Chapter 2 Sport as a vehicle to Close the Gap
2.1
The National Indigenous Reform Agreement (NIRA) endorsed by the
Council of Australian Governments (COAG) in 2008, commits all governments to
the following six Close the Gap targets to address the disadvantage faced by
Indigenous Australians:
n to
close the life-expectancy gap within a generation
n to
halve the gap in mortality rates for Indigenous children under five within a
decade
n to
ensure access to early childhood education for all Indigenous four years olds
in remote communities within five years
n to
halve the gap in reading, writing and numeracy achievements for children within
a decade
n to
halve the gap in Indigenous Year 12 achievement by 2020, and
n to
halve the gap in employment outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous
Australians within a decade.
2.2
The NIRA identifies seven action areas called ‘building blocks’, these
being early childhood schooling, health, economic participation, healthy homes,
safe communities, governance and leadership.[1]
The NIRA is supported by an investment of $4.6 billion through a series of
Indigenous-specific and mainstream National Partnership Agreements.[2]
2.3
The Prime Minister’s Closing the Gap Report 2013 acknowledged the
importance of the Indigenous sports programs to Closing the Gap through its
contribution to the health and wellbeing of Indigenous Australians.[3]
2.4
Many participants in the inquiry recognised that sport is a powerful
vehicle for engaging Indigenous Australians in positive activities which lead
to positive non-sport outcomes such as education, employment, health and
wellbeing. The Department of Regional Australia, Local Government, Arts and
Sport (DRALGAS) submitted that sport and active recreation have indirect
benefits under Closing the Gap building blocks, including:
n health - by
encouraging a healthier lifestyle that includes physical activity
n economic
participation - through employment opportunities for both Indigenous and
non-Indigenous people such as sport and recreation officers
n safe communities - by
providing an alternative to anti-social behaviour, and
n governance and
leadership - by funding initiatives to build capacity of Indigenous communities
to deliver sport and recreation activities independently.
2.5
Mr Matt Davies from the Department of Education, Employment and
Workplace Relations (DEEWR) spoke about sport participation as a ‘very powerful
vehicle for engaging communities in positive activities’. Outcomes of DEEWR
programs are not sport focused, rather they use sport as a mechanism to engage
and build positive education and employment outcomes.[4]
2.6
The Heart Foundation pointed to the health benefits to Indigenous
Australians of physical activity among Indigenous Australians, including a
reduction in risk for chronic disease, coronary heart disease and stroke, bowel
and breast cancer, diabetes and depression.[5]
2.7
Swimming Australia submitted that swimming activities greatly assist in
overcoming Indigenous disadvantage, including reducing illness and hearing
related health issues:
In some communities as many as 70 per cent of children have
been found to have skin sores, at any one time. Impaired hearing, a symptom of
glue ear, can seriously affect performance at school, and social circumstances.
Between 14 and 67 per cent has some degree of hearing loss.
Swimming pool use in remote communities has been shown to
reduce the prevalence of hearing loss and skin sores and other infections,
which can result in long-term benefits through reduction in chronic disease
burden as well as improved educational and social outcomes.[6]
2.8
Dr Bruce Hearn Mackinnon spoke about his observations in Central
Australian communities of the ability of sport, particularly Australian Rules
Football, to activate people and potentially enhance closing the gap:
Therefore it just strikes me that if we are looking at how to
close the gaps and all the other targets governments and society talks about,
we should be building on an activity which already has the passion and interest
of the communities. This is not just in terms of participation in playing
football. I see sports as being an opportunity to be leveraged in broader
capacity building. Sporting teams need administrators, coaches, physios, bus
drivers, cooks, timekeepers. Using sport as a model, I can see it as having the
opportunity to become the centre for growth in community development.[7]
2.9
Mrs Fiona Pelling from North Queensland Cowboys described how rugby
league clubs work with government towards closing the gap:
The contribution of Indigenous sporting programs and the
principal contribution of our programs to the Closing the Gap targets is in
engaging Indigenous young people and their families in those activities which
directly influence the Closing the Gap target, education, employment and
healthy lifestyles. We are able to do this because Rugby League is probably the
highest-profile sport in North Queensland, including in most Indigenous
communities. Indigenous legends within the Cowboys such as Johnathan Thurston
and Matthew Bowen have a very real role model status amongst Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander communities in the region and nationally. We have a
deliberate commitment to engage Indigenous young people and their families, and
we employ skilled staff to achieve that.[8]
2.10
Ms Trish Crews from National Rugby League spoke about the power of sport
to engage children in other activities that are not necessarily about playing
the game:
Our reading program is a really good example of that. We have
all got kids and nieces and nephews and we all know lots of little kids out
there who really do not like reading; however, if you can combine reading with
rugby league, all of a sudden they are interested. They want to read about
their heroes. They want to read about the games they see on TV. If you can
provide curriculum based and appropriate reading levels based around the
sport—and we have research behind this now—it does engage reluctant readers,
particularly boys. It is the same with maths; it is the same with health.[9]
2.11
Mr Matthew Francis from Titans 4 Tomorrow stated that it is important to
the club to make the distinction between the social outcomes made from
government funding rather than the sport outcomes:
And we are very committed to what we are funded for, and that
is those employment, education and training outcomes. So we are not using that
funding to promote participation in sport per se. That might be a welcome
by-product, but our key focus, and what the government is funding, is to
increase the retention of kids at school and to provide them with a career
pathway once they complete school. So the government dollars are spent where
the government has asked us to spend them. That is a very important distinction
for us to make.[10]
2.12
Left-field Business Solutions referred to the need for governments to
clearly articulate what role sport plays in non-sport outcomes:
Critical to the use of sport as a vehicle to achieve
non-sport outcomes is the development and design of programs and services that
clearly identify what role sport plays. This is critical because sport is
neither a panacea nor a silver bullet that will achieve holistic outcomes.[11]
2.13
Further, Left-field Business Solutions stated that it is unrealistic to
expect the sports industry to deliver non-sport outcomes in isolation to its
core business to achieve quality sport outcomes, including increases in
participation and improved high performance results. Therefore, partnerships
between the sports industry and service providers of health, education,
employment, social wellbeing and justice should be mandatory.[12]
Commonwealth Government sport initiatives
2.14
Sports policy has moved across Commonwealth Government portfolios
numerous times in the last ten years. From 2004 to 2007, administrative
responsibility for sport rested with the Department of Communications,
Information Technology and the Arts. The Department of Health and Ageing
administered sport from 2007 to October 2010, when the Department of Prime
Minister and Cabinet took over responsibility. The Department of Regional Australia,
Local Government, Arts and Sport has been responsible for sport since December
2011.[13]
2.15
Indigenous sports programs are funded through a number of Commonwealth
agencies including:
n Department of
Regional Australia, Local Government, Arts and Sport
n Department of
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
n Department of Health
and Ageing, and
n Department of
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
2.16
The state and territory governments provide funds to Indigenous sports
programs and a large body of the evidence received by the Committee refers to
these programs. The Committee has chosen to focus its discussion in this
chapter on Commonwealth Government programs and the essential partnerships and
coordination required between all levels of government and other stakeholders
to achieve positive outcomes for Indigenous people.
