|
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Agriculture, Resources, Fisheries and Forestry
Navigation: Contents | Next Page
Preliminary Pages
Foreword
“Plant trees. They
give us two of the most crucial elements for our survival: oxygen and books!”
-A Whitney Brown
Writer and Comedian
From the earliest times, trees have been the focus of
religious life for many peoples around the world. As the largest plant on
earth, the tree has been a major source of stimulation to the mythic
imagination. Trees have been invested in all cultures with a dignity unique to
their own nature, and tree cults, in which a single tree or a grove of trees is
worshipped, have flourished at different times almost everywhere. We have the
tree of life and the tree of knowledge in our own culture now.
Trees have also featured in our every day life, in design
and in structure across this continent. Both indigenous and European peoples
have valued the tree for its qualities, its strengths and its influence on a
landscape. It is after all the most amazing scientific structure that has
occurred in nature. We could never have invented such an entity with its
ability to soar to the clouds and yet have the structural integrity to deal
with storm, flood and fire, all part of a tree’s essence.
So it is not surprising that people feel that trees are
“sacred” and shouldn’t be touched. However, like all living entities, trees
have a life cycle, they seed, they grow and they die, in longer or shorter time
scales depending on the species. By managing them through their life cycles,
we can improve them, can strengthen their scientific features and in the future
develop alternative energy and fuels.
Products that are so much part of our living that if we did
not have them any more, we would lose a huge part of our cultures. By growing
and harvesting trees, and then replanting, we have the most sustainable way of
developing a product that we can use as part of our lives for ever.
Sure we have to keep samples of the various species which
make up our natural areas – and I believe Australia has understood this so well
through the development of the National Forest Policy Statement and the various
RFAs. We need to keep reviewing our agreements and ensuring that we keep our
forests sustainable.
But the idea of keeping an individual tree because it
represents “bio diversity” or is a “home for animals” is wrong. The tree will
die, and if there is nothing coming on to replace it to ensure that its species
is continued, then there is no future for that species, nor for its
inhabitants.
To help the future of the planet, we will need to have wood
replace other materials which embodies much more energy than non renewables,
such as steel or plastic.
This inquiry ranged far and wide and took in many different
points of view. But we were seeking a future for forestry. We did not want to
dwell in the past. So the recommendations have been carefully couched to give
hope to our forest workers, our contractors, sawmillers, pulp and papermakers
and our craft and woodworkers. Australia wants a sustainable industry in all
its facets and we want to ensure that our landscape still reflects the power of
the trees.
I believe the Committee has worked hard to do this. I would
like to thank all my committee members, particularly my Deputy Chair Alby
Schulz, for their diligence and their help in seeking out the best processes in
the business and looking forward to the future.
Thank you too to the Committee Secretariat for their hard
work in putting this all together.
Lastly, I would like to thank all those contributors who
submitted to the inquiry from all areas of forestry or who had an interest in
the future of forestry. Without your help, your time given freely to attend
consultations and your hospitality, this report could not have been written.
Hon Dick Adams MP
Committee Chair
What do we plant?
American
author, Henry Abbey (1842-1911)
What do we plant when we plant the tree?
We plant the ship, which will cross the sea.
We plant the mast to carry the sails;
We plant the planks to withstand the gales --
The keel, the keelson, and the beam and knee;
We plant the ship when we plant the tree.
What do we plant when we plant the tree?
We plant the houses for you and me.
We plant the rafters, the shingles, the floors.
We plant the studding, the lath, the doors,
The beams, and siding, all parts that be;
We plant the house when we plant the tree.
What do we plant when we plant the tree?
A thousand things that we daily see;
We plant the spire that out-towers the crag,
We plant the staff for our country's flag,
We plant the shade, from the hot sun free;
We plant all these when we plant the tree.
Membership of the Committee
Chair
|
Hon Dick Adams MP
|
|
Deputy
Chair
|
Mr Alby Schultz MP
|
|
Members
|
Mr Darren Cheeseman MP
|
Mr Geoff Lyons MP
|
|
Mr George Christensen MP
|
Mr Rob Mitchell MP
|
|
Mr Tony Crook MP
|
Mr Dan Tehan MP
|
Committee Secretariat
Secretary
|
Mr Russell Chafer (until 2 February 2011)
|
|
Mr David Brunoro (from 3 February 2011)
|
Inquiry
Secretary
|
Dr Bill Pender (until 25 July 2011)
|
|
Mr Thomas Gregory (from 8 August 2011)
|
Research
Officer
|
Ms Fiona Gardner
|
Office
Manager
|
Mrs Dorota Cooley
|
Administrative
Officer
|
Mrs Katrina Gillogly
|
Terms of Reference
The Committee is to inquire into the current and future
prospects of the Australian forestry industry, particularly in regards to:
- Opportunities for and constraints upon
production;
- Opportunities for diversification, value
adding and product innovation;
- Environmental impacts of forestry, including:
- Impacts of
plantations upon land and water availability for agriculture; and
- The development of
win-win outcomes in balancing environmental costs with economic opportunities;
- Creating a better business environment for
forest industries, including:
- Investment models for
saw log production;
- New business and
investment models for plantation production; and
- Superannuation
investment in plantations;
- Social and economic benefits of forestry
production;
- Potential energy production from the forestry
sector, including:
- Biofuels;
- Biomass;
- Biochar;
- Cogeneration; and
- Carbon sequestration;
- Land use
competition between the forestry and agriculture sectors:
- Implications of
competing land uses for the cost and availability of timber, food and fibre;
- Harmonising competing
interests; and
- Opportunities for
farm forestry.
