to the content of the draft Bill’ and
that it is supportive of the Bills’ intent of ‘consolidating the array of Acts,
Regulations and Orders that currently govern the export of Australia’s
agricultural exports into a more cohesive framework ...’.[16]
On the other hand, the Australian Livestock Exporters’
Council which represents Australia’s livestock export sector expressed its
concern about:
... the high risk of poor and unfair regulatory outcomes from
critical ambiguity, inefficiencies and inappropriate obligations or sanctions
inherent in [the Export Control] Bill. This will have a significant impact on
the commerciality of parts of the sector as we are an industry that runs on
incredibly tight margins and exporters bear considerable financial risk with
each shipment. Consequently, poor and unfair regulatory outcomes only heighten
that financial risk which may be an inhibitor to trade.[17]
Financial
implications
According to the Explanatory Memoranda to the Bills, they
‘will have no financial impact on the Australian Government budget’.[18]
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
As required under Part 3 of the Human Rights
(Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (Cth), the Government has assessed
the Bill’s compatibility with the human rights and freedoms recognised or
declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of that Act. The
Government considers that the Bill is compatible.[19]
Parliamentary
Joint Committee on Human Rights
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights had no
comment in relation to the Bills in the legislative package on the basis that
they ‘do not engage, or only marginally engage, human rights; promote human
rights; and/or permissibly limit human rights’.[20]
General
features of the Export Control Bill
Making rules
Whilst the Export Control Bill sets out the overarching
legislative framework for the export of goods, it also gives the Secretary the
power to make rules.[21]
(Note that this power cannot be delegated.[22])
These rules contain the details which are absent from the Bill itself. The
rules are legislative instruments in accordance with the Legislation Act
2003 and so are required to be tabled in both chambers of the
Parliament and will be subject to disallowance.
In addition the rules may make provision for, or in
relation to a matter by applying, adopting or incorporating, with or without
modification, a range of specified official documents including but not limited
to:
The rule-making power is featured throughout the Export
Control Bill. Draft Meat and Meat Product Rules, Draft Milk Rules, Draft Egg
Rules and Draft Fish Rules have been circulated.[24]
Scrutiny of
Bills Committee comments
The Scrutiny of Bills Committee noted that clause 432
provides that the Secretary may make rules prescribing matters ‘required or
permitted by this Act to be prescribed by the rules’ or ‘necessary or
convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act’.[25]
The Committee's view is that significant matters, such as
the circumstances in which goods may or may not be exported, should generally
be included in primary legislation unless a sound justification for the use of
delegated legislation is provided. In particular, the Scrutiny of Bills Committee
was concerned with the use of ‘rules’ rather than ‘regulations’. This is
because:
... regulations are subject to a higher level of executive
scrutiny than other instruments as regulations must be approved by the Federal
Executive Council and must also be drafted by the Office of Parliamentary
Counsel (OPC). Therefore, if significant matters are to be provided for in
delegated legislation (rather than primary legislation) the Committee considers
they should at least be provided for in regulations, rather than other forms of
delegated legislation which are subject to a lower level of executive scrutiny.[26]
The Committee sought advice from the Minister who provided
the rationale for the use of the rules in the Export Control Bill:
In the context of complex and rapidly changing export
markets, it is clear that the benefits of including detailed regulatory
requirements in rules rather than regulations outweigh any concerns. It has
also been common practise over a number of years for Acts to provide for the making
of instruments rather than regulations. Under the Legislation Act 2003
all disallowable legislative instruments are subject to parliamentary scrutiny.[27]
Giving
directions
The Export Control Bill also gives the Minister the power
to make directions, by legislative instrument, about the performance of the
Secretary’s functions or the exercise of the Secretary’s rule making powers.[28]
However, the Minister is not empowered to give directions in relation to a
specific application made under the Export Control Act. These directions
are not subject to either the disallowance provisions or the sunsetting
provisions of the Legislation Act.
Offences and
penalties
The Export Control Bill contains a number of types or sanctions
for non-compliance. These include criminal penalties, civil penalties,
infringement notices, injunctions and enforceable undertakings. Specific
offences and penalties are discussed in further detail throughout this digest.
Criminal
offences
The Criminal Code Act
1995 contains the Criminal Code. Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code,
entitled ‘General Principles of Criminal Responsibility’, contains a
comprehensive statement of principles of criminal responsibility for
Commonwealth offences. It provides that offences have physical elements,
for example, doing or not doing an action,[29]
and fault elements, such as intention, knowledge, recklessness or
negligence.[30]
Clause 370 of the Export Control Bill provides that for the purposes of
the Bill, the physical elements of an offence are described as conduct
rule provisions.
Where the law creating the offence does not specify a
fault element for a physical element that consists only of conduct, intention
is the fault element.[31]
A person has intention with respect to conduct if he or she means to engage in
that conduct.[32]
The standard of proof for a criminal offence is ‘beyond
reasonable doubt’.[33]
Importantly, an executive officer of a body corporate may
commit an offence or be liable to a civil penalty if the executive officer knew
or was reckless or negligent about contraventions of certain provisions by the
body corporate, was in a position to influence the conduct of the body
corporate in relation to the contravention, and failed to take all reasonable
steps to prevent the contravention.[34]
Civil
penalty provisions
The Export Control Bill triggers the framework for civil
penalties in Part 4 of the Regulatory Powers
(Standard Provisions) Act 2014 (Regulatory Powers Act). That Act
provides for a framework of standard regulatory powers exercised by agencies
across the Commonwealth. It reflects the Guide to Framing Commonwealth
Offences, Infringements Notices and Enforcement Powers and applies to
regulatory schemes which trigger its provisions through primary legislation—as
the Export Control Bill does.[35]
According to the Explanatory Memorandum:
Civil penalty provisions offer an alternative to criminal
prosecution. The penalties have been set at a level substantially higher than
the maximum fines available for criminal offences in the Bill. Given the
regulatory nature of the Bill, it is important that civil penalties are set at
a level that means that the penalty is not merely perceived as a cost of doing
business. This is particularly the case for bodies corporate.[36]
The Export Control Bill operates so that an executive
officer of a body corporate is liable to a civil penalty in specified
circumstances.[37]
Importantly, the body corporate must not indemnify a person against those
liabilities.[38]
Chapter
2—exporting goods
Chapter 2 of the Export Control Bill relates to exporting goods
which are defined as any of the following:
- an
animal or a plant
- an
article, substance or thing (including reproductive material) derived from an
animal or a plant, whether or not in combination with any other article,
substance or thing
- food
- any
other article, substance or thing
but does not include narcotic goods within the meaning of
the Customs Act
1901.[39]
Permanently
prohibited goods
The Export Control Bill permanently prohibits the export
of one good only—split vetch.[40]
Split vetch seeds are a particular form of vetch seeds and are not the same as
whole vetch seeds that have been broken (for example, in the course of
harvesting or transport). The requirement to prohibit absolutely the export of
split vetch seeds results from their toxic properties and possible use as a
substitute for edible red lentils.[41]
Notably, there is no rule-making power attached to this
clause. This means that any future decision to permanently prohibit the export
of another good will require a formal legislative amendment.
Temporarily
prohibited goods
The Bill provides that the Minister may determine, by
legislative instrument:
- the
export of a specified type of good from an Australian territory
is prohibited absolutely for up to six months or
- the
export of a specified type of good from an Australian territory to a
specified place is prohibited for up to six months.[42]
For the purpose of the Bill the term Australian
territory refers to Australia, the exclusive economic zone adjacent to
Australia and the waters above the continental shelf adjacent to Australia; as
well as to prescribed external territories or other areas prescribed by Rules
made in accordance with subclause 8(2) of the Bill.[43]
These are identified in the map below.[44]
Source: Geoscience Australia (GA), ‘Maritime boundary definitions’, GA website.
The Minister must make the temporary prohibition
determination in writing and set out reasons.[45]
Such a determination may only be made if he, or she, is satisfied that it is
necessary to do so to protect human, animal or plant life or health; or to
secure compliance with another Australian law.[46]
The Minister may extend a temporary prohibition order for those same reasons
for a further period of six months, and may do so more than once.[47]
Offences and
penalties
The Export Control Bill creates a number of offences in
relation to goods that are subject to permanent or temporary prohibition on
export.
The Bill also provides for a civil penalty offence as an
alternative to a criminal offence. Civil penalties are expressed as penalty
units. The value of a penalty unit is currently $210.[48]
Nature of offence
|
Maximum criminal penalty
|
Maximum civil penalty
|
Exporting goods that are permanently
prohibited or subject to absolute prohibition on export—basic contravention[49]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Exporting goods that are permanently
prohibited or subject to absolute prohibition on export—with an intention to
obtain a commercial advantage[50]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
Exporting goods that are permanently
prohibited or subject to absolute prohibition on export—where export causes
economic consequences for Australia[51]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
Conveying or possessing goods that are
permanently prohibited or are subject to absolute prohibition on export—and
are intended to be exported[52]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Exporting goods to a temporarily prohibited place—basic
contravention[53]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Exporting goods to a temporarily prohibited place—with an
intention to obtain a commercial advantage[54]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out under
section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount under section
50A.
|
Exporting goods to a temporarily prohibited place—where
export causes economic consequences for Australia[55]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out under
section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount under section
50A.
|
Conveying or possessing goods that are temporarily
prohibited and are intended to be exported to a particular place[56]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units or both
|
960 penalty units
|
References to section 50A in the Bill
Clause 50A of the Bill sets out the method for
calculating penalties payable for certain contraventions by bodies corporate.