Department of Regional Australia, Local Government and Sport
2.17
Commonwealth responsibility for sport currently lies with the Department
of Regional Australia, Local Government and Sport (DRALGAS). Within DRALGAS,
the Office for Sport is responsible for two Indigenous sports programs:
n the Indigenous Sports
and Recreation Program (ISARP), and
n the Indigenous Sport
Development Officers Program (ISDOP).
Indigenous Sports and Recreation Program
2.18
The ISARP supports community participation in sport and recreation
activities that help to improve the health and physical wellbeing of Indigenous
Australians and those that contribute to broader social benefits for
participants and their communities.
2.19
Prior to 2012, funding under ISARP was granted on an annual basis. This
was to allow funding to be provided to the best proposals around Australia from
year to year. However, this arrangement created too much uncertainty, since it
was mostly ongoing activities or annual events that were funded. The annual
funding round was also an administrative burden for recipients and the Office
for Sport. Consequently, since 2012, most funding agreements have been approved
for three years.[14]
2.20
The 2012-13 funding round of the ISARP resulted in 123 activities being
approved for funding. The majority of funding agreements will run for three
years to the end of 2014-15. The Office for Sport received 219 applications
seeking funds totalling $41.5 million for 2012-13. Recipients of funding are
mostly community organisations, with some sporting organisations and local and state
governments also receiving funding.[15]
2.21
The ISARP aims to support projects encouraging broad involvement and
projects which involve groups that may not typically be considered prime
candidates for sport and physical activity programs. The guidelines for 2013-14
grants encourage the submission of projects that focus on increasing
involvement by Indigenous females through participation in the activities and
also in other roles, such as coaches and administrators.
2.22
Some ISARP projects are spread across large areas of Australia, such as
Athletics Australia’s Athletics for the Outback and the Indigenous Golf
Association of Victoria’s 2012 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Golf Championships project. Other programs are directed at specific areas, such
as funding to AFL Cape York Limited (Qld), South Australian National Football
League and Australian Football League (AFL) (Victoria) Limited.
2.23
Activities funded by ISARP grants in recent years have included
athletics, Australian rules football, basketball, boxing, golf, hockey,
lacrosse, netball, rugby league, rugby union, soccer, softball, surf
lifesaving, surfing, swimming and tennis.[16]
Indigenous Sport Development Officers
2.24
There are 50 Indigenous Sport Development Officers (ISDOs) nationally.
The Office for Sport funds 28 of these ISDOs dispersed around Australia and employed
by State and Territory departments of sport and recreation, with the exception
of Queensland which elected not to accept Commonwealth funding.[17]
2.25
However, the Queensland Government is working with 38 Indigenous
communities to form Sport and Recreation Reference Groups (SRG) which will act
as a coordination point comprised of key stakeholders in the community. The SRG
will develop a community sport and recreation plan as the focus of effort for
the organisations looking to provide support.[18]
2.26
The two main objectives of the ISDOs are to:
n increase the active
participation of Indigenous Australians in sport and physical recreation, and
n encourage Indigenous
community ownership and management of sport and physical recreation activities,
including through skills development.[19]
2.27
The ISDOs liaise with Indigenous communities in their region to assess
sporting needs and priorities and coordinate the delivery of programs,
resources and services in partnership with the mainstream sporting industry and
the relevant state and territory departments of sport and recreation. The ISDOs
develop a range of partnerships between sporting organisations, clubs,
Indigenous community organisations, local governments, state and territory
government agencies, and schools.[20]
2.28
Much of the work of the ISDOs is focused on building the capacity of
others to deliver, rather than directly delivering activities. DRALGAS
submitted that community involvement in the coordination and running of
activities had improved, however a number of activities continue to rely
heavily on ISDOs to provide organisational and management roles for sporting
and recreational programs.[21]
2.29
Netball Australia commented on the valuable ‘brokering role of the
Indigenous Sports Development Officers:
Their aim is to create sustainable programs by focusing on
building the sporting capacity of Indigenous Australians. This is achieved
through coordinating the delivery of accredited coaching and officiating
courses, building links to existing sporting clubs or assisting in the creation
of new clubs and where possible, linking individuals to mainstream sporting
competitions.[22]
2.30
However, Netball Australia stated that the linkages between the national
sporting organisation and Indigenous Sport Development Officer network had
weakened over the previous 18 months, possibly due to a shift to providing
general strategic and participation support, rather than a ‘brokering’ role. [23]
2.31
Mr Adam Pine from Swimming Australia believed the ISDOs provide a very
important link for peak sporting bodies to programs and communities. Mr Pine
stated that ISDOs provide an understanding of the issues on the ground within
communities which is difficult from the head office in Canberra.[24]
2.32
Professor Colin Tatz believed Indigenous sports officers should be in
every Indigenous community and should assist to organise sporting activities
and competitions and coordinate funding.[25]
2.33
Feedback to ISDOs from Indigenous communities and organisations and
state sporting organisations in 2011-12 indicated ‘satisfactory’ to ‘very
satisfactory’ results with the performance of ISDOs in coordinating and
delivering activities.[26]
Australian Sports Commission programs
2.34
The Australian Sports Commission (ASC), a statutory agency within
DRALGAS’ portfolio, focuses on getting more Australians participating and
excelling in sport. The ASC is responsible for two programs related to
promoting sporting activities among Indigenous Australians:
n the Elite Indigenous
Travel and Accommodation Assistance Program (EITAAP) assists Indigenous
sportspeople and their sponsoring organisation to attend national or
international events and competitions, and
n participation funding
grants to national sporting organisations to support participation by
Indigenous Australians. A wide variety of sporting organisations receive
grants, including Australian Football League (AFL), basketball, cricket,
hockey, netball, rugby union, rugby league, surfing, softball, tennis, swimming
and touch football.[27]
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
2.35
The Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR)
has a number of programs that use sport and other activities, such as dance and
performing arts, to improve educational and employment outcomes for Indigenous
youth. DEEWR funds two Indigenous sport programs:
n Sporting Chance, and
n Learn Earn Legend.
2.36
Up to December 2012, DEEWR also funded the No School, No Play program.[28]
2.37
The DEEWR programs contribute to three key Closing the Gap targets:
n to halve the gap in
reading, writing and numeracy achievements for Indigenous children within a
decade,
n to halve the gap for
Indigenous students in year 12 equivalent attainment by 2020, and
n to halve the gap in
employment outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians within a
decade.
