Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1
The Procedure Committee’s recent report on the history of the committee
clearly demonstrates that the committee is strongly motivated to improve the
procedures and practices of the House and its committees so that Members can
more effectively and efficiently undertake their roles.[1]
The Procedure Committee has addressed issues related to committees in a number
of its earlier reports including a major review of the House of Representatives
committee system completed in May 1998, that is, Ten years on: A review of
the House of Representatives committee system[2].
Other Procedure Committee reports address particular aspects of the operation
of the committee system, for example: dealing with witnesses; application of
modern technology to committees; promoting community involvement in committees;
whether there should be a House Estimates system; and media coverage of
committee proceedings.[3]
1.2
In March 2005 the Procedure Committee decided it was timely to look again
at some critical committee procedure and practice matters, in particular, the
time the House gave to debating committee reports. This was an issue which has
been of continuing concern to the Procedure Committee and had been a recurring
theme in a number of the committee’s earlier reports.
Scope/ conduct of the inquiry and structure of this report
1.3
More specifically, the Procedure Committee decided to consider standing
order 39 relating to the presentation of reports of committees or delegations
as well as other matters relating to committee practice and procedure.
1.4
As an initial step on 2 June 2005 the Procedure Committee held a round
table meeting to discuss those issues with chairs and deputy chairs and other
interested Members of House and joint committees administered by the Department
of the House of Representatives.
1.5
The round table was successful and on 16 June 2005 in response to the matters raised the Procedure Committee resolved to undertake an inquiry into:
Practices and procedures relating to committees including:
n arrangements for
presenting committee reports;
n the amount of time
allocated to committee work in the House and Main Committee; and
n attendance at
committee meetings by non-members of the committee.
1.6
The committee then wrote to the chairs and deputy chairs of all House committees
and the Clerk of the House inviting each of them to make a submission to the
inquiry. A detailed submission was received from the Clerk of the House and one
member of the Procedure Committee, the Hon Roger Price MP, put forward a
paper on the topic. A copy of those documents is at Appendix A and B respectively.
1.7
The Procedure Committee also sent an email survey to all 150 Members of
the House of Representatives seeking their views on the time available for committee
business in the House and Main Committee. The survey was sent on 18 August 2005 with a return date of 9 September 2005. On 8 September 2005 a reminder email was distributed and the deadline for survey return extended to 14 September 2005. Thirty six responses were received (that is, a response rate of 24
per cent) and the responses to specific questions are presented in the relevant
sections of the next chapter and the summary results are presented at Appendix C.
1.8
The rest of this report is structured according to the two issues the inquiry
addresses, that is:
n Chapter 2 examines
the presentation of committee reports and time allocated to committee work in
the House and Main Committee; and
n Chapter
3 addresses the attendance at committee meetings by visitors.