The amount is not more than the greatest of the following:
- 20,000
penalty units
- if
the body has obtained, directly or indirectly, a benefit that is
reasonably attributable to the conduct constituting the contravention, and the
relevant court can determine the value of that benefit—three times the
value of that benefit
- if
the relevant court cannot determine the value of a benefit (as
above) or no such benefit has been obtained—10 per cent of the annual turnover
of the body during the period of 12 months ending at the end of the month in
which the body committed, or began committing, the contravention.
New concepts
The offences above introduce two new concepts:
- intention
to obtain a commercial advantage and
- exports
causing economic consequences.
Intention to obtain a commercial advantage
According to the Explanatory Memorandum to the Export
Control Bill:
Commercial advantage may include monetary profit or private
financial gain. There will be no requirement to prove that the person actually
obtained a commercial advantage; proving that, at the time of exporting the
goods the person intended to obtain a commercial advantage will be sufficient.[57]
Export
causes economic consequences for Australia
For the purposes of the Bill the term economic
consequences for Australia includes:
- substantial
damage to Australia’s trading reputation and
- a
restriction on, or the closure of, access to one or more overseas markets for
all goods or a kind of goods from Australia.[58]
The Explanatory Memorandum states: ‘this is not intended
to be an exhaustive definition, but will give examples of the kinds of
circumstances that will be considered to be economic consequences for Australia
for the purpose of the aggravated offences in the Bill.’[59]
Prescribed goods and conditions of export
Prescribed goods are those which have specific export
conditions placed on them to ensure they are fit for export. Currently, prescribed
goods include: dairy, live animals, animal reproductive material, fish,
plants and plant products (grain, fresh fruit and vegetables), eggs, meat and
meat products, animal food (frozen raw meat), organic produce, and
pharmaceuticals (raw animal material).[60]
Non-prescribed goods are goods which generally do not have
export controls placed on them because government to government certification
for these goods is often not required by importing countries.
Currently, non-prescribed goods include:
nutritional supplements, cosmetics, animal by-products, wool, skins and hides,
inedible blood, rendered meats, prepared dry pet food and processed foods.[61]
Prescribing
goods
The rules may prescribe kinds of goods
(called prescribed goods) with reference to particular
circumstances. This might be, for example, the place to which the goods are to
be exported or the intended use of the goods.[62]
In determining whether to prescribe certain goods, the
Secretary must take into account matters such as:
- any importing country requirements relating to goods of that kind[63]
- sanitary
matters (being matters relating to food safety, animal health or human health)
and phytosanitary matters (being matters relating to plant health) relating to
goods of that kind
- any
Australian laws and standards relating to goods of that kind
- Australia’s
rights and obligations relating to goods of that kind under any international
agreements to which Australia is a party
- any
international standards relating to goods of that kind and
- any
other matter the Secretary considers relevant.[64]
Prohibiting
export of prescribed goods
The Bill authorises the making of rules to prohibit the
export of prescribed goods from Australian territory, or from a
part of Australian territory, subject to certain conditions which are also
prescribed by the rules.[65]
The rule-making powers in relation to the export of goods and prescribed goods
are broad. They may cover matters including but not limited to:
- conditions
in relation to the export of prescribed goods, or the export of prescribed
goods to a specified place[66]
- requirements
for the exporter to have permission to export the goods—for example to hold an export
licence, government certificate or an export permit
for the goods[67]
- export
operations to be carried out in relation to the goods—for example, the
premises, equipment and facilities to be used to produce or prepare
the goods, loading and transport of the goods, and identification, tracing,
recall and transfer of the goods.[68]
Offences and
penalties
The Bill creates 20 separate offences in relation to prescribed
goods. These are set out below.
Nature of offence
|
Maximum criminal penalty
|
Maximum civil penalty
|
Exporting prescribed goods without complying
with prescribed conditions—basic contravention[72]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Exporting prescribed goods without complying
with prescribed conditions—intention to obtain commercial advantage[73]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount under section
50A.
|
Exporting prescribed goods without complying
with prescribed conditions—economic consequences for Australia[74]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units, or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount under section
50A
|
Conveying or possessing prescribed goods
that are intended to be exported in contravention of conditions[75]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Exporting prescribed goods to a particular
place without complying with prescribed export conditions—basic contravention[76]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Exporting prescribed goods to a particular
place without complying with prescribed export conditions—intention to obtain
commercial advantage[77]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units, or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A.
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount under section
50A
|
Exporting prescribed goods to a particular
place without complying with prescribed export conditions—economic
consequences for Australia[78]
|
If the person is an individual—imprisonment for 10 years
or 2,000 penalty units, or both
If the person is a body corporate—the amount worked out
under section 50A
|
If the person is an individual—4,000 penalty units
If the person is a body corporate—the amount under section
50A
|
Conveying or possessing prescribed goods
that are intended to be exported to a prescribed place in contravention of
conditions[79]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Producing or preparing prescribed goods for
export at certain premises in contravention of conditions—general[80]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Producing or preparing prescribed goods at
certain premises in contravention of conditions—where the goods are to be
exported to a particular place[81]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Making a false or misleading representation about prescribed
goods that are entered for export—general[82]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Making a false or misleading representation about prescribed
goods that are entered for export to a particular place[83]
|
Imprisonment for 8 years or 480 penalty units, or both
|
960 penalty units
|
Making a false or misleading representation about non-prescribed
goods that are entered for export to a particular place[84]
|
Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both
|
600 penalty units
|
Exemptions
Part 2 of Chapter 2 sets out exemptions from the operation
of the Export Control Act 2019 in certain circumstances. The exemptions
apply to prescribed goods—which in this Part are called relevant goods—that
are to be exported:
- as
a commercial sample
- for
experimental purposes
- in
exceptional circumstances
- in
special commercial circumstances or
- in
other circumstances prescribed by the rules.[85]
None of those terms is defined in the text of the Export
Control Bill. They will be defined in the rules.[86]
However, an application for an exemption cannot be made for goods that are
permanently prohibited or subject to a temporary prohibition determination.[87]
The Export Control Bill requires a person to make an
application to the Secretary for an exemption in the approved manner and form.
The application must, amongst other things, set out the basis on which the
exemption is sought and be accompanied by any documents which are prescribed by
the rules.[88]
The Secretary must decide to either grant or refuse the application.[89]
If the decision is to grant the exemption, the Secretary must give the
applicant a certificate of exemption setting out:
- the
kind of goods covered by the exemption
- each
importing country covered by the exemption
- the
basis on which the exemption has been granted
- the
provisions of the Export Control Act covered by the exemption
- the
date when the exemption takes effect
- the
period during which the exemption remains in force
- any
conditions of the exemption and
- any
other information prescribed by the rules.[90]
Where an exemption has been granted subject to conditions,
the Secretary is empowered, having regard to any matters prescribed in the
rules, to vary the conditions, including by imposing new conditions.[91]
In addition, the Secretary is empowered, having regard to any matters
prescribed in the rules, to revoke an exemption.[92]
Scrutiny of
Bills Committee comments
The Scrutiny of Bills Committee expressed concern about the
Secretary’s broad administrative power to exempt persons (applicants) from the
application of the law as it applies to particular classes of goods. The
Scrutiny of Bills Committee considered ‘this power to be broadly akin to a
Henry VIII clause, which enables delegated legislation to alter or override the
operation of primary legislation’.[93]
The Committee sought advice from the Minister in relation
to the matter.[94]
In response, the Minister advised that the Secretary would only be able to
grant exemptions from the provisions of the Export Control Bill in relation to a
small class of goods and that such an exemption would be granted in response to
an individual application, rather than in relation to all goods of a particular
kind or all goods exported to a particular importing country.[95]
Despite the Minister’s assurance in relation to the
limitations on the relevant power, the Scrutiny of Bills Committee remained
‘concerned about the breadth of the discretionary power to exempt persons
proposing to export relevant goods from provisions of the Bill’.[96]
Government
certificates
The rules may require, among other things that an exporter
is required to hold a government certificate in relation to prescribed
goods.[97]
According to the Department of Agriculture:
A government certificate is an official
document issued by the department containing details about the product being
exported, confirming the product meets importing country requirements ...
The role of the certificate is to confirm to the importing
country authorities that the described goods have met specified requirements.[98]
Government certificates ‘are high-volume decisions and
often made in relation to perishable items’.[99]
Clause 62 of the Export Control Bill contains a broad power to make
rules in relation to government certificates, including rules about the kinds
of goods for which a government certificate may be issued and the kinds
of goods for which a government certificate must not be issued.