2.38
From an educational perspective, the aim is to increase educational
engagement so that youth gain a Year 12 or equivalent qualification. From an
employment perspective, the focus is on improving participation in education,
so that Indigenous youth are skilled, confident and competitive when entering
the workforce, and on providing access to employment opportunities. DEEWR
explained:
These programs do not seek to produce elite sports men and
women. They use sport as a hook to improve educational outcomes and employment
prospects of all participants as a contribution to closing the gap in the
participation of Indigenous people in social and economic life and often in
locations where the gaps are at their greatest.[29]
2.39
Also of relevance under the education portfolio is the development of a
national health and physical education curriculum which is expected to be
finalised in late 2013. This curriculum will deliver the health and wellbeing
learning that all students require, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander students.[30]
Sporting Chance
2.40
The Sporting Chance program aims to improve educational outcomes such as
strengthened engagement with school, improved attitudes to schooling, increased
school attendance, increased retention to Year 12, and increased capacity to
make informed decisions about post-school pathways. Providers work with
schools, education authorities, sporting bodies, businesses, communities and
parents.
2.41
The Sporting Chance program comprises two elements:
n school-based sports
academies – targets secondary students and delivers sports activities up to
three hours a week, including training and competitions. In addition, up to
nine hours a week is spent on behaviour and leadership camps, mentoring
programs, cultural activities, reward excursions, support to complete
vocational or technical courses and employment expos, and
n educational
engagement strategies – targets primary and secondary students in remote
communities and delivers a range of sport and recreation based activities to
engage students in education. The program provides a few visits per community a
year.[31]
2.42
The Sporting Chance Program funding model requires
providers to source two thirds of the operating costs of an academy.[32]
2.43
A notable example of a sporting academy is the Clontarf Foundation,
which uses Australian Rules Football as the hook to attract Indigenous boys to
school, engage them in learning and improve their education, discipline, life
skills, self-esteem and employment prospects. By creating an attractive, safe,
welcoming and supportive environment, some of the most at-risk and disengaged
students are drawn into education. The Clontarf Foundation operates 40 school
based sports academies across Western Australia, Northern Territory, Victoria
and New South Wales.[33]
2.44
The Achieving Results Through Indigenous Education (ARTIE) program is a rugby
league Sporting Chance program which operates in 21 schools in Queensland and
uses former and current origin players to ‘promote the importance of attending
school, engaging in literacy and numeracy and how that impacts life beyond
school’.[34]
2.45
The National Aboriginal Sporting Chance Academy (NASCA) runs two
academies:
n the Walan Barramal Sporting Chance
Academy in South Sydney consisting of 94 students (in 2011) from Tempe High
School, Alexandria Park Community School and Marrickville High School, and
n the Gambirrang Sporting
Chance Academy in the Dubbo region, consisting of 117 students (in 2011) from
Dubbo College Senior Campus, Dubbo College Delroy Campus, Wellington High
School, and Narromine High School.[35]
2.46
Role Models and Leaders Australia operate seven girls-only academies in
Western Australia, four in the Northern Territory, and one in New South Wales.
Every school where Role Models and Leaders Australia operate an academy, there
is also a Clontarf Foundation boy’s academy. There are 13 co-educational
academies operating under the Sporting Chance program.[36]
2.47
DEEWR reported that at the end of 2012, 39 percent of academy
participants were female and 61 percent were male. In 2013, $3 million has been
allocated to girls’ only academies, $6.5 million to boys’ only academies, and
$4.3 million to co-educational academies.[37]
2.48
An example of education engagement strategies under the Sporting Chance
program is the ARMtour (Athletes as Role Models) NT project which is delivered
by NASCA. The project aims to encourage the educational engagement of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary and secondary students in
Papunya, Hermannsburg, Yuelamu and Santa Teresa in the Northern Territory. The
project uses sport and high profile athletes as role models to encourage
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth in remote communities to stay in
school, lead healthy lifestyles and make positive choices in life.[38]
2.49
NASCA recommended that the Sporting Chance Program funding continue and
that the program be expanded throughout the country. In its submission, NASCA
described why its Academies in South Sydney and central NSW and the ARMtour
program in the central desert have been successful:
The strength in these lies with the strong relationships
between NASCA staff, the students and the communities, coupled with the wide
range of interesting and engaging activities. Students attend school because
they know if they don’t they won’t get to participate in NASCA activities.
School attendance and behaviour in sessions are used as measures for whether
they attend end of year camps and other activities. Past students have said
this was the only reason they kept going to school. We have waiting lists of
students wanting to be in our Academies. Not only are the Academies enjoyable,
they provide a support structure for students that they are often not getting
elsewhere.[39]
Evaluations of the Sporting Chance program
2.50
DEEWR collects attendance data, general literacy and numeracy
improvement data and case studies. DEEWR stated that it is not possible to
establish causal links between the contributions of sport to specific
improvements in educational outcomes. However, data showed that participation
in the Sporting Chance Program was a contributing factor in improving education
outcomes.[40]
2.51
An evaluation in December 2010 of the Sporting Chance program found that
more than 90 percent of the students interviewed and surveyed reported a
positive attitude toward their schooling, particularly in relation to their
attitudes to school, self-identity, sense of pride in being Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander and self-efficacy as learners.[41]
2.52
DEEWR submitted that the average attendance rate of girls that participate
in a Role Models and Leaders Australia academy is 71 percent, whereas the
average attendance rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander girls that do
not participate in an academy is 68 percent. The Clontarf Foundation academy
participant’s average 72 percent attendance while the cohort of Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander boys that do not participate in the academy is 66
percent.[42]
2.53
Student feedback on the Sporting Chance program is that it is successful
in engaging students in school but the nature of the educational engagement
activities meant that the impact is likely to be short-term rather than
sustained. Effective educational engagement activities were characterised by
consistent and regular delivery, without too much time occurring between
visits.[43]
2.54
Netball Australia noted that the involvement of girls in academies under
the Sporting Chance program is likely to be complex. For example, in a review
of the program in 2009, the one girls-only academy, Role Models Western
Australian Clontarf Girls Academy, indicated that the lack of purpose-built
boarding accommodation in remote areas led to a high turnover of girls at the
school. The review found that research was required into the needs of
Indigenous female students and their motivations. Further, specific strategies
for females needed to be developed.[44]
Learn Earn Legend
2.55
The Learn Earn Legend program encourages young Indigenous people to
remain in education and be aware of and explore career opportunities. In
2011-2012, the total expenditure by the Commonwealth Government to Learn Earn
Legend was over $9.25 million.[45] The focus is on school
to work transitions and aspiration building. DEEWR stated:
Sport provides a means of engaging students and employers.
