House of Representatives Committees

Chapter 3 Issues and Conclusions

Future Rent
Size of Building
Workstations
Future Staffing Levels
Optional Floor
Re-Use of Existing Furniture
Energy Conservation
Australian Greenhouse Office and Green Leases
Cost Benefits
Child-Care Centre
Consultation
Local businesses
CPSU
Construction Program and Contingency Arrangements
Lease Extension
Risk Management

Future Rent

3.1

In its submission to the inquiry, DITR outlined the rental costs, per square metre per annum, for each of the four buildings on Allara Street which the Department presently occupies.1

3.2

Further to the questions asked on costing and security matters at the confidential brief, at the hearing the Committee requested that the Department supply it with written details of the rental rate for the proposed new building.2

Size of Building

3.3

DITR undertook to provide the Committee with that information. The figure was later supplied to the Committee on a confidential basis. The Committee was satisfied that the rental figure was within the acceptable range for market rents on new, A-grade buildings in Civic.

3.4

According to written evidence received from the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU), a small percentage of staff expressed concern that the proposed relocation from office space totalling 23, 353 square metres of NLA, to a building of 21, 750 square metres NLA will not provide adequate space.3

3.5

The Committee asked DITR if the reduced space available in the new building will have an adverse impact on staff amenity.4

3.6

DITR replied that the new building will offer efficiencies in space at the same time as improving amenities for staff.5

3.7

The Department explained that the current buildings are configured awkwardly:

“One of them has a long curve along its full length, so in trying to design the number of workstations that fit there it is a matter of constantly adjusting for the length of the curve. Another [our central building] has a very small floor plate – 830 square metres…once you take out the central lift core, that enables you to put in one office and a set of workstations, plus a little bit over-but not enough to put in anything useful.”6

3.8

The new building, whilst approximately 1, 600 square metres smaller in area than the four buildings combined, will make more effective use of the space available:

“The amount of space we have to set aside [now] for people just walking around in is about 6, 500 square metres…In the new building, that will fall to about 3, 800 metres – more than making up for the gap in overall net lettable area.”7

3.9

Further, the consolidation of four reception and ground floor foyer areas into a single entry point, and the movement of record storage from the floors to the basement will create additional space.8

3.10

There will be an overall increase in useable space of approximately 10 per cent. This space will be diverted, into more meeting rooms, extra car, motorbike and bicycle parking spaces, and larger amenities rooms.9

Workstations

3.11

Given the overall decrease in space, the Committee sought clarification from the Department on whether the workstation space of staff members would decrease or increase in the new building.10

3.12

DITR affirmed that there will be an increase from 7.8 to 8 square metres per individual workstation.11

3.13

The Department also noted its intention to set up trial workstations for staff to provide feedback on.12

Future Staffing Levels

3.14

In view of the overall decrease in size of the new building, the Committee was interested to learn what the growth rate of the Department has been in the last decade and if the proposed building will be able to accommodate any future growth in staffing numbers.13

3.15

DITR responded that staffing levels had remained fairly static in recent years:

“…the general trend has been for it to be a bit over 1, 000.”14

3.16

The Department said that it expects to accommodate 1, 350 workstations and offices, and at this stage only 1, 240 are expected to move into the proposed building.15

3.17

The Committee also wished to know what DITR intends to do in the event that there is a reduction in staffing levels and surplus space becomes available in the new building.16 The Department indicated that this was an unlikely scenario, however:

“We do have a capacity written into the contractual negotiations with the developer to sublease parts of the building.”17

Optional Floor

3.18

DITR’s main submission states that:

“An additional optional floor may be constructed. The decision to construct the optional floor would be made by February 2005.”18

3.19

At the hearing, the Committee enquired whether the Department had decided to construct an additional floor.19

3.20

DITR informed the Committee that it does not envisage the need for an extra floor at this stage and has advised the developer to that effect.20

Re-Use of Existing Furniture

3.21

According to the main submission, DITR intends to re-use existing joinery and loose furniture items where appropriate.21