About
issuing bodies
The Export Control Bill provides that the issuing body
for a government certificate in relation to a kind of goods that are to be, or
that have been, exported is a person or body prescribed by the rules in
relation to goods of that kind or if no person or body is prescribed by the
rules in relation to goods of that kind—the Secretary.[100]
Scrutiny of
Bills Committee comments
The Scrutiny of Bills Committee expressed its concern at
the broad delegation of administrative powers to non-Commonwealth officers or
bodies. The Committee noted that ‘there are no limits in the Bill as to the
type of person or body who may be appointed as an issuing body for government
certificates, meaning that such persons or bodies may include private
contractors’.[101]
The rationale for the provision is contained in the Explanatory
Memorandum:
Third party issuing bodies are necessary in circumstances
where a body or person has the specialisation, knowledge and expertise to
certify a kind of goods. For example, bodies that have specialised expertise in
organics certification that the Secretary may not have will be authorised to
issue certificates in relation to organic goods. The Bill operates so that the
Secretary will be the issuing body for all kinds of goods, unless an issuing
body is prescribed in the rules. In that case, the Secretary will not be an
issuing body for that kind of goods unless the Secretary is also prescribed in
the rules.[102]
Powers of
the issuing body
The Bill sets out the manner in which an application for a
government certificate is to be made to an issuing body.[103]
The term issuing body is defined as a person or body that may
issue a government certificate in relation to a kind of goods.[104]
The Secretary may do anything he, or she, thinks necessary
in relation to an application for a government certificate. These include:
- requesting
the applicant (or another person who is considered to have information or
documents) in writing to provide further specified information or documents relating
to the application
- arranging
for another person with appropriate qualifications or expertise to take, test
or analyse samples of goods, or from equipment or other things, that are
relevant to the application or
- any
other thing prescribed by the rules.[105]
The issuing body for a government certificate (other than
the Secretary) may charge a fee.[106]
Grant or
refuse an application
On receiving an application in the appropriate manner and
form,[107]
the issuing body must decide to issue or refuse to issue the
certificate.[108]
The Bill sets out the reasons on which a decision to refuse a decision may be
based. These include, but are not limited to, matters such as:
- the
issuing body is not satisfied, having regard to any matter that the issuing
body considers relevant, that the requirements of the Export Control Act
in relation to the export of the goods have been complied with, or will be
complied with before the goods are imported into the importing country[109]
- the
issuing body reasonably believes that the applicant made a false, misleading or
incomplete statement in the application for the certificate or gave false,
misleading or incomplete information or documents to the issuing body[110]
- information
or documents requested by the issuing body were not given within a reasonable
period after the request was made[111]
or
- the
applicant refused to consent to a request by a person to enter premises of the
applicant to conduct an audit of export operations carried out in relation to
the goods.[112]
A government certificate may be issued electronically or
in another form that is acceptable to the country to which the goods are
exported.[113]
The government certificate remains in force until the earlier of the expiry
date on the certificate or the day the certificate is accepted or rejected by
the importing country.[114]
Revoke a
certificate
The issuing body or the Secretary may revoke
a government certificate by notifying the holder of the certificate in writing
if they have a reasonable belief in relation to the matters listed in subclause
75(1) of the Bill.[115]
In that case, the holder of the certificate must return it to the issuing body,
or the Secretary, within the period or in the circumstances set out in the
rules. A failure to comply with this requirement gives rise to a maximum civil
penalty of 60 penalty units.[116]
Setting
generic requirements
An important feature of the 2016 consultation report was
the acknowledgement:
Stakeholders want consistent regulation across commodities
with generic requirements applied as much as possible across the board
rather than on a commodity by commodity basis. This is particularly relevant
for those who deal with multiple commodities and/or multiple markets.[117]
The Export Control Bill largely delivers on that request.
To that end Chapters 4–6 of the Export Control Bill are drafted to ensure the
provisions are mirrored where possible.
The rules may prescribe conditions in relation to the export of prescribed
goods, or the export of prescribed goods to a specified place, that require
export operations to be carried out in relation to the goods:
- at
a registered establishment—that is, an establishment registered
by the Department [of Agriculture] to prepare goods for export.[118]
Regardless of the size of the exporter, establishments must be registered
before commencing preparation of prescribed goods for export (which includes
production, storage, handling and/or presentation)[119]
- at
another kind of premises prescribed by the rules
- in
accordance with an approved arrangement—that is, an arrangement
between the Department and a registered establishment that covers each stage of
production and documents the establishment controls used to ensure that legislative
and food safety requirements are met; importing country requirements are met
and there is a sound basis for issuing an export permit or government
certificate[120]
- in
accordance with an export licence[121]
or
- in
any other way prescribed by the rules.[122]
Lodge an application
Chapter 4 of the Bill provides that the occupier of an
establishment may apply to the Secretary to register the establishment for a
kind of export operations in relation to a kind of prescribed goods.[123]
In that case, the Secretary must decide to register, or to refuse to register,
the establishment.[124]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in respect of applications for the approval of an arrangement and the grant of
an export licence.[125]
Registering
the establishment
The Secretary may register the establishment if he,
or she, is satisfied of the following:
- the
occupier of the establishment is a fit and proper person
- either
all relevant Commonwealth liabilities of the occupier of the
establishment have been paid or are taken to have been paid or where there are relevant
Commonwealth liabilities unpaid the non-payment is due to exceptional
circumstances
- the
construction of the establishment and its equipment and facilities are suitable
for carrying out export operations of that kind in relation to goods of that
kind
- if
the rules require export operations of that kind to be carried out in relation
to goods of that kind in accordance with an approved arrangement—an
approved arrangement is in force
- if
export operations, or other operations, are to be carried out in relation to
different kinds of goods at the establishment—the operations are compatible
with each other and will not have a detrimental effect on export operations to
be carried out at the establishment
- any
other requirement prescribed by the rules.[131]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in respect of applications for the approval of an arrangement and the grant of
an export licence.[132]
Key
issue—fit and proper person
The fit and proper person test is applied to
applications made under Chapters 4, 5 and 6 of the Export Control Bill, and may
apply to other provisions of the Act prescribed by the rules.[133]
The matters to be considered in determining whether a person is fit and proper
include but are not limited to the following:
- whether
the person, or an associate of the person, has been convicted of an offence
against, or ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty under:
- whether
the person, or an associate of the person has contravened any of the statutes
listed above[135]
- whether
a debt is due and payable by the person, or an associate of the person, to the
Commonwealth under any of the statutes listed above[136]
and
- whether
the person made a false or misleading statement in an application under the Export
Control Act or gave false or misleading information or documents to the
Secretary or to another person performing functions or duties or exercising
powers under the Export Control Act or a prescribed agriculture law.[137]
Key
issue—Commonwealth liabilities
The Bill provides that certain activities are fee-bearing
activities carried out by, on or behalf of, the Commonwealth in the
performance of functions or exercise of its powers under the Export Control
Act.[138]
The Bill defines a cost recovery charge as:
- a
fee prescribed by rules for a fee-bearing activity
- a
charge imposed by the Export Charges (Imposition—Customs) Act 2015, the Export
Charges (Imposition—Excise) Act 2015, or the Export Charges
(Imposition—General) Act 2015
- a late payment fee relating to the fees and charges above.[139]
The Bill provides that the rules may prescribe:
- when
the cost-recovery charge is due and payable[140]
- who
is liable to pay the charge[141]
and
- whether
a late payment fee is payable.[142]
A cost recovery charge may be recovered as a debt due to
the Commonwealth by action in a court.[143]
Importantly, the requirement to pay a cost recovery
charge is linked to the continuing registration of an establishment under
Chapter 4, the approval of an arrangement under Chapter 5 and the grant of an
export licence under Chapter 6 of the Bill.
Conditions
of registration
The registration of an establishment is subject to
conditions set out in the Export Control Act, prescribed by the
rules and any additional conditions that the Secretary considers to be appropriate.[144]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in respect of conditions which may be applied to the approval of an arrangement
and the grant of an export licence.[145]
Period of
registration
Registration of an establishment may be subject to an
expiry date—otherwise the registration remains in force unless it is revoked.[146]
Those registrations which have an expiry date require an application to renew
the registration to be made within the period prescribed by the rules or a
longer period that the Secretary allows.[147]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in respect of the period of approval of an arrangement and the grant of an
export licence.[148]
Key
issue—review of decisions
The Export Control Bill provides that certain decisions
may be reviewed internally and by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The reviewable
decisions are set out in table form in clause 381.
The Bill provides that:
- when
a person makes a reviewable decision they must notify the relevant person of
the decision in writing. The notice must state the terms of the decision, the
reasons for the decision and include information about the right to have the
decision reviewed[149]
- an
application for review must be in writing and be made within 30 days of the day
the person was notified of the reviewable decision—or such longer period as the
Secretary allows[150]
- the
Secretary must either review the decision personally or delegate that task to
an internal reviewer. Either of those persons may
affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision[151]
and
- once
the decision has been reviewed, the Secretary or the internal reviewer must
notify the person of the decision in writing and include information about the
person’s right to have that decision reviewed by the Administrative Appeals
Tribunal.[152]
Decisions to set an expiry date for the registration of an
establishment and to register an establishment subject to conditions are
reviewable decisions.[153]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions in respect of decisions
relating to the approval of an arrangement and the grant of an export licence.[154]
Consequences
of registration
If the Secretary registers an establishment, the applicant
must be given a certificate of registration which includes information
which is set out in the Bill and a written notice stating the following:
- any
conditions prescribed by the rules that the Secretary has decided are not
to be conditions of the registration
- any
additional conditions of the registration and
- any
other information prescribed by the rules.[155]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill do not require the issuance
of a certificate. However, Chapter 5 requires a written notice to be given,
setting out relevant information in relation to the period of approval of an
arrangement, and the conditions which do or do not apply.[156]
Chapter 6 requires that the export licence which is issued contains relevant
information about the terms of the licence.[157]
Renewal of
registration
Where the registration of an establishment is subject to
expiry, the occupier of the establishment may apply to the Secretary to renew
the registration—in which case the application must be made within the period
prescribed by the rules or within such longer period that the Secretary allows.[158]
On receiving an application for renewal of the registration
of the establishment, the Secretary must decide to renew or to refuse to renew
the registration.[159]
An application for renewal made after the period set out in the rules or
allowed by the Secretary, is taken to be an application to register an
establishment and is subject to the same requirements as those for a new
application.[160]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Export Control Bill contain
equivalent provisions so that the holder of an approval of an arrangement or the
holder of an export licence must apply for a renewal within the time set by the
rules.[161]
Grounds for
refusal
As the Secretary may refuse to renew the registration of
the establishment if the Secretary is not satisfied of the following:
- the
occupier of the establishment is a fit and proper person
- either
all relevant Commonwealth liabilities of the occupier of the establishment have
been paid (or are taken to have been paid) or, where relevant Commonwealth
liabilities of the occupier have not been paid—the non-payment is due to
exceptional circumstances
- the
occupier of the establishment has complied with the requirements of the Export
Control Act in relation to the export operations and prescribed goods
covered by the registration
- the
conditions of the registration have been, and are being, complied with
- the
construction of the establishment and its equipment and facilities are suitable
for carrying out export operations of that kind in relation to goods of that
kind
- if
the rules require export operations of that kind to be carried in relation to
goods of that kind in accordance with an approved arrangement—an
arrangement is in force
- any
other requirement prescribed by the rules is met.[162]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain near equivalent
provisions which permit the Secretary to refuse to renew an approved
arrangement or refuse to renew the grant of an export licence.[163]
Variation of
registration
Chapters 4–6 of the Export Control Bill set out two
methods by which the registration of an establishment, the approval of an
arrangement and the grant of an export licence may be varied—that is, either on
application by the occupier of the establishment, the holder of the approved
arrangement or the holder of the export licence[164]
or by the Secretary.