The initiatives supported under the LEL! banner are not sporting programs, nor
do they encourage students to become sports people. They are projects which
encourage students, particularly those in the latter years of school, to remain
engaged and to see beyond the end of school. The majority of the projects
provide intensive, individual support to participant students, assisting them
to realise their career goals. Intensive, individual support is provided to
students, assisting them to realise their career goals.[46]
2.56
Elite sportspeople act as role models or Ambassadors for the Learn Earn
Legend program with access to corporate sponsors facilitated through the
sporting codes. For example, the Broncos partnered with Arrow Energy and All
Trades Queensland to provide school based traineeships and apprenticeships for
15 students across Brisbane and Ipswich.[47] Tennis Australia, in
collaboration with the Evonne Goolagong Foundation, delivers the Learn Earn
Legend message through a range of programs such as ‘Come and Try’ days and
camps.[48]
2.57
The Imparja Cup is Cricket Australia’s ‘marquee event’ as part of its
Indigenous program. The Imparja Cup is designed to encourage Indigenous
Australians to participate in cricket and in 2012 had 32 teams participate,
including a super clinic with approximately 120 children from local schools
around Alice Springs. During the Imparja Cup, Learn Earn Legend funding assists
Cricket Australia to stage activities to encourage and support Indigenous
Australians take up education, training and employment opportunities.[49]
2.58
Learn Earn Legend supports several other sporting events and programs
such as the NRL Indigenous All Stars team and its yearly match against the NRL
All Stars, Former Origin Greats (FOGs) Employment and Careers Expos, Dreamtime
at the ‘G and associated matches, and Local Legends, who are everyday people
doing great things in their community.
2.59
Mr Mark deWeerd from National Rugby League discussed the benefits of the
Learn Earn Legend program:
The biggest benefit out of Learn Earn Legend is the ability
for us to build the aspirations of young Indigenous people. We provide a range
of programs to do that. It provides us with access. Learn Earn Legend has it
clear message, which is about getting an education, finding employment and then
becoming a legend in your community.[50]
2.60
The Broncos reported results for students on the club’s Learn Earn
Legend program. For example in 2010, 39 out of 41 students entered into jobs,
training or further education. In 2011-12, 103 of the 135 students found
further education opportunities, work or training.[51]
2.61
Learn Earn Legend projects focus on senior students in Years 10 to 12 in
order to address decreasing retention rates and to improve employment outcomes
by providing young Indigenous people with a vision of their potential pathways
beyond school. DEEWR submitted that retention rates for Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander students rapidly decrease over Years 10 to 12. The retention
rate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students for Years 7/8 to Year
10 in 2011 was 98.7 percent. This decreased to 73.3 percent for Years 7/8 to
Year 11 and 48.7 percent for Year 7/8 to Year 12.[52]
2.62
Several sporting organisations which run Learn Earn Legend programs
supported the extension of the program to lower high school grades and into
primary school years.[53]
2.63
The North Queensland Cowboys recommended the Commonwealth Government
extend the Learn Earn Legend funding to primary age groups:
We know from the Obe Geia challenge and the Every Day Counts
initiative that the power of legends like Johnathan and Matthew to engage
Indigenous young people is even more pronounced within the primary school
children than it is with the secondary students. We also know from school
feedback that successfully engaging with Indigenous students in primary school
is the best way of setting them up for success in secondary school and beyond.[54]
2.64
The North Queensland Cowboys self-fund the Every Day Counts program as
an add-on to the Learn Earn Legend program aims to increase attendance rates
for Indigenous children in the primary school grades. Mrs Fiona Pelling
described the impetus for the Every Day Counts program:
A big part of the problem we are finding with the Learn Earn
Legend! program is that a lot of our kids that are coming out in year 11 and
year 12 have only got grade 5 or grade 6 numeracy and literacy skills, which
severely compromises their choices as they leave school. Through our
investigations we have found that a lot of this is due to nonattendance at
school and non-engagement. If you can get them to attend primary school and get
those attendance levels up I think their engagement in their high school years
will be much better. They will feel included at the same level as the other
kids at school and they will be less likely to truant.[55]
No School No Play
2.65
The Commonwealth Government provided $2 million to the No School No Play
initiative to support eight national sporting organisations to promote school
attendance. Programs were based on partnerships between sporting organisations,
parents and communities of secondary school students. The goal was to assist
Indigenous students to increase their Year 12 attainment through reward and
incentive initiatives, mentoring and personal development and community
engagement. The program ceased in 2012.[56]
2.66
DEEWR reported that in December 2011, No School No Play projects were
being delivered to 2 727 students, of which 2 540 were Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander students. On average approximately 80 percent of No School No
Play participants were reported to have improved school attendance and school
engagement.[57]
2.67
Basketball Australia expressed its disappointment at the discontinued
funding of the No School No Play program and reported that in 2011, 80 per cent
of the participants in No School No Play through Basketball Australia improved
their engagement with school, and 90 per cent improved the numbers of days they
attended school. One school in Coffs Harbour went from an average of 50 per
cent attendance at the school to 91 per cent attendance, across two terms in
which they operated No School No Play.[58]
2.68
The Committee heard evidence about no school, no play programs operating
without government funding. Some sports work with schools to run no school, no
play programs. For instance, Rugby Union stated the concept of no school, no
play has been entrenched in their programs for years.[59]
Department of Health and Ageing
2.69
The Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) funds a number of programs
which aim to increase physical activity among Indigenous people. Some examples
of DoHA’s contributions to improving the health and wellbeing of Indigenous
people through sport and physical activity are:
n the Indigenous
Chronic Disease Package which aims to close the gap in life expectancy within a
generation. One of the aims of this package is to reduce major risk factors for
chronic disease. As part of the package, Regional Tackling Smoking and Healthy
Lifestyle Teams promote and support good health including through sporting role
models who promote smoke-free healthy messages
n the Deadly Choices
campaign, developed by the Institute of Urban Indigenous Health in Queensland,
uses sporting role models to engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
communities. The program aims to empower Indigenous people to make healthy
choices for themselves and their families, including exercising and undergoing
health checks
n the Healthy
Communities initiative provides funding to local councils to implement
community-based, healthy lifestyle programs targeting disadvantaged populations
and unemployed adults. Many of these programs benefit Indigenous people
n funding to Vibe
Australia Pty Ltd to develop, produce and disseminate health and lifestyle
promotion materials for Indigenous people. Sports people are regularly featured
as role models
n as part of the ‘Swap
it, Don’t Stop It’ program, a dedicated Indigenous webpage was created and
includes messages such as swapping sedentary behaviour for physical activity,
and
n funding to the
Clontarf Foundation through DEEWR to incorporate health promotion activities.