3.22

At the hearing, the Committee asked the Department if a furniture audit had been conducted. DITR responded that an initial study had been made. The Committee expressed concern about the impact on the project budget if this line item were underestimated. The Department indicated that it also had an annual budget for updating and replacing furniture, and:

“…it would have to come out of that.”.22

Energy Conservation

3.23

The main submission details a range of measures which DITR intends to install in its new premises to minimise energy usage and operating costs.23

Australian Greenhouse Office and Green Leases

3.24

According to the submission received from the Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO), the new DITR building will achieve an energy score equivalent to a 4 ½-star rating under the Australian Building Greenhouse Rating (ABGR) scheme.24

3.25

At the hearing, the Department confirmed that the ABGR scheme requires that an audit be undertaken 12 months into the occupancy to ensure that the energy rating is being maintained at that level.25

3.26

Given that the Attorney-General’s Department and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, both of which brought works before the Committee in late 2004, have signed Green Leases with the AGO, the Committee was interested to learn whether DITR had considered signing a Green Lease Schedule.26

3.27

DITR stated that its lease with the developer does include a schedule:

“…which requires not only the installation of the energy saving equipment in the first place but also that they maintain that equipment to ensure that the ongoing advantages of the energy saving features of the building are achieved and maintained throughout the life of the building.”27

Cost Benefits

3.28

n DITR’s opening statement at the hearing, the Department emphasised the superior environmental features of the new building, which will include solar hot water panels and a range of water saving measures such as the use of collected rainwater for irrigation and toilets, and water-free urinals.28

3.29

The Committee requested that DITR supply it with further written information on the cost benefits that will be achieved by the installation and implementation of the solar panels and the water-saving initiatives.29 The Department later provided the Committee with commercial-in-confidence material detailing the simple payback periods for the solar panelling and water saving equipment. The figures provided to the Committee do not reflect any possible future increase in the cost of energy and water over the life of the building and, therefore, in some cases, do not appear to be cost-effective. However, the Committee is supportive of the efforts made to minimise energy and water consumption, and to adhere to the Government’s green building initiatives.

Child-Care Centre

3.30

In written evidence, DITR stated that the proposed fit-out will include a 74-place child-care centre, primarily for the use of staff of the Department, but also other government workers in the area if there is insufficient demand from DITR.30

3.31

The Committee questioned DITR on how the child-care centre will operate.31 The Department told the Committee that it intends to engage an independent child-care provider to run its child-care centre for babies through to pre-schoolers. While it is anticipated that staff will pay normal commercial rates for this service, there will be tax advantages for the user. In addition, DITR said that it would consider offering supplementary rental assistance to the operator, to ensure that normal commercial rates are provided to staff.32

3.32

The Committee also enquired about the capacity of the child-care facility and if it is sufficiently large enough to cater for demand from staff.33

3.33

DITR said that it had surveyed staff about child-care needs. The Department believes that 74 places is an appropriate size, having compared it to other government run centres in Canberra.34

Consultation

Local businesses

3.34

DITR’s consultation processes in respect of the proposed work are detailed in the main submission.35The Department outlined consultation with relevant Commonwealth and Territory government agencies, and its staff but did not mention consultation with nearby businesses.

3.35

At the hearing, DITR told the Committee that it had held discussions with the neighbours:

“In our earlier consultations we consulted with the Property Council of Australia, the Australian Taxation Office – which is a major tenant adjoining the building – and Electric Shadows [Cinema]…”36

3.36

The Committee sought assurance from the Department that local businesses will have a forum in which to raise any concerns throughout the construction period.37

3.37

DITR advised the Committee that the channels of communication have remained open:

“…the building site and the site manager are in constant communication with [the neighbours].”38

Community and Public Sector Union

3.38

The CPSU’s submission states that a small number of staff felt that internal consultation had been inadequate.39

3.39

At the public hearing, the Committee requested that DITR provide it with an update on its communication strategy with employees.40