The Secretary has broad powers in relation to a variation
including:
- to
vary any aspect of the registration, approved arrangement or licence, such
as the kind of export operations or prescribed goods or the place to which
goods may be exported
- to
vary the conditions or impose new conditions
- to
set an expiry date or set a different expiry date or
- to
revoke an existing expiry date.[165]
Occupier’s
request to vary
The Bill sets out a range of circumstances about which the
occupier of a registered establishment may apply to the Secretary to vary the relevant
registration, including but not limited to:
- in
relation to matters such as the kinds of export operations or prescribed goods
- the
places to which goods may be exported
- varying
the conditions of registration or
- approving
an alteration of the establishment.[166]
In that case, the Secretary may make the variation or
approve the alteration; or refuse to do so.[167]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain near equivalent
provisions so that the holder of an approved arrangement or the holder of an
export licence may seek a variation from the Secretary. In that case the
Secretary may refuse to vary the approved arrangement or refuse to vary the
licence.[168]
Basis for Secretary’s
decision to vary
The Secretary may make variations to the registration of
an establishment on, amongst other things, the following grounds:
- the
integrity of a kind of prescribed goods covered by the registration cannot be
ensured or to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Export Control
Act or importing country requirements
- a
condition of the registration has been contravened or the condition of, or the
equipment or facilities in, the establishment has changed or
- there
has been a change to the suitability of the establishment for the export
operations covered by the registration.[169]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain similar provisions so
that the Secretary may vary an approved arrangement or an export licence.[170]
Notice
requirements
Where the Secretary makes a decision to vary the
registration of an establishment the Secretary must not take any action in
relation to the variation without first giving a written notice to the occupier
of the establishment. That notice must:
- specify
each proposed variation
- specify
the grounds for each proposed variation
- request
the occupier of the establishment to give the Secretary, within 14 days after
the day the notice is given, a written statement showing cause why the
proposed variation should not be made and
- include
a statement setting out the occupier’s right to seek review of a decision to
make the proposed variation.[171]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
requiring the Secretary to provide a notice to show cause as to why the
variation of an approved arrangement or an export licence should not be made
and to set out the relevant rights of review of the decision.[172]
Suspension
of registration
The suspension of the registration of an establishment may
occur in two ways—either on application by the occupier of the registered
property[173]
or by the Secretary.[174]
General
grounds of suspension
The Bill provides for the suspension of registration of an
establishment for equivalent conditions as those that apply to the variation of
a registration. In addition to those reasons the Secretary may suspend a registration
if, amongst other things:
- the
occupier of the establishment has failed to comply with a direction given to
the occupier by an authorised officer (or the Secretary) or with a request made
by an auditor
- the
occupier of the establishment has engaged in conduct that intimidated, hindered
or prevented a person from performing functions or exercising powers under the Export
Control Act
- the
occupier of the establishment or any other person who manages or controls
export operations carried out at the establishment has made a false, misleading
or incomplete statement in an application in relation to registration or
- the
occupier of the establishment or any other person who manages or controls
export operations carried out at the establishment gave false, misleading or
incomplete information or documents to the Secretary or to another person
performing functions or exercising powers under the Export Control Act.[175]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions.[176]
Notice
requirements
Before the Secretary takes action to suspend the
registration of an establishment, written notice must be given to the occupier
of the registered establishment. That notice must do all of the following:
- specify
each kind of export operations and each kind of prescribed goods and, if
applicable, each place in relation to which the registration is proposed to be
suspended
- specify
the grounds for the proposed suspension
- request
the occupier of the registered establishment to give the Secretary, within 14
days after the day the notice is given, a written statement showing cause
why the registration should not be suspended as proposed and
- include
a statement setting out the occupier’s right to seek review of a decision to
suspend the registration as proposed.[177]
The suspension of registration of the establishment must
not commence before the earlier of, the day after any response to the show
cause notice is received by the Secretary and the end of 14 days after
that notice was given.[178]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
requiring the Secretary to provide a notice to show cause as to why the
suspension of an approved arrangement or an export licence should not be made
and to set out the relevant rights of review of the decision.[179]
Suspension
because of overdue relevant Commonwealth liability
In addition to the general rules under which the Secretary
may suspend the registration of an establishment, the Bill provides that the
Secretary may suspend the registration of the establishment in relation to all
kinds of export operations and all kinds of prescribed goods if:
- a
relevant Commonwealth liability of the occupier of the establishment, or
relating to the establishment, is more than 30 days overdue
- the
Secretary has given a written notice to the person (the debtor)
who is liable to pay the relevant Commonwealth liability and
- within
eight days after the notice is given, either the relevant Commonwealth
liability has not been paid or the debtor has not entered into an arrangement
with the Secretary to pay the relevant Commonwealth liability.[180]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
empowering the Secretary to suspend an approved arrangement or an export
licence in the event that there are overdue Commonwealth liabilities.[181]
Secretary’s
power and suspension
A suspension of the registration of an establishment under
the general rules or because of an outstanding Commonwealth liability must not
be for more than 12 months.[182]
Importantly, the Bill empowers the Secretary to vary the
period of a suspension[183]
and/or to revoke a suspension of the registration of an establishment by
written notice to the occupier of the establishment.[184]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in relation to the period of suspension of an approved arrangement or an export
licence.[185]
Offences
Chapters 4–6 of the Bill provide for offences to arise in
the event that the conditions of registration of an establishment, the
conditions for approval of an arrangement or the conditions for the grant of an
export licence are contravened.
First an offence arises where the occupier of a
registered establishment carries out a kind of export operations in relation to
a kind of goods which is not covered by the registration of the establishment.[186]
There is no equivalent offence under Chapters 5 and 6 in respect of an approved
arrangement or an export licence.
The maximum penalty for the offence is imprisonment for
two years or 120 penalty units, or both. In the alternative, the occupier of a
registered establishment is liable for a maximum civil penalty of 240 penalty
units.[187]
Second an offence arises where the registration of
the property is not suspended. In that case, the occupier of the
registered establishment commits an offence if he, or she, contravenes a
condition of the registration.[188]
Similarly, an offence arises:
- where
a person is the holder of an approved arrangement and a condition of the
approved arrangement is contravened[189]
and
- where
a person is the holder of an export licence and a condition of the licence is
contravened.[190]
Third an offence arises where the registration of
the property is suspended. The Bill provides that the occupier of a
registered establishment commits an offence if a condition of the registration
is contravened and the condition is required to be complied with during the
period of the suspension.[191]
Similarly an offence arises:
- where
a person is the holder of an approved arrangement and a condition of the
approved arrangement which was required to be complied with during the
suspension is contravened[192]
and
- where
a person is the holder of an export licence and a condition of the export
licence which was required to be complied with during the suspension is
contravened.[193]
Revocation
of registration
The Bill sets out the general rules which allow the Secretary
to revoke the registration of an establishment.[194]
These are in equivalent terms to the general rules which empower the Secretary
to suspend registration of an establishment.
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in relation to the revocation of an approved arrangement or an export licence.[195]
Notice
requirements—general rules
The Secretary must not revoke the registration of
an establishment under the general rules unless he, or she, has given a written
notice to the occupier of the establishment.
The form of the notice is to be in near equivalent terms to a notice given in
the case of a proposed suspension of registration—that is, it must amongst
other things, request the occupier of the registered establishment to give the
Secretary, within 14 days after the day the notice is given, a written
statement showing cause why the registration
should not be revoked.[196]
If the Secretary decides to revoke the registration of the
establishment he, or she, must give the manager of the property a written
notice stating that the registration of the establishment is to be revoked, the
relevant reasons and the date the revocation is to take effect.[197]
The revocation must not take effect before the earlier of the day after any response to the show
cause notice is received by the Secretary and the end of 14 days after the show
cause notice was given.[198]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in relation to the revocation of an approved arrangement or an export licence.[199]
Notice requirements—outstanding
Commonwealth liability
The Secretary may revoke the registration of an
establishment where registration has been suspended for non-payment of a
relevant Commonwealth liability and within 90 days after the start of the
suspension:
- the
relevant Commonwealth liability had not been paid and
- the
person (the debtor) who is liable to pay the relevant Commonwealth liability
had not entered into an arrangement with the Secretary to pay the relevant
Commonwealth liability.[200]
A revocation notice, in the same terms as for revocation
under the general rules must be given.[201]
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Bill contain equivalent provisions
in relation to the revocation of an approved arrangement or an export licence
on this ground.[202]
Offence
It is an offence for an occupier of a registered
establishment, who has been given notice of revocation, to continue to carry
out export operations after the revocation takes effect. A maximum penalty of
imprisonment for two years and/or 120 penalty units applies. Alternatively, the
occupier may be liable for a maximum civil penalty of 240 penalty units.[203]
Register of
registered establishments
The Secretary must keep a register of information about
registered establishments. The register is to be kept at a place and in a form
that the Secretary determines—including by electronic means.[204]
Accredited
properties
The rules may prescribe conditions in relation to the export of prescribed
goods, or the export of prescribed goods to a specified place, that require
export operations to be carried out in relation to the goods at an accredited
property.[205]
‘An accredited property will generally relate to the production of prescribed
goods for export, and will usually be at the beginning of the supply chain, for
example, where animals are raised or crops are grown.’[206]
Chapter 3 of the Export Control Bill contains many of the
generic drafting elements which are common to Chapters 4–6.