Under the National Binge Drinking Strategy, the Australian National
Preventative Health Agency funds the David Wirrpanda Foundation to support its
‘Gwabba Yorga – Gabaa Worra’ project, which uses netball as a means to educate
Indigenous girls about the dangers of binge-drinking.[60]
Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
2.70
As the lead agency for Indigenous affairs, the Department of Families,
Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) provides whole of
government coordination, policy advice and support for the Council of
Australian Governments’ National Indigenous Reform Agreement (NIRA).[61]
2.71
FaHCSIA funds several initiatives, some of which are not Indigenous
specific, that use sport as a mechanism to improve outcomes for Indigenous
Australians, including:
n the Respectful
Relationships strategy aims to prevent sexual assault and domestic and family
violence through education. Funding has been provided to National Rugby League
and the AFL
n Community Action
Grants under the National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their
Children 2010-22 which provide support to communities in reducing violence
against women. The Australian Netball Association was funded to educate on
healthy relationships and violence prevention, train coaches and implement a
peer education and mentoring program for Indigenous young women. The AFL was
funded for an education program and National Rugby League was funded for a
communications program[62]
n to the AFL and AFL
affiliates for a range of initiatives across Australia, for example:
§
to establish partnerships between AFL clubs and Indigenous
communities in the Northern Territory and South Australia
§
a ‘Strength and Unity through Football’ project delivers football
programs in Maningrida, Yirrkala, Ngukurr, Lajamanu and Hermannsburg
communities to provide leadership skills and training
§
a South Australian National Football League Coordinator in the
Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands in South Australia
§
a Youth Leadership Program in the APY Lands delivered by the
Adelaide Football Club in collaboration with with former AFL player Andrew
McLeod,[63] and
§
a range of activities, including training, workshops, carnivals
and competitions for East Kimberley communities delivered by the West
Australian Football Commission in partnership with Garnduwa Amboryn Wirnan
Aboriginal Corporation[64]
n Sports Leadership
Grants and Scholarships for Women Program is a joint initiative with the
Australian Sports Commission which provides development opportunities and
training to women to reach their leadership potential in the sport industry,
and
n The Youth in
Communities Program operates in more than 30 locations in the Northern
Territory, delivering early intervention, prevention and diversionary initiatives
for Indigenous youth at risk. Some examples of sport related activities are:
§
a Sport Demonstration Project to trial a best practice model for
delivering sport focused diversion activities through improved whole of
government coordination and the use of place based approach to service delivery
to build community capacity in Gapuwiyak, Wadeye, Yuendumu, Gunbalanya and
Nguiu
§
diversionary programs in Yirrkala, Milingimbi, Ramingining,
Gapuwiyak and Umbakumba run by the East Arnhem Shire Council
§
a regional development manager working in Wadeye and Galiwin’ku
with AFL Northern Territory to establish and coofinate competitions organise
coaching and umpiring courses and promote healthy lifestyles, and
§
suicide prevention education and activities with a focus on sport
in the Northern Territory.
2.72
In 2012, the Commonwealth Government made a commitment to continue the
Youth in Communities Program for 10 years. Under the Package, the program will
be progressively integrated into 15 new remote sites across the Northern
Territory. This will increase the level of access to and integration of a
variety of services including mentoring, sport and recreation.[65]
2.73
An interim evaluation report in 2011 of the Youth in Communities program
found the program made good progress in engaging Indigenous young people in
positive activities. FaHCSIA submitted that the evaluation included evidence of
young people at risk engaging constructively with peers, participating in
community events such as sport, increasing self-care and self-esteem, improving
attendance and re-engagement with school, contributing to community wellbeing,
influencing the resilience of peers and engaging in cultural activities.[66]
2.74
In addition to regular reporting and monitoring arrangements, FaHCSIA
has commissioned independent evaluations of AFL funded programs, including the
AFL Remote Regional Development Program in Wadeye, the AFL National Partnership
Agreement, and the Youth in Communities Program. FaHCSIA submitted that
evaluations show that:
AFL involvement in these programs has a positive impact in
encouraging healthy and active lifestyles, building leadership skills,
strengthening community cohesion, improving school attendance and engagement in
some type of training, education or paid work in remote Indigenous communities.[67]
Government coordination to achieve Close the Gap outcomes
2.75
Coordination across government departments in the delivery of Indigenous
sports programs was a common theme in submissions to the inquiry. For example, Professor
Colin Tatz described what he called ‘passing the buck’ on sport:
Let me just get out of the way the need to look into the constant
shuffling of sport between government departments, with each one passing the
buck, so to speak, to other departments, saying, 'We're not into sport; we're
into housing,' or, 'We're into health; it's not about sport,' et cetera.
Government departments are obstinate in refusing to see a correlation between
the two.[68]
2.76
Left-field Business Solutions stated that because the funding of sport
related programs for Indigenous Australians is spread amongst a number of
Commonwealth Government agencies, there is an immediate risk that these
programs do not operate cooperatively to achieve Close the Gap outcomes.
Left-field Business Solutions recommended a framework be developed for
government agencies that fund sport for non-sport outcomes:
The NIRA and service delivery principles provide the basis
for an overarching framework which agencies that fund sport for non-sport
outcomes can operate under. Such a framework should be developed and managed by
the lead agency for Indigenous affairs, the Department for Families, Housing,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA), in consultation with the
lead agency for sport, the Department of Regional Australia, Local Government,
Arts and Sport (DRALGAS) and other agencies already investing in sport programs
for non-sport outcomes.
Funding to the sports industry from the Australian Sports
Commission (ASC), Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) and other State/Territory
Institutes and Academies of Sport should be exempt from this framework as this
funding predominantly supports sport-specific outcomes like participation,
capability building (coaching and officiating), junior and elite pathways (e.g.
State/National Championships, Commonwealth Games, World Championships etc.).[69]
2.77
Similarly, Netball Australia called on the development of an overarching
strategic framework for the long term investment in Indigenous sport programs:
In acknowledging that a significant amount of work has been
done to empower Indigenous communities and recognising the valuable
contributions of many committed, motivated and dedicated individuals and
organisations, the main impediment is that the sport sector has been devoid of
an overarching strategic framework and/or policy positions and the long-term
investment that is required to achieve sustainable and successful Indigenous
policies and programs (be they culturally inclusive, mainstream or Indigenous
specific).[70]
2.78
The submission from the Indigenous Marathon Project stated that education, health and sports departments should take a
collaborative approach when developing programs in communities:
IMP believes that there needs to be more collaboration
between Federal Departments and the Deadly Fun Runs are an example of this. The
main source of assistance for the Deadly Fun Runs does not necessarily come from
Indigenous Sport Development Officers (ISDO’s DRLGAS funded) but more so the
Healthy Lifestyle Workers located all over the country (DOHA funded). So we
have a program funded by the department of Sport, but delivered by Department
Health on the ground (and ISDO’s in a number of areas). … In order to develop
sporting programs it would seem DOHA and DRLGAS should work a little closer in
order to achieve the most efficient value for money programs on the ground for
both parties.[71]
2.79
Many participants in the inquiry referred to the need for a coordinated
effort from all levels of government, non-government entities and Indigenous
communities on the delivery of sports programs.