List of Abbreviations
A3P |
Australian Plantation Products and Paper Industry Council |
ACF |
Australian Conservation Foundation |
AFG |
Australian Forest Growers |
AFPA |
Australian Forest Products Association |
AFSL |
Australian Forestry Standard Limited |
CEC |
Clarence Environment Centre |
DAFF |
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry |
ET |
Environment Tasmania |
FFIC |
Forest and Forest Industry Council of
Tasmania |
FFORNE |
Farmed Forests of the North East |
FSC |
Forest Stewardship Council |
IFA |
Institute of Foresters of Australia |
MTG |
Australian Master TreeGrower Program |
NAFI |
National Association of Forest Industries |
NEFA |
North East Forest Alliance |
NUFG |
Northern United Forestry Group |
OAN |
Otway Agroforestry Network |
PFT |
Private Forests Tasmania |
SCU |
Southern Cross University |
TCA |
Timber Communities Australia |
TWS |
The Wilderness Society
|
VAFI |
Victorian Association of Forest
Industries |
List of recommendations
3 Future
role for forestry and forest products
Recommendation 1
The Committee recommends the Australian Government, through
the COAG Standing Council on Primary Industries, lead a process to assess and
publicly report on likely wood demand and supply scenarios over the longer term
(at least the next forty years). This should be completed within twelve months.
Recommendation 2
The Committee recommends the Australian Government, through
the COAG Standing Council on Primary Industries, lead a process to consider and
publicly report on whether Australia should aim for wood supply
‘self-sufficiency’.
Recommendation 3
The Committee recommends the Australian Government run public
information campaigns to promote timber and wood products as replacements for
more energy-intensive materials.
Recommendation 4
The Committee recommends the Australian Government develop
robust national standards quantifying the carbon stored in different products
made from harvested trees, including the duration of storage and policy
implications of those standards.
Recommendation 5
The Committee recommends the Australian Government, as it
develops a mature Carbon Farming Initiative regime, consider:
- the
capacity for ‘additionality’ to recognise the diversity of plantations and farm
forestry applications, rather than relying on generalised inclusions and
exclusions;
- the
capacity for ‘permanence’ to include the sustainable harvesting and replanting
of plantations and farm forestry; and
- other
ways for the CFI to support the forestry industry generally.
4 Native forestry
Recommendation 6
The Committee recommends the Australian Government initiate a
process to renew existing Regional Forest Agreements, incorporating the
principles of review, consultation, evergreen extension and concrete timelines.
Recommendation 7
The Committee recommends the Australian Government, subject to
the agreement of the relevant State Government, ensure that a renewed RFA is in
place within three years of the expiry of each existing RFA. Renewed RFAs
should incorporate the principles outlined above.
Recommendation 8
The Committee recommends the Australian Government, in
negotiation with State Governments, develop, agree and implement a new regime
within all renewed RFAs to provide for ongoing monitoring and periodic
assessment. The new regime should provide for the periodic assessment of each
RFA on an individual basis, at regular intervals, and at arm’s-length from all
interested parties.
Recommendation 9
The Committee recommends the Australian Government direct the
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry to consider and evaluate the
‘stewardship’ proposal outlined above, and that relevant Minister report to
Parliament on its findings within twelve months.
5 Plantations
Recommendation 10
The Committee recommends the Australian Government lead a
process through COAG to create a national plan for plantations, to ensure that:
- plantations
of appropriate species are planted in appropriate locations; and
- appropriate
regional infrastructure exists or is planned and funded.
Recommendation 11
The Committee recommends the Australian Government:
- decide whether the encouragement of long-rotation plantations is an appropriate
objective of policy;
- establish whether it is necessary and appropriate for government to provide an incentive
to meet that objective;
- if it is, set out a clear plan to meet that objective, according to the national
plan for plantations;
- assess whether MIS as a mechanism can meet that objective;
- if MIS can meet that objective, determine whether it needs to be altered to make
it more effective; and
- if MIS cannot meet that objective, determine whether other mechanisms could do so.
6 Farm forestry
Recommendation 12
The Committee recommends the Australian Government, through
COAG, lead a process to agree a national plan for the provision of, and access
to, enabling infrastructure for farm forestry.
Recommendation 13
The Committee recommends that the Australian Government, in
concert with state and local governments, provide immediate and ongoing
financial support to local organisations that provide extension services for
farm forestry, particularly through the Caring for our Country initiative.
Recommendation 14
The Committee recommends that the Australian Government
explicitly state that Caring for our Country funding is available for farm
forestry activities, and actively promote this fact to the broader community
through an extensive information campaign.
7 Using forestry biomass
Recommendation 15
The Committee recommends that, under any version of the RET
(or similar scheme), bioenergy sourced from native forest biomass should
continue to qualify as renewable energy, where it is a true waste product and
it does not become a driver for the harvesting of native forests.
Recommendation 16
The Committee recommends that, if the above principles are
adhered to, legislation or regulation direct the Minister to grant an
individual exemption from native forest biomass exclusion.
Recommendation 17
The Committee recommends that, under any system of exemption
from the native forest biomass exclusion, provision be made for reporting on
biomass volumes used, energy used and income generated, to ensure that the
biomass used is a true waste product.
8 Forestry into the future
Recommendation 18
The Committee recommends that the Australian Government
provide funding to FSC Australia to support the development of the proposed FSC
national standard, with the expectation that the FSC national standard will
replace the interim standard within five years.
Recommendation 19
The Committee recommends the Australian Government lead a
process of discussions with all state and territory governments, to consider
national approaches to:
- Forestry
and climate change;
- Farm
forestry; and
- Future
wood product demand and supply.
Navigation: Contents | Next Page
Back to top