- the
manager of a property may apply to the Secretary to accredit the property for a
kind of export operations in relation to a kind of prescribed goods.[207]
In that case the terms of clauses 377–379 (about applications) apply
- the
Secretary may accredit property for a kind of export operations in
relation to a kind of prescribed goods and (where relevant), a specified
place to which the goods may be exported provided that any Commonwealth
liabilities have been paid or the non-payment is due to exceptional circumstances
and[208]
any other requirements prescribed by the rules are met.[209]
Accrediting
the property
If the Secretary accredits the property he, or she, may
set an expiry date for the accreditation.[210]
Otherwise the accreditation remains in force unless it is revoked.[211]
The accreditation of a property may be subject to conditions set out in the Export
Control Act, conditions prescribed by the rules and any additional
conditions that the Secretary considers appropriate.[212]
If the Secretary accredits a property, the Secretary must
give the applicant a written notice stating the following information setting
out the information specified in clause 81 of the Export Control Bill.
The information includes matters such as:
- each
kind of export operations and each kind of prescribed goods covered
by the accreditation
- the
date the accreditation takes effect
- any
conditions prescribed by the rules that the Secretary has decided are not to
be conditions of the accreditation and
- any
additional conditions relating to the accreditation.
Renewal,
variation and suspension of accreditation
As with Chapters 4–6, Chapter 3 of the Export Control Bill
empowers the Secretary to:
- renew
the accreditation of the property—in which case the application must be made
within the period prescribed by the rules or within such longer period that the
Secretary allows[213]
- refuse
to renew the accreditation of the property for a kind of export operations in
relation to a kind of prescribed goods and for a specified place to which the
goods may be exported[214]
- set
a new expiry date for the accreditation of the property[215]
and
- impose
conditions on the renewed accreditation.[216]
The variation of the accreditation of a property
may occur in two ways—either on application by the manager of the property[217]
or by the Secretary on the following grounds:
- requirements
prescribed by rules in relation to the accreditation of property are no longer
being met
- a
condition of the accreditation has been, or is being, contravened
- it
is necessary to do so to take account of a notified event (under clause 108)
or to correct a minor or technical error or
- the
accreditation needs to be varied for any other reason prescribed by the rules.[218]
The Export Control Bill provides for the suspension
of accreditation of a property if the Secretary reasonably believes, amongst
other things, any of the following:
- the
integrity of a kind of prescribed goods covered by the accreditation cannot be ensured
- a
requirement prescribed by rules is no longer met
- a
condition of the accreditation has been, or is being, contravened
- the
manager of the property failed to comply with a direction or request by an
authorised officer (or the Secretary) or failed to comply with a request by an
auditor
- the
manager of the property has engaged in conduct that hindered or prevented a
person from performing functions or exercising powers under the Export
Control Act or
- the
manager of the property or any other person who manages or controls export
operations carried out at the property has made a false, misleading or
incomplete statement in an application or
given false, misleading or incomplete information or documents to a person
(including the Secretary) who is performing functions or exercising powers
under the Export Control Act.[219]
The Export Control Bill sets out the relevant notice
requirements including, but not limited to, a request that the manager of the
accredited property to give the Secretary, within 14 days after the day the notice is given, a written
statement showing cause why the accreditation should not be suspended as
proposed.[220]
Consistent with the other generic provisions outlined in
relation to Chapters 4–6 above, the Secretary may suspend the accreditation of
a property if a relevant Commonwealth liability of the manager of the property, or relating to the property, is more
than 30 days overdue.[221]
A decision to suspend does not affect the person’s liability to pay the
relevant Commonwealth liability.[222]
The Export Control Bill empowers the Secretary to vary the
period of a suspension[223]
and/or to revoke a suspension of the accreditation of a property under this
Division by written notice to the manager of the property.[224]
Offences
The Bill creates offences where the conditions of
accreditation are contravened.
First an offence arises where the accreditation of
the property is not suspended. In that case, the manager of an
accredited property commits an offence where:
- the
accreditation covers a kind of prescribed goods (called the relevant
goods) that may be exported (either generally or to one or more places
- the
relevant goods are exported and
- a
condition of the accreditation relating to the relevant goods, or to export
operations carried out in relation to the relevant goods, is contravened.[225]
Second an offence arises where the accreditation of
the property is suspended. In that case, the manager of an accredited
property commits an offence where the relevant goods are exported and:
- a
condition of the accreditation relating to the relevant goods or to export
operations carried out in relation to the relevant goods, is contravened and
- the
condition is required to be complied with during the period of the suspension.[226]
In either case, the maximum penalty for the fault based
offence is imprisonment for two years or 120 penalty units, or both. In the
alternative, the person is liable to a maximum civil penalty of 240 penalty
units.[227]
Revocation
of accreditation
The Bill sets out the general rules which allow the
Secretary to revoke the accreditation of a property.[228]
These are in equivalent terms to the general rules which empower the Secretary
to suspend accreditation.
The Secretary must not revoke the accreditation of a
property under the general rules unless he, or she, has given a written notice to the manager of the property. The form of the
notice is to be in near equivalent terms to a notice given in the case of a
proposed suspension of accreditation—that is, it must amongst other things, request
the manager of the accredited property to give the Secretary, within 14 days
after the day the notice is given, a written statement showing cause why the accreditation should not be revoked.[229]
If the Secretary decides to revoke the accreditation of a
property he, or she, must give the manager of the property a written notice
stating that the accreditation of the property is to be revoked, the relevant
reasons and the date the revocation is to take effect.[230]
The revocation must not take effect before the earlier of
the day after any response to the show cause notice is received by the
Secretary and the end of 14 days after the show cause notice was given.[231]
In addition, the Secretary may revoke the
accreditation of a property where accreditation has been suspended for
non-payment of a relevant Commonwealth liability and within 90 days after the
start of the suspension:
- the
relevant Commonwealth liability had not been paid and
- the
person (the debtor) who is liable to pay the relevant
Commonwealth liability had not entered into an arrangement with the Secretary
to pay the relevant Commonwealth liability.[232]
A revocation notice, in the same terms as for revocation on
this ground under the general rules, must be given.[233]
Export
permits
An export permit represents permission given by the Department of Agriculture to
export a consignment of a prescribed product. Permission is given when
legislative and importing country requirements are met.[234]
Chapter 7 of the Export Control Bill contains many of the
generic drafting elements which are common to Chapters 4–6. It provides that a
person may apply to the Secretary for an export permit for a kind of prescribed
goods.[235]
However, Chapter 7 gives the Secretary certain powers in relation to an
application which are not extended to applications under Chapters 3–6. These
include the power to:
- request
the applicant, in writing, to give the Secretary further specified information
or documents
- require
an audit of export operations carried out in relation to the relevant goods (under
Part 1 of Chapter 9)
- require
an assessment of the relevant goods to be carried out (under Part 2 of
Chapter 9)
- request
the applicant to give a written statement which is signed and dated by the
applicant, to the effect that the requirements of the Export Control Act
have been complied with, or will be complied with; and any importing country
requirements relating to the relevant goods have been met, or will be met in
relation to the goods
- take,
test or analyse samples of the goods or from other things relevant to the
application
- arrange
for another person with appropriate qualifications or expertise to take, test
or analyse samples of the relevant goods or
- any
other thing prescribed by the rules.[236]
Issuing the
permit
The Secretary must decide to issue the permit or to refuse
to issue the permit.[237]
In making the decision the Secretary must consider whether:
- the
requirements of the Export Control Act have been complied with, or will
be complied with before the goods to which the application relates are imported
into the importing country and
- the
importing country requirements relating to the goods to which the application
relates have been met, or will be met before the goods are imported into the
importing country.[238]
The export permit may be granted subject to conditions.[239]
A permit must be issued in writing and specify the unique number that has been
allocated to it.[240]
An export permit takes effect when it is issued and
remains in force in accordance with the rules unless it is revoked.[241]
Variation,
suspension or revocation of permit
The Secretary may vary an export permit, or the conditions
of the permit, if the Secretary reasonably believes that circumstances
prescribed by the rules exist or that it is necessary to correct a minor or
technical error.[242]
As with other variations under the Export Control Bill, the Secretary may vary
the export permit on his, or her, own initiative or on the application of the
holder of the permit.[243]
The varied export permit takes effect when it is issued
and remains in force in accordance with the rules unless it is revoked.[244]
Similarly, the Secretary may suspend an export permit if
the Secretary reasonably believes that circumstances prescribed by the rules
exist.[245]
In that case the Secretary must give a written notice to the holder of the
permit to that effect.[246]
The Bill also allows the Secretary to revoke an export
permit if he, or she, reasonably believes that, amongst other things:
- the
integrity of the goods cannot be ensured
- a
condition of the permit has been, or is being, contravened
- an
importing country requirement relating to the goods will not be, or is not
likely to be, met before the goods are imported into the importing country or
- the
holder of the permit made a false, misleading or incomplete statement in the
application for the permit; or gave false, misleading or incomplete information
or documents to the Secretary or to another person performing functions or
exercising powers under the Export Control Act.[247]
Other
matters
Where an export permit is in force, the Secretary may
require an assessment of the goods to be undertaken. Similar to the above, the
basis for such a requirement includes that the Secretary reasonably believes
that, amongst other things:
- the
integrity of the goods cannot be ensured
- a
condition of the permit has been, or is being, contravened
- the
requirements of the Export Control Act have not been complied with or
- an
importing country requirement relating to the goods will not be, or is not
likely to be, met before the goods are imported into the importing country.[248]
Chapter
8—other matters relating to export
Notices of intention to export
A notice of intention to export a consignment of prescribed
goods must be given to the Secretary in the appropriate manner and
form. It must include any information, and be accompanied by any documents,
that have been prescribed by the rules.[249]
A notice of intention to export is taken not to have been given if the
notice does not comply with those requirements.[250]
Where a person who has been given a notice of intention to
export a consignment of prescribed goods becomes aware that information
included in the notice, or information or a document given to the Secretary in
relation to the notice, was incomplete or incorrect, the person must, as soon
as practicable, give the Secretary additional or corrected information.[251]
Trade descriptions
The term trade description for goods means a
description or statement (whether in English or any other language), or a
pictorial representation, indication or suggestion (direct or indirect), about
any of the following:
- the
nature, number, quantity, quality, purity, class, grade, breed, measure, gauge,
size, mass, colour, strength, sex, variety, genus, species or age of the goods
- the
country or place where the goods were made, produced or grown
- the
exporter, manufacturer or producer of the goods
- the
person by whom the goods were selected or in any way prepared
- the
method, time or place of manufacturing, producing, selecting or otherwise
preparing the goods
- the
time before which, or period within which, the goods are to be used
- the
batch, lot or other grouping in which the goods are included
- the
material or ingredients of which the goods are composed or from which they are
derived
- the
goods being the subject of an existing patent or privilege.[252]
A trade description for goods includes a
mark that is commonly taken to be an indication of any of those matters.[253]
The rules may make provisions about trade descriptions for
prescribed goods that are intended to be exported.[254]
A person commits an offence if the person engages in conduct that contravenes such
a rule. In that case the maximum criminal penalty is imprisonment for five
years or 300 penalty units, or both. In the alternative the person is liable
for a maximum civil penalty of 600 penalty units.[255]
In addition, a person commits an offence if the person alters
or interferes with a trade description which is applied to prescribed goods
after an export permit has been issued but before the goods have been exported.