2.80
DRALGAS stated that the Office for Sport and the ASC were seeking to
build relationships with state and territory sport and recreation departments
to facilitate coordination, where possible, in various communities and regions.[72]
2.81
The application process for ISARP funding includes referring general
details of grant applications to other Australian, state and territory
governments and agencies that provide grants of a similar type. DRALGAS stated
that there could be scope for increased efficiency if all government agencies
adopted a similar approach so that information on grant applications for sport
and active recreation and grant approvals could be shared.[73]
2.82
The Queensland Government referred to the challenges with the
coordination of funding to sports programs:
The Queensland Government has consistently invested funding
with local governments, sport, recreation and community organisations to strengthen
participation opportunities for Indigenous people. A consistent challenge in achieving
increased participation is coordinating the diversity of effort and funding
that occurs particularly in remote communities and engaging community members
to identify sport and recreation needs.[74]
2.83
vicsport stated that sport must be combined with other government
services in tackling health inequalities in Indigenous communities:
To solely focus on sport as a determinant of wellbeing fails
to appreciate the vital role that all government departments play in the health
of communities including key community services such as education, employment,
health, law and order. All relevant government departments should be working
towards a whole of government approach in tackling health inequalities
prevalent in Indigenous communities.[75]
2.84
The Government of South Australian claimed there are multiple levels of
disadvantage in urban, regional and remote areas and therefore multiple
strategies using sport to achieve outcomes, whether they are sport related or
other outcomes with regard to education, health, employment or crime
prevention. The South Australian Department of Planning, Transport and
Infrastructure stated that sport can provide a range of benefits for Indigenous
people but it is not a panacea and governments need to be clear about what they
are trying to achieve through the delivery of sport and recreation programs:
It is the view of the DPTI that it is not a lack of financial
resources that is limiting development of sustainable sport but rather the lack
of clarity around desired outcomes, limited coordination and communication, and
significant duplication of effort across various levels of Government and NGOs.
Anecdotal evidence in remote areas has pointed to an overwhelming number of
organisations visiting communities to achieve the same or similar outcomes.
Sport also falls into this category.[76]
2.85
Left-field business solutions stated that governments should be clear
about what data is to be collected to determine the impact of Indigenous sports
initiatives and suggested that output related data, such as number of
participants and sport sessions, should be measured along with participant,
deliverer and partnership feedback. Independent evaluations are also necessary
to ensure accuracy and validity of data collected.[77]
2.86
Mr Bill Fogarty asserted there was a need for better evaluations of the
links between sports programs and non-sport outcomes in order for service
providers to know where to spend their efforts.[78]
Committee comment
2.87
Individuals and communities are passionate about sport. Sport excites
people, gets them active and involves whole communities. The Committee found
that sport can be a very powerful way of engaging Indigenous people and
providing positive outcomes in the Close the Gap in areas of health, education,
employment and justice.
2.88
However, the Committee notes that sport is not the sole ingredient to
Indigenous wellbeing. While sport is often the hook, many government services,
in partnership with Indigenous communities and the sporting industry, play a
role in achieving Close the Gap outcomes. The importance of partnerships is
discussed further in chapter 3.
2.89
Numerous participants in the inquiry pointed to the lack of coordination
and the duplication of effort around achieving outcomes through sport programs.
The Committee heard that the duplication of activities and limited strategic
direction has resulted in a fragmented approach to sport and recreation service
delivery for Indigenous Australians.
2.90
The Committee considers there must be clear direction on the purpose of
sports initiatives and what outcomes governments are trying to achieve. There
is presently no overarching strategy on how sports programs can be coordinated,
involving partnerships and communities, and provide the outcomes in relation to
Close the Gap targets.
2.91
The Committee considers that the Commonwealth Government must take a
stronger lead in promoting better coordination of sport and recreation programs
for Indigenous Australians.
2.92
The Committee considers that the Ministers for Indigenous Affairs, Sport,
Health and Education need to take a more collaborative approach when developing
sport programs in their portfolio areas. The Committee recommends the Minister
for Indigenous Affairs, in consultation with the Minister for Sport, develop an
overarching framework of service delivery and evaluation for Commonwealth
agencies which fund sport programs. Outcomes should be aligned with Close the
Gap targets.
Recommendation 1 - Framework for sport programs and Close the
Gap outcomes |
2.93 |
The Committee recommends the Minister for Indigenous
Affairs, in consultation with the Minister for Sport, develop an overarching
framework of service delivery and evaluation for Commonwealth agencies which
fund sport programs to clearly identify outcomes that align with Close the
Gap targets.
Commonwealth agencies, such as the Australian Sports
Commission, which predominantly fund programs for sports-specific outcomes,
should be exempt from the framework. |
2.94
The Committee commends the sporting codes and clubs which are demonstrating
Close the Gap outcomes through government funded programs. For example, the
Australian Rugby League Commission outlined in its submission how its programs
are contributing to each of the Close the Gap objectives in schooling, health,
economic participation, safe communities, and government and leadership.[79]
The Committee discusses sporting codes creating positive change for Indigenous
communities in chapter 3.
2.95
Some government programs are focussing on particular Close the Gap outcomes,
such as Learn Earn Legend, which aims to achieve positive outcomes in Year 12
attainment, employment and improvements in literacy and numeracy.
2.96
However, other sports programs are being rolled out with very little
understanding of how the Close the Gap outcomes are being achieved.
2.97
Governments need greater understanding of what sports programs are
achieving in relation to the governments’ Close the Gap objectives. The
Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government develop evaluation mechanisms
for sports programs to include the collection of data on both participation
outcomes and Close the Gap outcomes.
2.98
The Committee recommends that data collection for Indigenous
participation in sport, including age and gender, is mandatory for all clubs
and organisations that receive Commonwealth funding to run targeted Indigenous
sporting programs. This Indigenous participation data should be compiled and
provided back to the responsible Commonwealth agency for evaluation and
analysis. This will assist both the sporting groups and the Commonwealth
Government to gain a better understanding of whether the Indigenous sporting
programs are having an impact on participation numbers.
2.99
Further, the Committee recommends results from sports program
evaluations be incorporated into annual Close the Gap reporting to Parliament.
Recommendation 2 - Evaluating outcomes of sports programs |
2.100
|
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government develop
evaluation mechanisms for sports programs that include the collection of data
on sport participation outcomes as well as non-sport outcomes such as the
Close the Gap targets.
The Committee recommends that all Commonwealth funded sports
programs should collect comprehensive data on Indigenous participation. The
data should be collected at the start and finish of each program and should
be analysed as part of an evaluation process for individual programs.
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government
incorporate results of evaluations of sports programs and their contribution
to Indigenous wellbeing into the annual Close the Gap reporting to
Parliament.
|
2.101
The Committee notes the positive comments from non-government agencies
regarding the DEEWR programs Learn Earn Legend and Sporting Chance. Sports
clubs and codes demonstrated how these programs can contribute to better
education and employment outcomes for Indigenous Australians. The Committee
supports the continuation of funding to these two programs.
2.102
The sporting industry has demonstrated that the Learn Earn Legend
program is effective at engaging Indigenous youth and promoting the positive
messages of completing high school years and gaining employment.
2.103
Currently funding to the Learn Earn Legend program targets Indigenous
students in Year 10 to Year 12. The Committee notes the comments by the
sporting industry that Learn Earn Legend could have greater positive outcomes
in education if it targeted Indigenous children at school during the earlier
high school years.
2.104
The Committee contends that the Learn Earn Legend is a very
effective program at working towards Close the Gap targets in education and
employment. The Committee believes targeting Indigenous students in the earlier
years of high school would assist to further achieve the Close the Gap target to halve the gap in reading, writing and numeracy achievements for
children within a decade.
