Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1
During the period July 2008 to June 2009, Defence continued its
engagement in military operations around the world.
1.2
The Australian Defence Force (ADF) was involved in 18 overseas
operational deployments between July 2008 and June 2009 in areas such as East
Timor, Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, the Northern Indian Ocean, Africa,
the Middle East, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Defence also engaged in maritime
security operations in the South China Sea in support of regional security, supported
United Nations missions, and operated in the Gulf region and the Horn of Africa
to counter the threat of piracy.[1]
1.3
In Australia, Defence assisted the civil authorities' response to
devastating natural disasters such as the Victorian bushfires, and floods in
Queensland and New South Wales.[2]
1.4
On 2 May 2009, Defence released the first White Paper in over
eight years: Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030.
Under plans announced in the White Paper, the Government is to double
the number of submarines, build a new class of frigates, provide more than
1,100 new combat vehicles for the Army, and equip the Air Force with around 100
Joint Strike Fighters. In addition, the Government committed to fundamental and
extensive reform of Defence business.[3]
1.5
Defence also released and implemented the Strategic Reform Program.
The Strategic Reform Program sets out how Defence intends to save around
$20 billion (gross) over the next ten years. Defence announced that ‘money
will be reinvested in Defence to deliver stronger military capabilities, to
remediate areas where there has not been enough funding in the past and to
modernise the Defence enterprise ‘backbone’, which is essential to support the
fighting force.’[4]
1.6
On 9 December 2009, Defence released the findings from the first ever
ADF families survey. The results of the survey are being used to help shape the
20-year ADF Housing and Accommodation Strategy and inform the
development of an improved Absence from Home Support program for ADF
members and their families.[5]
1.7
The Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO) is managing over 210 major
projects[6] and more than 140 minor
projects[7] and in the 2008-09 financial
period it expended $4.8 billion on these projects.[8]
According to the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), keeping major
projects on schedule remains a major challenge for the DMO.[9]
Annual Report review objectives and scope
1.8
The review of the Defence Annual Report is an important task and an
opportunity for the Defence Sub-Committee of the Joint Standing Committee on
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade to inquire into a broad range of Defence
issues as part of the process of accountability of Government agencies to
Parliament. The sub-committee takes this responsibility very seriously.
1.9
The sub-committee took evidence from senior Department of Defence
officials at a public hearing held in Canberra on 30 March 2010. The transcript
of the hearing is available on the committee’s website.[10]
1.10
The proceedings of the hearing were webcast over the internet through
the Parliament’s website, allowing interested parties to watch the proceedings
as they occurred.
1.11
The review examined a combination of information from both volumes of
the Defence Annual Report 2008-09 and the ANAO 2008-09 Major Projects
Report.
1.12
The committee also encouraged public input through an advertising
campaign, resulting in three submissions being provided to the sub‑committee
for consideration. The sub-committee thanks those individuals and organisations
that have contributed.
Focus areas
1.13
The sub-committee selected a broad range of issues for examination at the
public hearing. In broad terms, the focus areas were:
- Major Projects
including the:
- Joint
Strike Fighter
- Airborne
Early Warning and Control Aircraft
- F/A-18
Hornets and Super Hornets
- Australian
Light Protected Vehicle
- Air
Warfare Destroyer, and
- the High
Frequency Modernisation Project.
- Personnel
- Operations
- Defence Estate, and
- Other issues.
Conclusions
1.14 While this report does not include any specific recommendations, there
are conclusions drawn by the committee that are identified in bold type.
1.15
The government should note these conclusions which identify matters of
concern.