In that case the maximum criminal penalty is imprisonment for two years or 120
penalty units, or both. In the alternative, the person is person is liable to a
maximum civil penalty of 240 penalty units.[256]
False trade descriptions
A trade description for goods is a false trade
description for the goods if the description is false or likely to
mislead in a material respect due to anything contained in or omitted from the
description, or any alteration of or interference with the description.[257]
The Export
Control Bill prohibits a person from knowingly applying a false
trade description to prescribed goods that are intended to be exported. If a
person contravenes the prohibition, the person commits an offence. The maximum
criminal penalty is imprisonment for five years or 300 penalty units, or
both. In the alternative, the person is liable to a maximum civil penalty of 600 penalty
units.[258]
The Export
Control Bill also prohibits a person from entering goods for export,
putting goods on any aircraft or vessel for export, bringing goods to a landing
place, port or other place for the purpose of being exported or exporting goods
that are prescribed goods to which a false trade description has been applied.
If a person contravenes the prohibition, the person commits an offence. The
maximum criminal penalty is imprisonment for two years or 120 penalty units, or
both. In the alternative, the person is liable to a maximum civil penalty of
240 penalty units.[259]
Official marks
Rules may provide that a specified mark is
an official mark for the purposes of the Export Control Act. In that
case, the rules may relate to the following:
- the
persons, or classes of persons, who may manufacture, possess, apply, alter or interfere
with an official mark
- the
methods for applying official marks
- the
circumstances in which an official mark may, or must not, be applied
- security
of official marks
- removal
or defacement of official marks
- making
records in relation to official marks or
- any
other matter relating to official marks.[260]
In addition,
the rules may provide for marks that resemble
official marks[261] and for devices that are capable of being used to apply an
official mark.[262]
The Export Control Bill also creates offences in relation
to official marks including:
- where
a person contravenes a rule about official marks[263]
- where
a person applies a false, misleading or deceptive official mark to goods or to
a document[264]
or
- where
a person engages in conduct that results in an official mark that is applied to
goods or to a document being altered so that it is false, misleading or
deceptive.[265]
Tariff rate quotas
‘Tariff rate quotas between the Government and trading
partners enable a specific quantity of exported product to enter the importing
country at a reduced tariff rate.’[266]
Under the Export Control Bill the rules may make provision for and in relation
to the establishment and administration of a system of tariff rate quotas for
the export of goods. The rules may set out matters such as:
- determining
the amount of tariff rate quota for the export of goods for a period
- methods
for determining tariff rate quota entitlements for the export of goods
- establishing
and maintaining a register of tariff rate quota entitlements
- surrender,
transfer, variation, and revocation of tariff rate quota entitlements
- tariff
rate quota certificates, including revocation of certificates
- imposing
conditions, including variation and revocation of conditions and
- auditing
and reporting requirements.[267]
Chapter
9—powers and officials
Audits
Audit of
export operations
Under the Export Control Bill the Secretary may require an
audit to be conducted of various aspects of export operations—whether the
operations relate to prescribed goods or to non-prescribed goods.[268]
Such an audit may deal with anything that is reasonable necessary for the
effective conduct of the audit or incidental to the matter to which the audit
relates.[269]
In that case, the audit may be conducted by an approved
auditor or by an authorised officer.[270]
The Secretary must determine, in writing, the training and
qualification requirements for persons to conduct audits[271]
and may approve persons to conduct audits who satisfy those training and
qualification requirements.[272]
The rules may also provide that a person included in a specified class of
persons is approved to conduct audits.[273]
Audit of
persons
The Secretary may also require an audit to be conducted in
relation to the performance of functions and the exercise of powers under the Export
Control Act and compliance with the Act by a person such as a third
party authorised officer,[274]
an approved auditor, an approved assessor or an accredited veterinarian.[275]
Such an audit may be conducted by a Commonwealth authorised officer or a person
who has been prescribed by the rules for that purpose.[276]
The Secretary does not need to give notice of an audit.
Rather, an auditor must give the relevant person for the audit a
description of the scope of the audit before the audit is commenced.[277]
Powers of auditors
An auditor may do anything the auditor considers necessary
for the purpose of conducting an audit, including:
- request
a person to answer questions, provide information in writing, or produce the
documents
- take
samples of goods, or from equipment or other things used in export operations
to which the audit relates
- if
the auditor is an authorised officer—take, test or analyse
samples of goods, or from equipment or other things used in export operations
or other operations, to which the audit relates or arrange for another person
with appropriate qualifications or expertise to do so.[278]
Stakeholder comment
According to Citrus Australia:
... it is inappropriate for any auditor (government or
commercial) to remove items or documents from any business. Much of this
information is commercially sensitive. Citrus businesses gain an advantage over
their competitors through a range of measures (e.g. pest and disease
management, fertigation, irrigation, genetics, post-harvest practices). We have
no confidence that the Department could appropriately manage the chain of
custody for such items, and feel that the intellectual property and trade
secrets of the businesses we represent would be compromised. Auditors travel
between properties in motor vehicles. It is doubtful that these vehicles would
achieve the Department’s own security requirements for identifying and
protecting Commercial-in-Confidence information.[279]
Assessment of goods
An assessment of goods may be carried out by an authorised
officer or an approved assessor.[280]
The purpose of carrying out an assessment of goods is to verify one or
more of the following:
- that
the requirements of the Export Control Act in relation to the export of
the goods have been complied with, or will be complied with before the goods
are imported into the importing country
- that
the importing country requirements relating to the goods have been met, or will
be met before the goods are imported into the importing country
- that
a matter stated, or to be stated, in a government certificate in relation to
the goods is true and correct.[281]
Powers to be exercised in carrying out an assessment
An assessor may do anything the assessor considers
necessary in the conduct of the assessment, including the following:
- request
a person to answer questions, provide information in writing, or produce relevant
documents and
- take,
test or analyse samples of the goods or arrange for another person with
appropriate qualifications or expertise to do so.[282]
Approved assessors
Under the Export Control Bill the Secretary may, in
writing, approve a person, or each person in a specified class of persons, to
carry out assessments of goods.[283]
However, a person must not be approved to carry out assessments of goods unless
the Secretary is satisfied that the person satisfies the training and
qualification requirements or will do so before the person carries out any
assessments.[284]
The relevant training and qualification requirements for
persons to carry out assessments of goods are to be determined, in writing, by
the Secretary.[285]
As is the case for approved auditors, approved assessors
may charge a fee in relation to things done in the performance of their
functions or the exercise of their powers under the Export Control Act.[286]
Powers of the Secretary
Power to require information or documents
The Secretary may, by notice in writing given to a person,
require the person, within the time stated in the notice, to give the Secretary
any information, or produce any documents, specified in the notice that relates
to:
- any prescribed goods that have been, or are intended to be, exported
- any permanently prohibited goods that have been exported, or any
goods for which a temporary prohibition determination applied that have been
exported or
- any non‑prescribed goods in relation to which an application
for a government certificate or a tariff rate quota certificate has been made
or has been issued.[287]
A person who is required to provide information or produce
documents but fails to do so commits an offence, the maximum penalty for which
is imprisonment for two years or 120 penalty units or both.[288]
In the alternative, the person is liable to a maximum civil penalty of 240
penalty units.[289]
Delegation
and sub-delegation
The Secretary may, in writing, delegate any of his, or
her, functions or powers under the Export Control Act to an SES employee, or an acting SES employee, in the
Department. However, the Bill provides that certain functions or powers must
not be delegated,[290]
specifically:
- to
arrange for the use of computer programs for making certain decisions[291]
- to
apply for an adverse publicity order[292]
and
- to
make rules.[293]
Where the Secretary delegates a function or power to an SES employee or an acting SES employee in the
Department, that person may, in turn, sub-delegate some—but not all—of the
functions or powers to:
- an
authorised officer
- an
APS employee in the Department or
- if
the function or power is to issue export permits—to a nominated export permit
issuer.[294]
The powers
that must not be sub-delegated are listed in table form in the Export
Control Bill.[295]
Scrutiny of Bills Committee comments
The Scrutiny of Bills Committee noted that the Export
Control Bill allows for the delegation (or sub-delegation) of administrative
powers to a relatively large class of persons, with little or no specificity as
to their qualifications or attributes.[296]
The Explanatory Memorandum to the Export Control Bill
justifies such a power stating:
In an operational context, many of the powers that are
delegated to SES staff may need to be completed by staff at a lower
classification level as a matter of administrative necessity. This arises from
the volume and timeliness of decision making and availability of SES officers
who have broad responsibilities.[297]
The Scrutiny of Bills Committee sought further advice from
the Minister who responded stating:
All APS employees in my Department with delegated powers are
subject to the APS Code of Conduct as well as other key performance indicators.