2.105
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government
extend the funding of the Learn Earn Legend program to target Indigenous
students in the high school years. Further, the Committee recommends the
Commonwealth Government assess in the year 2016 the effectiveness of the Learn
Earn Legend program being extended to target Indigenous students attending
primary school.
Recommendation 3 - Learn Earn Legend |
2.106
|
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government extend
the funding of the Learn Earn Legend program to target Indigenous students in
the high school years.
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government assess
in 2016 the effectiveness of further funding the Learn Earn Legend program to
target Indigenous students in the primary school years.
|
2.107
There are 50 Indigenous Sport Development Officers (ISDOs) across the
country employed by the state and territory departments of sport and
recreation. Funding by the Commonwealth Government supports 28 of those ISDOs.
2.108
The Committee notes that the Queensland Government elected not to be
part of the ISDO network, rather it supports 38 Indigenous communities to form
Sport and Recreation Reference Groups to coordinate stakeholders in a
community.
2.109
Some witnesses spoke of the value of ISDOs to provide links between governments,
sporting bodies and communities in coordinating sustainable sport and
recreation programs. However, the Committee notes comments by Netball Australia
that linkages between national sporting organisations and ISDOs had weakened.
2.110
The Committee believes ISDOs have an important role in assisting to
breakdown the silo effect of different government departments and to connect
key service providers in education, health and employment, with local sporting
bodies and community groups about sport and recreational opportunities
available.
2.111
The Committee encourages the DRALGAS to ensure ISDOs continue to provide
the essential links between sporting organisations and stakeholders in
Indigenous communities to coordinate sustainable sports programs.
Sports carnivals and events
2.112
Many participants spoke of the significance of sporting carnivals and
events at bringing communities together for sport and recreation, while
enabling service providers to conduct and promote their business.
2.113
Dr Alfred Bamblett from the Victorian Aboriginal Community Services
Association Ltd referred to football and netball carnivals which brought
together many young participants and enabled health checks:
We have been engaged in a couple of Closing the Gap programs
where we have run football and netball carnivals for young people and kids in
schools. The idea was to get them to come along so we can do some preliminary
health checks—that was to satisfy the funding bodies. Of course, the kids are
not interested in the health check; they are really interested in football,
netball and getting together. These sorts of things are part of making it
happen. It adds benefit. We have had kids who have had to get glasses and kids
who have had to have their hearing attended to.[80]
2.114
Dr Bruce Hearn Mackinnon discussed the positive impact that sporting
carnivals can have on communities in terms of inclusion and capacity building.
He commented:
I see sport not only as an incredible opportunity for wider
capacity building but also for promoting self-governance, autonomy and strength
in these communities. It is one activity for all people, which includes elders,
young people, men, women—it just does not seem to matter. There is a unified
excitement and passion for sports. You only have to visit a remote community
sports weekend or the Lightning Carnival in Alice Springs for instance to see
that engagement of people. That just shows people can be energised and
motivated but people do need assistance.[81]
2.115
The NSW Annual Aboriginal Rugby League Knockout carnival has been
referred to as a ‘modern day corroboree’ and brings together more than 100
teams across NSW. Ms Heidi Norman submitted that further annual government
funding was required to support the future viability of the event.[82]
2.116
Representatives from Australian Rugby Union spoke about the
opportunities for government to spread messages through sport, such as at rugby
carnivals and events. Mr David Sykes from Australian Rugby Union stated:
Effectively, you have a captured market. All of those kids
who come along will get a health check, for instance. There will be promotions
around anti-gambling. Those events happen anyway and they are always going to
happen. They happen irrespective of government funding. So it is a real
opportunity to have the government say that this is the message we are going to
sell anyway. We do not have to host the cost of the event, but maybe sending
someone along to talk to the kids is something that can happen with relatively
little or no additional funding.[83]
2.117
In the Western Desert region of Western Australia the Western Desert
Sports Council (WDSC) provides structure around improving the level of sport
and recreation programs for Indigenous communities. The WDSC holds three
carnivals each year which attract up to 1 000 participants and attendees from
eight communities. The WDSC is a partnership between eight communities who work
together to develop an integrated regional program of sport and recreation
activities. The WDSC has formed a partnership with Desert Feet Inc (DFI) which
promotes music, dance and performing arts to the region. The DFI assists the
WDSC to ensure cultural activities are provided at the carnivals for those
people who are not participating in the sporting activities. The partnership
brings sport and music together to focus on the determinants of health to bring
about changes in health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
people.[84]
2.118
The Queensland Aboriginal and Islander Health Council (QAIHC) is the
state peak body representing community controlled health services across
Queensland, and the Queensland affiliate for the National Aboriginal Community
Controlled Health Organisation. In 2011 QAIHC established a partnership with
the Arthur Beetson Foundation to support the organisation and running of the Queensland
Murri Rugby League Carnivals.
2.119
QAIHC utilised the Murri Carnival to promote healthy lifestyles within
Indigenous communities and encourage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
peoples to access their local Aboriginal and Islander Community Controlled
Health Service (AICCHS). All players and officials competing in the Murri
Carnivals are required to complete a health check at their local Community
Controlled Health Service. In 2011, this resulted in the completion of over 1 200
health checks throughout Queensland. At the 2012 carnival held in Ipswich, 47
teams competed which equated to around 1 000 competitors over a long weekend.[85]
2.120
For players competing in the Under 15 Competition, it was compulsory
that they maintain 90 percent attendance at school. The carnivals are promoted
as alcohol and drug free events and provide an opportunity to integrate and
showcase the work of Tobacco and Health Lifestyle Teams funded by the
Department of Health and Ageing. The Institute for Urban Indigenous Health
launched its Deadly Choices campaign at the carnival and representatives from groups
such as Former Origin Greats provided some role modelling and mentoring.[86]
2.121
QAIHC partnered with the Lloyd McDermott Rugby Development Foundation to
support similar events through organised Rugby Union competitions, supporting
participation at under 16, under 18, senior men's and women's levels. These
events utilise the same principles of compulsory health checks for all
participants, along with regular participation and attendance at school in
order to be eligible for participation. Ella Sevens Events in 2012 were held in
Cairns and Brisbane, with around 12 competing men's teams and six women’s teams
and the National Indigenous under 16 tournament held on the Gold Coast with six
competing teams and participants of around 200 young men from all states and
territories.[87]
2.122
Mr Selwyn Button from QAIHC referred to the importance of having ‘solid
partnerships’ with the Arthur Beetson Foundation and the Lloyd McDermmott
Foundation and the endorsement of the state sports governing bodies, such as
Queensland Rugby League and Queensland Rugby Union to allow the carnivals to be
successful in promoting non-sport outcomes such as health, education and
employment:
As we have seen at the Ipswich carnival and a few of the
Lloyd McDermott carnivals in Queensland, they do attract some fairly big
crowds. We get a fair few people that have come from all over Queensland to
come and have a look at this stuff. So what you have created is an environment
where not only can you drive home a message around health and wellbeing, around
active sport and recreation participation, but there are secondary benefits
that we can get out of that as well. We can have conversations with people
about the importance of schooling, about the importance of education and
training and going on to employment and university and other bits and pieces,
and we can even build it into the process of the carnival, particularly for the
under 16 boy players.