3.40

The Department reported the various means of consultation it has had with staff to-date, including the meetings of the main consultative forum for the project, in which every division is represented and two representatives from the workplace relations committee attend. There is an intranet site dedicated to the building. There have also been all-staff emails and briefings. In addition, an electronic survey that sought staff input was conducted in February 2004.41

3.41

The Department asserted that the CPSU submission was in the main supportive of the proposed new building.42

3.42

The Committee questioned the CPSU on consultation matters at the hearing. The CPSU concluded that it was satisfied with the Department’s response to staff needs and the ongoing consultation process:

“[DITR has] made the commitment that staff will be better off in the new building…there will be more common staff facilities…the design includes natural light and occupational health and safety considerations.”43

Construction Program and Contingency Arrangements

Lease Extension

3.43

DITR’s main submission states that:

“The proposed building must be completed to enable occupation before the current leases expire on 31 December 2006.”44

3.44

The submission states further that the lease on 40 Allara Street expires six months earlier than the leases on its other three properties, on 31 June 2006, and that the extension of the 40 Allara Street lease until 31 December 2006 is being investigated.45

3.45

At the hearing, the Committee wished to learn if negotiations with the lessor of 40 Allara Street in relation to obtaining a lease extension until 31 December 2006 had been negotiated. DITR advised the Committee that it had not completed that exercise yet. The Committee requested that DITR advise it of the outcome of future negotiations.46 The Department later confirmed in writing that it will keep the Committee updated.

Risk Management

3.46

In its written evidence, DITR stated that:

“A pro-active approach to risk management has ensured that DITR commenced this process with sufficient time before the lease expiry to allow for any delays in delivery of the proposed building.”47

3.47

At the hearing, the Committee asked DITR to elaborate on the contingency measures it has put in place with the developer to protect against delays to the construction program and the escalation of project costs.48 The Department told the Committee that it holds regular meetings with the developer and any potential delays would be quickly brought to its attention. Further, the contract documentation contains certain provisions, including a bank guarantee, which ensures that DITR is protected in the event of a delay in project delivery.49

3.48

In addition, the construction timeline was proceeding well:

“…[construction] is on track…the ground slab is now almost done, and that is the biggest single risk for delay in a project.”50

 

Recommendation 1

The Committee recommends that the proposed fit-out of new leased premises for the Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources in Civic, ACT, proceed at the estimated cost of $19.4 million.

 



Footnotes

1 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 1.2.4 Back
2 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 3 Back
3 Volume of Submissions, Submission No. 4, paragraph 9 Back
4 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 3 Back
5 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 3 Back
6 ib id Back
7 ib id, page 4 Back
8 ib id Back
9 ib id Back
10 ib id, page 5 Back
11 ib id Back
12 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 5 Back
13 ib id Back
14 ib id, page 6 Back
15 ib id, page 5 Back
16 ib id, page 6 Back
17 ib id Back
18 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 1.7.3 Back
19 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 8 Back
20 ib id, page 12 Back
21 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 2.21.1 Back
22 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 9 Back
23 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 2.11 Back
24 Volume of Submissions, Submission No. 2 Back
25 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 7 Back
26 ib id Back
27 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 8 Back
28 ib id, page 2 Back
29 ib id, page 9 Back
30 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 2.15.1 Back
31 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 10 Back
32 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 10 Back
33 ib id Back
34 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 10 Back
35 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 1.11 Back
36 i Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 13 Back
37 ib id Back
38 ib id, page 14 Back
39 Volume of Submissions, Submission No. 4, paragraphs 12-13 Back
40 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 12 Back
41 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 13 Back
42 ib id Back
43 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 17 Back
44 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 1.3.6 Back
45 ib id, paragraph 1.2.4 Back
46 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 14 Back
47 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 1.3.7 Back
48 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 14 Back
49 Appendix D, Official Transcript of Evidence, page 15 Back
50 ib id Back


Print Chapter 3 (PDF 111KB) < - Report Home < - Chapter 2  : Appendix A - >

Back to top

We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledge their continuing connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images and voices of deceased people.