Third party authorised officers may be suspended or commit an offence for
failing to comply with the conditions of their authorisation. I believe that
these oversight mechanisms provide sufficient safeguards for the exercise of
powers under the Bill, including those with subdelegations.
The person or persons to whom a power is subdelegated will
depend on the specific power and which area of my Department is responsible for
regulating that export industry for that aspect of the Bill. For example, the
power to approve an approved arrangement may be subdelegated to directors (APS
Executive Level 2) in the relevant program areas for industries that use
approved arrangements (such as live animal export, meat and plants) ...[298]
Authorised officers
Authorisation of persons
The Secretary may, in writing, authorise a person, or each
person in a class of persons, to be an authorised officer if the person, or
each person in the class of persons, is an officer or employee of a
Commonwealth body or is an officer or employee of a State or Territory body.[299]
The Secretary must only authorise an officer or employee
of a State or Territory body to be an authorised officer if an arrangement is
in force under clause 294 of the Export Control Bill.[300]
A person who is not an officer or employee of a
Commonwealth body or a State or Territory body may apply to the Secretary to be
a third party authorised officer.[301]
The Secretary must determine, in writing, training and
qualification requirements for authorised officers and must not authorise a
person to be an authorised officer unless the Secretary is satisfied that the
person satisfies those requirements.[302]
Variation, suspension and revocation of authorisation
Consistent with the other provisions in the Export Control
Bill the Secretary may:
- vary
the functions that the person has been authorised to perform, or the powers
that the person has been authorised to exercise
- vary
any conditions to which the person’s authorisation is subject
- vary
the period or specify a period during which the authorisation has effect or
- vary
any other aspect of the person’s authorisation.[303]
In addition, the Secretary may, at any time, by notice in
writing given to a person who is an authorised officer, suspend the person’s
authorisation[304]
or revoke the authorisation of a person by notice in writing given to the
person.[305]
Functions and powers of authorised officers
An authorised officer may give a direction to a relevant
person requiring the person to take specified action (such as to cease
carrying out export operations in relation to particular prescribed goods or a
kind of prescribed goods), within a specified period.[306]
The direction may be given orally or in writing (including
by electronic means). However, where a direction is given orally, the person
must, as soon as practicable after giving the direction, also give the
direction in writing (including by electronic means).[307]
Accredited veterinarians and
approved export programs
Accreditation of veterinarians
The rules may make provision for, and in relation to the
accreditation of veterinarians for the purposes of carrying out export
operations in approved export programs. The rules may include any of the
following:
- requirements
that must be met for accreditation
- applications
for accreditation
- the
period of an accreditation
- conditions
of an accreditation
- variation,
suspension and revocation of an accreditation and
- records
and reporting by an accredited veterinarian.[308]
Approved
export programs
The Secretary may, in writing, approve programs of export
operations to be carried out by an accredited veterinarian or an authorised
officer for the purpose of ensuring the health and welfare of eligible
live animals or the health and condition of eligible animal reproductive
material.[309]
The Export Control Bill sets out the types of export
operations to be carried out in a program of export operations:
- they
may include matters such as, but not limited to, monitoring the health and
welfare of eligible live animals or the health and condition of eligible animal
reproductive material; examining, testing or treating eligible live animals or
eligible animal reproductive material and keeping records of the implementation
of the program
- the
operations may differ depending on matters such as the country to which the
eligible live animals or eligible animal reproductive material is to be
exported and the method by which the eligible live animals or eligible animal
reproductive material is to be transported.[310]
Offences and
penalties
The Bill creates a number of strict liability offences
under Chapter 9.[311]
Nature of strict liability offence
|
Penalty
|
A veterinarian commits an offence if:
- the veterinarian
carries out export operations in an approved export program and
- the veterinarian is
reckless as to whether the export operations are in such a program and
- the
veterinarian is not an accredited veterinarian or an authorised
officer who has been directed to carry out the export operations.[312]
|
50 penalty units
|
An accredited veterinarian commits an offence of strict
liability if:
- the accredited
veterinarian is required by the rules to keep records, or provide reports, in
connection with an approved export program and
- the accredited
veterinarian contravenes the requirement.[313]
|
50 penalty units
|
An accredited veterinarian commits an offence of strict
liability if:
- the
veterinarian is given a direction in relation to an identified deficiency in
the carrying out of export operations in an approved export program and
- the veterinarian fails to comply with the direction. [314]
|
50 penalty units
|
A person commits an offence of strict liability if:
- under the rules, the
person is required to allow an accredited veterinarian or an authorised
officer to accompany eligible live animals during their transport from
Australia to their overseas destination in connection with an approved export
program and
- the person
contravenes the requirement.[315]
|
50 penalty units
|
If:
- an accredited
veterinarian is engaged to carry out some or all of the export operations in
an approved export program or
- the Secretary
directs an authorised officer to carry out some or all of those export
operations
the person who wishes to export the eligible live animals
or eligible animal reproductive material to which the program relates must
provide the accredited veterinarian or authorised officer with all reasonable
facilities and assistance necessary to carry out the export operations.
A person commits an offence of strict liability if:
- the person is
required to provide facilities and assistance as above; and
- the person fails to comply with the requirement.[316]
|
50 penalty units
|
Chapter
10—compliance and enforcement
Modified
meaning of authorised officer
For the purposes of Chapter 10 of the Export Control Bill,
the term authorised officer means a Commonwealth authorised
officer, or a State or Territory authorised officer, who satisfies the training
and qualification requirements which have been determined by the Secretary in
writing in relation to the performance of functions or duties and the exercise
of powers under Chapter 10 or the Regulatory Powers Act.[317]
This has the effect that a third party authorised officer is not
able to exercise the powers set out in Chapter 10.
Monitoring
powers
Basic
monitoring powers
The Export Control Bill imports the monitoring powers in section
19 of the Regulatory Powers Act,[318]
including the power to:
- search
the premises and any thing on the premises
- examine
or observe any activity conducted on the premises
- inspect,
examine, take measurements of or conduct tests on any thing on the premises
- make
any still or moving image or any recording of the premises or any thing on the
premises
- inspect
any document on the premises
- take
extracts from, or make copies of, any such document
- take
onto the premises such equipment and materials as the authorised officer
in order to exercise powers in relation to the premises
- operate
electronic equipment on the premises, to put relevant data in documentary form
and remove those documents from the premises[319]
- secure
electronic equipment where an authorised person enters premises under a
monitoring warrant[320]
and
- secure
a thing for a period of 24 hours in circumstances where the thing is found
during the exercise of monitoring powers on the premises and an authorised
officer believes on reasonable grounds that it relates to the
contravention of a related provision.[321]
Additional
monitoring power
The Export Control Bill contains additional powers to:
- take,
test and analyse samples of any thing on premises entered under Part 2 of the Regulatory
Powers Act
- secure
premises entered, and to secure things on premises entered, under Part 2 of the Regulatory Powers Act for the purpose of testing or analysing those
things.[322]
Issuing a monitoring warrant
A monitoring warrant is issued if the issuing
officer[323]
is satisfied that it is reasonably necessary for one or more authorised
officers to have access to premises for the purpose of determining
whether a provision that is subject to monitoring has been, or is being, complied
with or that information subject to monitoring is correct.[324]
In that case the relevant warrant must do all of the following:
- describe
the premises to which the warrant relates
- state
that the warrant is issued under section 32 of the Regulatory Powers Act
- state
the purpose for which the warrant is issued
- authorise
one or more authorised officers (whether or not named in the
warrant) from time to time while the warrant remains in force to enter the
premises and to exercise the monitoring powers
- state
whether entry is authorised to be made at any time of the day or during
specified hours of the day and
- specify
the day (not more than three months after the issue of the warrant) on which
the warrant ceases to be in force.[325]
An authorised officer may enter premises and
exercise the monitoring powers only if the occupier of the premises has
consented to the entry, or the entry is made under a monitoring warrant.[326]
An authorised officer may use such force as
is reasonable and necessary in the circumstances against things. However, this
does not extend to the use of force against a person.[327]
Investigation
powers
Nature
of investigation powers
Clause 329 of the Export Control Bill sets out the
provisions that are subject to the use of investigation powers under the Regulatory
Powers Act. They are:
- an
offence against the Export Control Act
- a
civil penalty provision under the Export Control Act or
- an
offence against the Crimes
Act 1914 or the Criminal Code
as it relates to the Export Control Act.
Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act applies to the evidential
material in respect of the above. Evidential material
is material relevant to criminal offences and civil penalty provisions under
the Export Control Act.[328]
Subclause 329(2) of the Export Control Bill aligns the relevant
provisions in both statutes in addition to providing that the Secretary
for the purposes of the Export Control Act is equivalent to the relevant
chief executive under the Regulatory Powers Act.
The investigation powers which are imported
from section 49 of the Regulatory Powers Act therefore, include the
power to:
- where
the occupier consents to entry—search the premises and any thing on the
premises for the evidential material the authorised officer suspects
on reasonable grounds may be on the premises
- where
the entry is under warrant—search the premises and any thing on the premises
for the kind of evidential material specified in the warrant and to seize
evidential material of that kind if the authorised officer finds
it on the premises
- inspect,
examine, take measurements of, or conduct tests on, the evidential material
- make
any still or moving image or any recording of the premises or evidential
material
- take
such equipment and materials as the authorised officer requires
for the purpose of exercising powers in relation to the premises
- operate
electronic equipment on the premises, to put relevant data in documentary form
and remove those documents from the premises[329]
- secure
electronic equipment where an authorised person enters premises under a
monitoring warrant[330]
and
- seize
a thing that is not evidential material in circumstances where the evidential
material is found in the execution of an investigation warrant which an authorised
officer believes on reasonable grounds is evidence of the contravention
of a related provision.[331]
Similar to the provisions about monitoring powers, the Export
Control Bill provides for additional investigation powers being the power to take,
test and analyse samples of any thing on the premises.[332]
An authorised officer may use such force as is reasonable and necessary in the
circumstances against things. However, this does not extend to the use of force
against a person.[333]
Issuing
an investigation warrant
Where an authorised officer suspects on reasonable grounds
that there may be evidential material on any premises, he or she may enter the
premises and use investigation powers so long as the occupier consents or the authorised
officer has an investigation warrant.[334]
The provisions in Part 3 of the Regulatory Powers Act set out the
requirements for applying for an investigation warrant and its contents.[335]
Entry to
adjacent premises
An authorised officer may apply to an issuing
officer for an adjacent premises warrant authorising, on any one or
more occasions, entry to premises and to remain on the premises for such period
as is reasonably necessary.[336]
Where a warrant which is specified above relates to entry,
the Export Control Bill requires an authorised officer, before actually entering
the premises, to inform the occupier of the reasons for entering the premises
and that the occupier may refuse consent.[337]
Consent which is not voluntary is not valid. An occupier’s consent is valid
until it is withdrawn.[338]
General
rules—appropriate person
The Export Control Bill sets out the rights and
responsibilities of appropriate persons (usually the occupier of
the premises) in relation to monitoring and investigation warrants.[339]
These are:
- the
appropriate person for premises is entitled to observe the
execution of an entry warrant if the person is present at the premises while
the warrant is being executed[340]
- the
right to observe ceases if the appropriate person impedes the execution of the
relevant warrant[341]
- an
appropriate person is required to provide an authorised officer or a person
assisting an authorised officer with all reasonable facilities and assistance
for the effective exercise of their powers.[342]
Entering
without a warrant or consent
Under the Export Control Bill an authorised officer must
follow certain rules when entering relevant premises with neither
a warrant nor consent. In that context, relevant premises are those that are,
or form part of, a registered establishment or premises in or on,
or that form part of, an accredited property.[343]
In that case, an authorised officer may enter relevant premises
during business hours without a warrant for the purpose of exercising
monitoring or investigation powers (as set out in Parts 2 and 3 of the Regulatory
Powers Act)—as if the officer had a warrant.[344]
An authorised officer may also enter relevant premises at any time if the
officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting there might be on the premises a
particular thing:
- with
respect to which an offence provision or civil penalty provision has been
contravened or is reasonably suspected to have been contravened
- that
there are reasonable grounds for suspecting will afford evidence as to the
contravention of such an offence or civil penalty provision or
- that
there are reasonable grounds for suspecting is intended to be used for the
purpose of contravening such an offence or civil penalty provision.[345]
Despite the absence of a warrant or consent, an authorised
officer must announce their entry and show their identity card to the
appropriate person and explain their reasons for entering the premises.[346]
Occupiers of premises which are entered without warrant, and their
representatives, may observe the exercise of powers there, and must provide
reasonable facilities and assistance.[347]
Powers in
emergency situations
The Export Control Bill permits an authorised officer, in
serious and urgent circumstances, and without consent or a warrant, to secure
evidential material in or on certain premises or stop and search a conveyance.[348]
Infringement
notices
Clause 359 of the Bill provides a list of each
provision in the Export Control Act which is subject to an infringement
notice under Part 5 of the Regulatory Powers Act.[349]
The Secretary is both an infringement officer and the
relevant chief executive for the purposes of that Part.[350]
Part 5 of the Regulatory Powers Act operates so
that an infringement notice may be given if the Secretary believes on
reasonable grounds that a person has contravened a provision subject to an
infringement notice. An infringement notice must be given within 12 months
after the day on which the contravention is alleged to have taken place.[351]
The contents of an infringement notice are set out in
detail in section 104 of the Regulatory Powers Act including amongst
other things:
- the
day and the name of the person to whom the notice is given
- the
name and contact details of the person who gave the notice and brief details of
the alleged contravention
- the
amount that is payable under the notice and how payment may be made
- the
requirement to pay the amount specified within 28 days after the day the notice
and the consequences of a failure to do so—including the possibility of
prosecution for a contravention of a civil penalty provision.
The Export Control Bill modifies the effect of some
provisions in Part 5 of the Regulatory Powers Act. In particular, the amount
to be stated in an infringement notice must be the least of:
- one-fifth
of the maximum penalty that a court could impose on the person for that contravention
- 12
penalty units where the person is an individual, or 14 penalty units where the
person is a body corporate and
- if
the rules specify a different number of penalty units for the alleged
contravention of the provision by the person—that number of penalty units.[352]
Enforceable
undertakings
Provisions of the Export Control Act are
enforceable under Part 6 of the Regulatory Powers Act.[353]
For the purposes of Part 6 the Secretary is an authorised person
in relation to those provisions.[354]
The Regulatory Powers Act will operate so that the Secretary
may accept undertakings that a person will take specified action or refrain
from taking specified action. The person who gives the undertaking may withdraw
or vary it at any time with the written consent of the Secretary. Similarly,
the Secretary may, by written notice given to the person, cancel the
undertaking.[355]
In addition, the Secretary may apply to a relevant court for an order where he
or she believes that an undertaking has been breached by the person who has
given it.[356]
Injunctions
In addition, certain provisions of the Export Control
Act are enforceable under Part 7 of the Regulatory Powers Act.[357]
For the purposes of Part 7, the Secretary is an authorised person
in relation to those provisions.[358]
The Regulatory Powers Act will operate so that the Secretary
may apply to a relevant court for the grant of an injunction to restrain a
person from engaging in specified conduct or requiring the person to do a
thing.[359]
Chapter 11
Cost
recovery
Clauses 398–406 of the Export Control Bill relate
to cost recovery. As stated above, the rules may prescribe fees that may be
charged in relation to activities carried out by, or on behalf of the
Commonwealth in the performance of function or the exercise of powers under the
Export Control Act.[360]
Charges Imposition Bills
The export of certain goods is managed under the current
Export Control Act and the Australian Meat and Livestock Industry Act.
These Acts and other supporting legislation provide the basis for ensuring that
certain exports such as meat, seafood, dairy, plant products, non-prescribed
goods and live animals meet the requirements of importing countries.[362]
The Department of Agriculture monitors operational policy
and systems to ensure compliance with Australian export controls and any
additional importing country requirements. This is achieved by undertaking
inspection, audit and certification activities to ensure that the production,
storage, handling and transportation of meat, seafood, dairy, plant products, non-prescribed
goods and live animals intended for export comply with the conditions of the
Australian export controls and any additional requirements imposed by an
importing country.[363]
The Export Charges
(Imposition—Excise) Act 2015, (the Imposition Excise Act) the Export Charges
(Imposition—Customs) Act 2015 (the Imposition Customs Act) and
the Export
Charges (Imposition—General) Act 2015 (the Imposition General Act)
were enacted as a legislative package that was designed as a cost recovery
mechanism.[364]
The Imposition Acts do not impose charges. They merely act as an appropriate
legal structure for the recovery of costs through the imposition of charges, as
a cost recovery levy,[365]
rather than a cost recovery fee.[366]
The Export Charges (Imposition—Excise) Amendment Bill 2019,
the Export Charges (Imposition—Customs) Amendment Bill 2019 and the Export
Charges (Imposition—General) Amendment Bill 2019 amend the Imposition Excise
Act, the Imposition Customs Act and the Imposition General Act
respectively by:
- repealing
and substituting section 4 of each of the Imposition Acts to align the
application of each of the Imposition Acts with the proposed Export
Control Act 2019 by providing that the Imposition Acts extend to the
same external Territories or other areas as the proposed Export Control Act[367]
- amend
subsection 7(1) of each of the Imposition Acts so that Regulations may
prescribe a charge in relation to the export of a kind of goods covered by the
proposed Export Control Act[368]
and
- amend
section 11 of each of the Imposition Acts so that Regulations may
prescribe a charge in relation to a matter relating to the export of a kind of
goods under the proposed Export Control Act.[369]
Concluding
comments
The report of the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and
Transport Committee opined that the Bills:
... strike the right balance of continuing to provide the level
of regulatory oversight expected by Australia's trading partners, while making
the requirements expected by those involved in the system easier to understand
and administer through the reduction of complexity, duplication and ambiguity
of existing legislation.[370]