It was one of their requirements to have 90 per cent
participation and attendance rates at school leading up to the carnival. So, if
you are building those things into the overall package, you are building a much
more solid structure from which you are going to get outcomes in terms of not
only sporting achievements and sporting abilities but overall social development
through participation in school, education and training, university, and other
bits and pieces as well.[88]
2.123
Mr Selwyn Button spoke about further opportunities for QAIHC to partner
with other organisations that run carnivals, such as a netball carnival to
attract a large number of females across a large area.[89]
Committee comment
2.124
The Committee is encouraged by the success of sports carnivals and
events at bringing together a variety of organisations and Indigenous families
and communities. The evidence demonstrates that if partnerships are formed in
the lead up to a sporting event, the benefits to Indigenous players and their
extended families are many, including to health, wellbeing, education and
employment. Sporting events and carnivals, such as the Murri Carnival, have
helped to promote greater responsibility in managing health conditions and
support greater awareness of issues impacting on health in communities.
2.125
Data collected by health, education, employment and other agencies at
sports carnivals and events would be useful inclusions in the evaluations of
sports programs as described previously in this chapter.
2.126
The Committee believes there is a role and responsibility for the
Commonwealth Government to support Indigenous sporting events and carnivals that
promote health and wellbeing, education and employment. Governments should not
take control of these events, instead it should fulfil a partnership role in
supporting and partnering organisations on the ground.
2.127
The Committee believes governments should give further consideration to
supporting sporting carnivals and events where sports are played which are
popular among female participants.
2.128
The Committee recommends that the Commonwealth Government fund regional
and state sporting carnivals which draw together government, non-government,
sporting codes and clubs, mentors and role models, and businesses to address
health, education and employment Close the Gap targets.
Recommendation 4 - Indigenous sporting carnivals |
2.129
|
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government provide
base funding and coordinated assistance to Indigenous regional and state
sporting carnivals which draw together governments, sporting codes and clubs, mentors and role
models, corporates and businesses to address health, education and employment
Close the Gap targets.
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government ensure
that funding is provided to sport and recreation carnivals and events in
particular those which support high participation by Indigenous females.
|
Three year funding
2.130
While recognising coordination and partnerships are critical to
sustainable sports programs that achieve Close the Gap outcomes, numerous
participants in the inquiry believed another important requirement was longer term
funding to provide sustainable government programs.
2.131
The Chief Executive Officer of the Clontarf Foundation described its
success as being due to the partnerships with communities and the long term
involvement in the community to build relationships over 30 years.[90]
Long term relationship building needs longer term funding according to Mr Anthony
Bowd from vicsport:
The manner in which programs are being funded I do not think
has traditionally worked with how successful programs are rolled out. Sporting programs
are traditionally funded on a set time period—say, one year or two years—and at
the end of that time we tend to count up the numbers and how many people
participated, and that dictates whether the program is successful or not. But I
think that history demonstrates that the really successful programs occur over
a long period of time and that they do not necessarily fit into the standard
funding models of 12 months, for example. So sports need to take a longer-term
view—and funders also need to take a longer-term view—of how funds are
committed to these programs.[91]
2.132
The South Australian National Football League (SANFL) submitted that the
key risks to the delivery of its sports programs in remote Anangu
Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands are insufficient funding or the
cessation of funding. The Senior Sports League and the Junior Sports Program
were reviewed by FaHCSIA and DEEWR in 2010 and found they were essential
strategies in the health and wellbeing of people on the APY lands.[92]
2.133
Left-field Business Solutions also suggested that a collaborative
approach to the delivery of successful sports programs is underpinned by
funding security, of at least three to five years, and a commitment to sustain
services for as long as it takes to achieve outcomes.[93]
2.134
Some participants in the inquiry suggested that
sports receiving government
funding and providing ‘fly in,
fly out’
programs, provide little to no opportunity for ongoing involvement in many communities.
Touch Football Australia referred to the experience of many remote communities:
Community members have become accustomed to sporting
programs that
begin but very rarely continue because the funding has disappeared or
because there has not been an emphasis on providing the education and support
necessary for the sport
to
continue within the community, and as a result, community
members are now very hesitant in becoming involved in new programs because
there is an expectation that it will fail.[94]
2.135
NASCA recommended a minimum of three year government funding contracts:
The nature of government contracts means that the grant cycle
may be 12 months, which can create program uncertainty. It also makes planning
for coming years difficult and in some circumstances can create unrealistic
goals for change. This would also assist in the prevention of stop-start,
fly-in fly-out activity that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities
have had so frequently in the past, creating distrust and minimal long term
impact.[95]
2.136
The North Queensland Cowboys recommended the Commonwealth Government
extend the length of the Learn Earn Legend program to run beyond one year at a
time:
Currently, the government's Closing the Gap targets and our
Learn Earn Legend program are funded to run only one year at a time, and a lot of
that is building relationships with the schools so they allow us to run those
programs. We need continuity and consistency within the school so that kids
feel it is something to aspire to as they go up through the grades.[96]
Committee comment
2.137
The Committee contends that financial resources to Indigenous sports
programs are significant and the goal of achieving sport and non-sport outcomes
through sport programs must start with better coordination of effort and
partnerships between governments, non-government organisations and communities.
There is a lack of clarity around desired outcomes and duplication of effort
across various levels of government and non-government organisations.
2.138
Recommendations 1 and 2 aim to provide government with the tools to
better direct funding in a coordinated way.
2.139
In addition, the Committee maintains that government funding to sport
and recreation programs must be over at least three years to assist in achieving
sustained and coordinated sport activities and events for Indigenous
Australians.
2.140
The Committee recommends Commonwealth Government funding to sports and
recreation programs in Indigenous communities is over a longer term preferably
a three year cycle.
Recommendation 5 - Three year funding |
2.141
|
The Committee recommends the Commonwealth Government should
fund Indigenous sports programs over a longer term preferably a three year
cycle.
|
2.142
The Committee contends that sports based programs must link to local
sporting clubs and communities and develop the community capacity to deliver a
program which can be sustained beyond funding timelines.
2.143
Partnerships between governments, communities, sporting codes, the
corporate sector and other not-for-profit or non-government organisations is
critical to the achievement of sustainable sport and non-sport outcomes. Partnerships
and sponsorships are discussed in chapter 4.
2.144
The involvement of the sporting industry in developing and delivering
sustainable sport and recreation programs is essential and various sporting
codes and clubs are working with Indigenous Australians to improve their
participation rates in sport and recreation and to assist with Close the Gap
outcomes.
2.145
Participation in various sports and overcoming some of the barriers to
participation, including improving participation by Indigenous females are
discussed in chapter 3.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Back to top